Posted on 10/31/2001 8:03:54 PM PST by JohnHuang2
Edited on 04/23/2004 12:03:51 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Must Journalists Be Un-American?
CNN's chairman, Walter Isaacson, "has ordered his staff to balance images of civilian devastation in Afghan cities with reminders that the Taliban harbors murderous terrorists, saying it 'seems perverse to focus too much on the casualties or hardship in Afghanistan,'
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
and this is good.
maybe they'll wake up to the news--americans are tired of their leftist crap!
Every single time this anti-American, anti-Bush stuff starts, they need to be deluged with calls, faxes, letters and e-mail.
This is our duty as Americans. These people need to fade into obscurity, and we can help them on their way.
Our guy knocks another one out of the park! :-)
AND they're losing :-)
BIG TIME! (to use alittle Cheney lingo, there ;^)
were the royalty in saudi arabia concerned about nyc collateral damage?
Another villain from an Ayn Rand novel....and you thought it was fiction!!!
The media today, sad to say, is a nest of traitors.You need only watch the typical evening "news" broadcast -- larded, from beginning to end, with the most vile, unadulterated enemy propaganda.
This isn't news, it is political pornography, political prostitution as "correspondents" jokey to please their host Arab governments or out of fear of having their press credentials pulled
ABCNEWS doggedly refuses to air so much as the faintest blurb about the cold-blooded mass-murder of Christians in Pakistan, while hyperventilating endlessly about accidentally bombed Afghan Red Cross warehouses, Afghan refugees and 'civilian' casualties.
This is the network which regurgitates, wholesale, Taliban pablum, withut the vaguest hint of skepticism, even as it labors to cast doubt on our leaders, our war strategy -- even the very rightness of our cause.
But the problem isn't just ABCNEWS: The entire news business -- FOXNEWS being the noteworthy exception -- is infected with the same strain of virulent anti-Americanism.
And so is most of print "journalism", needless to say.
The dirty little secret is that most "reporters" share the same disdain, the same ardent anti-western, anti-Judeo-Christian poisoned mindset so prevalent in the mideast they cover.
Can there be any doubt -- any doubt whatsoever -- that these treacherous leeches in a heartbeat would willingly trade the lives and safety of our soldiers just to be *the first* with the news?
During the roundtable segment yesterday on Special Report With Brit Hume, panelist Fred Barnes related an incredible episode which occurred during Q & A at yesterday's Pentagon briefing.
Are you ready for this? One of the "reporters" wanted to know why "leaflets" weren't being dropped prior to bombing raids to "warn" Afghan "civilians".
The question is emblematic of a sickness which pervades the typical newsroom today, and it isn't stupidity, either.
I don't for a minute believe these "reporters' are merely dupes -- well intentioned, but misguided.
No, they are traitors, from top to bottom.
You don't have to be a West Point graduate to know that dropping leaflets and giving your enemy a 'heads-up' is a bad idea.
Is it becasue We are Americans?
First it was Bill Maher and now this ABC news Director and both owned by Disney.
Boycott Disney and its products until the war is over.
I often think to myself, just what do the media left-wing traitors think will happen to their jobs after the US has been defeated and turned into some totalitarian regime?
Exactly, my friend.
We already heard the hypothetical about Mike Wallace and Peter Jennings not willing to inform American troops of an imminent ambush if they were traveling with an enemy patrol because they are journalists first.
We also heard the hypothetical about NPR correspondents willing to report the location of secret commando troops to unaware enemies because of an obligation to history to report what is going on.
So, I ask, hypothetically:
If a US troop becomes aware of an American journalist who is about to report the location of secret commando forces and possibly compromise the mission, would he be right to treat the journalist as a hostile and kill the journalist to prevent the aid and comfort of the enemy and guarantee the success of his mission?
In other words, if the journalist is a journalist first and an American second, then is the soldier a soldier first and an American second, too?
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.