Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Back from the Copley Freep
me ^ | now | ME

Posted on 12/01/2001 2:04:55 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99

We kicked a little booty.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Editorial; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2001 2:04:55 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
pictures to come . . .
2 posted on 12/01/2001 2:05:46 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
A few of us did a little FReeping down in Modesto, CA today also. Keep up the good work Big Guy and Rusty 99.

EAGLES UP!!!!!!!!

3 posted on 12/01/2001 2:21:42 PM PST by The Real Deal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Real Deal
Michaelje and Little Bill organized, they deserve the real credit. We had plenty of people right off the street who joined us, perhaps future freepers.
4 posted on 12/01/2001 2:25:49 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
A Big TexansSalute from a Massachusetts native.
I knew there were SOME intelligent Yankees up there.
5 posted on 12/01/2001 2:33:22 PM PST by PetroniDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
When I think of, "Copley," and "Boston," I think of this...

"The year 1768 was an important one for two young Bostonians: John Singleton Copley, who painted this picture, and Paul Revere, who sat for it. They were both in their early thirties, and they could not have been more different. This was a time of extreme political tension, when Boston was divided into Whigs, who wanted freedom, and Tories, who were content to stay British. Paul Revere was deeply political - and 100 percent Whig. Copley, on the other hand, was completely uninterested in politics; he wanted only to be neutral, which was not possible. He was about to marry into one of the leading Tory families, the Clarkes (owners of the notorious tea concession). Copley was performing a balancing act, but this was the year when he wrote that he felt he must leave America and go to live in England. There he could be an artist and a gentleman - while silversmith Paul Revere was happy to be a craftsman.

"It was costly to have one's portrait painted, and very unusual to be painted without a gentleman's coat. Revere's descendants misunderstood this picture. They thought it made him look like a workman, and they hid it in the attic, but Revere is wearing an elaborate vest with gold buttons. The great expanse of bare sleeve - a fullness of flowing linen - makes a political statement. There was supposed to be no linen in America unless it was imported. The ladies of Boston objected to this, and in this very year they produced a hundred ells (about 125 yards) of linen. Revere is honoring this act of defiance, sporting a symbol of his country's freedom. The problem is the teapot, because tea was a burning issue. Only the Tories drank tea; the Whigs drank "Boston Tea," which was punch. Why does Revere hold a teapot? Is Copley deliberately trying to balance the Whiggish sleeve? Or was it Revere's own choice - to show off his skills as a silversmith? I see this picture as almost a confrontation between the two young men. Looking at Revere's solid, brooding face, I am not surprised that he won. Copley signed the portrait, but in letters so minuscule that hardly anyone could read them."

-Sr. Wendy Beckett

6 posted on 12/01/2001 2:40:55 PM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Nice.

Doc

7 posted on 12/01/2001 2:49:10 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Interesting. My favorite patriot has always be Ben Franklin.
8 posted on 12/01/2001 2:57:45 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99; Doc On The Bay
The other day I replied to a post regarding the utility of art as an academic discipline. One of my B.A.s is in Art History, and my argument was that IF AND WHEN it is properly taught, it is an all encompassing discipline, entailing chemistry, biology, anatomy, history, geology, geography, religion, musicology, literature, architecture, engineering, and politics. I think Sister Wendy's analysis of Copley's Revere Portrait demonstrates nicely, the utility of the discipline.
9 posted on 12/01/2001 3:05:33 PM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I wish I had more time to study art.
10 posted on 12/01/2001 3:08:19 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
I wish I had more time to study art."

So do I...once you've dipped your toe into it, it kind of sucks you in. I was very fortunate to have some incredibly conservative profs who taught from a western/ U.S. perspective, and had resisted the trendy marxist/deconstructionist/communist/feminist overtones the discipline has sadly adopted.

A great, concise, yet comprehensive overview of western art and its impact on, and reflection of society can be had in (Lord)Kenneth Clark's Civilisation.

It was a BBC series, and is available in both print and video.

11 posted on 12/01/2001 3:16:19 PM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I hate the Marxist view of everything.
12 posted on 12/01/2001 3:23:29 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
"I hate the Marxist view of everything."

I consider Senator Joe McCarthy one of my personal heroes. I'm not a Bircher, but in most cases can align myself with their views.

13 posted on 12/01/2001 3:28:22 PM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
same here.
14 posted on 12/01/2001 3:35:58 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
I'm very slow, what was this all about?
15 posted on 12/01/2001 3:39:24 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Guy and Rusty 99
I wish I had said that!

Kudo's for a brilliant observation.....

Doc

16 posted on 12/01/2001 3:41:10 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; ladyjane; ElectricStrawberry; michaelje; awestk
Pimg
17 posted on 12/01/2001 3:43:26 PM PST by Little Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
PICTURES?
18 posted on 12/01/2001 3:58:25 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: breakem
They had an anti-war protest, so we crashed it with an anti-anti-war protest.
19 posted on 12/01/2001 3:59:15 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
Nice job fellas. It couldnt have went smoother....
20 posted on 12/01/2001 4:05:04 PM PST by michaelje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson