Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red Cross, under fire for charity relief effort,unclear on what WTC money has been distributed
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | October 28, 2001 | SHELLEY EMLING

Posted on 10/28/2001 4:05:49 AM PST by sarcasm

NEW YORK -- It should be a dream come true for the American Red Cross: so many donations it has had to take out full-page newspaper ads seeking more people to help.

Indeed, since Sept. 11 the Red Cross and other charities have been deluged with more than $1 billion in gifts and pledges for families of World Trade Center victims.

But making sure the money is being fairly distributed -- or distributed at all -- is turning the relief effort into something of a nightmare.

Charity watchdog groups estimate that only about 10 percent of the money donated has been distributed to victims' survivors.

"We are starting to get calls from donors asking what's going on with all the money," said Bennett Weiner, chief operating officer of the Better Business Bureau's Wise Giving Alliance.

Indeed, dissatisfaction about the way the Red Cross is raising and distributing the New York relief funds is believed to be one reason that the charity's president, Bernadine Healy, announced her resignation Friday.

The Red Cross said Friday it had collected $531 million, more than half of the total in all the funds. But the charity said it was not clear how much had been distributed beyond $35 million in cash grants to families.

Devorah Goldburg, a spokeswoman for the Red Cross, said detailed information about disbursements is hard to provide.

"We're getting invoices as we speak and it's been hard to track everything, especially with the mail being kind of strange right now," Goldburg said, referring to the effects of the anthrax scare on mail service.

"At some point we'll make all the numbers available to the public, because it is public information," she added.

On its Web site, the Red Cross estimates the value of services provided following the Sept. 11 attacks at between $300 million and $320 million.

But it may surprise donors to know that much of that money won't be going directly to the victims, but instead to various other projects: the operation of toll-free hot lines, the creation of a new blood reserve, and the initiation of programs encouraging tolerance in communities across the country.

Red Cross officials say that about $2 million a day is spent on everything from hot meals to grief counselling.

What about the rest of the money that has been raised?

"It will be spent on emerging human needs as a result of this tragedy," Goldburg said. "We may provide grief counseling for years."

Goldburg said one factor holding up disbursement is the difficulty of getting people who are entitled to relief to claim it. Some families may be too consumed with grief to think about asking for assistance, she said.

She said that is why the Red Cross has placed ads in newspapers in both New York and Washington and assigned 35 staff members to do little but look for potential aid recipients.

"We're trying to encourage people to call us because we want to give them a gift, but still not all people have called us," Goldburg said.

The New York charities are getting mixed reviews for their performance.

Weiner said charities shouldn't necessarily be criticized for taking their time with disbursements.

"A lot of people expect the money to be spent quickly, but we've never had a terrorist attack and raised $1 billion before," he said. "When you're talking about disbursements, haste can make waste."

But Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy, a charity watchdog group in Maryland, said any charitable organization should be able to release an estimate of total money disbursed.

"An agency should be able to release some kind of figure, even if it's just an estimate," he said.

Borochoff also said it makes him nervous when charities start talking about spending money years down the road.

"If they need it down the road, then they can ask for it at that time," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
"We're getting invoices as we speak and it's been hard to track everything, especially with the mail being kind of strange right now,"

Spare me.

1 posted on 10/28/2001 4:05:49 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
As some one who has observed the Red Cross up close over the past ten years (blood donations, among other items) I don't think you could find a more confused and disorganized organization than the ARC.
2 posted on 10/28/2001 4:14:10 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Is that ever the truth!! These donations were meant for those victims of the 9-11 attacks, and not for projected needs years from now. The 9-11 $ should have been held separate from ARC's general fund...and it was NOT. The ARC is one sorry outfit, and has been for years.
4 posted on 10/28/2001 4:18:28 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
It has only been seven weeks of delay.

1) Time enough to make victims into beggars.

21) Time enought for incredible interest on $590,000,000 for the Board of the Red Cross.

5 posted on 10/28/2001 4:18:49 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dudoight
When the President of the ARC resigned, I thought I heard that she had wanted all of the money to go to victims/survivors, but the Board wanted to co-mingle it with ARC general funds. Looks like they got their way. Ghouls, in my opinion.
6 posted on 10/28/2001 4:21:34 AM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I refuse to give any money to the Red Cross. Ever since my next door neighbor received aid from them after a flood (in east Kentucky), and they demanded he sign a note to pay it back! It was a loan, not a gift.
7 posted on 10/28/2001 4:22:50 AM PST by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
How much of the money donated by people for the victims in NY has gone for food aid and relief to Afghanistan?
8 posted on 10/28/2001 4:24:01 AM PST by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More
It seems that we have been had. At work after the attack there was a collection for the relief efforts and we sent the proceeds to the Red Cross - never again will I contribute a penny to this organization.
9 posted on 10/28/2001 4:29:43 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Bill O'Reilly was saying last night, that Hollywood was to have raised millions of dollars, why isn't just one of them up in arms about this?? I know the United Way was taking care of their money, but still, it is still not going to the victims. Also United Way and Red Cross both have said the money they have spent went on pychologists. NOT food, rent, gas, utilities, but PYCHOLOGISTS. Is there something wrong with this picture??
10 posted on 10/28/2001 4:30:36 AM PST by kassie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More
One excuse they used is they give according to the needs of the individual. That means paperwork...lots of paperwork to prove your needs, paperwork that has been lost in the shuffle along with the persons seeking help. It would be cheaper to ease up on all the forms and just divvy the money. So a few get money they don't need?! That happens all the time. It is easier to get welfare on a pemanent basis than get emergency relief at a timely pace. They will get the money after they are back on their feet and then be told they really don't need it and will have to pay it back. What a bureaucratic mess!
11 posted on 10/28/2001 4:32:11 AM PST by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I knew this about the United Way, but had no idea the Red Cross was capable of it...they should be sunk for it. Damn them people.

Never, NEVER again...

SR

12 posted on 10/28/2001 4:32:26 AM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I never give to charity “organizations.” I will never tell people how to spend their money, but I have found, for myself, great satisfaction over the years giving directly to a person who has fallen on hard times, to a privately owned animal shelter, send someone to school who otherwise would not have been able to afford an education but merited the chance to get ahead in this world, etc. Yesterday, a professional beggar approached my car at a church parking lot (nice touch I thought) while waiting for someone. She had some long whining story. She also had her healthy kid a few yards away (around 8 years old) who was “hungry.” When she was through with her spiel, I looked at her straight in the eye and told her I wasn’t an ATM. She immediately left. I didn’t enjoy being put in this position, but enough is enough.
13 posted on 10/28/2001 4:38:05 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm
I once new a man who served in the First world War, when he,as an infantry soldier, approached a Red Cross service canteen ,in France they charged him for Coffee and a doughnut,He never gave a penny to them again.

These people are all a bunch of charlatans.

O'Reilly was right on target from the beginning and he has been right all along

The Money was donated for the victims, no one else.

All these 138 Huckster agency's should be made to give the money to a central source for that purpose.

Then the "RED CROSS" and the rest should be shut down..

15 posted on 10/28/2001 4:44:19 AM PST by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I watched Bernadette Healy give her resignation speech the other day. She voiced the usual platitudes about how great the Red Cross is. But there were a few jarring notes imbedded in her remarks. Something's going on. This woman is no dummy. Why would she be taking a powder (from a highly-paid position) at the height of Red Cross relief involvement due to 911? I think there's big trouble behind the scenes in the Red Cross hierarchy and bureaucracy that she couldn't voice publicly. A possible scandal may be brewing and about to erupt. I can't think of any other reason she jumped overboard.

Leni

16 posted on 10/28/2001 4:44:37 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
The Salvation Army would do a superb job. Why trust the crooks, that draw 6 figure salaries, to do it.
17 posted on 10/28/2001 4:50:42 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: overseer5
Bump. Hate to be so cynical but don't be surprised if a year from now 1.5 billion is still unaccounted for meaning it's in a Swiss bank account drawing interest. It's a good thing O'Reilly is on the job because none of these other talking heads would be asking the hard questions and holding those responsible's feet to the fire. Semper Fi, Mike
18 posted on 10/28/2001 4:50:56 AM PST by HEFFERNAN2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm
This is a great thread. I regret I must leave for awhile but will be back to finish reading it.
20 posted on 10/28/2001 4:54:58 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson