Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islam's enemy is victimhood, not the US (by Iraqi dissident)
The Observer via SMH ^ | 10/22/01 | Kanan Makiya

Posted on 10/22/2001 8:06:18 AM PDT by dead

The Muslim world cannot forever attribute its ills to the great Satan, America, writes Kanan Makiya.

The Arab and Muslim worlds suddenly find themselves facing a civilisational challenge such as they have not had to face since the fall of the Ottoman Empire. In the years to come, the greatest price of the madness that was unleashed upon New York and Washington on September 11 will be borne by them and by all individuals of Arab or Muslim origin, wherever they may live in the world.

I am not talking about the next war in Afghanistan or greatly redoubled efforts to hunt down Muslim and Arab terrorists from Boston and Hamburg to Cairo and Karachi. The price I am talking about is not paid in blood or by being the victims of the kinds of humiliating slurs and racist attacks that are everywhere on the rise in the West. It is the much greater price brought about by continuing to wallow in the sense of one's own victimhood to the point of losing the essentially universal idea of human dignity and worth that is the only true measure of civility.

Arab and Muslim resentment at the West is grounded in many grievances, some legitimate, others less so. Without question, the West has blundered in its dealings with the Arab world. The United States has in recent years behaved unjustly towards the Palestinians. The Allied victory in the Gulf War of 1990-91 was a lost opportunity to rectify this record, to show that the West, and the US in particular, was capable of reaching out the hand of friendship and support to the peoples of the Arab world, to their democrats and civil libertarians, not merely to a host of tyrannical and unrepresentative regimes.

Like Germans after World War I, Arabs felt they deserved a different lot after the Gulf War.

They thought of themselves as having tried to change the ways they did politics in the past and got nowhere. Palestinian living standards have actually declined since the Oslo accord in 1993, and Iraqi society (much less its polity and economy) is in a state of steady disintegration.

So Arabs grew more resentful and angry at the West than at any other time in modern Arab history. This resentment can be felt everywhere; it has taken root in the most Westernised sections of the Arab population, among businessmen and students of science and engineering, and even among the sons of the mega-rich such as Osama bin Laden.

Grievances alone, however, do not explain the apocalyptic act of fury that was unleashed upon New York and Washington. Arabs and Muslims need to face up to the fact that their resentment at America has long since become unmoored from any rational underpinnings it might once have had; like the anti-Semitism of the inter-war years, it is today steeped in deeply embedded conspiratorial patterns of thought rooted in profound ignorance of how a society and a polity such as the US, much less Israel, functions.

Attribution of all of the ills of one's own world to either the great Satan, America, or the little Satan, Israel, has been the driving force of Arab politics since 1967. As a powerful undercurrent of Arab culture and politics, it has been around much longer than that. After 1967, however, it became the legitimising cement upon which such murderous regimes as Saddam Hussein's Iraq were built.

From the hands of secular Arab nationalists, anti-Americanism was passed on to religious zealots. In 1979, it fused with anti-Shah sentiments to become the animating force of the Iranian revolution and, with that seminal event, major sections of the Islamic movement.

Today, it has become a murderous brew of passions fuelled by paranoia and frustration.

In the five-page letter left in a suitcase in the car park of Boston's airport, this passage, giving guidance to the hijackers should they meet resistance from a passenger, appears: "If God grants any one of you a slaughter, you should perform it as an offering on behalf of your father and mother, for they are owed by you. Do not disagree among yourselves, but listen and obey. If you slaughter, you should plunder those you slaughter, for that is a sanctioned custom of the Prophets, on the condition that you do not get occupied with the plunder so that you would leave what is more important, such as paying attention to the enemy, his treachery and attacks. That is because such action is very harmful [to the mission]."

This is not Islam any more than the Ku Klux Klan is Christianity. No concessions can be made to either mindset, which have more in common with one another than they do with the religions they claim to represent.

To argue, as many Arabs and Muslims (and not a few liberal Western voices) are doing today, that "Americans should ask themselves why they are so hated in the world" is to make such a concession; it is to provide a justification, however unwittingly, for this kind of warped mindset.

The thinking is the same as the "linkage" dreamt up by Saddam Hussein when he tried to get the Arab world to believe that he had occupied Kuwait in 1990 to liberate Palestine. The difference being that if the argument was intellectually vacuous then, it is a thousand times more so now.

Worse than being wrong, however, it is morally bankrupt, to say nothing of being counterproductive. For every attempt to "rationalise" or "explain" the new anti-Americanism rampant in so much of the Muslim and Arab worlds bolsters the project of the perpetrators of the heinous act of September 11, which is to blur the lines that separate their sect of a few hundred people from hundreds of millions of peace-loving Muslims and Arabs.

But it is now up to Arabs and Muslims to draw the line that separates them from the Osama bin Ladens of this world, just as it was up to Americans to excoriate, isolate, outlaw, imprison and eventually root out the members of the Klan from their midst.

Mercifully, the very same Western leaders who are waging the "war against terrorism" are trying hard, and genuinely, to say their efforts are not directed at Muslims and Arab or Muslim culture. Constantly, they are being seen with Muslim clerics and visiting mosques. That is all for the good.

But it is not enough to turn the tide of public opinion, which will increasingly need and want to know who is "the other" in this war. Terrorism is a tactic, after all, not a side. Use of the word "war", however understandable, was a strategic mistake by the American President, for, like the wars on drugs or poverty, it inculcates expectations at the risk of showing few results.

The problem is deeper than bin Laden and his associates and will not end with their demise. As I wrote in Cruelty and Silence, citing the 1930s Iraqi alter ego of Tom Lehrer, Aziz Ali, Da' illi beena, minna wa feena: "The disease that is in us, is from us and within us." Against this kind of enemy the West can do nothing. We have to do it ourselves.

Muslims and Arabs have to be on the frontlines of a new kind of war, one that is worth waging for their own salvation and in their own souls. And that, as good out-of-fashion Muslim scholars will tell you, is the true meaning of jihad, a meaning that has been hijacked by terrorists and suicide bombers and all those who applaud or find excuses for them.

To exorcise what they have done in our name is the civilisational challenge of the 21st century for every Arab and Muslim in the world today.

The Observer

Kanan Makiya is an Iraqi dissident and author of Cruelty and Silence: War, Tyranny, Uprising and the Arab World (Norton/Cape) and the forthcoming The Rock (Pantheon).


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/22/2001 8:06:18 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead
Boy, this poor guy is just gunning to get a faaaaaaatwaaaa declared on his hinney.

I love that...you peeve extremeist Christians off, and they just complain about you on their TV shows. You piss Islamists off, and they want your head on a pike...literally!! And I'm supposed to believe this is a religion of peace?
2 posted on 10/22/2001 8:13:11 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
hehe
3 posted on 10/22/2001 8:14:12 AM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
The Allied victory in the Gulf War of 1990-91 was a lost opportunity to rectify this record, to show that the West, and the US in particular, was capable of reaching out the hand of friendship and support to the peoples of the Arab world, to their democrats and civil libertarians, not merely to a host of tyrannical and unrepresentative regimes.

This part of the author's argument is such nonesense. The main "tyrant" we support is the Saudi royal family. Imagine how well our values of democracy and civil liberties would be received by that Wahabi, Sunni, and Shi'ite nation. Do they want freedom of speach in that Islamic culture? Perhaps freedom of religion? Maybe women's rights? Equal rights for minorities? Even the rule of secular law?

Such values are even more hated than are the dictators we support. Our support of the expansion of these Western values is the main reason these people hate us.

4 posted on 10/22/2001 8:36:47 AM PDT by Jeff F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
I would imagine his book already earned him a fatwa.
5 posted on 10/22/2001 8:37:49 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead
These guys are something, they got all the money you can ever spend and you blame America for not supporting Palestinians. They have millions of acres of land theydon't use and they blame America for not giving Palestine a state.

What has the Arabs done for the Palestinian people but buy them C-4 to kill themselves with?

6 posted on 10/22/2001 8:38:03 AM PDT by Liberal Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
This article correctly touches on the suicidal-martyrdom and paraniod-delusional pathologies that are causing Islam's (or at least Arab Islam's) violent demise. The two central delusions of the Islamic world are:

1. Paranoia: that the Westerners (esp. USA) and Zionists are in some diabolical crusade to take over their world and wipe out their True Faith of Islam. This is Protocols of the Elders of Zion on steriods and also on acid. As a matter of fact, Protocols is standard reading for these Islamic groups.

2. Martyrdom: that if only more of them will die for their cause, they will win. Patton knew this was absurd, and Islamists have taken this obsession to the extreme that Palestinians and others are willing to send their children on suicidal and ineffective suicide missions - armed with stones and bottles against tanks and missiles - knowing full well that the only possible result will be more reprisals, death and destruction.

However, even this author has fallen for his culture's delusions:
1. The United States has in recent years behaved unjustly towards the Palestinians - Becasue we did not allow them to destroy a sovereign state of Jews? By accepting the creation of a new state next to a valued ally, a state whose central purpose is the destruction of that ally?
2. Use of the word "war", however understandable, was a strategic mistake by the American President - does he still not see that war was declared on us, long before 9/11?

One thing he does have right, though: Muslims and Arabs have to be on the frontlines of a new kind of war, one that is worth waging for their own salvation and in their own souls This is true; if WW1, WW2 and the Cold War were civil wars for control of Western Civilization, then this is part of a civil war for the remnants of Islamic Civilization. They have just as much to lose as we do.

7 posted on 10/22/2001 8:38:30 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff F
Our support of the expansion of these Western values is the main reason these people hate us

Great point !!

Their main beef with us is that we support tyrannical and dictatorial governments that don't permit
western-style democratic/republican priciples or principles of human rights.
And their main beef with the same governments is that they accept
western-style democratic/republican priciples and principles of human rights.

If it don't make sense, it's probably just a lie.

8 posted on 10/22/2001 8:45:55 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dead
Palestinian living standards have actually declined since the Oslo accord in 1993...

Because before Oslo, the radical gangsters had to make their way into Israel and the West Bank across fortified and protected borders... a problematic exercise. Post-Oslo, the same gangsters became integral members of the Palestine Authority.

Israelis have suffered at their hands, but not nearly as much as the Palestinians have.

The author is correct in his general theme. While we may be able to bring vengeance to those who act against us, the only lasting solution is to have the Islamic world rise up against these bastards who have lead so many to poverty and misery.

9 posted on 10/22/2001 8:58:50 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Islam's enemy is victimhood, not the US (by Iraqi dissident)

I sense 1.2 billion potential DemoNAZI voters there.

10 posted on 10/22/2001 9:02:07 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson