Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Bridge Threat Specifics
AM 600 KOGO (San Diego) | now 02 Nov 2001

Posted on 11/02/2001 4:42:33 AM PST by newzjunkey

In the morning news, it was revealed the threat was SINGLE SOURCED. It was revealed, illustrated with FBI audio, before the events of 9/11 such a threat would *not* be announced. It was revealed the threat covers SIX Western US SUSPENSION bridges--and not limited to CA. The bridges were not named. EIGHT governors were warned.

Davis extended that to include the major CA bridges. Among those is the Coronado bridge in San Diego which is *NOT* a suspension bridge.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
Post more details as they come as this "event" is supposed to happen during "rush hour" on the 2nd through 7th. Morning rush hour is still to come out here.

Based on the new details, I'm highly suspicious of this "threat".

As an aside...a San Diego student has apparently been charged with perjury for lying about knowing two of the terrorists. He was *NOT* involved in the bombing or planning. He could get 5 years. I thought the Clintonphiles said this never happened?

1 posted on 11/02/2001 4:42:33 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: newzjunkey
Has it ever occured to anyone that the "specific targets" of the Bridge threats are decoys for the ones they REALLY intend to strike?

sw

3 posted on 11/02/2001 4:46:14 AM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spectre
The Taliban seem to have been going on about a threat to their dams from our bombing. A couple of weeks ago, they accused us of chemical and biological warfare, when the anthrax letters were going round. They seem to need to accuse us of what they are doing. So I would watch our dams.
4 posted on 11/02/2001 4:48:22 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
That's a very interesting observation.
5 posted on 11/02/2001 4:50:37 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Takes a lot of C4 to down a bridge, I suspect.

"Make a noise in the East, but strike in the West."

6 posted on 11/02/2001 4:51:23 AM PST by Ironword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
A broken clock is right once every twelve hours, but it’s by error resulting from a defect.
7 posted on 11/02/2001 4:53:14 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
The dams have been watched very closely since at least 9-11. There are no commercial trucks or travel trailers or RV's allowed near Hoover Dam.
8 posted on 11/02/2001 4:53:17 AM PST by GWfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Has it ever occured to anyone that the "specific targets" of the Bridge threats are decoys for the ones they REALLY intend to strike?

I've thought that, too. Also, that they're going to push the date of the actual strikes as close to Ramadan as they can, forcing our hands to attack them during Ramadan.

These yahoos WANT a holy war and want US looking at this as a holy war. That's why I think the Pope is one of their highest-priority targets.

9 posted on 11/02/2001 4:53:53 AM PST by Dominus Vobiscum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ironword
C4 is not the weapon of choice, I fear. I fear the explosive power of LNG carriers (ships) that pass under the bridges.

Living in the foothills of the Smokies, I don't literally "fear" them, just making a point.

10 posted on 11/02/2001 4:54:24 AM PST by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
They seem to need to accuse us of what they are doing. So I would watch our dams.

Notice that the public accusations preceed the attacks here. I think the Taliban's press releases are little more than "code word" communications to their operatives over here.

11 posted on 11/02/2001 4:55:23 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Soiunds like it to me. I am thinking that they are trying to throw us off. They can do a lot of damage just by having bridges closed. I love in NJ and when the Truck Explosing took out a part of a bridge on Rt 80 in the summer it cause a lot of grief and traffic for over 3 months. Imagine if they had to close all of those bridges during rush-hour.
12 posted on 11/02/2001 4:55:26 AM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
This is just Gov. Davis trying to grab the limelight!
13 posted on 11/02/2001 4:55:27 AM PST by advocate10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ironword
Think of the most unlikely place it could happen. That's were the strike will occur if there is one.


14 posted on 11/02/2001 4:56:08 AM PST by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
6 bridges and 8 warned governors? So now we have to figure out which two bridges are located on the border of two states??????
15 posted on 11/02/2001 4:56:42 AM PST by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
So I would watch our dams

Hoover Dam web site shows your concern is shared.

Traffic Information
The Hoover Dam Visitor Center is open for limited operations. All guided tours are suspended until further notice. However, the theater, exhibits and overlook are open to the public! There are also organized talks by the guides.
Semi-trucks, Class A and Class C motor homes, and vehicles with trailers are prohibited. These vehicles must use the detour through Laughlin, NV on Highway 95.
Passenger cars, mini-vans, SUV's, pick-up trucks towing small trailers with personal water craft or small boats, and pickup trucks with bed-mounted campers are allowed to cross the dam at this time.
Visitors can park in designated lots and walk across the dam for better viewing and photographic opportunities, during daylight hours only. At no time will any vehicles be allowed to stop on top of the dam. Pedestrians are prohibited from the top of the dam during hours of darkness.

16 posted on 11/02/2001 4:56:52 AM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dominus Vobiscum
forcing our hands to attack them during Ramadan.

Oh, please, please do it! Make my day!

17 posted on 11/02/2001 4:57:20 AM PST by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Yes, and it is abit hard to believe that they would give us warning, considering the shocking event of 9/ll.

Maybe our "sources" are double-agents? I don't mean this to sound paranoid, it's just that we don't know for sure we can trust them, especially if we are paying good money for the information..

sw

18 posted on 11/02/2001 4:58:19 AM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
I think this bridge threat is a decoy. What purpose would this achieve? It seems the fed is willing to allow themselves to be duped so it looks like they have "intelligence" on the plans of the terrorists.

Blowing up a bridge takes some pretty elaborate planning. Casulties would be low, and it wouldn't really affect the economy. As far as instilling terror, unlike the anthrax, people know where they can find bridges, thus they can avoid the threat. I'm sorry, but if anthrax is phase II...Phase III is smallpox or dirty nukes or possibly some unthought of tactic that would really shock us. Blowing up bridges is not phase III of this attack...it doesn't fit the MO.

Of course, I could be wrong...and the terrorists may want it to appear that they spent themselves on the first attack, and make us beleive that anything else they do would be small and barely significant. This could make us put our proverbial guard down. Then the real phase II could start.

I have lost faith in the ability for the FED to protect us at home.

19 posted on 11/02/2001 4:58:28 AM PST by francisandbeans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ironword
Takes a lot of C4 to down a bridge, I suspect.

Fire --- very hot fire --- melts steel. Fire, not blast, destroyed the WTC towers.

If they drove a gasoline truck to the center of the bridge and blew it up the intense heat would melt the cable and destroy the road bed. The bridge would collapse.

Solution: Remove all drivers from trucks. Trucks driven across by security personnel. Actual drivers bussed across.

Inconvenient? Hell, yes. But it would reduce threat.

20 posted on 11/02/2001 4:58:54 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson