Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI considers torture as suspects stay silent
The Times-UK ^ | Oct. 22, 2001 | Damien Whitworth

Posted on 10/22/2001 6:59:05 AM PDT by Alouette

FBI considers torture as suspects stay silent

AMERICAN investigators are considering resorting to harsher interrogation techniques, including torture, after facing a wall of silence from jailed suspected members of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda network, according to a report yesterday.

More than 150 people who were picked up after September 11 remain in custody, with four men the focus of particularly intense scrutiny. But investigators have found the usual methods have failed to persuade any of them to talk.

Options being weighed include “truth” drugs, pressure tactics and extraditing the suspects to countries whose security services are more used to employing a heavy-handed approach during interrogations.

“We’re into this thing for 35 days and nobody is talking. Frustration has begun to appear,” a senior FBI official told The Washington Post.

Under US law, evidence extracted using physical pressure or torture is inadmissible in court and interrogators could also face criminal charges for employing such methods. However, investigators suggested that the time might soon come when a truth serum, such as sodium pentothal, would be deemed an acceptable tool for interrogators.

The public pressure for results in the war on terrorism might also persuade the FBI to encourage the countries of suspects to seek their extradition, in the knowledge that they could be given a much rougher reception in jails back home.

One of the four key suspects is Zacarias Moussaoui, a French Moroccan, suspected of being a twentieth hijacker who failed to make it on board the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania. Moussaoui was detained after he acted suspiciously at a Minnesota flying school, requesting lessons in how to steer a plane but not how to take off or land. Both Morocco and France are regarded as having harsher interrogation methods than the United States.

The investigators have been disappointed that the usual incentives to break suspects, such as promises of shorter sentences, money, jobs and new lives in the witness protection programme, have failed to break the silence.

“We are known for humanitarian treatment, so basically we are stuck. Usually there is some incentive, some angle to play, what you can do for them. But it could get to that spot where we could go to pressure . . . where we don’t have a choice, and we are probably getting there,” an FBI agent involved in the investigation told the paper.

The other key suspects being held in New York are Mohammed Jaweed Azmath and Ayub Ali Khan, Indians who were caught the day after the attacks travelling with false passports, craft knives such as those used in the hijackings and hair dye. Nabil Almarabh, a Boston taxi driver alleged to have links to al-Qaeda, is also being held. Some legal experts believe that the US Supreme Court, which has a conservative tilt, might be prepared to support curtailing the civil liberties of prisoners in terrorism cases.

However, a warning that torture should be avoided came from Robert Blitzer, a former head of the FBI’s counter-terrorism section. He said that the practice “goes against every grain in my body. Chances are you are going to get the wrong person and risk damage or killing them.”

In all, about 800 people have been rounded up since the attacks, most of whom are expected to be found to be innocent. Investigators believe there could be hundreds of people linked to al-Qaeda living in the US, and the Bush Administration has issued a warning that more attacks are probably being planned.

Newsweek magazine reports today that Mohammed Atta, the suspected ringleader who died in the first plane to hit the World Trade Centre, had been looking into hitting an aircraft carrier. Investigators retracing his movements found that he visited the huge US Navy base at Norfolk, Virginia, in February and April this year.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Well, whaddaya think? Should they go for it?
1 posted on 10/22/2001 6:59:05 AM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Already posted here and here.
2 posted on 10/22/2001 7:03:52 AM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
I am: a.) surprised this story was leaked; and b.) surprised torture and/or truth drugs were not used from the outset.
3 posted on 10/22/2001 7:04:36 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Feed them pork.

--Boris

4 posted on 10/22/2001 7:06:39 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte
Pen them up with some well fed hogs.
5 posted on 10/22/2001 7:07:33 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
No, our police and the FBI cannot use torture as it would compromise our laws.

I do suppose, however, we can give these guys the choice of talking to us or talking to the Israeli Shin Bet....

6 posted on 10/22/2001 7:14:26 AM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Remember the technique they used in The Marathon Man?
7 posted on 10/22/2001 7:14:43 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
If an attack on one NATO country is an attack on all, extradite them to Turkey and let them take over the interrogation. I'm sure they have a lot of experience with Islamic extremists like this...
8 posted on 10/22/2001 7:15:50 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Torture should not be used, since it's completely useless. Either you have the right guy or you don't. Using torture to extract a confession won't tell you anything because the prisoner's ONLY concern is how to stop the torture. That means the information you get would have a very high chance of being false. Think about it, who would be more likely to "confess"? An innocent who values his life or a suicidal jihadist who has been trained by alQuaeda to resist torture? Mind-numbing drugs or extreme psychological techniques, which induce the prisoner to DIVULGE information rather than attempting to EXTRACT it, would be the best option. And there's also the fact that you could very possibly be damaging or killing innocents.
9 posted on 10/22/2001 7:19:55 AM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
Another thing, I don't think it's legitimate to refrain from using torture ourselves but to expect some other government to use it. If we extradite these guys to some other country with the express intent or having them tortured, which is what is implied in the article, then we are morally culpable for that torture, regardless of whether we ourselves do it or not.
10 posted on 10/22/2001 7:23:13 AM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Here is a concept!

Replace the torch on lady liberty with a sword...and drop the bastards out of huey's onto the sword until they start talking! And if they don't talk well at least they are not eating up taxpayer money anymore!

11 posted on 10/22/2001 7:27:15 AM PDT by surfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: surfer
I really like the idea of replacing "Lady Liberty"'s torch with a sword. Also do away with the "send me the wretched refuse of your teeming shores".

America FIRST!!

g

13 posted on 10/22/2001 7:38:08 AM PDT by Geezerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Aside from the moral question (which of course is the most important issue), torture is now, has always been, and forever will be absolutely useless for one very simple reason: if you hurt somebody enough you can get him to say anything you want him to say just to get the pain to stop. This "insight" is pure common sense, requiring absolutely no historical "moral progress" whatsoever. In other words, there was never any excuse for torture as a means of getting at "the truth" in any culture, at any point in history.

Moreover, halakhah does not even accept confessions but requires eyewitnesses (at least two for Jews, one for non-Jews). While the secular mind reels at the possibility of guilty people slipping through the cracks due to an absence of eyewitnesses, the whole idea is that G-d actually exists and if we obey His laws He will Himself execute judgment on those we ourselves weren't permitted to punish.

Also, doesn't justification of torture "to save lives" smack of moral utilitarianism?

All that being said, I certainly understand the frustration of the authorities at encountering such disciplined evil.

14 posted on 10/22/2001 7:40:18 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billybudd
"Torture should not be used, since it's completely useless"

Right. Budd, once they start popping your toes off with a pair of lineman dikes, or start castrating you REAL slow, I guarantee you'll tell everything you know. You'll start making things up when you've found you've spilled your guts (pun intended) and the torture just keeps right on going. Don't believe all the B.S. you see in the movies. NO ONE is immune to torture.

15 posted on 10/22/2001 7:42:13 AM PDT by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist
I understood it was just a shot of "truth serum." Is this torture?
16 posted on 10/22/2001 7:45:37 AM PDT by MotherSpector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Truth be told, torture does work, and we do use it. We're just more subtle about it, and make sure there aren't any marks. Or we contract it out.

To deal with this guy, send him to some miserable jail - Louisiana has some interesting ones - and intern him in a cell with 20 or so other prisoners. Get the word out that there will be extra privileges if the guy breaks....pizza, hamburgers maybe, ice cream, whatever. And then just walk away.

We have some creative people in jail....

I recall an article, years ago, from the Wall Street Journal. They discussed that in one Atlanta prison, only ONE prisoner had not been raped - and he was the toughest, meanest fellow the warden had ever met. Somehow, I think the suspect would fail to thrive in such an environment.

17 posted on 10/22/2001 7:47:49 AM PDT by neutrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
"Remember the technique they used in The Marathon Man?"

How thoughtful of us to provide our prisoners with free dental care....

18 posted on 10/22/2001 7:51:36 AM PDT by Reo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MotherSpector
"We are known for humanitarian treatment, so basically we are stuck" - HORSE S**T!! Who cares whether or not what they tell us is admissible in court. Do we really want these animals ever brought into a U.S. courtroom where some ACLU scumbag can plead them down to a Class 2 Midemeanor and have them sentenced to time served?! You want them to talk?! Drill their teeth! Cut their fingers and toes off one by one. Insert bamboo shoots up their urethras! Force raw pork down their throats! If none of this works - then use sleep deprivation - probably the most useful form because it renders the subject so weak and disoriented he is unable to fabricate rational lies.
19 posted on 10/22/2001 7:53:05 AM PDT by Camerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: billybudd
Sure, it might involve some moral culpability to turn these perps over to the Israeli's after they've been given a chance to sing to us, but not much, and no legal culpability. Lincoln was acting illegally when he suspended habeus corpus during the Civil War, but was he wrong? I' not so sure. We're not talking about ordinary criminals here, we're talking about terrorist suspects. I'd be willing to take them to court, give them personal use immunity for 100% honest, complete testimony, and compel them to testify. Then, if they don't, turn them over to the Israeli's or one of the other European secret services that have less than squeamish standards.
20 posted on 10/22/2001 7:56:52 AM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson