Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China cautions Japan against playing active role in US terror war
Hindustan Times ^ | 10-30-01 | PTI

Posted on 10/31/2001 10:05:06 AM PST by tallhappy

China cautions Japan agst playing active role in US terror war


PTI
Beijing, October 30

China on Tuesday cautioned Japan against playing an active military role in supporting the on-going US-led war against terrorism in Afghanistan.

Reacting to the Japanese parliament's approval of a bill yesterday to allow its Self-Defence Forces (SDF) to provide non-combat support to the ongoing US strikes against Afghanistan, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Sun Yuxi said the Japanese government must act cautiously.

"We believe that cracking down on terrorism is the common task of the international community. We hope that the relevant parties will, in accordance with the United Nations charter and international law, make efforts in the fight against terrorism," Sun said.

However, due to historical reasons, the role of Japan in the military field is a question that should be handled cautiously by the Japanese government, the spokesman said.

The new laws authorise Japan's SDF to provide rear-area logistical support for coalition members and takes measures to strengthen security around US bases in Japan.

The legislation allows Japan to send the SDF overseas during an armed conflict for the first time, enabling it to provide logistic support, such as medical services and supply shipments, to the military operations.

The US has alread warmly welcomed the passage of the bills by the Japanese parliament.


Compare that to the following article's headline and emphasis:

Agence France Presse

October 30, 2001 Tuesday

HEADLINE: China takes conciliatory line on Japanese anti-terror law

DATELINE: BEIJING, Oct 30

China on Tuesday took a notably soft line on the passage of a new counter-terrorism law permitting the Japanese military to offer non-combat support to the US-led war on terrorism.

In a departure from usual hostility to any move giving the Japanese armed forces a higher profile, Beijing broadly welcomed the Japanese parliament's decision as part of the global fight against terror.

"We believe that cracking down on terrorism is a common task of the international community," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Sun Yuxi said in response to the Japanese law passed Monday. "We hope that the relevant parties will, in accordance with the UN Charter and international law, make efforts in the fight against terrorism," he told a regular press briefing.

Sun added: "However, due to historical reasons the role of Japan in the military field is a question that should be handled with caution by the Japanese government."

China, which was brutally occupied by Japanese forces before and during World War II, habitually reacts with fury to any suggestion of Japan tinkering with its post-war pacifist constitution.

But Sun, while saying all of Asia was extremely wary of Japan flexing any military might, expressed the reservations in far softer language than usual.

On Monday the upper house of parliament in Tokyo, the House of Councillors, voted to permit Japan's Self-Defence Forces to provide rearguard support at sea for the Afghan campaign.

If Japanese forces are deployed in support of the United States, it would be the first such action since World War II. Japan's post-war constitution bars the use of offensive force.

Sun stressed Japan should not stray beyond a strictly non-military role.

He said due to "what the Japanese did during the Second World War, that's why there is the peace constitution in Japan".

"We hope the Japanese will go along the road of peaceful development. We hope they will stick to this policy."

Any Japanese military action "should be adopted in consideration of history, in consideration of the Asian people and in consideration of the demands and feelings of the Japanese people who much love the cause of peace", Sun added.

Japan's government reportedly plans to send up to 1,000 personnel, two fuel-supply ships and three or four destroyers to carry fuel and supplies to US bases in Diego Garcia, a British territory in the Indian Ocean.

Under the new law, Japan's military will be able to provide medical and logistical support to US forces in any action against Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, but will not be allowed to operate in "combat zones".

China has altered its foreign policy in a number of areas after electing to support the US-led military response to the September 11 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.

Relations with Japan on the issue of wartime history were also eased this month when Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, while visiting a war memorial in Beijing, expressed "heartfelt apology and condolences" to Chinese victims of Japanese aggression during World War II.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
The ChiComs are reacting to Japan Gives Approval To Send Troops In Support Of U.S. War Against Terror

It seems the ChiComs are not being helpful. They aren't doing anything militarily.

1 posted on 10/31/2001 10:05:06 AM PST by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Japan ought to flip them off.
2 posted on 10/31/2001 10:11:48 AM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WriteOn
I'd be happy to see Japan amend their constitution.
3 posted on 10/31/2001 12:23:56 PM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
myself included. I think Japan is slowly but surely reaching that point. They are just trying to warm the Japanese people up to the Idea. I dont think they are really going to be too concerned with what China or the Koreas think as long as the have the full support of the United States.
4 posted on 10/31/2001 12:47:02 PM PST by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
China is very afraid of the United States - Japan alliance.
5 posted on 10/31/2001 5:43:12 PM PST by Bombard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade; B4Ranch
FYI
6 posted on 10/31/2001 8:05:28 PM PST by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
If they can bury the hatchet with Korea, and they are trying, they could build a very formidable alliance. It is a very different Korea from the last time Japan dominated it, and I am very impressed by Korean troops I have observed. I'd feel good having both/either of them at my back in a fight.
7 posted on 10/31/2001 8:45:59 PM PST by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
I think Japan is looking at the calendar and seeing what the future will bring. Hopefully the US, who is getting into bed with China, will remember Japan.
8 posted on 10/31/2001 9:29:51 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Britton J Wingfield
Imagine a US- UK- S. Korea- Philippines- Taiwan alliance being formed. China would freak.
10 posted on 10/31/2001 9:52:13 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
China has just shown it's deep seated fear of Japan. Amazing, even after all these years.
11 posted on 10/31/2001 9:52:30 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: juval
Very cheap labor has a way of doing things like that. If Japan I number one....where is the U.S.? Or does that matter if ownership of the company is listed as Chinese?
13 posted on 10/31/2001 10:22:48 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
No kidding, they must be absolutely freaking with their bitter enemies all lining up, and the US inserting a military presence on their western front. No wonder there has been rumor of Chinese support for the Taleban
14 posted on 10/31/2001 10:23:26 PM PST by freeasinbeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: juval
Two things.

1. - That's business, capitalism, supposedly what America is for

Wrong. America is for unalienable rights, liberty and morality. All of the other flows out of that. When we compromise on those issues, the others dry up.

2. - Do you really think every country in the world was born rich?

See the answer to number one. America was not born rich, the people who founded it and adhered to the principles it was founded upon (despite whatever weaknesses and shortcomings) made it that way.

Regards.

18 posted on 10/31/2001 10:59:33 PM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson