Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq Threatens Response to US attack
Jerusalem Post ^

Posted on 11/29/2001 3:55:21 AM PST by IcommGen

(15:20) Iraq threatens response to US attack

Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Taher Ramadan Yassin said his country reserves right to respond to any planned US attack.

In the event of an American attack, Iraq would request the intervention of Russia and Europe, Yassin said in an interview broadcast on Qatar-based Al-Jazeera television.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said today that Iraq is armed with non-conventional weaponry, despite international efforts to curtail the development of such munitions,

Commenting on reports of an Iraqi attack against Israel in the wake of a possible US strike, Sharon said, "They have the knowledge, ability, and professional teams working at a high level.

"We don't know if they have fissionable material or not ...[but] possibly within a short period of time they may acquire nuclear weaponry."

In a related story, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher urged the United States not to use military force against Iraq or any other Arab country in its campaign against terrorism.

Maher said any punishment of Iraq for defying the UN and not permitting renewed inspection of suspect weapons sites should be meted out in other ways than by military force.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Hmm...
1 posted on 11/29/2001 3:55:21 AM PST by IcommGen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IcommGen
"Iraq Threatens Response to US attack"

So did the Taliban and Mullah Omar.    Yawn....... ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzz

2 posted on 11/29/2001 3:58:38 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IcommGen
US attack? Ah! that's a good one, as if Iraq was not attacking the US with its agents as we speak.
3 posted on 11/29/2001 4:00:34 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IcommGen
Nuke Baghdad!

Ask the rest of them if they'd like to discuss the fine details of the unconditional surrender. Repeat step one above as needed.

4 posted on 11/29/2001 4:05:47 AM PST by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IcommGen
In a related story, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher urged the United States not to use military force against Iraq or any other Arab country in its campaign against terrorism.

Color me stupid, or caffeine deprived, but I thought the Egyptians were on our team. Did I miss something?

5 posted on 11/29/2001 4:07:23 AM PST by Weatherman123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IcommGen
"In the event of an American attack, Iraq would request the intervention of Russia and Europe"

Cmon, guys...help a brutha out...my guys run like girls when the U.S. come our way!

6 posted on 11/29/2001 4:10:09 AM PST by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IcommGen
Maybe the War on Terrorism is the justification that the U.S. is promoting for an all out attack on Iraq. Personally, I think it's their continued development of weapons of mas destruction that is the real threat to the middle east as well as to ourselves.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Maher urged the United States not to use military force against Iraq or any other Arab country

Don't these Arab countries realize that when Saddam finally has nukes, they will be on his target list? If we want long term peace and stability, he needs to be stopped NOW by whatever means are necessary.

7 posted on 11/29/2001 4:34:48 AM PST by doc30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weatherman123
If they don't want us to use military force, why don't they give us an option? What are we suppossed to do? Send them flowers? Gimme a break.
8 posted on 11/29/2001 4:45:20 AM PST by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Weatherman123
When it comes to lip service, maybe.
9 posted on 11/29/2001 4:48:19 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IcommGen
(buthead laugh)uhh,uhh,uhh, were gonna kick off in his A$$.
10 posted on 11/29/2001 5:07:44 AM PST by Vote 4 Nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weatherman123
Yes you missed something. They have been against us since 9/11.
11 posted on 11/29/2001 5:11:01 AM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Maybe we should attack Greenland, or Sweden or Argentina? Yeah, thats the ticket! ANYBODY BUT THE PEOPLE ATTACKING US RIGHT? sheeeesh!
12 posted on 11/29/2001 5:32:01 AM PST by cb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
Of course. No doubt Sadam is a terrible dictator but he has not been proved guilty of the terrorist attacks as far as I know. So, more arguments for bombing him are needed: he is a Hitler (of course), he has weapons of mass destruction (or is aaallllllmmmmoossst there), if we don't get rid of him now he will be an even bigger threat in the future. Do people realise that by destabilising the Middle East the future will be even more insecure and dangerous than it is now? Or do they seriously believe that they can 'control' a destabilised ME by pushing a few puppets around?
14 posted on 11/29/2001 5:47:52 AM PST by NewAmsterdam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NewAmsterdam
I'd love to hear Saddam's phone call when he asks Putin for help, presumably to take out Turkey and Israel... heh, heh, heh.
15 posted on 11/29/2001 5:53:25 AM PST by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
hmmm...I thought it was only Iraq that refused to join us and condemm the Taliban and UBL. I understand many nations are doing lip service, I just thought Egypt was one of them. This statement struck me as pretty "off the bus" kind of talk.
16 posted on 11/29/2001 6:03:30 AM PST by Weatherman123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Weatherman123
I was disgusted with Saudi Arabia and Egypt. In my ignorance, I didn't realize how they felt. Now I am quite willing to pay 2.00 per gallon of gas in order to quite buying anything at all from them.
17 posted on 11/29/2001 6:15:27 AM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Standing Wolf
Ditto!
19 posted on 11/29/2001 6:32:51 AM PST by Alas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IcommGen
From Gallup poll released today:

There has been increasing discussion about the possibility of expanding the war on terrorism to include new military action in Iraq. On Monday, President Bush reiterated that the war on terrorism would include any nation that made weapons of mass destruction, and demanded that Iraq let weapons inspectors return. The American public is increasingly supportive of the idea of widening the war to include Iraq. Three-quarters of Americans in the Nov. 26-27 poll favor sending Americans troops back into the Persian Gulf in order to remove Saddam Hussein from power. This is similar to June 1993 responses, but marks a significant increase from last February, when only 52% said that the United States should attempt to remove Saddam Hussein from power.

20 posted on 11/29/2001 6:43:23 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson