Skip to comments.
Washington Post Earnings Fall 95 Percent
Yahoo! News ^
 | Oct. 19, 2001
Posted on 10/19/2001 12:39:58 PM PDT by Alissa
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Washington Post Co. reported a 95 percent decline in third quarter net earnings Friday due to an advertising slump and charges to write down investments.
 The company, whose properties include The Washington Post and Newsweek, reported net income of $1.6 million, or 14 cents per share, compared to $33.5 million, or $3.51 per share, in the same period a year ago.
 Excluding the effect of about $26 million in investment write-downs, earnings for the most recent quarter were $15.1 million, or $1.56 a share, above the $1.39 per share analysts polled by Thomson Financial/First Call were expecting.
 The company attributed the decline in earnings to a 19 percent drop in advertising revenue at its advertising-based businesses. That includes its flagship newspaper, where ad revenue fell 20 percent in the quarter, as well as at its television stations, which saw a 23 percent decline.
 However, Newsweek magazine had what the company described as a ``significant spike'' in newsstand sales following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Revenues were also higher at its Kaplan test preparation and educational services division. 
 Total revenues fell 1 percent to $595.5 million from $602.4 million in the same period a year ago.
 The company's shares were off $1.75 to $521 in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange. 
 For the first nine months of the year, net income was $215.1 million, which included gains from the sale and exchange of cable TV systems. In the same period a year ago the company earned $98.8 million. Nine-month revenues edged up 3 percent to $1.79 billion from $1.74 billion.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next  last
    
1
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:39:58 PM PDT
by 
Alissa
 
To: Alissa
    I shan't sleep a wink tonight.
2
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:41:29 PM PDT
by 
AppyPappy
 
To: Alissa
    BWAAAAHHHHHH!!
3
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:43:17 PM PDT
by 
GunsareOK
 
To: Alissa
    Schadenfreude!
To: Alissa
    Heartbreaking. Simply heartbreaking. I'll take the time now to wish all WP employees an early Merry Christmas....
5
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:44:16 PM PDT
by 
TomServo
 
To: Alissa
    after that first editorial howard fineman wrote after the attack, it is no wonder. Paybacks are a bit** for these traitors it looks like.
6
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:44:29 PM PDT
by 
lawgirl
 
To: Alissa
    Yes, I'm crying real tears for them. Advertisers have cut their expenditures, readers no longer take them seriously... Geez -- I wonder why the decline? Maybe the old lady took the money with her!!
7
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:44:38 PM PDT
by 
TommyDale
 
To: Alissa
    Great news, also AOL down, CNN in tatters. Just hope they do not hype too much more than they already have-6 Questions for Osama-to boost their revenues.
8
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:47:40 PM PDT
by 
Helms
 
To: Alissa
    Doncha just LOVE it?
9
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:48:48 PM PDT
by 
Maceman
 
To: AppyPappy
    I shan't sleep a wink tonight.
Enjoy the party!
 
10
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:49:03 PM PDT
by 
patent
 
To: Alissa
    If the WP is in trouble, just guess what other companies' book are going to look like.We can all enjoy their misfortune, however, they are the premier media company in America, and with a tremendous franchise, and yet they have profitability problems.Christmas bonuses are going to be slim this year, for everyone.
To: Alissa
    Let's all chip in with condolence cards, while we're at it..
12
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:50:29 PM PDT
by 
TomServo
 
To: Alissa
    The Washington Post Co. reported a 95 percent decline in third quarter net earnings Friday......due to Bill Clinton's leaving town. "All the political news is so boring, so ADULT," a spokesman replied when asked why that would make a difference. "People have gone about their business trusting that now that the adults are here, they don't have to be constantly focused on the latest antics of our erstwhile boy-President."
 
13
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:51:01 PM PDT
by 
Illbay
 
To: Alissa
    Oh woe! Oh Woe! Let us all proceed collectively to the nearest cliff where we will throw ourselves off. Oh woe! Oh woe!
To: Alissa
    Good for the lying clymers. And W's approval is 90+. Sweet. Very, very, sweet....
15
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:51:42 PM PDT
by 
eureka!
 
To: habs4ever
    Christmas bonuses are going to be slim this year,My company spells it with two words: BONE US!
 
To: Alissa
    Good! The Washington Times rules.
To: Alissa
    News that's worth at least a chortle or two. Maybe even three.
To: Alissa
    Washington Post? Whats that?
19
posted on 
10/19/2001 12:58:13 PM PDT
by 
carlo3b
 
To: Alissa
    Wonder how their web site is doing. "Copyright infringement" may be a moot point
. . . 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson