Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

West's feminists (including Hillary) blasted by woman Afghan general
The Times of London ^ | Nov. 28, 01 | Stephen Farrell

Posted on 11/28/2001, 10:41:09 PM by laureldrive

WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 28 2001 The Times of London

West's feminists under fire from female general

FROM STEPHEN FARRELL IN KABUL

THE general leans forward in the gathering gloom, her eyes glinting with anger, and delivers a surprise attack on an unexpected foreign enemy.

... General Suhaila Siddiq, 60, sighs with exasperation at Western feminists and their obsession with the burka, the all-enveloping veil whose forcible use symbolised for many outsiders the Taleban’s oppressive rule.

“The first priority should be given to education, primary school facilities, the economy and reconstruction of the country but the West concentrates on the burka and whether the policies of the Taleban are better or worse than other regimes,” she says dismissively. “Let these things be decided by history.”

She believes that the burka, which was worn long before the Taleban and still is by most women around Kabul, is not the battlefield upon which to fight their war.

General Siddiq is Afghanistan’s only woman general, a surgeon, hospital director and heroine to a generation of young women who remained in the country....

Now head of the Women and Children’s Hospital in Kabul, she is scornful of exiled Afghan women’s rights campaigners and Western feminists who champion their agenda. ...

Of Hillary Clinton, another supposed advocate, she simply says: “She cannot defend her own rights against her husband. How can she defend the rights of my country?” At the 400-bed hospital in Kabul, where she now heads a separate women’s section, her colleagues speak reverentially of the woman who took on the Taleban on their own ground.

...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:41:09 PM by laureldrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
When I read that line about Hitlery I slapped my forehead and cried out "Doh!" Why didn't we brilliant Freepers ever think of that? She is on the money...
2 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:44:50 PM by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
This woman should be President of Afghanistan.


3 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:45:28 PM by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Now THAT is a liberated woman. Bump for a great image for young women everywhere.
4 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:47:08 PM by My back yard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Plenty of merit in her argument. However, she appears to be applying a different standard to herself than to the women of her country at large. I would ask, does the Ms. General wear a burqa? She comes from a powerful and probably rich family. She's political and outspoken, the opposite values symbolized by the burqa. Is that attire reserved for uneducated housewives, or is Ms. General espousing attending university in a burqa?
5 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:47:21 PM by steenkeenbadges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
"She can't even defend her own rights against her husband..."

This is just toooo delicious!

Of course, we all know this marriage is a sham in the first place, put together for political purposes, but still this is so funny!

6 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:49:39 PM by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Of Hillary Clinton, another supposed advocate, she simply says: “She cannot defend her own rights against her husband. How can she defend the rights of my country?”

Or ours! Time to unelect her for poor job performance.

7 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:49:56 PM by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
This has already been posted.
West's feminists under fire from female general
8 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:53:14 PM by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
That is awesome!
9 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:53:17 PM by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Can we get a picture of the General posted on this thread?
10 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:53:22 PM by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Hopefully, this General has a place at the table in Bonn, Germany this week.
11 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:53:42 PM by zeaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Bears repeatin'!!!!

Of Hillary Clinton, another supposed advocate, she simply says: “She cannot defend her own rights against her husband. How can she defend the rights of my country?”

12 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:54:19 PM by AgThorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Of Hillary Clinton, another supposed advocate, she simply says: “She cannot defend her own rights against her husband. How can she defend the rights of my country?”

WOW, this is a keeper!

13 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:57:26 PM by deadhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
General Siddiq will have to learn that Western feminists and their liberal media supporters always obsess over the least important point of any issue.
14 posted on 11/28/2001, 10:57:57 PM by Uncle Sausage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Republicans should have her speak at fund raisers.
15 posted on 11/28/2001, 11:00:12 PM by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
ROFL on hillary blast
16 posted on 11/28/2001, 11:11:54 PM by nancetc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steenkeenbadges
Plenty of merit in her argument. However, she appears to be applying a different standard to herself than to the women of her country at large. I would ask, does the Ms. General wear a burqa? She comes from a powerful and probably rich family. She's political and outspoken, the opposite values symbolized by the burqa. Is that attire reserved for uneducated housewives, or is Ms. General espousing attending university in a burqa?

There's no picture with the Times article, but when I saw the story last night it was accompanied by an image of a woman in a burqa. It may or may not have been her; I don't remember if there was a caption or not.

17 posted on 11/28/2001, 11:19:56 PM by NovemberCharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
This woman should be President of Afghanistan.

Here here! Damn, Hillary has been abused for the last 10 years from every angle. When will that woman break and just go home. UGH

18 posted on 11/28/2001, 11:23:23 PM by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deadhead
WOW, this is a keeper!

This is poster material for the next Hillary Freep.

19 posted on 11/28/2001, 11:24:43 PM by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: laureldrive
Nice to meet you ld, great post - the PIAPS is now being exposed, worldwide, for the PIAPS that she is. Good job, JL
20 posted on 11/28/2001, 11:24:49 PM by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson