Posted on 12/01/2001 6:53:07 AM PST by George Frm Br00klyn Park
New World Order
Additional Titles
IS THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE A UNITED NATIONS FRONT?
By Liz Schuh
NewsWithViews.com
Most people, including Chamber of Commerce members, would be astonished to learn the extent of power that organization exerts over international, national, state and local policies. With the exception of a few leaders at the top, most members never learn about the inner sanctum of the Chamber which appears to think locally but actually acts globally.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other blankets were formed in 1912 and the International Chamber in 1919. Individual Chambers were invited to join these blanket organizations and most of them did. Their existence helps to explain why separate Chambers of Commerce all over the country -- even the world -- frequently adopt similar local policies or support the same legislation. (1)
The International Chamber of Commerce is one of many international/ national non-governmental organizations (NGOs) which have consultative status with the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). Organizations associated with the United Nations through the ECOSOC have surrendered their own sovereignty to the United Nations' world dictatorship. They belong to the regional government world management system. They cannot be counted on to support the U.S. constitution. (2)
Along with the Chamber of Commerce, we find other NGO interlocks such as the International Planned Parenthood, International Free Trade Unions, World Assembly of Youth, League of Red Cross Societies, International Social Security Association, World Veterans Federation. At last count 2012 international and national organizations have consultative status. (3)
The Economic and Social Council was the one thing lacking in the old League of Nations that was replaced by the United Nations. The ECOSOC opened the way for the Chamber to have direct and continuous influence upon international affairs, even though it was a non-governmental organization.
The "NGO community" may be referred to as the New Global International that is refining and expanding the mission of the Socialists International. (4)
THE CONSENSUS GAME
The idea of a "civil society" (ostensibly represented by the NGOs) is a way of presenting the process as if it were a democratic one when, in fact, it isn't at all. The U.N. uses NGO delegates to essentially stack the deck at its policy conventions in order to easily ratify its predetermined platform. (5)
The ECOSOC passed a resolution in 1996 stipulating that NGOs with consultative status must "be in conformity with the spirit, purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations" and that the organizations "shall undertake to support the work of the United Nations." (6)
While some groups may have joined the United Nations in an NGO status hoping to be a small ripple in a big pond, the outcome could be frustrating and disheartening because of the evil one-world forces against them.
And while we are hearing about wars and rumors of war, perhaps Robert Hunter with the Center for Strategic and International Studies said it best: "It is important that it goes right because it is getting the American people used to this kind of operation... it is creeping the American people up on the idea of accepting the use of American forces under United Nations command." (7)
The Chamber of Commerce gets it direction from the International Chamber of Commerce which has special recognition at the United Nations. Unfortunately, the Chamber presidents don't know this. Most of them are good local folks who want to help their community. (8)
The United Nations continues to serve, as it has since its inception in 1945, as a major Marxist spy and propaganda apparatus and a hotbed of anti-Americanism. (9)
WORLD IS BEING RESTRUCTURED
Multinational corporations and tax-exempt foundations, in cooperation with the U.S. government, your local schools and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are restructuring not only our educational system by preparing children for a one world government and alienating them from their parents in the process, but our free society as well. The Chamber hierarchy has been up to its eyeballs working for world government ever since the foundation of the United Nations, which is nothing more than a Communist front.
The New York Times (7/11/1998 P. 9) said, "After heavy lobbying by the computer industry and the Clinton administration, the Senate rejected a proposal to tighten control of the sale of American supercomputers to China and Russia and instead voted for further study of the issues..." So it was the computer companies and the Chamber of Commerce which pressured the GOP for Red Sales and the sunset of U.S. Security. (10)
The alleged defrocked former leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, who has never renounced his love, admiration and respect for Marxist/Leninist ideology, is now ensconced in the commandant's residence of the Presidio in San Francisco. He lives there and operates his Gorbachev Foundation USA from those beautiful grounds. (11)
And from its confines issues pronouncements about the coming global despotism envisioned by his Soviet predecessors, such as Lenin, Stalin, Brezhnev and Andropov. (12)
His 1994 World Forum concentrated on "fundamental challenges and opportunities confronting humanity as we enter the next century... we are giving birth to the first global civilization... Inherent within the Forum is the potential for establishing a global brain trust to continue into the next century... and to provide the framework for stability and regulated human interactions..." (13)
Bill Gates and other corporation executives attended "The State of the World Forum" in San Francisco in 1995. This Forum is a thinly veiled call for convergence and world government. (14)
Truly, we have not only helped wheel this latest Trojan Horse inside the gates, we are stabling it in the finest of sumptuous quarters and feeding it the most delectable of our abundant produce -the fertile, febrile brains of our highly impressionable youth. (15)
It has been frequently observed that history repeats itself, and that those who will not learn the lessons of the past are condemned to repeat them. Lenin understood the appeal of potential trade and bragged that, when the time came to hang the capitalist class, they would be competing for the contract to provide the rope. (16)
So if some Americans are wondering about the "state of the union" and why it is in the shape it is in, we need look no further than the Chamber of Commerce and other NGOs. While your local Chamber members may be vehemently opposed to much of what the International Chamber supports, they have no say in the real decision making any more than dues-paying teachers to their unions. The leaders at the top are the final authority.
(1) 1994 Winter Edition, Florida Forum News. Article by Erica Carle
(2) 8/3/2000 Wisconsin Report. Article by Erica Carle, "Who Cares About the Constitution."
(3) Ibid
(4) 10/17/1994 New American P. 5
(5) 7/16/2001 New American P. 28
(6) Ibid
(7) Barbarians Inside the Gates (c) 2000 P. 369 - Author: Donn de Grand Pre'
(8) 1/21/1999 Wisconsin Report
(9) 1/4/1998 New American P. 7
(10) July 1997 Howard Phillips Newsletter
(11) Book: Barbarians Inside the Gates P. 357
(12) Ibid
(13) Ibid
(14) 9/18/1995 New American P. 42
(15) Barbarians Inside the Gates P. 358
(16) Jan. 1998 Christian Anti-Communism Crusade Newsletter P. 2
Lis Schuh is a researcher for the past 25 years, former reporter from an Eastern Washington newspaper, Political Activist, Editor of a legislative newsletter, business owner and former Chambers of Commerce member.
THIS Article at newswithviews.com
via WND Commentary where I found it
All, "Consensus" among those few at at the top is the "democracy" being sold to the world AND "locals" by our leaders TODAY. Socialism!! Rule of the many by the few. Peace and love, George.
All, Probably. Is the NRA? Peace and love, George.
All, Probably. Is the NRA? Peace and love, George.
I highly suspect both are. The CIA had a Project Trojan Horse, which I believe set up organizations to lure people as members who would pose problems to the NWO. I've been suspicious of NRA for a year or two, and they have that nice little database of names. Who needs registration?
I looked here for info on the Chamber, but didn't find anything specific, although it looks as if it fits. More on Gorby and the Presidio here and here . All from an excellent site which will probably be a target of Ashcroft's hate.
Here's Gorby's site: http://www.gci.ch/ for anyone who's interested. The fact that our government gave this consecrated, gorgeous piece of real estate (the Presidio) over to this tyrant is, in my opinion, an abomination, and an indication of what lies ahead.
As in the American-Chinese Chamber of Commerce that George W. Bush's uncle has been the head of for so many years? And, perhaps, as in International Planned Parenthood that was founded in the late '40's & and 1950's at Yale with assistance from George W. Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush? And, councils formed by the Rockefellers in 1912-1919 - would that include the David & J.D. Rockefeller that were important customers of Samuel P. Bush's (George W.'s great-grandfather) Columbus, Ohio castings company?
I believe the CC and the UN CHARTERS have similar dates on them. Local CC units will be pushed toward REGIONALIZATION which makes the step to Global much smaller.
I can hear the sabres rattling and the tromp of jack boots in the halls comin' ta getcha! You've just posted the highest insult here- never mind that it probably has a completely factual basis and should be brought out and faced/discussed, especially in a place such as this.
But, after watching the complete knee-jerk mentality that has permeated the rabid Republicrats on this forum, I don't hold out a great hope that anything factually negative regarding this administration will be rationally, thoughtfully and honestly discussed. In fact, I don't hold out much hope for your continued existence on this forum- nor probably mine, after this post. I would suspect either the thread, or our posts will soon suddenly disappear and the next time we go to post, we'll politely notified that we are no longer allowed to do so.
Thanks for posting that factual information. I'm sure there is a lot more such facts out there, but you won't find them posted and rationally debated and discussed here. Too bad. This has to have been one of the finest research, news and debate forums anywhere. And even somewhat objective, too.
Hope both of our accounts still exist after this. I'd enjoy learning more about what you've posted.
I want to talk about another subject that's incredibly important for not only the border states, but all of America. And that's relations with our neighbors to the south, Mexico. Mexico is a friend of America.
Mexico is our neighbor. And we want our neighbors to succeed. We want our neighbors to do well. We want our neighbors to be successful. We understand that a poor neighbor is somebody that's going to be harder to deal with than a neighbor that's prospering. And that's why it's so important for us to tear down barriers and walls that might separate Mexico from the United States. And that's why it's so important for us to stand strong when it comes to free trade with our neighbors to the south.
NAFTA has been good for New Mexico, and it's been good for Mexico. And that's an important relationship that I pledge to continue on. I ask -- I ask for the Congress -- I ask for the Congress to give me trade promotion authority, so that we can not only have free trade with our neighbor to the south, so that we can have free trade throughout the hemisphere.
Oh, I know there's some voices who want to wall us off from Mexico. They want to build a wall. I say to them, they want to condemn our neighbors to the south in poverty, and I refuse to accept that type of isolationist and protectionist attitude. (Applause.)
And let me say one other thing, one other issue that's important. It speaks to the spirit of our nation. It speaks to whether or not we're going to be true friends with the neighbors to the south. And that's the issue of trucking. There are some people who say we shouldn't allow our friends to the south to send their trucks into the United States. I say that's discrimination against Mexico.
I say that if we're going to have NAFTA, we ought to enforce all of NAFTA. I believe strongly we can have safety on our highways without discriminating against our neighbors to the south. To the protectionists and isolationists, I say if Mexican trucks, if United States trucks, and Canadian trucks are allowed to move freely on our highways, we can not only enforce the laws, it will help prosperity spread its roots throughout our neighborhood. And that's important for the future. (Applause.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.