Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cloning Controversy Raises Specter Of Brave New World And Nazi Doctors
Traditional Values Coalition ^ | November 27, 2001 | Rev. Louis P. Sheldon

Posted on 11/27/2001 6:03:20 AM PST by simicyber

Traditional Values Coalition

Opinion Editorial

For publication on or after

Tuesday, November 27, 2001

 

Cloning Controversy Raises Specter Of

Brave New World And Nazi Doctors

 

By Rev. Louis P. Sheldon

Chairman, Traditional Values Coalition

Washington, DC – Over the Thanksgiving Holiday, Advanced Cell Technology (ACT) of Worcester, Massachusetts announced that it had cloned the first human embryo. According to ACT vice president Dr. Robert Lanza, this effort was designed to use the embryo as a source for stem cells. "Our intention is not to create cloned human beings but rather to make lifesaving therapies for a wide range of human disease conditions," said Lanza.

ACT’s announcement makes it all the more urgent that the Senate quickly vote to approve S. 790, the "Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001." The House passed its version of this bill in July, but it has been stalled in the Senate ever since.

This legislation was introduced in the Senate by Sam Brownback (R-KS). The introduction to this bill notes: "Nearly all scientists agree that such attempts [at cloning] pose a massive risk of producing children who are stillborn, unhealthy, or severely disabled, and considered opinion is virtually unanimous that such attempts are therefore grossly irresponsible and unethical. . . . creating cloned live-born human children (sometimes called ‘reproductive cloning’) begins by creating cloned human embryos, a process which some also propose as a way to create embryos for research or as sources of cells and tissues for possible treatment of other humans."

ACT has now entered the business of manufacturing baby humans whose bodies will be cannibalized for use by other humans. Aldous Huxley, author of "Brave New World" would be amazed that his 1932 novel is now a reality in the United States.

In "Brave New World" a group of "World Controllers" run the lives of every human being on earth and children are created in test tubes in government-run hatcheries. These children, however, are not allowed to grow normally. Some are genetically engineered to be retarded so they can perform the mundane tasks of life. Others are genetically programmed to be leaders in this government-enforced caste system.

In this future culture, one human egg produces up to 96 identical twins. These embryos eventually go to the "Social Predestination Room" where they are engineered for leadership or for a life of mindless servitude to the state.

Perhaps the scientists at Advanced Cell Technology are using "Brave New World" as their office procedures manual. Or, they may have adopted the philosophy of human life advocated by Germans Dr. Alfred Hoche and Karl Binding in 1920. Their essay, "Releasing Persons from Lives Devoid of Value," proposed a new medical ethic for dealing with the mentally retarded and others whose lives were considered to be useless. Hoche and Binding urged the killing of those considered worthless and described this as a "healing treatment" and "healing work." They believed that killing the unwanted was a positive contribution to German society.

This new philosophy of killing as "healing work" swiftly took root among pre-Nazi German doctors and eventually paved the way for the Nazi Holocaust. Dr. Leo Alexander, who served in the office of the war crimes tribunal at the Nuremberg trials, detailed the resultant horrors of medicine under Adolf Hitler in his 1949 essay, "Medical Science Under Dictatorship," published in the "New England Journal of Medicine."

Alexander said the Nazi experience should serve as a warning to medical professionals about how their view of human life can affect the future of mankind. Under Nazism, German doctors began to believe that some people did not deserve to live. "Gradually it led to the killing of the socially unproductive, the ideologically unwanted, the racially unwanted, and finally all non-Germans," said Alexander.

What value do ACT scientists place on the human lives they will be creating in their laboratories? Are these human embryos undeserving of life? Will Congress allow humans to be manufactured for their stem cell tissues? We already know where this has led in the past. We are currently killing more than 4,000 unborn children each day in the U.S. and the abortion industry is aggressively marketing many of the body parts of these dead babies to research facilities. Are we now going to approve the creation of new babies for high-tech cannibalism?

 

-30-

Traditional Values Coalition is an interdenominational public policy organization representing more than 43,000 churches across the United States. For more information, contact Emily Davis at 202-547-8570. TVC's
Web site is:
www.traditionalvalues.org.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/27/2001 6:03:20 AM PST by simicyber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simicyber
Human Cloning: The Technology destined to spawn a thousand euphemisms for murderous god-complexes.
2 posted on 11/27/2001 6:08:34 AM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
if they can find a cure for Type 2 diabetes, it would be a blessing.
3 posted on 11/27/2001 6:15:21 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: simicyber
I've said it before and I'll say it again:



Isn't this obvious? How can anyone say that this isn't a baby? IT'S A CHILD, NOT A SCIENCE EXPERIMENT!
4 posted on 11/27/2001 6:21:18 AM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simicyber
I'm 100% sure that someone somewhere has already secretly cloned human(s). They probably laughed like all hell (and asked one of their cloned Pamela Andersens to mix some more martinis), when the Scot trotted out Dolly!

In all seriousness, if our own government scientists haven't already sucessfully cloned humans, then what the hell are we paying them for?

It's the first guy to announce publicly his intent to do so that gets to take all the heat.
5 posted on 11/27/2001 6:27:28 AM PST by wheezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheezer
In all seriousness, if our own government scientists haven't already sucessfully cloned humans, then what the hell are we paying them for?

It's the first guy to announce publicly his intent to do so that gets to take all the heat.


Good point. I'm also miffed that we don't have our crime problem solved with Killer Robot Police.
6 posted on 11/27/2001 6:43:30 AM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: simicyber
Cloning is not healing, it is replacing decaying tissue, not fixing it. Medicine is going to take a nose dive with such practice, contrary to what pundits claim. You'll see people seeking the fountain of youth, harvesting cells to that end.

You see, this is what farming is all about, someone's sick? just slaughter the whole herd, keep the better beasts.

7 posted on 11/27/2001 6:47:39 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wheezer
It's the first guy to announce publicly his intent to do so that gets to take all the heat.

Liberals want to make it a government thing, that's for sure.

8 posted on 11/27/2001 6:48:55 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Killer Robot Police...LOL

...we call `em State Troopers. ;o)
9 posted on 11/27/2001 6:54:28 AM PST by wheezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wheezer
In my hometown we have the incompetent and corrupt mindless robot police( not killer though not that tough)
10 posted on 11/27/2001 7:27:41 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: simicyber
Bump for sanity exposing insanity
11 posted on 11/27/2001 9:19:54 AM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
if they can find a cure for Type 2 diabetes, it would be a blessing.

If they could cure type 2 diabetes by killing you, and you had no say in the matter, what would that mean? Think of all the suffering that could be prevented.

12 posted on 11/27/2001 10:42:28 AM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson