Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patrick J. Buchanan: "Architects of American vulnerability"
WorldNetDaily ^ | Friday, November 2, 2001 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 11/01/2001 9:08:35 PM PST by ouroboros

"The lamps are going out all over Europe. They will not be lit again in our lifetimes," said Sir Edward Grey, as he watched the lamps being lit in St. James Park, the evening of August 3, 1914. At noon, the foreign minister had persuaded Parliament that the German violation of Belgian neutrality meant they must go to war.

Grey sensed it was the end of an era. Tears in his eyes, he said to U.S. Ambassador Walter Hines Page: "Thus, the efforts of a lifetime go for nothing. I feel that I have wasted my life."

British "Tommies" and German soldiers might have sung Christmas carols across "no man's land" that December. But, by 1917, the Christmas spirit was dead, along with millions of Christian soldiers.

Sept. 11 may prove such a day for this generation. For that day, the post-Cold War era came to a crashing close. All the assumptions by which our elites have guided us for a decade were suddenly, violently, called into question.

"Isn't diversity wonderful!" they exulted, as they threw open America's doors to mass immigration from cultures and countries vastly different from our own. A majority of Americans objected. They were called "xenophobes." But today, we read interviews of strangers in our midst who tell reporters, "The Americans had it coming!" Can we still say it was wise to remove all the locks and doors to our lovely home, so strangers could enter at will?

Two months ago, President Bush floated the idea of an amnesty for illegal aliens and opening America to all the trucks from Mexico. Today, Bush ruefully admits, "Never did we realize that people would take advantage of our generosity to the extent they have."

Intending no disrespect, Mr. President, some people did.

In the 1990s, we intervened in Somalia, smashed Iraq and bombed Serbia for 78 days to rescue Muslim people from starvation, invasion and massacre. But as America responds to a savage attack on herself, Islamic crowds from Palestine to Pakistan to Indonesia cheer for Osama bin Laden. No crowds cheer Uncle Sam. But were we not warned by our founding fathers – from Washington to Adams to Jefferson – to stay out of these damnable foreign wars?

That all the interventions – from Panama to Haiti to Somalia to Bosnia to Kosovo to Kuwait – made for exciting careers for our elites is undeniable. But as we bury our 5,000 dead and check our mail for anthrax, how have the interventions profited the American people?

Economic independence is critical to political freedom. So, Washington, Hamilton and Madison taught us. At Philadelphia, they wrote a constitution to end our reliance on British merchants for the needs of our national life. For two centuries, we would follow the Hamiltonian model to become the most self-sufficient nation in history. No so long ago, America was dependent on no one.

Lately, however, we threw aside all that as "protectionism," to embrace "free trade" and the global economy as preached by 19th century utopians like Ricardo, Mill, Bastiat, Cobden and all the other idiot-savants – none of whom ever built a great nation, and whose ideas brought the British nation to ruin.

Now, after three decades and trillions in U.S. trade deficits, we depend on foreign farms for a growing share of our food, on foreign factories for 40 percent of our manufactures, on foreign regimes for 55 percent of our oil. And we live in fear of a "dirty atomic bomb" being smuggled into our beloved country by a foreign truck or merchant ship.

Meanwhile, U.S. taxpayers are forced to fund endless bailouts of bankrupt regimes like Argentina, for fear their defaults will drag down the world financial system. Isn't interdependence wonderful? Like Esau, this generation traded its birthright for a mess of potage.

After our Cold War triumph, the course for America was clear to anyone who had read history: Strengthen U.S. defenses and cut U.S. commitments. We did the opposite, expanding war commitments to Eastern Europe, the Balkans, the Gulf, the Taiwan Strait and Central Asia, while cutting our armed forces in half. Now, in the Afghan war, America seems like an aging heavyweight champion, whose reflexes and punch are not what they used to be. And, indeed, they are not.

Still, we must win this war. As MacArthur said, there is no substitute for victory. We were barbarically attacked. Those who did it have been given sanctuary. Congress has authorized war. The president has taken us to war. We cannot lose, and we cannot let Ramadan impede an early victory.

But, then let us dismiss the overeducated, arrogant fools who made America as dependent and naked to her enemies as she has not been since 1812.


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: patbuchanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2001 9:08:35 PM PST by ouroboros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Agrarian; Mercuria; diotima; sheltonmac; Either/Or; Askel5; mrustow; UnBlinkingEye...
bump
2 posted on 11/01/2001 9:12:36 PM PST by ouroboros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Patrick J. Buchanan: "Architects of American vulnerability"

I thought from the title Pat was at fault.

3 posted on 11/01/2001 9:19:32 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Can't argue his points at all.
4 posted on 11/01/2001 9:40:49 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Some of it is quite true. How can we get resonable discussion of it on national forums, in educational institutions, and in national politics?
5 posted on 11/01/2001 9:45:53 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP
I thought from the title Pat was at fault.

It seems there is the "blame America first" crowd, and then there is the "blame anyone who puts America first" crowd. Pat, to his credit, is on the sh!t lists of both crowds. Bravo for him.

6 posted on 11/01/2001 9:57:40 PM PST by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
Agree with him or not, he says it with style.
7 posted on 11/01/2001 10:13:33 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RLK
How can we get resonable discussion of it on national forums, in educational institutions, and in national politics?

We can't, as long as the elites have control of the media and Congress. When we break the corporate money lock on those institutions, we might have a chance, not until then.

8 posted on 11/01/2001 10:17:05 PM PST by SR71A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
What is amazing: He got through the entire article, without mentioning Israel. Must be a first for Pat.
9 posted on 11/01/2001 10:27:14 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros; Snow Bunny; freedomnews; t-shirt
This was part of the plan to divide America into groups, ie. Japanese-American, African-American, Mexican-American, etc. That way they could get each group to be against the rest and easier to control. Then open the door to illegals and now we have another group to fight against, except now we are also bringing in terrorists who we know will attempt to rise.

When they do then we will throw the 4th Amendment into the back closet and bring in stronger police powers. Now we can gather the ones who are demanding that we respect the Bill of Rights and cut back on the powers of government and lock them up much easier. It won't be long before we will be in total control of the Republic's democracy sheeple.

(We=The New World Order)

10 posted on 11/01/2001 10:30:53 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Thanks for the bump, ob. Strong opening, but agreeing with PB's political points does not entail agreeing with his economics. Supporting national sovereignty does not require that one support protectionism.
11 posted on 11/01/2001 10:31:22 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
But today, we read interviews of strangers in our midst who tell reporters, "The Americans had it coming!"

I thought raimondo and the others at antiwar.com were all from the USA?

12 posted on 11/01/2001 10:31:25 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: ouroboros
Well I can't find anything to disagree with in this Buchanan piece. Good one. We need a sane immigration policy and we need it yesterday!
14 posted on 11/01/2001 10:34:11 PM PST by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: mrustow
I agree with Pat's article. We should protect our borders, our sovereignty, and our jobs.
16 posted on 11/01/2001 10:56:05 PM PST by kevinw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kevinw
I agree with Pat's article. We should protect our borders, our sovereignty, and our jobs.

Maintain our borders and sovereignty, sure, but "our jobs"? How do you do that? Protectionism is ultimately a case of robbing Peter to pay ... Peter! Propping up unprofitable industries is just another form of socialism, which always kills many more jobs than it saves.

17 posted on 11/01/2001 11:01:54 PM PST by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ouroboros
Please note that Pat used the word "German" twice in the first six sentences. Nod, nod, wink, wink..you know what I mean? German=Nazi. Get it? Pat is up to his old tricks again. Without a doubt, Yes Sir! No wonder he is shunned by the entire civilized world.
18 posted on 11/01/2001 11:04:29 PM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: sonofliberty2
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PLATFORM, ADOPTED AT MINNEAPOLIS, MINN., JUNE 9, 1892

We reaffirm the American doctrine of protection. We maintain that the prosperous condition of our country is largely due to the wise revenue legislation of the Republican Congress. We believe that all articles which cannot be produced in the United States, except for luxuries, should be admitted free of duty, and that upon all imports coming into the United States coming into competition with the products of American labor there should be levies duties equal to the difference between wages abroad and at home.

20 posted on 11/01/2001 11:21:17 PM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson