Posted on 10/20/2001 10:54:30 AM PDT by ikka
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Health board troubled by AOL flings By Skinny DuBaudOctober 19, 2001
|
America Online had its share of contradictions even before it merged with Time Warner. On the one hand, AOL was the all-American, family-oriented "walled garden" accessible to grandparents and technophobic soccer moms; on the other, it was a swinging pickup scene, not least among gay men.
Gay Skintimates of the Rumor Mill have long referred to AOL as the "Gay Home Shopping Network," and Steve Case is known to have credited AOL's survival at critical junctures to heavy gay use of the online service. "Thank God for the gays and lesbians," he once reportedly said.
Steve Case is undoubtedly still grateful for the gays and lesbians, but the AOL Time Warner chairman can't be too happy about a new flare-up in the long-standing battle between the company and San Francisco's health department over a suspected link between AOL chat rooms and an explosive rise in the number of syphilis cases among gay men in the city.
The current contretemps has generated a maelstrom of confusion, with a local AIDS activist, a U.S. House of Representatives staffer, a local health official, and an AOL vice president all getting into the melee and offering conflicting versions of events.
The controversy first arose two years ago after gay portal PlanetOut agreed to spearhead an outreach effort aimed at educating denizens of AOL's "sanfranciscom4m" chat rooms about the heightened risk of syphilis among men meeting there.
The link between the AOL chat rooms and the syphilis outbreak was the subject of a July 2000 article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which reported that gay men who had syphilis in San Francisco were eight to nine times more likely to have met a recent partner in the AOL chat rooms than elsewhere.
Two years later, the local syphilis rate among gay men continues to skyrocket, with AOL's chat rooms linked to between a fifth and a third of reported cases, according to Dr. Jeff Klausner, director of San Francisco's STD Prevention and Control Services.
In 1999, according to the doctor, nine of the 29 syphilis cases in gay men were linked to AOL's sanfranciscom4m chat rooms. In 2000, it was 10 of 47 cases. So far this year, the number is 15 out of 87.
While San Francisco's syphilis rate is spiking among gay men, the nationwide rate is heading south.
After heavily lobbying AOL to warn SFM4M chatters about the problem, Klausner told the Rumor Mill he'd finally succeeded in securing a commitment from AOL's vice president of corporate relations, Richard Socarides, to post notices in the chat rooms.
But AOL denies that Socarides made any such commitment.
"He said we're working with the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) to educate our members about health issues including STDs, and we've been doing so for more than a year," said an AOL representative. "We have not disclosed how that campaign is going to work yet."
That noncommittal commitment has Klausner in a fit.
"It amazes me that AOL still denies any associated risk to its members of meeting new sexual partners in the AOL SFM4M chat rooms," Klausner fumed to the Rumor Mill. "Richard clearly stated that AOL would inform members in appropriate places of this risk...The fact that AOL has been working with CDC to educate its members about health issues is neither here nor there. What we are asking for is not general education but specifically to inform members who use the AOL SFM4M chat rooms that persons who have met recent sexual partners (there) have acquired syphilis."
Could San Francisco really pin the syphilis explosion to AOL chat rooms? After all, people who meet on AOL also meet for sex all over town, and all over the Internet, for that matter.
"No," Klausner replied. "Many more syphilis cases in San Francisco meet partners on AOL SFM4M than on Gay.com, MSM4sex.com or many other sites or other venues."
Klausner, CDC representatives and health officials in AOL's home state of Virginia say the AOL chat room-syphilis link is unique to San Francisco, as far as they know.
The U.S. House of Representatives, now engaged in more pressing bacteriological matters, became involved in the fracas when Roland Foster, staff member on the Government Reform Committee's Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, fired off a blistering e-mail to the CDC inquiring whether Klausner had tried to get Virginia's health department to shut down AOL chat rooms.
"It has come to my attention that Klausner has made numerous calls to the Virginia Health Department over the past six weeks demanding that Virginia act to close a number of online chat rooms," Foster wrote the CDC. "It is my understanding that Dr. Klausner blamed Virginia for a recent trend of HIV infections in the City acquired from sex partners who met online. According to Dr. Klausner's accusations, a 'majority' of new HIV cases in San Francisco are linked to America Online (AOL) chat rooms."
Klausner told the Rumor Mill he hadn't tried to get AOL or the state of Virginia to shut any chat rooms--a move he considered counterproductive for education and outreach efforts--and that he'd found no special link between AOL and any spike in HIV cases. He suggested that Foster had been the recipient of misinformation spread by a San Francisco AIDS activist known for confusing journalists and public officials.
Casey Riley, director of the division of STD/HIV and viral hepatitis at the Virginia department of pubic health, said San Francisco had asked his department to "see what we could do to get AOL to put educational information messages in their chat room. We were under the impression that AOL was already doing this."
Meanwhile, the CDC said it was planning a fall meeting with Internet service providers and telecom types to address STD prevention.
A CDC representative added that the agency was researching the link between chat rooms and STDs, and that preliminary evidence showed that people who searched for sex partners online reported more sex partners and a higher rate of STDs.
Klausner said his request of AOL was nothing out of the ordinary.
"This is run-of-the-mill public health," he said. "We ask businesses whose services have been implicated in disease transmission or facilitation of disease transmission to inform their patrons of the risk." Meanwhile, the only thing I'm spreading are your rumors.
Note as well how this exposes the lie that gay men are just as faithful to their "partner" as hetero men are to their wives.
How is it AOL's fault that gay men are indulging in their mentally deranged behavior and getting sick as a result?
Would this even be a story if a number of straight women had gotten STDs through online hookups?
Uh... how did you arrive at this sweepingly general conclusion?
Because of homosexual activist resistance to closing the homo bath houses that were the main breeding ground for AIDS back when the disease was first documented. And by their attempts recently to reopen them. And by the stories about bug-chasers. And by the stories about homos refusing to use condoms because exposing themselves to the risk of AIDS is considered more 'intimate.' BARF!
We aren't surprised, however. These people are mentally ill after all.
Your talking about two sides of the same coin. Promiscuity among heterosexuals is as unacceptable to a moral society as is homosexuality.
>>>Whom do you propose to penalize because of these idiots? Me?<<<
If you consider denying homosexuals special rights as some sort of penalty, then the answer is yes.
>>>Are you going to use this little news bite as part of your reason that the partners of WTC victims do not deserve aid?<<<
Actually, it was intended to highlight the inherent immorality and perversity of homosexuality.
>>>Then it is only fair that you use heterosexual promiscuity statistics to determine proportionally how much aid heterosexuals get.<<<
No aid for domestic partners. Period. Good enough?
>>>As dear old Ronald would say, "There you go again!" Using the irresponsible acts of a small minority to tar the majority.<<<
I don't believe it is a minority. You begin with a foundation of sexual perversion and everything you build upon it will be corrupt.
>>>Curtailing the rights of one person by statistics involving someone else.<<<
I'm not curtailing anyone's rights. No survivor benefits should be created for bedmates.
>>>Assuming anything a small number of gays do must reflect on gays as a class but taking no particular responsibility for the sins of heterosexuals.<<<
That's because we condemn those sins as well. Just because heteros sin doesn't mean I have to accept your sin as moral.
>>>I mean, perhaps you should address the excesses of the spokesmen for heterosexuals. You know, Larry Flint, Marilyn Cambers, Hugh Hefner. Your leaders.<<<
They are people who promote perversity and who should not recieve any special rights or priveleges.
No survivor benefits for bedmates.
You already have them. Case in point, you can marry any woman you want (family members excluded). ;-)
>>>Sure. And a piece about rape would highlight the inherent immorality and perversity of heterosexuality?<<<
No, there are violent people in both camps. They should be in prison. The parallels arise when one observes how the perversity of homosexuality draws its victims into a downward spiral of perversion. Perversion isn't limited to homosexuals, of course, but they and the NAMBLA types are the only ones harping for acceptance.
The homosexuals who raped and murder Jesse Dirkhising were supposedly in a long term committed relationship and poor Jesse's parents didn't recognize the inherent threat of allowing deviants access to their innocent child. Such a pity, really.
>>>If a gay person does something bad, that proves gay people are bad. If a straight person does something bad, you distance yourself from him.<<<
Actually, your talking about heterosexual perverts. I avoid them as strenously as the homosexual ones.
>>>Of course, you don't mean that. I'm sure you really care about the widows involved. What you really mean is "no survivor benefits for bedmates who are not legally married." But you won't give us that right.<<<
Correct. Two people of the same sex cannot marry anymore than pigs can fly. Marriage is between a man and a woman.
>>>Admit it. You want gay people to be irresponsible, because it helps you to treat them as the enemy. If 99% of gays were in monogomous, long-term relationships, it would really upset you, wouldn't it?<<<
Actually, I'd like to see all of them cured of their Same Sex Attraction Disorder so that they can live heality, monogomous, long-term relationships with a person of the opposite sex as God and nature intended them to.
If I hadn't legally been able to marry my wife, it wouldn't have changed a thing about our relationship. What is wrong with homosexuals that it drives them to promiscuity? Simple, they are ill people.
Face it, we will not permit homosexuals to tarnish the moral foundations of this nation, marriage merely being one of them.
People commit crimes for all manner of reasons, including sexual perversion. Since homosexuals already suffer from a sexual perversion, they have an increased risk toward additional perversion than would a normal person.
>>>Homosexuals can't marry in Vermont. They can form civil unions, which are legal secular relationships involving certain rights and responsibilities. <<<
True for now, but not for very much longer.
>>>What is your objection to that? It is not marriage.<<<
Several homosexuals have attempted to use the perverted Vermont "civil union" to force their home states to recognize it as a marriage. That's why I am financially supporting the effort to get protection for marriage amended to the Constitution. And we will prevail.
>>>Ah, yes, but you would not want to learn they were mostly living healthy, monogomous, long-term relationships with a person of the same sex, as their nature intended them to.<<<
Nature did not intend the penis to enter the human rectum. Damage is done everytime. AIDS, a variety of STD's, and even increased instances of anal cancer result. Nature's send a message.
Homosexual is neither normal nor natural.
>>>Again, you want people to be happy following your life plan, certainly not their own.<<<
The plan comes from God and nature.
Homosexuality is not the moral equivalent of heterosexuality. We will not permit it to become the legal equivalent either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.