Skip to comments.

Posted on 11/26/2001 10:58:50 AM PST by Pokey78

'Their arrival signals the final phase - or at least what US commanders pray will be the final phase'

They are the ones with the buzz cuts and the impossibly shiny boots you see at every US ceremonial occasion, the ones who protect American embassies, the ones standing to attention with their heads tilted upwards – as if on page one of the training manual there was a specific instruction that their gaze should not fall on other more ordinary mortals.

And if you look at it from their point of view, why not? These are the US Marines, the elite corps that every American kid who dreams of the armed forces wants to join, the guys who get the most glamorous assignments, the guys who go in first. And now, inevitably, it's happened again. If ever there was a sign that this latest Afghan war is close to the endgame, it was the news early yesterday that hundreds of marines had landed at an airstrip near Kandahar, to carry the fight against the Taliban, Osama bin Laden and al-Qa'ida to their last major redoubt.

This is the moment towards which the campaign has been building, almost inevitably, for the past seven weeks. The airstrikes will continue, of course, as will the use of Afghan anti-Taliban forces to break the enemy's resistance. But the arrival of the marines signals the final phase – or, at least, what US commanders pray will be the final phase – when American troops will fight on the ground against a visible enemy, perhaps even in the streets of Kandahar, to finish the job.

And you sense, somehow, that this is how the American people want it. Since Vietnam, zero-casualty wars, or the nearest thing available, has been the Pentagon's creed. Such was the so-called "Powell Doctrine," named after the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, now Secretary of State, whereby you committed to war only when you had amassed overwhelming force for a clearly defined purpose.

To an extent, that mindset remains. With their attack helicopters, armoured personnel carriers and Harrier jump jets, the marines will have superior firepower, and a mobility allowing them to bring deadly force in the pursuit of Mr bin Laden and his lieutenants. But the terrain and the semi-guerrilla nature of this war makes it a perilous enterprise.

Equally, however, after 11 September, the national aversion to bodybags is weaker. "Americans must be prepared for loss of life, there will be sacrifice," George Bush warned his people yesterday, preparing them for casualties ahead. And, for most Americans, if that is what is needed to avenge the thousands who died at the World Trade Centre, then so be it.

So, once again, it falls to the marines. In two dozen wars and conflicts in which the US has been involved since the foundation of the Republic, they have been in the front line. Maybe it was the first president, George Washington himself, who first uttered that phrase beloved of schoolboys everywhere, "Send in the marines", when they entered action against the British in the revolutionary war. In that conflict, the marines suffered the first 49 of the 40,178 casualties that they have incurred in the 226 years since the Second Continental Congress signed the law that set up two battalions of marines and appointed one Captain Samuel Nicolas as their first commander.

It has been a mostly glittering history since, burnished further by what even the marines' critics concede is a supremely polished public relations operation, as well as various lapidary quotes, sometimes in the heat of battle, which have entered military lore. "Casualties many. Percentage of dead not known. Combat efficiency: we are winning," Marine Colonel David Shoup reported from the bloody landings at Tarawa Atoll in November 1943, a turning point in the Pacific war against the Japanese. It was one of the first combat actions at which the media were present in force. The American public was appalled at pictures of bodies of marines washing ashore, amid reports of 1,000 casualties in just three days. But only 17 of 4,800 Japanese defenders survived. Thus are legends forged.

Tawara was, moreover, a perfect illustration of how the Marines epitomise US military strategy. At least until September 11, the American mainland had been inviolate for more than a century and a half. Washington's wars were abroad. They required not stout defence of the motherland, but landings and invasions abroad, by air but predominantly by sea.

Every country has its army, airforce and navy. Only the US has a specifically amphibious branch of its armed forces, equal in status to (and much envied by) its three less glamorous sisters, developed and equipped for precisely this sort of overseas operation. The First World War expeditionary force, the invasion of Europe in 1943 and 1944, Korea, Vietnam and the Gulf – all, for better or worse, exemplify the sort of war the Marines and America fight.

There have been failures of course – most obviously Vietnam in which the Marines suffered 13,000 dead, a quarter of all US fatalities (even though with a total strength of about 170,000, the Corps is barely a third the size of the Army). Then there was the wretched episode of Somalia 1993, a case-study in the dangers of "mission-creep". Even more futile was the Beirut bombing of 1983, when a truck packed with explosives drove in to the barracks housing 350 Marines on an ill-conceived peacekeeping mission in Lebanon. Some 240 were killed as they slept.

Later, Ronald Reagan would call that Sunday of October 23 1983 "the saddest day my presidency, perhaps the saddest day of my life". Four months later, the Marines were out of Lebanon. The only reason the debacle did not damage Reagan's presidency more seriously was that within two days he had ordered the invasion of Grenada, in the name of keeping Cuban-style Communism out of the rest of the Caribbean. And who led the operation? The Marines, naturally – 400 of them, ferried in from the helicopter carrier USS Guam.

Today, the lesson of Beirut has been taken to heart. In a more innocent time, a war against Afghanistan might have seen the Marines going in from a borrowed land base, perhaps in Pakistan, maybe complete with a barracks that would have been a perfect target for an Islamic suicide bomber. Not now. Instead, the Marines have laid on the logistical show of a helicopter-borne full-kit landing from six amphibious assault ships, 400 miles away in the Arabian Sea, to take control of a desert landing strip deep inside enemy territory. Of such deeds is US Marines history made.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.