Posted on 11/10/2001 4:23:09 PM PST by sarcasm
Relief agencies had hoped to head off the food shortage, which has been slowly building for months even as the government refused to acknowledge the severity of the crisis. But after a three-week tour of Zimbabwe last month, a team of monitors from the World Food Program, a United Nations agency, concluded that they could no longer wait before providing direct aid, which will begin next month. The food shortage stems from an untimely convergence of political and natural problems. Many parts of the country have suffered from drought, while others have yet to recover fully from severe flooding early last year. Additionally, sometimes violent land occupations, driven by a government plan to redistribute much of the land owned by the country's small white minority, have disrupted food production and generally discouraged investment in agriculture. The economy has been crumbling and is expected to shrink by 7.3 percent next year. Taken together, the problems mean that many Zimbabweans have a lot less to eat. The government has tried to halt the surging costs of staples like bread with price controls. But the main effect has been a decline in supply from producers unwilling to settle for below-market prices. While such problems may well spawn an even bigger crisis next year, the immediate concern of World Food Program officials is the hunger now affecting more and more of Zimbabwe's 11.3 million people. "We think right now people are managing to cope, but we think in the next three or four months it could become very difficult," Judith Lewis, the World Food Program's regional director, said in an interview from Kampala, Uganda. Grain reserves are at their lowest in two years, according to the Famine Early Warning System Network, an arm of the United States Agency for International Development. Those stocks, which are projected to run out by the end of January, would ordinarily be replenished with imports, but the country's economic crisis has left the government desperately short of cash. The next harvest will not be on the market until May or June. But even that may not bring relief because farmers who should be starting their planting this month are finding it harder to buy supplies as inflation approaches triple digits. Fertilizer, for example, has more than doubled in price since last year. It is an unusual predicament for a fertile country that has in past years often recorded surpluses, and readily imported food when its harvests fell short. For months, the government denied that any serious shortage was on the horizon, even as evidence mounted. Finally, a few months ago, the finance minister, Simba Makoni, publicly acknowledged the looming crisis and began laying the groundwork for an appeal for aid. But the bureaucracy was slow to move, perhaps encumbered by the pronouncements of some ministers who continued to insist that everyone would be fed without any aid. Zimbabwe's own request for aid, outlined in a petition last month to the United Nations Development Program, makes it clear that outside help is essential. In the letter, which asks for more than $360 million in international aid, the government details the huge food demands facing the country along with a host of other needs, like rebuilding damaged roads and bridges and repairing breaches in the water and sanitation systems. The need is greater than the resources available, Mr. Makoni wrote to the United Nations. The World Food Program is starting almost from scratch as it lays the groundwork for the operation in Zimbabwe. "We're sort of fighting against time to get our operation up and running," Ms. Lewis said. OHANNESBURG, Nov. 9 The World Food Program has announced that it will begin providing emergency food aid to more than half a million Zimbabweans, a stark indication of a deepening hunger crisis in a country that has traditionally been one of Africa's most self-sufficient.
Do they have any confidence that any of this food will get to the people who need it? Sounds like money down a rat home to me as long as Mugabe remains in power.
Well, yes, I suppose having your workers beaten and threatened, your livestock shot, your wives and daughters raped and murdered in their beds and getting thrown in jail for trying to defend yourself would certainly tend to disrupt one's farming and discourage further investment in one's farm.
This is nothing less than genocide against white people, and the UN is supporting it! Instead of international sanctions and blue-helmeted UN soldier to protect the white farmers, we get aid for the murderers.
Does anyone out there still wonder what the New World Order is really about?
Does anyone out there still wonder what the New World Order is really about?
Absolutely right! Giving the Zimbabweans food gives them more strength to torture the old Rhodesians. Western aid, technology, food, and medicine has caused a population explosion over there. Time to let natural selection do it's work and winnow away the Zimbabweans.
The understatement herein is astounding. The "crisis" for which we'll be forking over hundreds of millions of U.S. taxpayer bucks was caused by these ALWAYS violent land occupations, the killing of farmers, beating of workers, and pillaging of the lands. I read somewhere that 80% of mass-production farms were owned by whites, and almost all of those have had violent squatters intimidating and harassing (if not outright killing) the farmers, taking possession of the land and burning fields. What investor would pump money into that kind of hostile environment? It's not as though the farmers are being compensated for losing their land, land that has been in some of these families for generations. They escape with nothing but the clothes on their backs (if they're lucky) and a thumb in the eye from the government. And now the perpetrators are whining that some unforeseen famine will leave them with a food shortage??? For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. You kill a farmer and seize his farm, and the farmer is no longer producing food on that farm. So there's a food shortage. Duh! (shaking head in disgust...)
The white farmers and their families, were brutally Murdered and their farms were not worked, so these people have nobody to blame but themselves.
Let the Black Murderers plant the farms and let the crops grow so they can feed themselves.. If these people are so savage and stupid they deserve no better.
No food should be sent to Murderers,CASE CLOSED.
Not one grain of food to be sent until all the criminals are brought to justice and the farms given back to the White Farmers.
Or the White farmers are reimbursed for their property and given safe passage out of that country. Didn't we impose Sanctions on South Africa because we thought the WHITE PEOPLE we treating the blacks unjustly
TIME AGAIN FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST THE BLACKS, FOR TREATING THE WHITES TO MURDER..
Dream on.... you can't commit hate crimes against whites. Even in a country where whites are 0.1% of the population, they are still the opressors. Those farmers may have been great at feeding a continent, but they should have known what was going to happen when the blacks were given the country.
Call me a racist if you will, but the only thing to do is get the whites out and let the blacks starve. 20 yrs from now, they can go back to a depopulated Rhodesia and start the whole sorry cycle over again. That cycle is the story of Rhodesia, South Africa and our future as well. Whites move into a uninhabited or sparcely populated area, build a prosperous civilization, and then allow in hordes of 3rd world scum to take over and destroy it all.
Get used to it. The politically correct name of this process is multiculturism, but what it is is cultural suicide, and its coming to a neighborhood near you.
The truly frustrating thing about leftist philosophy is how totally predictable it is....yet somehow the philosophy manages to move ahead anyhow.
I'm reminded of the Greek myth about the man who was condemned to be able to see the future...but the only catch was that no one would ever believe him.
One South African farmer described how the farms were carved out of plots of land covered with a type of bush/tree that has an incredible root structure. It takes them about two days to remove each tree, it takes years to make a plot big enough to farm. One farm next to his was "liberated". Within a year 20 black 'farms' were there. Each farm produced only enough for that family. They were watering the farm with buckets hauled from the river by their women and children. The irrigation system was still there but they had broken it and did not bother to fix it! A farm that once produced enough to feed hundreds and employed 20 men, became 20 sustenance farms that are shrinking as the land they can no longer sustain is beginning to grow those bushes again...
This article is a masterpiece of misinformation and misdirection.
"unwilling to settle for below-market prices"
Make that:
Unwilling to sell at a fraction of the cost of production.
Unwilling to plant only to see the crops destroyed by thugs.
Unable to sell because the crops have been destroyed.
Unable to graze cattle because of veldt fires set by thugs.
Unable to sell maize because it had to be fed to cattle that otherwise would have grazed the burnt out veldt.
Unable to sell meat because the cattle contacted hoof-and-mouth disease or anthrax after the thugs broke down the fences separating the domestic herds from wild herds.
Unable to sell meat because the cattle had to be slaughtered when the veldt was burned,
Unable to maintain commercial farming operations because the farm employees have been attacked, dirven off the land and are nlw living hard in the bush.
Unable to maintain farming operations because the commercial farms have been broken down into market gardens which are not commercially viable in the red soil veldt.
Unable to transport farm produce to market because government and Zanu-PF cadre are confiscating the produce en route at pistol point.
The author of this article is infected with terminal political rectitude.
I am taking the liberty of flagging the people on my list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.