Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woolsey champions ethanol
Colorado Daily ^ | November 04, 2001 | KELLY HEARN

Posted on 11/03/2001 9:19:53 PM PST by CommiesOut

Woolsey champions ethanol

By KELLY HEARN/United Press International

WASHINGTON -- The United States should lessen its strategically perilous dependence on Middle East petroleum by promoting processing technologies that could render fuel from agricultural wastes, grasses and indigenous crops, former CIA director James Woolsey told a panel of lawmakers.

"We have to realize that the United States' fuel and energy distribution and transmission systems will almost certainly be subject to attack," Woolsey said. "We ought to always be looking at ways to decentralize and make more flexible and less fragile our energy-distribution network."

Woolsey, who testified before the House energy subcommittee, said that means, in part, relying on renewable fuels and alternative energy for transportation, which accounts for roughly 60 percent of U.S. oil demand.

The former CIA director, who has recently suggested that Iraq is behind the terrorist assaults on America, said the United States' dependence on foreign oil, and particularly the world's dependence on oil from the Middle East is "bad and getting worse."

"The Middle East, outside of Israel and Turkey (which have no oil producing capacity) is composed of pathological predators or vulnerable autocrats," he said. "This is not a recipe for long-term stability."

Renewable and alternative fuel credits are needed to spur consumer acceptance, he said, and "one major untapped resource is waste of all sorts, (especially) agricultural waste from packing plants and pig farms. There are technologies that can turn them into energy."

Those technologies could create so-called cellulosic ethanol, a kind of fuel that could be created from virtually any plant or plant product. Past attempts to manufacture ethanol using corn have not taken hold in the consumer market because ultimately the fuel has cost more than the wholesale price of gasoline.

Woolsey said so-called Flexible Fuel Vehicles or FFVs that can use up to 85 percent ethanol are already available and in widespread use in some counties, particularly Brazil.

"All it requires to make a FFV is a chip in the fuel system and a different kind of plastic in the fuel line," he said.

The former spymaster told lawmakers that world petroleum production will begin to turn downward "sometime between 2010 and 2030. And as each year goes on, our dependence on the Middle East is going to get greater and greater."

Well over two-thirds of the world's remaining oil reserves are in the Middle East, he said.

Woolsey pointed out the environmental allure of ethanol as well.

"Remember that biomass ethanol doesn't come from the Middle East and it doesn't contribute to global warming," he said.

Woolsey said that every $1 billion of oil imports that is replaced by domestically produced ethanol creates 10,000 to 20,000 American jobs.

He told lawmakers past energy saving efforts have wrongly fixated on boosting gas mileage.

"If you are doing something good with the fuel you don't care if you are getting twenty or twenty five miles per gallon because it's fuel you don't mind burning," he said. "We need to rethink the notion of what we are trying to do."

Woolsey said he thinks America should drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and save it for emergency needs. He cautioned, however, that officials would first need to lessen the vulnerability of the Alaskan pipeline, which was recently punctured by a hunter's rifle.

Woolsey, quoting environmental author Hunter Lovins, said the pipeline is so vulnerable "it is like a 900-mile piece of Chapstick."

America's oil companies should not feel threatened by ethanol, he said, because their oil refineries would likely be the places it gets produced.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/03/2001 9:19:53 PM PST by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: madrussian; malarski; Askel5; GROUCHOTWO; Zviadist; kristinn; Free the USA; Black Jade...
America's oil companies should not feel threatened by ethanol, he said, because their oil refineries would likely be the places it gets produced.
2 posted on 11/03/2001 9:20:25 PM PST by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Ethanol development would be a waste of time and money. Hydrogen and fuel cells are the future.
3 posted on 11/03/2001 9:30:26 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
Is Woolsey working for ADM these days?
4 posted on 11/03/2001 9:37:51 PM PST by RWCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
I don't know what the answer to alternative fuel will be but I suggest we take all the aid money we are giving to the Arab/Muslims and all other countries who hate us and invest it in research. Anyone have an idea how much that would be?
5 posted on 11/03/2001 9:55:59 PM PST by Kangaroo Court
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWCon
I found this info Here. former CIA director Jim Woolsey is now a director of BCI Corporation, which owns the patents for many of the new biomass to ethanol technologies.
6 posted on 11/03/2001 9:57:54 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Those technologies could create so-called cellulosic ethanol, a kind of fuel that could be created from virtually any plant or plant product. Past attempts to manufacture ethanol using corn have not taken hold in the consumer market because ultimately the fuel has cost more than the wholesale price of gasoline.

The energy calculations do show that production of ethanol is not practical. Energy input into ethanol is more than the output thru the car's engine. Immediate solution - hybrids at 80 miles/gallon

7 posted on 11/03/2001 9:58:09 PM PST by malarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
Ethanol development would be a waste of time and money. Hydrogen and fuel cells are the future.

A lot of the fuel cell development I have seen would use gasoline, methanol, or ethanol for storing the hydrogen. Any money spent developing an E85/M85 infrastructure would still be good for fuel cells.

8 posted on 11/03/2001 9:59:44 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: malarski
I'm not giving up my small SUV!
9 posted on 11/03/2001 10:01:00 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
"Hydrogen and fuel cells are the future.

OK...I'm listening. So....where do we get the hydrogen?

10 posted on 11/03/2001 10:20:32 PM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
My spouse has worked for one of the majors for over thirty years and is aware of "alternative forms of energy." The majors are looking at all options. Recommendation is that no "alternative" is the perfect fit or panacea. This would be like saying, "the only way to travel is by bus,.. or by car,... or by train."

Or, the only really good food is sushi... not steak

Yes, hydrogen cell solution is on the top of my list, but that is only ONE alternative.

If we can distill pig sh!t to make methanol and drop the residue into bin Laden's caves, we will have achieved long and short term goals.

Learn, listen, and think and keep an open mind. Regards

11 posted on 11/03/2001 11:05:04 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

I don't remember the statistics, but I read or heard that there isn't enough land in the US
to provide more than a small part of our fuel needs - and that's without growing any food.

It's also expensive.

12 posted on 11/03/2001 11:15:45 PM PST by RickGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hove
OK...I'm listening. So....where do we get the hydrogen?

About four years ago I read and article in Scientific American about I think they were Hydroxyl Crystals in the ocean. Apparently there is thousands of times more Energy available in those crystals than all of the petroleum, coal and Natural Gas ever discovered or believed to exist. They also had a pond scum, which created a byproduct of Hydrogen. There are numerous other options but I think the Hydroxyl Crystals were among the most promising. The pond scum was interesting but probably not practical because of the amount of land area exposed to sunlight, which would be required.

13 posted on 11/04/2001 9:41:50 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
"I think the Hydroxyl Crystals were among the most promising.

You are correct about the tremendous energy stored in these deposits. Now if we found a way to extract/mine this resource, then wouldn't the separation of hydrogen leave CO2 as a byproduct? Wouldn't that exacerbate the problem of global warming? Especially as the third world starts driving their own hydrogen/fuel cell SUV's.

14 posted on 11/04/2001 11:23:27 AM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hove
Sounds like you may know more about the subject than I do. As for Global warming I lean toward the idea of Solar activity and Natural fluctuation being the cause rather than CO2.
15 posted on 11/04/2001 2:17:56 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
Global warming is a problem created by environmentalist and their lawyers to reduce us to third world statis and make us subjects of the government and doesn't actually exist.

When their program begins to fail they will revert to their previous program of the "new ice age" that they promoted in the 40s and 50s and blame it on human activity.

16 posted on 11/04/2001 2:29:33 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
cold fusion
17 posted on 11/04/2001 2:36:39 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
I also prefer ethanol. Merlot if possible.
18 posted on 11/04/2001 2:41:43 PM PST by cc2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
It's too expensive--for all sorts of reasons. Just look at Archer Daniels Midland for several of them.
19 posted on 11/04/2001 2:43:52 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malarski
You are right. I found an article on fr with information from a researcher at Cornell University. Basically, the article stated that it tok 1.7 gallons of ethanol to raise corn and process it into ethanol. Also even if ethanol was feasible that it would take 97% of the land area of the US to grow the corn.
20 posted on 11/04/2001 2:51:56 PM PST by Charliehorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson