Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

American Flight 587: Engine Concerns?
Time Magazine ^ | November 12, 2001 | Sally B. Donnelly

Posted on 11/12/2001 7:56:14 PM PST by Lady In Blue

   " "\"Netscape\ "
SEARCH THE TIME ARCHIVE:
Magazine All of TIME.com
  Monday, November 12, 2001 Top Searches   Anthrax  Osama bin Laden  Covers 
HOME
 > NATION
 Politics
 Society
 Science
 Columnists
 Photo Essays
    -
 Life on the
 Homefront

 One Nation,
 Indivisible

 Day of Infamy
 The New Frontier
 > WORLD
 > BUSINESS
 > ARTS
 > HEALTH
 > EDUCATION
 > PHOTOS
 > MAGAZINE
 > ARCHIVE
 > COLUMNISTS
 > SPECIALS
 > HELP DESK
 > SUBSCRIBE
 > MUSIC ISSUE
 > U.S. ON ALERT

American Flight 587: Engine Concerns?
Sally Donnelly on questions about the engines that power the Airbus A300



TIME: NTSB: This Looks Like an Accident

Monday, Nov. 12, 2001
While it will take weeks, even months, for investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board to determine exactly why American Airlines 587 plunged to the ground, some aviation safety experts are already focusing on the aircraft's engines. The General Electric-manufactured CF6 engines that power the Airbus A300 and several other large aircraft have raised concerns within the industry for several years.

There are some 1,400 CF6 engines in use worldwide on planes including Boeing 747s, 767s and Airbus 300s, and there are four thousand CF6-equipped airplane takeoffs each day. It's a common engine, but it has had problems. In a sternly worded report last December, the NTSB warned that the CF6 engines presented a potentially "catastrophic" threat. The NTSB recommended to the FAA that it take action, including a review of the design of the engine's high pressure turbine disc because of a number of dangerous incidents in the past few years.

The FAA this spring began requiring operators to replace the engine shrouds on the engines. That action followed one in September, 2000, when the FAA issued an emergency directive to shorten inspection intervals for the CF6. The order had been prompted by a troubling incident two months earlier. A Varig Airlines 767 had to abort a takeoff after one of its CF6 engines had what is called an 'uncontained' failure, in which the engine partially disintegrated and metal flew out of the engine's casing. According to reports, there have been 61 uncontained low-pressure turbine failures with CF6 engines since 1993.

Another incident which worried experts took place in April 1999 and involved the abrupt emergency landing of a Brussels-bound Continental Airlines DC-10 flight which had just taken off from Newark International Airport. The right CF6 engine was seriously damaged when it suffered an uncontained failure. Last September, a US Airways CF6 engine undergoing a maintenance check blew apart and scattered parts across the tarmac and even into a nearby river.


SEARCH THE ARCHIVE



Magazine All of TIME.com




Search all back-issues of TIME since 1985 for TIME's unique perspective on history, people, and the most important events of the day.
GO TO THE ARCHIVE

See our most-popular articles





Copyright © 2001 Time Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

FAQ | Site Map | Search | Contact Us
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Reprints & Permissions | Press Releases


-->

Order this Special Issue:


Helping.org
Make an online donation to the relief efforts



Another New York Tragedy
American Airlines flight 587 crashes three minutes after takeoff

Sailors' Day Off
Picnics. Swimming. Basketball. Tricycle races.
More photo essays >>>

NTSB: This Appears to Be an Accident
A plane carrying 246 passengers bound for the Dominican Republic crashes shortly after takeoff

The Afghan Way of War
As a rebel offensive sends the Taliban running, Time looks at how both sides fight to the death

Profile of a Killer
Lacking hard evidence, the FBI hopes its portrait of the anthrax mailer will flush out a suspect









TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
FYI and DISCUSSION.
1 posted on 11/12/2001 7:56:14 PM PST by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
I knew it all along. It was a mechanical malfunction. [/sarcasm]

Move along folks, the gummint says there is nothing to this.

2 posted on 11/12/2001 8:00:52 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
I freely admit to bias, prejudice, bigotry, and general bad vibes, but after my personal and professional experiences with GE turbine a/c engines from the F104, L1011 and the current crop......................

Like mom said: "if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all"

(silence)

3 posted on 11/12/2001 8:09:36 PM PST by KirklandJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
Hey, I was only kidding!

I'm hoping to see informed discussion here as I was out of pocket for the past two days. I didn't have time to follow this story in detail today.

4 posted on 11/12/2001 8:18:22 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
But the vertical stabilizer and rudder appear to have come off before either engine, and the fact that both engines came off is very, very strange...
5 posted on 11/12/2001 10:01:39 PM PST by Excuse_Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Fred Mertz
FREEPERS-It's time to Nominate You Know Who for the Ronald Regan Award at CPAC
7 posted on 11/12/2001 10:26:20 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zordas
You make a good argument with the APU scenario.
8 posted on 11/12/2001 10:46:18 PM PST by bootless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zordas
The early model A-300s had a fuel dump system. I can't speak to the American Airlines' version.

The manufacturer stated that this version does not. I don't think they would have had time to dump fuel anyway. I thought that was strange when it was mentioned at the Pataki-Giuliani press conference.

9 posted on 11/12/2001 10:46:37 PM PST by Excuse_Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson