Posted on 10/24/2001 11:04:45 AM PDT by Cacophonous
Steel Trap
For Bethlehem Steel, its too little too late. On October 15, the company that built the Golden Gate Bridge, Chicago's Merchandise Mart, and much of the New York skyline, filed Chapter 11. A surge of subsidized imports left it reeling, and depressed demand in the wake of September 11 brought the giant to its knees. Despite nearly $300 million in net cost reductions since the middle of 1998, the company could not overcome the injury caused by record levels of unfairly traded steel imports and the slowing economy that have severely reduced prices, shipments, and production, the nations third-largest steel-maker said in its obituary as Bethlehem joined 24 other U.S. steel companies that have gone dark since 1996.
This week, their case reached the International Trade Commission. In response to a June 6 request by President Bush to determine whether imports were damaging our domestic steel industry, the panel ruled that U.S. steel has indeed been harmed. The ITC now has 60 days to write a prescription, which will be forwarded to the President.
But its too late for Bethlehem and may be too late for America.
As the nation rebuilds and ramps up for war, we are one of only two countries that cannot satisfy its own demand for steel. From aircraft carriers in the Indian Ocean to the girders that shore up our damaged Pentagon, America must now face the strategic implications of allowing this domestic industry to die. Over the last year, weve lost 8 million tons of capacity due to bankruptcies and cutbacks, and last quarter alone, the industry recorded a collective loss of $1.43 billion.
When the civilian market is threatened by the glut of foreign imports, the military's capability is put at risk, then Pennsylvania Governor, now head of Homeland Security Tom Ridge told the Trade Commission. We all know the events of [Sept. 11] highlighted the need for a stable domestic steel industry. Not just steelworkers and their families -but all Americans- are made vulnerable by unfair imports."
The problem goes beyond bullets and bombs. Not only do we depend on foreign suppliers to feed our military machine, here at home, from water supplies to metro rails, steel supports the critical components of domestic defense. As the airlines collect their $15 billion bailout check and retailers and tourist traps press for a piece of the $90 million stimulus package, an industry more integral to national and homeland security than most any other may yet be sacrificed to protect failed trade policies
If American mills produced an inferior product through inefficient processes, the free market should rightly bolt their doors. But thats not the case. In the late 80s, the U.S. steel industry underwent a painful restructuring and modernization process at the cost of $60 billion and 400,000 jobs. It emerged with 300% productivity gains and 90% lower emissions as the world leader in efficiency and environmental responsibility. But while American steel was self-correcting, the Asian currency crisis of 1997-98 sent overseas economies spiraling. Desperate for cash, foreign competitors began dumping subsidized steel well below our cost of production while our government did nothing. As a result, in the last three years alone, imports have risen to 38 million tons, 10 million tons more than the average for the four years preceding. Domestic prices have plunged to twenty-year lows; 31,000 U.S. steelworkers have lost their jobs.
In his lament for burned-out Youngstown, rocker Bruce Springsteen sang, Taconite, coke, and limestone fed my children, made my pay, And them smokestacks reaching like the arms of God into a beautiful sky of soot and clay Well my daddy come on the Ohio Works when he come home from World War II, Now the yards just scrap and rubble. He said, Them big boys did what Hitler couldnt do. These mills they built the tanks and guns that won this countrys wars. We sent our sons to Korea and Vietnam, now were wondering what they were dying for
Let it be said that the next who fall in service die for a nation that honors its independent tradition, supports its vital industries, and refuses to auction security to the globes lowest bidder. The ITC has given Mr. Bush an opportunity to affirm the same; September 11 has given him a reason. America has proved she has steel in her spine. For the sake of our defense, both at home and abroad, he must also keep it within our grasp
Amerika is being destroyed from within, all in the name of the New World Order.
One notes that in the 1980s we didn't have that much trouble. We were building ships, planes, tanks and stuff like crazy. Defense cuts may be the real culprit here.
Accelerating planned construction of high-speed ground transportation infrastructure would help. (High-speed rail, maglev.) Added benefit is alleviating congestion on both the Interstate Highway System AND the air corridors and air traffic control system. At the same time, reducing our long term dependence on imported OPEC oil!
The problem is that the Japanese and Korean governments subsidize their own industries so much that they can undersell Bethlehem Steel. This is not to recommend that the US government subsidize its own steel industry; rather to place and enforce tariffs on imported steel to make the prices competitive. The free market (not to be confused with the current notion of "free trade") will keep the price down, because, as we agree, the demand is there.
Personally, I'll stick with the free market.
But a lot of that cannot be helped at this point. We CAN make a big order for steel used to build ships, planes, tanks, and other assorted necessities for the war we are fighting, and that will help out a great deal.
But don't confuse the free market with how we today define "free trade". A free market allows supply to meet demand and establish a price in equilibrium. What the Japanese and Koreans are doing is artificially setting the price low; this drives out competitors, decreasing the supply and ultimately driving prices up. It's not at all a free market.
The free market exists within the US borders because we all play by the same rules, for the most part. Our competitors do not.
But the economics aside, it is, as Buchanan illustrates, a matter of national security, and of national sovereignty. I for one am not willing to sacrifice either for the gain of a cheaper widget. The very notion that the consumer should determine trade policy is abhorrent.
The suicide rates (workers) in the American steel industry in the past few decades has been horrendous. Nobody much cared. We went to dot-com heaven as the steel towns, and our citizens withered and died. Free Trade, in it's politicaly correct form is America's obituary.
All the experts said ; "we are no longer a manufacturing economy". This is the "information" and "service" new ecomonic world they pontificated. We would all be re-trained, the experts said -- for the brave new world of unlimited riches (oops!) and germ-free (double oops!) leisure. Well, as of late, the 'information' has been "lay offs, mergers, down-sizing, plants moving overseas, cut-backs, give ups etc. " and they're 'serving' unemployment checks. The life boats are filling up and we're several NAFTA paddles short.
But not to worry, there's a environmentally friendly bullet in every anthrax-free imported "Job Terminated" envelope. Oops, oops and oops.
How do you think they get all these professors in these Universities, and police chief's throughout the country.
They do it all through these International Unions.
I live near John Hopkin's Hospital.
Thousands of doctors are coming in Baltimore by a pack that Hopkin's has with the U.N.
Even out the playing field and US steel producers will be able to compete. Remember, US steelworkers are the most productive in the world.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.