Posted on 10/24/2001 8:16:39 AM PDT by Starmaker
Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) found herself being jeered and booed by thousands of New York firemen and policemen at a 9-11 benefit concert on Saturday evening. VH1 cameras caught New York's finest screaming at the Senator to get off the stage. One police officer yelled, "Get off the stage! We don't want you here!" Senator Clinton apparently cut short her speech and her time on stage.
New York's firemen and policemen are astute enough to recognize someone who is insincere and is merely attempting to regain notoriety after the 9-11 terrorist attack on our nation. Senator Clinton and Rep. Gary Condit had both been getting plenty of press prior to 9-11, but all that has changed.
Clinton's often denied, but real objective of becoming the first female President may have also died on 9-11, along with her desire to establish herself as a serious legislator.
Senator Clinton, of course, found a far more receptive audience when she gave a speech at the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) dinner on October 5. CNN reported that her comments on domestic partners were aimed at me.
She is obviously more at home among homosexuals and leftists than with firemen and policemen. During her speech, she likened the terrorist attack on New York to a "hate crime" and suggested that Congress should pass pro-homosexual hate crime legislation.
She also said she wanted federal legislation passed to legalize homosexual "domestic partners" so that homosexuals can have the same "rights" as married couples.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) is also comfortable supporting homosexual activists who are working to redefine marriage. Daschle has expressed support for legislation that grants "domestic partners" benefits to homosexual employees in Washington, DC. He also supports giving needles to drug addicts in our nation's Capital. Daschle is promoting anti-business and pro-homosexual "hate crime" legislation that will threaten American businesses with endless litigation.
Regrettably, Clinton's and Daschle's homosexual allies are using the terrorist attack on our nation to push for domestic partners legislation and policy changes in how relief agencies hand out funds to the survivors of the terrorist attacks in New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, DC.
The Red Cross has recently fallen victim to the homosexual political agenda aimed at redefining the family. The Red Cross issued a letter to the Human Rights Campaign on Oct. 11, assuring homosexuals that this organization would use a "broad and inclusive definition of family" in determining who receives funds. According to Red Cross Vice President John Clizbe, ".we recognize traditional married families, as well as the committed relationships and domestic partnerships of many couples who are living together." The United Way is also aiding the homosexual agenda by redefining "family" as it distributes benefits.
Several weeks ago, I spoke out against the distribution of funds to the survivors of homosexual victims because I viewed this as a shameless political move designed to promote same-sex marriages. Following our lead, Concerned Women for America and Family Research Council issued similar statements decrying this effort to normalize homosexual partnerships in our culture.
The events that transpired on 9-11 are horrific enough without politically-motivated homosexuals and their allies using this attack on our nation to undermine the sanctity of marriage in our culture. We would urge the Red Cross, the United Way, and other relief organizations to seriously reconsider their decision to use a "broad and inclusive" definition of family in distributing relief funds.
Homosexuals are notoriously promiscuous and drift from one relationship to another without lasting commitments. There are also a growing number of homosexuals who are promoting what they call "polyamory" or multiple sexual partners who are briefly joined together. How will the Red Cross deal with polyamory when it becomes more firmly entrenched within the homosexual culture? Will three homosexual men be a "family" under Red Cross guidelines?
Homosexual activist Michelangelo Signorile, writing in "Out" magazine says that homosexuals should fight for "same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely" in order to "debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution." In short, he wants traditional marriage destroyed.
Senators Clinton and Daschle as well as the Red Cross are helping in this process. While Clinton is undoubtedly deliberately trying to destroy the concept of marriage altogether, the Red Cross leadership has apparently been victimized by clever homosexual activists. Let us pray that the Red Cross reverses course soon.
Go away.
:/ ttt
BTW, I was quite impressed with your insightful comments on this article.
And to what purpose should I make comments? I agree with the article. Homosexuals, as a group, are hard-left and are key supporters of everything which I am fighting against (liberalism, immorality, perversion; take your pick). If you disagree with the article, how about walking us through a RATIONAL argument, rather than being an ass.
:/ ttt
And New Yorkers boo her! Never thought I'd see the day. Maybe this country IS experiencing a revival of sorts.
If Yorkies have any sense, they'll send Fannybags packing in the next election. Tho' hopefully, she'll be indicted and sent to prison before then.
You keep whining about 'em. I'll keep laughing at 'em.
Which people? And when have I whined about them?
Documentation, documentation. Be sure to provide this with your "thilly" comments.
:/ ttt
They’re all just right-wing, mentally-ill Christian, homophobes with latent tendencies who don’t represent the 85-90% of the real conservatives in America.
Does that mean they'll start fag-bashing at a later date? ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.