Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clayton $26 strip search appealed to Supreme Court
ajc ^ | Saturday, November 10, 2001 | Bill Rankin - Staff

Posted on 11/10/2001 3:58:31 AM PST by CFW

Clayton $26 strip search appealed to Supreme Court

Clayton County parents who want school officials found liable for conducting an intrusive strip search over $26 have now taken their case to the highest court in the land.

In a petition filed Friday, the parents asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate their federal lawsuit against Clayton school officials, the school system and the county.

"They just want to make sure it doesn't happen again," said the parents' lawyer, Gerry Weber, of the American Civil Liberties Union.

The strip search occurred Oct. 31, 1996, at West Clayton Elementary School after $26 from student candy sales turned up missing.

According to the lawsuit, a former Clayton police officer, at school that day for a drug awareness program, dropped his pants and underwear to show male students how to strip for the search in a bathroom. He threatened to take them to the police station if they refused. A teacher, Tracy Morgan, struggled with female students during an invasive search, the suit said. The money was never recovered.

The 13 parents are appealing an Aug. 15 decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta that dismissed all claims.

The court said it had "little trouble in concluding . . . that the strip searches in this case were unconstitutional." The ruling, written by Senior Judge Emmett Cox, said that an alleged theft of $26 "does not present such an extreme threat to school discipline or safety that children may be subject to intrusive strip searches without individualized suspicion."

But Cox held that the defendants were shielded under the legal doctrine of qualified immunity. Qualified immunity protects government officials from liability, unless they violate clearly established laws or rights a "reasonable" person should have known.

In this case, Cox wrote, if Clayton school officials had consulted prior court rulings for legal guidance on the issue before conducting the strip search, the best they could have discovered was that "a court may later determine that the searches were unreasonable," Cox wrote. This is not enough to make them liable, Cox said.

Weber, legal director of the ACLU's Atlanta office, said the 11th Circuit ruling is at odds with decisions by other circuit courts and with the U.S. Supreme Court's own precedents.

"It doesn't take a constitutional scholar to know that school officials can't drop their own pants and strip-search kids to recover the grand sum of $26," he said.

But Gary Sams, a lawyer for the Clayton school system, said the 11th Circuit was correct in its ruling issued last August. "The search now is deemed unconstitutional, but at the time there were no guidelines governing such a search," he said. "We'll certainly file a motion in opposition."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/10/2001 3:58:31 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW
Let me try to understand this. They weren't liable because they were ignorant of the proper rocedure for searches? That's sort of like saying that if you're ignorant of the law, you shouldn't be charged with a crime. It doesn't work that way. I hope the parents prevail on this one. I also hope they think twice before returning their kids to this "school."
2 posted on 11/10/2001 4:46:32 AM PST by bettina0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *BillOfRights
BillOfRights Bump

I get asked all the time: “How do I get on this bump list?” Well the answer is you can’t! The FreeRepublic Master Bump List is not a list of people who get notified about a topic appearing on FreeRepublic but it is a list of topics that you can click on and have posts relevant to those topics displayed to you. There are many topics like “WOD_list” (War On Drugs) or “Homeschool_list” (Stories that Homeschoolers may be interested in) or “Homosexual Agenda” (A list of articles related to that topic). And they all appear on the The FreeRepublic Bump List

When you are reading an article you can add it to the list by posting a reply to that topic and in the “TO” box put the name of the list you want it to appear on preceded by an “*”. For example if you want the article to appear on the War on Drugs list then put “*WOD_list” in the “TO:” box instead of someones screen name. You can also put it on several lists by separating the list names with a simi-colon “;”. Then when you want to see the list go to The FreeRepublic Master Bump List and click on the link for that list.

3 posted on 11/10/2001 4:49:27 AM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: one_particular_harbour
I have to say, if one of my children were in fact subjected to that, physical assault would be my first priority.
5 posted on 11/10/2001 5:02:31 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: one_particular_harbour; riley1992
Ditto. Couldn't have said it better myself. (Glad I was never partnered with an idiot like that guy, although I've been partnered with a lot of idiots in general).
8 posted on 11/10/2001 5:34:42 AM PST by LJLucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CFW
"a former Clayton police officer, at school that day for a drug awareness program, dropped his pants and underwear to show male students how to strip for the search in a bathroom"

I think dropping your pants and underwear in front of minor children is know as "flashing". The guy needs to be charged under the sex offender law.

9 posted on 11/10/2001 5:54:51 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
know=known
10 posted on 11/10/2001 5:55:28 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
I wish I could say "UnFrigginBelievable" - but I can't. Nothing surprises me any more.
11 posted on 11/10/2001 6:27:19 PM PST by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson