Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Noble' dissenters are sometimes just wrong
Kentucky Kernel (UK) ^ | 10/22/01 | Clay McDaniel

Posted on 10/23/2001 8:12:35 AM PDT by NorCoGOP

LEXINGTON, Ky. -- Weird times can lead people to do weird things. There has been a lot of debate, but the school board in Madison, Wis., recently decided not to allow students to either say the Pledge of Allegiance or sing the national anthem. The former invokes God, of course, and the latter talks about bombs bursting in air, which could in turn incite children to violence.

I am sure all those board members had visions of ACLU awards dinners dancing in their heads when they made that decision, but those visions soon faded as thousands of parents flooded the phone lines and radio waves protesting the vote.

After another meeting, which had to be relocated because of the turnout, the board voted 6-1 to overturn their prior decision. The children will say the Pledge of Allegiance, but it will have to be preceded by the clause, "We live in a nation of freedom. Participation in the pledge is voluntary. Whoever wishes to participate may stand, those who do not may sit."

This is a true statement and almost completely uncontroversial. And unless you were born with your head attached to your colon, it is also completely unnecessary.

One can be certain those board members took a tremendous amount of pride in standing up to the rising tide of patriotism that has been sweeping the nation since Sept. 11. No doubt they speak of their heroism over morning coffee and make jokes about the backward, brainwashed parents of Madison.

They were dissenters, and dissenters thrive on going at it alone.

That's fine, just so long as they realize that most of the time -- this was a case in point -- there is a reason the dissenter stands alone. The school board stood alone because they were so incredibly wrong. My only surprise was that Jesse Jackson was nowhere to be found.

There is nothing inherently right in standing alone just as there is nothing wrong with it. But the Left so loves being the dissenting voice on every topic that they have turned it into a crusade. Many times they even consider themselves loners when the majority's opinion is on their side.

I remember watching the Emmy awards last year when "Will and Grace" won Best Comedy (or something like that). The speeches all focused on how brave and daring the creators were in making a sitcom about homosexuals.

Now, correct me if I'm wrong (I'm not, mind you), but it seems to me that making a show about homosexuals in Hollywood is about like making a show about steel mill workers in Pittsburgh. How were they pushing the boundaries when everyone they knew supported them?

The reason we live in a republic is because occasionally the majority is wrong. The reason we were founded on democratic principles is because most of the time the majority is right. That is how civilization evolved, by societies deciding over time which behaviors are acceptable and which ones are not.

Occasionally, one must be willing to brave the odds and stand on principle. Even when that time comes, one must accept that someone might disagree.

This is certainly not a religious argument; it is about rights and how far our government can go to restrict those rights. If 90 percent of parents at a football game want to say an invocation asking God to protect their children from harm, how does a pre-game prayer impede on the rights of an atheist in Sec. D? If 90 percent of the population prayed to the god of jellybeans, would they be forcing their religion on anyone else by enjoying a moment of tasty goodness before the game?

You can chalk the Madison school board's decision up to political correctness, I suppose, but that would let the individual board members off the hook. It was a plain stupid decision made by people with spines made of applesauce.

They are certainly only one of the cases in many across the nation -- Berkeley, Calif., comes to mind -- but the Madison case demonstrates there is something very appealing about dissension.

Even when it's wrong.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 10/23/2001 8:12:35 AM PDT by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
...making a show about homosexuals in Hollywood is about like making a show about steel mill workers in Pittsburgh.

It was a plain stupid decision made by people with spines made of applesauce.

GOOD STUFF!!! This guy has a future...but I'm sure on a liberal college campus, this article will go over like a fart in church...

2 posted on 10/23/2001 8:19:33 AM PDT by Chief Inspector Clouseau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
Woo Hoo! This is my Alma Mater! I am so proud to see some common sense coming from at least ONE college campus! I was at UK on Sept. 22 for a football game and the place was COVERED with American flags. I even saw some "God Bless America" signs in some dorm windows. Kentucky is a very patriotic place. Yee-haw!
3 posted on 10/23/2001 8:32:41 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
PING!!!!
4 posted on 10/23/2001 8:33:10 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: NorCoGOP
Now, correct me if I'm wrong (I'm not, mind you)

ROTFL. I've never read this guy before but I definitely like his style.

6 posted on 10/23/2001 8:45:19 AM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
You know, I read this and then read the comments. I had not realized this was a student essay. I can usually spot them a mile away -- snide remarks (even among conservatives), bad grammar, lack of research/facts and a general immaturity. This young person does indeed have a future.
7 posted on 10/23/2001 8:49:56 AM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: SiouxsieQ
Just out of curiosity, was the pledge and the anthem banned outright, or did the school just neglect to set a special time aside for these things?

Banned.

9 posted on 10/23/2001 8:59:20 AM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: american arnie james
We need to arrest, convict, and hang all traitors. We are at war and must act as such!

I hope you're not saying that anyone who decides to "sit out" any given Pledge of Allegiance is a traitor.

10 posted on 10/23/2001 9:00:10 AM PDT by CubicleGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: american arnie james
Why would any person who loves America not want to say the Pledge of Allegiance?

That's not for you to decide. It's up to each of us. That's what freedom is all about. I'd rather have people stand up for the pledge because they thought it really was the right thing to do, instead of everyone standing up for it because of social or legal pressures. It wouldn't mean anything if we "had" to do it.

Please don't be like Frank Burns: "Individuality is great, so long as we do it all together."
12 posted on 10/23/2001 9:10:16 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
I didn't look at the author until after I had finished reading the article. I thought it was written by Jeff Jacoby. Good stuff.
13 posted on 10/23/2001 9:22:04 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american arnie james
Why would any person who loves America not want to say the Pledge of Allegiance?

An athiest might have a problem with the "under God" phrase (which was not a part of the Pledge as originally written, but was added later (as an afterthough, I suppose), and it is my understanding that Jehovah's Witnesses don't (as in "won't") say the Pledge, either.

14 posted on 10/23/2001 9:33:19 AM PDT by CubicleGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NorCoGOP
I would like to start a list of "enlightened" higher learning institutions that conservative alums boycott until they clear their heads. This boycott would mean no donations and no legacy students until the administrations come to their senses. Some examples; University of Texas at Austin University of Michigan at Ann Arbor (Dearborn should also be included for obvious reasons) University of Wisconsin at Madison MIT University of California at Berkely University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of Massachusetts at Amherst Lehigh San Diego State University Yale Harvard
15 posted on 10/23/2001 9:49:10 AM PDT by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Dems_R_Losers
MY ALMA MATER ALSO.....GO BIG BLUE STUDENTS HAVE MATURED IN THE LAST MONTH. THE STUDENTS IN WISCONSIN HAD IT RIGHT ALSO. GOD BLESS AMERICA
18 posted on 10/23/2001 11:18:42 AM PDT by bobg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: american arnie james
Perhaps a person who loves America might find the pledge to be a trite recitation of words that amount to wearing patriotism on your sleeve; that to speak the pledge wouldn't mean that you really do love America, but only that you want to be seen as appearing to love America.
19 posted on 10/23/2001 11:21:32 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson