Skip to comments.
Man who let drunken friend drive faces prosecution on manslaughter charge
Associated Press ^
| 11/16/2001 4:18 pm ET
| Associated Press
Posted on 11/16/2001 1:27:04 PM PST by mdittmar
A judge cleared the way Friday for the manslaughter trial of a man who picked up his drunken friend from police, took him back to his truck and learned later that his friend had been in a deadly car accident.
Superior Court Judge William Forester rejected a motion to dismiss the charges against Kenneth Powell and ruled that a jury must decide whether he committed a crime.
Powell, 40, was called by police in July 2000 to collect Michael Pangle, 37, at the Bridgeton barracks. Three hours earlier, Pangle had registered a 0.21 blood-alcohol concentration and was charged with drunken driving.
Less than an hour after he was released, prosecutors say, Pangle slammed his sport utility vehicle into a car driven by 22-year-old Navy Ensign John R. Elliott. Both men were killed.
Powell, who was not in Pangle's vehicle, was charged with manslaughter, vehicular homicide and aggravated assault by auto and faces up to 15 years in prison.
Powell's lawyer, Carl Roeder, had argued that Powell didn't know Pangle was drunk and state police hadn't told him his friend's blood-alcohol level.
To hold Powell accountable would open the door to the prosecution of toll collectors, gas station attendants and anyone else who sees a drunken driver but doesn't prevent them from driving, Roeder said.
Prosecutor Michael Ostrowski argued it was impossible not to know Pangle was drunk, saying his speech was slurred and he could barely stand up.
Returning Pangle to his vehicle, when police had told Powell to take him home, was the equivalent of putting a gun in the hand of someone engaged in a heated argument, Ostrowski said.
"He was an accomplice to a crime that night," Ostrowski said.
Powell, who is free on bail, declined to comment. A trial date has not been set.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Hmmm.
1
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:04 PM PST
by
mdittmar
To: mdittmar
Was Powell drunk when he let his buddy drive drunk?
2
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:04 PM PST
by
illbenice
To: mdittmar
Seems to me the police were just as negligible. Why didn't they take him home, or keep him until he sobered up? What if he took the guy home and then the guy gets into his car anyway and kills someone?
3
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:05 PM PST
by
Azzurri
To: illbenice
To hold Powell accountable would open the door to the prosecution of toll collectors, gas station attendants and anyone else who sees a drunken driver but doesn't prevent them from driving, Roeder said.But not police who release them from custody after confirming they are intoxicated, apparently.
4
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:05 PM PST
by
Dakmar
To: mdittmar
This just follows the disgusting trend of holding people responsible for the criminal behavior of others.
PERSONAL responsibility, remember that one?
Failure to babysit others should never be a criminal offense.
5
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:05 PM PST
by
freeeee
To: Dakmar
Bartenders and waitresses are probably a little nervous about this.
6
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:05 PM PST
by
mdittmar
To: Dakmar
Stay tuned....You ain't seen nutin' yet..!!!
Police state...?!!!? Not here..!!! This IS America..!!!
7
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:05 PM PST
by
freddy
To: mdittmar
Pangle is guilty. Pangle received the death sentence. Case closed.
To: mdittmar
What was his friend supposed to do - take him home and then hold him hostage until the man sobered up? The police are as guilty, if not more, than the friend facing charges.
To: mdittmar
It's those damn road construction workers, why if that road wasn't there...
Wait, better yet: If those Arabs hadn't sold Texaco that crude oil...
10
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:06 PM PST
by
Dakmar
To: freddy
Perhaps the first self-serve police state.
11
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:06 PM PST
by
Dakmar
To: mdittmar
this is obnoxious.
To: Dakmar
Listen, how many times do I have to tell you that the police are never wrong ? They act in the best interest of the people, and always take the right steps to ensure safety and security. I have learned a few things from Freerepublic over the years, but this is the most important. Never doubt the police, anyone who does should head for the bunker with their tin foil yarmulke.
To: mdittmar
This is a stupid charge. Even the police have to administer a breathalizer(sp) test. Also they have to be trained on using the machine. The judge in the case should be tried for malfeasance in office and given life.
14
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:07 PM PST
by
scouse
To: NittanyLion
Havent you learned anything in your years as a freeper ? This forum has taught me that the police are honest, forthcoming, and good decision makers. I am very disappointed in you comments.
To: mdittmar
The standard practice for DWI arrest is to spend the night in jail.(in the tank) Most states have at least a six hour minimum. At least that has been my experience.(bashfully grinning)Looks like the police messed this up. Far as I can see he was not released on the other mans signature therefore the charges against the mans friend are bogus and beatable.
"I am not my brothers keeper"
To: mdittmar
Bump to stay posted!
To: freeeee
this defies all logic!
To: michaelje
ROFL. My mistake!
To: freddy
This isn't a POLICE STATE problem; this is a LAWYERS PROBLEM.
20
posted on
11/16/2001 1:27:08 PM PST
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson