Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oliver North Pegged Osama (Vanity)
Email | Email

Posted on 11/26/2001 6:25:16 AM PST by MickMan51

Subject: ANYONE REMEMBER THIS??

At a UNC lecture the other day they played an old video of Lt. Col. Oliver North testifying at the Iran-Contra hearings during the Reagan Administration. There was Ollie in front of God and country getting the third degree. But what he said was stunning!! He was being drilled by some senator:

"Did you not recently spend close to $60,000 for a home security system?"

Ollie replied, "Yes I did sir."

The senator continued, trying to get a laugh out of the audience, "Isn't this just a little excessive?"

'No sir,' continued Ollie.

"No? And why not?" the senator asked.

"Because the lives of my family and I were threatened sir."

'Threatened? By whom?" the senator questioned.

'By a terrorist, sir.' Ollie answered.

'Terrorist? What terrorist could possibly scare you that much?"

"His name is Osama bin Laden sir." Ollie replied.

At this point the senator tried to repeat the name, but couldn't pronounce it, which most people back then probably couldn't. A couple of people laughed at the attempt. Then the senator continued.

"Why are you so afraid of this man?" the senator asked.

"Because sir, he is the most evil person alive that I know of," Ollie answered.

"And what do you recommend we do about him?" asked the senator.

"Well sir, if it were up to me, I would recommend that an assassin team be formed to eliminate him and his men from the face of the earth."

The senator disagreed with this approach and that was all that was shown of the clip.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
This was emailed to me. Sounded good, but I haven't seen the clip. Has anyone out there seen this video, or can anyone verify it ??
1 posted on 11/26/2001 6:25:16 AM PST by MickMan51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
Sorry. This is a hoax. It has been disproven repeatedly. This thread will probably disappear.
2 posted on 11/26/2001 6:27:31 AM PST by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
Hoax.
3 posted on 11/26/2001 6:28:09 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
No biggie. That's what I was wondering.
4 posted on 11/26/2001 6:28:15 AM PST by MickMan51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
Email is rarely a good source.
5 posted on 11/26/2001 6:28:37 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
The quote is doctored. It was Abu Nidal in the original quote, I'm pretty sure. Followed the whole thing on NPR. This was long before Osama bin Laden graduated to boxer shorts.
6 posted on 11/26/2001 6:29:14 AM PST by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
This has got to be an urban myth. I've seen North on FoxNews several times since 9/11 and if this exchange took place, you can be certain that North would have mentioned it.
7 posted on 11/26/2001 6:29:43 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Yessir, but now I can debunk this from those who sent it to me.
8 posted on 11/26/2001 6:29:49 AM PST by MickMan51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
(Sigh)

How long, Lord, before people stop believing every bogus email that lands in their mailbox?

9 posted on 11/26/2001 6:29:55 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
I didn't believe it, that's why I posted it. Geez.
10 posted on 11/26/2001 6:31:14 AM PST by MickMan51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
I think this did occurr, however he did not mention Bin Laden, he mentioned Abi Nidal, who was the most feared terrorist at the time.
11 posted on 11/26/2001 6:31:41 AM PST by JARthur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
I didn't believe it, that's why I posted it

Reading this makes the thread worthwhile.

12 posted on 11/26/2001 6:33:14 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
I didn't believe it, that's why I posted it. Geez.

Don't try to weasel out of it now, you said it "sounded good". There it is, right under the article. Hahahaaaaaaaaaaa...

13 posted on 11/26/2001 6:38:28 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
How long Lord...

That is a rhetorical question? I do like your art.

14 posted on 11/26/2001 6:39:40 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
Ya you fell for it, just come clean and admit it.
15 posted on 11/26/2001 6:40:50 AM PST by dstalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Yeah, as in, "sounded too good to be true." Read the rest of the note with the post. It explicitly asks for verification because it does sound too good to be true.
16 posted on 11/26/2001 6:42:26 AM PST by MickMan51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dstalley
Started to fall for it, I'll admit that.
17 posted on 11/26/2001 6:44:16 AM PST by MickMan51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
It explicitly asks for verification because it does sound too good to be true.

No it doesn't.

This was emailed to me. Sounded good, but I haven't seen the clip. Has anyone out there seen this video, or can anyone verify it ??

Sorry man, you are what you post. You were looking for it to be verified, not debunked.

18 posted on 11/26/2001 6:47:48 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
What part of "sounds good" don't you understand ?? End of discussion. Out.
19 posted on 11/26/2001 6:57:38 AM PST by MickMan51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MickMan51
Myth
20 posted on 11/26/2001 7:01:33 AM PST by NC Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson