Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Border with U.S. 'likely to disappear'
Ottawa Citizen Online | Saturday 17 June 2000 | Jim Bronskill and Mike Blanchfield

Posted on 11/29/2001 5:49:01 AM PST by Jethro Tull

National - Ottawa Citizen Online

HOME | FRONT PAGE | CITY | SPORTS | NATIONAL | WORLD | OPINION | ENTERTAINMENT
OTTAWA.COM | HIGH TECH | BUSINESS | PRESS CLIPS | STOCKS/MUTUALS | INTERNET COMMUNITY
SEARCH/ARCHIVES | CAREERCLICK | CARCLICK | HOMESCLICK | CLASSIFIED
BIRTHS/DEATHS | PERSONALS | ABOUT US | ADVERTISING INFO
 NATIONAL
  National News
  Press Clips
  Gargoyle
  World
  Canada Dailies
  Parliament Hill Cam
 COLUMNISTS
  Dan Gardner
  Charles Gordon
  Susan Riley
  John Robson
  Christina Spencer
  David Warren





Ad Information
Get Our Media Kit

Saturday 17 June 2000
Share This Story With A Friend

Border with U.S. 'likely to disappear'

North America urged to integrate immigration, customs and security

Jim Bronskill and Mike Blanchfield

WASHINGTON -- An American think-tank is calling on Canada, the United States and Mexico to combine customs, immigration and security functions to the point at which borders become almost irrelevant.

A study released yesterday by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace urges the three countries to explore whether a North American "integration project" is worth pursuing and to develop a strategic plan for rethinking border relationships.

A decision to proceed would trigger bilateral negotiations with the aim of agreeing on the border relationship each pair of neighbouring countries wishes to see in 10 or 15 years.

"For the U.S.-Canada border, this means ever closer and organic co-operation, an ever more explicit focus on understanding and addressing differences and ever greater experimentation," says the study, prepared by the endowment's International Migration Policy Program.

"It is in fact our contention that, substantively at least, the U.S.-Canada border is likely to disappear before any politician finds the political courage to negotiate its removal."

The study's authors, Demetrios Papademetriou and Deborah Waller Meyers, spent two years researching the issues, paying special attention to life in border communities.

The study acknowledges the sensitivities around fostering closer ties between sovereign countries and insists the proposals would not lead to the creation of a new political entity, nor a continental capital akin to Brussels in the European Community.

It also stresses that stronger border co-operation would not unduly affect areas the partners consider "nearly sacred" -- such as issues of identity and, in Canada's case, a tradition of government-sponsored social programs.

Canadian and U.S. leaders see more effective border management as a pressing issue, insisted Martha Nixon, a senior Immigration Department official who attended a Washington conference yesterday to discuss the report's findings.

"They have asked us to make this a much more strategically focused piece of business, so I think it's clear this is a priority."

The authors say continental integration is based on a vision that imagines the NAFTA borders gradually "becoming irrelevant to the point where their abolition could proceed without any real compromise" in any of the priorities of each partner.

Meyers said the rapid growth in commerce between the countries demands a forward-looking approach to ensure border systems can handle the flow of goods and people.

"Maybe things aren't collapsing yet, but they will if we don't do anything," she said in an interview.

Among the authors' ideas:

-One partner conduct all inspections and tariff collections on behalf of the other two countries when cargo enters NAFTA space, eliminating the need to repeat procedures at each border. A similar system could be implemented by immigration services to deal with people crossing borders.

-Canada and the United States, initially, agree to a common visa regime for the widest band of countries possible.

-Canada and the United States gradually liberalize the movement of each other's citizens, building on the treatment each now offers one another's professionals under the NAFTA agreement.

The authors believe the proposals could enhance protection against illegal activities such as terrorism and drug-smuggling, improve economic prosperity and insulate each country from "political ups and downs" that affect vital interests. For instance, some U.S. politicians have been pushing for stricter border controls that would, in turn, hurt businesses.

The study says U.S. interest in the integration project is "likely to be tepid" unless the proposals can help Washington accomplish its own goals less expensively, more efficiently and much more effectively.

Nixon, an assistant deputy minister with Canada's Immigration Department, does not believe the sort of changes outlined in the report would water down sovereignty or lead to erasure of the border.

"I think we can do a whole lot without sacrificing or challenging our identity at all."

She pointed to a pilot project that will allow people crossing the Bluewater Bridge at the Canada-U.S. border near Sarnia, Ont., to fill out forms at just one stop instead of two.

"Why do we have two places to go to?" she asked. "Why don't we have one pass between two countries?"

HOME | FRONT PAGE | CITY | SPORTS | NATIONAL | WORLD | OPINION | ENTERTAINMENT
OTTAWA.COM | HIGH TECH | BUSINESS | PRESS CLIPS | STOCKS/MUTUALS | INTERNET COMMUNITY
SEARCH/ARCHIVES | CAREERCLICK | CARCLICK | HOMESCLICK | CLASSIFIED
BIRTHS/DEATHS | PERSONALS | ABOUT US | ADVERTISING INFO
Copyright 2000 Ottawa Citizen

Kemp Envisions Currency for Americas

Home | About CWA | Library | Legislation | States | Radio Join CWA | Shop
Home LIBRARY
  
Family | Life | Education | Pornography | Freedom | Sovereignty | Misc
Kemp Envisions Currency for Americas
November 26, 1997

Former congressman, and 1996 GOP vice presidential nominee Jack Kemp is calling for a "common currency" for the Americas, similar to the European Community's "euro" dollar. He claims this will "re-establish a hemispheric and global monetary regime in which there is stability, credibility and integrity for our currency." (Washington Times, 10/27/97)

The European Community's "euro" has already threatened to debase the currency of several member states. How much more would linking the dollar to the bankrupt economies of countries like Mexico decrease the value of our money? U.S. trade with its neighbors is not hampered by different monetary systems and the strength of the dollar has long acted as a stabilizing force in the market place the world over. Thus, what's really driving the push for a "common currency?"

There are many who believe that the nation state as we know it is evolving into a world without borders, a global government. Love of home and country are considered outmoded ideas that will soon be replaced by such notions as "tolerance" of the politically correct, "acceptance" of anything but the Christian faith, and "citizenship" without allegiance. However, we must resist this onslaught against our national sovereignty.

Our military troops are already being commanded by the Secretary General of the United Nations in global peace-keeping operations -- an infringement of the Constitution. Soldiers who are kidnapped during these UN operations are no longer considered missing in action, or prisoners of war, and do not benefit from U.S. diplomacy. Perhaps most disgraceful, American servicemen who are killed are buried under the blue and white flag of the UN.

A move in the direction of a "common currency" for the Americas would further ensnare our country in this global movement. It is time for us as Americans to stand up and protect the sovereignty of our nation and of our people. God has blessed our nation with one of the greatest political institutions on the face of the earth. Let's not sell our birthright away piece by piece.



E-mail a friend about this article

Concerned Women for America
1015 Fifteenth St. N.W., Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: (202) 488-7000
Fax: (202) 488-0806
E-mail: mail@cwfa.org

Current Headlines
•  Cloning Shows Utter Disregard for Human Life:
Biotech industry uses patients as pawns in drive to produce humans as spare parts
•  Victoria Has No Secrets Left:
Program-Length Commercials Grow Up
•  Trust God Implicitly:
A Message for Thanksgiving—and Always
•  Free At Last!:
Aid Workers Released in Afghanistan
•  Fairness for Miguel Estrada:
Judicial nominee would be first Hispanic on D.C. Court of Appeals
•  Patriotism En Vogue:
Love of country is once again fashionable
Family | Life | Education | Pornography | Freedom | Sovereignty | Misc


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: globaloney; sovereigntylist
TIN FOIL HEADS UNITE!

CRUSH THE NEW WORLD ORDER!


1 posted on 11/29/2001 5:49:01 AM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofliberty2
It looks like your dream of a North American Union is coming true. Now, all you need for your long advocated Union of Atlantica is the addition of the UK to our union. Too bad for you that the results of your Bene Gesserit Plan Atlantica will include unrestricted immigration from Mexico to Arizona forcing you to move progressively farther north to escape the Latinos you despise until you are forced to move into the Yukon Territory in Canada. Be careful what you wish for because it might come true!
2 posted on 11/29/2001 6:05:44 AM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
I think the correct name is 'Oceana'...

Bigger is NOT better.
3 posted on 11/29/2001 6:08:17 AM PST by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stevieboy
At what point does individual nationhood become extinct? If we integrate the economies, immigration, defense, culture, public works and law enforcement... isn't THAT the end of the individual nations?
4 posted on 11/29/2001 6:10:54 AM PST by Stevieboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
We're not ready for this. Not at all. 9-11 showed us that. Utopia is a long way off.
5 posted on 11/29/2001 4:46:50 PM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jethro Tull
Jeez, these articles are from years ago. Time to come out of the Y2K bunker and get some fresh air.
6 posted on 11/29/2001 4:54:57 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
What does the age of these articles mean to a Broken Glass Republican like yourself?

Despite 9-11, the goal of utopians from both political parties has no apparent impact on you.

7 posted on 11/30/2001 2:11:44 AM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Jethro Tull
Not gonna happen for a long time.

I have some friends from Canada. Great folks, but they arent especially big fans of the US governmental system.

Sometimes I swear Canada's whole culture is based on the single perception that they're not America.

9 posted on 11/30/2001 2:45:40 PM PST by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jude24
I'd really like to think you're correct Jude, however, a careful study of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace will show you a clique of very powerful and wealthy internationalists.

IMHO, the North American Free Trading Zone is just a matter of time...

10 posted on 11/30/2001 5:23:46 PM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jude24
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace - Click here

In 1948, the president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace was Alger Hiss (Secretary General of the United Nations organizing convention, adviser to President Roosevelt at Yalta, later sentenced to five years in prison for perjury in testimony concerning his involvement with a Soviet spy ring). Others among the 28 Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment were Dwight D. Eisenhower (president of Columbia University, former U. S. Allied Commander in Europe, later President of the United States), John Foster Dulles (prominent member of the Federal Council of Churches, foreign relations counsel for Gov. Dewey when Dewey was the Republican presidential candidate, later Secretary of State under Eisenhower), David Rockefeller (of oil and banking fame), and Thomas J. Watson (of IBM). Among the Trustees were Republicans and Democrats, so-called conservatives and liberals, and a suspected Communist.

11 posted on 11/30/2001 5:28:11 PM PST by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson