Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Cancels Appearance at G.O.P. Event
New York Times ^ | Wednesday, October 24, 2001 | By RICHARD L. BERKE

Posted on 10/23/2001 9:06:40 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

Bush Cancels Appearance at G.O.P. Event

By RICHARD L. BERKE

WASHINGTON, Oct. 23 — It was an unusual debate at the highest levels of the White House: Could President Bush afford to be a politician again?

The answer, Mr. Bush himself concluded late today, was no.

The president had been scheduled to be the marquee attraction at a $1 million Republican fund-raising dinner this Thursday, an engagement that had left his aides agonizing over whether he should attend.

Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's chief political adviser, thought he should, officials and event organizers said. But Vice President Dick Cheney and Andrew H. Card Jr., the White House chief of staff, thought the timing inappropriate, the officials said.

Late today, Dan Bartlett, the White House communications director, said Mr. Bush had decided to send the vice president in his place.

"President Bush," Mr. Bartlett said, "just returned from China and is focusing on the war effort."

The dinner, billed as "An Evening With President George W. Bush," is a fund-raiser to benefit the Republican Governors Association and will be held at the National Building Museum here. It was planned long before the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, but the events of that day ultimately led to wrangling at the White House over whether Mr. Bush should appear there, at what would have been his first partisan event since the attacks.

"You could argue one side or the other," Ronald Kaufman, finance chairman of the governors association, said before the decision was made late today. "There are legitimate, different schools of thought on every public activity right now."

White House officials, as well as organizers of the event, said Mr. Rove had been among those urging the president to attend.

"There's a strong argument that if you really want the country to get back to normal, politics and fund- raising are all part of America," said one prominent Republican involved with the dinner. "Karl is a pretty articulate proponent of that argument."

There were financial considerations, too, of course. The Republicans are counting on collecting more than $1 million from the dinner to help their candidates in the two elections for governor next month, in New Jersey and Virginia.

But others, including Mr. Cheney and Mr. Card, questioned the wisdom of Mr. Bush's attendance, people involved in the event said. The vice president and the chief of staff were described as concerned that Mr. Bush not appear too political at a time of crisis, when the White House is trying to foster an atmosphere of bipartisanship.

"My view is that he shouldn't do it," said one person associated with the event. "There's a war going on."

In addressing the president's decision late today, Mr. Bartlett, the communications director, said that although Mr. Bush would not attend the fund-raiser, he would meet with Republican governors earlier on Thursday.

As recently as this afternoon, though, White House officials had said that there was a better-than- even chance that Mr. Bush would be at the dinner, and that they had already begun preparing a speech for him. Officials said his speechwriters had been told to draft an address in which he would explain the objectives of his military and domestic actions since Sept. 11. One White House aide said the instructions were to make the speech "high-toned and nonpartisan."

Clinton Key, executive director of the governors association, had already said that ticket buyers who wanted refunds would get them if Mr. Bush did not attend. But Mr. Kaufman, the association's finance chairman, said he hoped that participants would be content to mingle with the governors; he said 18 of the 29 Republican governors would attend.

"He's got to do what's best for the country," Mr. Kaufman said of the president. "Folks are going to get their money's worth. Everybody understands right now that these are extraordinary times."

The Republican and Democratic Parties both suspended fund-raising efforts after the attacks, but resumed early this month. Mr. Bush's participation in this fund-raiser had been considered important because it was the biggest donors who expected to have the greatest access to him there. The invitation said anyone who contributed or raised $100,000 or more could be part of the "official presidential arrival party." Among other things, they were also to get four tickets to a private reception and photo opportunity, presumably with the president.

The cheapest ticket for the dinner costs $1,000.

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 10/23/2001 9:06:40 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
With D.C. postal workers dropping dead from inhalation anthrax this week, President Bush chose wisely to not attend this fundraiser.
2 posted on 10/23/2001 9:10:48 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
"With D.C. postal workers dropping dead from inhalation anthrax this week, President Bush chose wisely to not attend this fundraiser."

I agree. Could something be breaking on the war front also?

3 posted on 10/23/2001 9:14:38 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
That's my President! Awesome guy....the classiest of the classiest.

He knows what is important, and what is right.

A reporter recently described him as "not obsessed with himself."

I like that. I like HIM.

Let's not even THINK about Clinton or Gore in the same situation.

Shouldn't have said that....now I've upset myself!!

4 posted on 10/23/2001 9:16:30 PM PDT by Office Manager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Office Manager
Clinton and Gore--just a bad dream.
5 posted on 10/23/2001 9:21:29 PM PDT by Calpublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Exactly -- cancellation of an appearance is something which the shameless showboat, X42, would never even deign to consider.
6 posted on 10/23/2001 9:24:02 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This is yet another difference between this President and the unmentionable one before him. X42 would never pass up a fund raiser no matter what. This is the only decision that President Bush could make. It would not be appropriate at this time for him to attend.
7 posted on 10/23/2001 9:25:28 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
He made a wise decision. This is not the time for fundraising using the President. I seriously doubt anyone would cancel with Cheney being there.
8 posted on 10/23/2001 9:31:05 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
This is yet another difference between this President and the unmentionable one before him. X42 would never pass up a fund raiser no matter what.

Not in a million years.

Of course, his knee-padded propagandists in the "news" media would spin it favorably, something along the lines of, 'our brave commander-in-chief sends a reassuring message of normalcy amid the storm'...blah, blah, blah.

9 posted on 10/23/2001 9:31:31 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
It was a good decision not to go. I'm sarting to wonder about Karl Rove. He seems to be on the wrong side of some of the intra administration debates lately.
10 posted on 10/23/2001 9:33:01 PM PDT by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Agree. This cancellation has to be a crushing disappointment to the press -- which was poised to pounce on Bush had the fundraiser gone forward.
11 posted on 10/23/2001 9:33:38 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: paul51
'starting' to wonder
12 posted on 10/23/2001 9:33:44 PM PDT by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"There's a strong argument that if you really want the country to get back to normal, politics and fund- raising are all part of America," said one prominent Republican involved with the dinner. "Karl is a pretty articulate proponent of that argument."

Yeah, he would be.

13 posted on 10/23/2001 9:33:53 PM PDT by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I'm wondering who has it in for Karl Rove. This was a no-brainer after the deaths this weekend, yet someone is trying to paint him as still being for Bush attending the fundraiser. I just don't think Rove is that stupid.
14 posted on 10/23/2001 9:34:20 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The invitation said anyone who contributed or raised $100,000 or more could be part of the "official presidential arrival party." Among other things, they were also to get four tickets to a private reception and photo opportunity, presumably with the president.

The cheapest ticket for the dinner costs $1,000.

15 posted on 10/23/2001 9:34:51 PM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good to know that Dick Cheney is the "closest" to the President's ear -- and his advice is apparently that most closely followed. We and the President could do much worse than to have this man be the most listened to advisor.
16 posted on 10/23/2001 9:36:02 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I'm wondering who has it in for Karl Rove

NYT's attempt to engender suspicion and sow division among advisors?

17 posted on 10/23/2001 9:36:52 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
IOW, I wouldn't put it pass the NYT to completely fabricate quotes, if it could sow fissures among Bush staffers.
18 posted on 10/23/2001 9:38:52 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Considering that noone was quoted on the record about Rove in this article, it does make one wonder. However, it could be the usual backstabbers who are part of any administration or party in power.
19 posted on 10/23/2001 9:41:35 PM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
However, it could be the usual backstabbers who are part of any administration or party in power.

True....

20 posted on 10/23/2001 9:46:14 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson