Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Norman Rockwell turning in his grave? He should be.
Wall Street Journal on-line ^ | Friday, Nov. l6, 200l a.m. EST | Philip Chalk

Posted on 11/18/2001 12:38:53 PM PST by almajur

Edited on 04/23/2004 12:03:54 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

In case you haven't noticed, well-wishers at the New York Times have been trying to soothe your shaken psyche of late. In a recent series of full-page house ads running with their post-Sept. ll coverage, the Times has offered readers the salve of mid-century images from the idyllic archive of the late Norman Rockwell..images that, at second glance, sport timel, digital pdates of war-on-terror themes. The idea behind the campaign, according to the Times and its licensers with the Rockwell estate, is to juxtapose the past and the present..and, well, to borrow a little iconic gravitas for the Times as it sells itself to the world. "Freedom From Fear" shows two parents solemnly tucking their children in bed as the father carries a newspaper..now the Times front page of Sept. l2, 2001..recounting wartime horror. Surrounded by white space, the image appears well above the campaign's understated slogan: "Make sense of our times".


(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
It appears that the Times acquired the rights to use a total of l4 Rockwell images, after the Rockwell children rejected several proposed alterations. I wonder why the Times didn't just run Rockwell's Four Freedoms as they were; after all, a picture speaks a thousand words. The American public gets it without all the monkeying around. It was on target the first time.
1 posted on 11/18/2001 12:38:53 PM PST by almajur (ALMARAY@webtv.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: almajur
What red-blooded American male would be caught dead with the poofy Times in his home anyways?
2 posted on 11/18/2001 12:42:35 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: almajur
During his lifetime and today, Rockwell's work elicits the dismissiveness of art elites, who consider him just an illustrator. The Village Voice trashes the Guggenheim exhibition as "underlin[ing] Rockwell's reputation as merely the maker of what he himself called 'feel-good' 'story-pictures.'

Dismissed because his art depicted an America they don't care to see.

3 posted on 11/18/2001 12:46:17 PM PST by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: almajur
Would the Times be as likely to repaint Picasso's demoiselles d'Avignon watching the latest from Kabul on CNN?

I think the answer is a resounding "YES." At least, if Rockwell had never existed.

And isn't augmentation-by-pixel an artistic slight?

This is pretty heavily-debated stuff in snooty artistic circles these days, actually. I'm reminded of some rap guy who was quoted a while back saying something along the lines of, "We've been making music for 100 years. Now it's time to start sampling it."

4 posted on 11/18/2001 12:55:39 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: almajur

The headline on the paper is very poignant.

5 posted on 11/18/2001 12:57:47 PM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: almajur
Rockwell's Four Freedoms:


6 posted on 11/18/2001 12:59:19 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
A kinder , gentler nation.....George Bush...
7 posted on 11/18/2001 1:01:33 PM PST by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Thanks BL...Great pictures...NYT...ESABATM.

Happy Thanksgiving...Hope you are free from want!

FMCDH

8 posted on 11/18/2001 1:50:10 PM PST by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: almajur
Rockwell rocks!

"Fashionable art critics once had nothing but disdain for Norman Rockwell, labeling his idealized view of America as "Gee-Gosh-Shucksism." But Rockwell's work is enjoying a resurgence of respect; critics like him again—and even "admit it in polite society"

9 posted on 11/18/2001 3:09:06 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
These pictures are making me a little choked. Why?

What is the anatomy of deep love of country?

10 posted on 11/18/2001 3:40:23 PM PST by Interious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Interious
What is the anatomy of a deep love for one's country?

Take another look at his prints.
Every person depicted is an American-American.

Not one trace of a culture based on a hyphenated foreign origin .
Some people living in the USA are so insidiously proud of their hyphenated heritage that they have decayed into a split allegience to the land of their ancestors and often prioritize that nation's self interests rather than Americas.

Nathan Hale would be scoffed at or ridiculed as being an American Firster...

11 posted on 11/18/2001 5:12:19 PM PST by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: prognostigaator
The America depicted by Rockwell is long dead. It is heartbreaking.
12 posted on 11/18/2001 5:33:49 PM PST by Interious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson