Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FRENCH HIGH COURT RULES CHILD HAD RIGHT TO BE ABORTED
ZENIT.org via EWTN.com ^ | 12-1-01

Posted on 12/03/2001 9:33:26 AM PST by Notwithstanding

PARIS, (Zenit.org).- The French Supreme Court decided that a Down syndrome child must be indemnified for the harm his birth caused him, because his "right" not to be born was not respected.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
EWTN News Story

2-Dec-2001 -- ZENIT.org News Agency
ZENIT material may not be reproduced without permission. Permission can be requested at info@zenit.org

FRENCH HIGH COURT RULES CHILD HAD RIGHT TO BE ABORTED

Indemnifies Down-Syndrome Boy

PARIS, (Zenit.org).- The French Supreme Court decided that a Down syndrome child must be indemnified for the harm his birth caused him, because his "right" not to be born was not respected.

The high court asked the Paris Court of Appeal to recalculate the amount of the indemnification for the suffering caused Lionel, who was born in January 1995.

Lionel´s mother estimated the material needs of her child in the future to amount to $603,234, although the Rennes Court of Appeal estimated $87,136.

The gynecologist did not tell the parents about the problem. Had he done so, they would have asked for an abortion.

With this decision, the Supreme Court confirmed the controversial jurisprudence established a year ago in the "Perruche case," reaffirmed in July in another case.

Nicolas Perruche was born severely handicapped as a result of rubella, which doctors failed to detect during the mother´s pregnancy. Consequently, she was deprived of the possibility of killing him through abortion.

The court decided that Nicolas should be indemnified for the harm he suffered by being born because of a medical error. The decision has been much criticized by associations for the handicapped and by religious, political, medical and judicial authorities.

In a message sent last Friday to the Catholic Social Week in France, John Paul II severely criticized French Justice´s support of the elimination of unborn handicapped children.

Bishop André Vingt-Trois, president of the episcopal Commission for the Family, said that the court´s decision is an offense to those who accept handicapped children.

"I think with sadness of all those families who have taken in a mongoloid child, and surrounded him with love, received his love in turn," the bishop told Agence France-Presse. The court´s decision implies that "it is not worthwhile to experience such love. Thus it discredits those who have accepted and lived such love."

Click here to share this news story with a friend.



One of the largest collections of Church documents in the world

Back to List

1 posted on 12/03/2001 9:33:27 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Dude, you, ahh, forgot the barf alert.
2 posted on 12/03/2001 9:36:02 AM PST by FateAmenableToChange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Dude, you, ahh, forgot the we surrender alert.
3 posted on 12/03/2001 9:37:40 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
How long before the "right to be aborted" combines with the "right to die" to become the "right to euthanize your baby"?
4 posted on 12/03/2001 9:40:28 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
How terrible. Imagine when he's 40 and strikes out on his own, brimming with self-confidence that he can be self-sufficient, and learns that his parents would have killed him had they known he was disabled.
5 posted on 12/03/2001 9:41:14 AM PST by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Did Peter Singer file an amicus with this court?
6 posted on 12/03/2001 9:42:09 AM PST by Seeking the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I tell myself all the time that we should not be surprised by anything the commie French do, but this sickens me.
7 posted on 12/03/2001 9:42:18 AM PST by Vote 4 Nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Well, the French have gone through the looking glass and we're not far behind.
8 posted on 12/03/2001 9:42:28 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Insanity.
9 posted on 12/03/2001 9:46:03 AM PST by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
That is sick beyond words. Are we sure the Vichy gov't isn't still in charge in France? This just sounds so Nazi-esque to me.
10 posted on 12/03/2001 9:46:33 AM PST by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
These decisions are actually good in that they implicitly recognize that unborn children have rights. Ergo, the right to be born must exist alongside the right not to be born.
11 posted on 12/03/2001 9:46:57 AM PST by ironcitymike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Defending the right of pre-natal surrender......
12 posted on 12/03/2001 9:47:58 AM PST by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I'm awed but the insanity. If the child had the right to be aborted, does it not follow the same child has a right to be born?
13 posted on 12/03/2001 9:48:04 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
...awed by...
14 posted on 12/03/2001 9:48:36 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding; Thinkin' Gal
The court decided that Nicolas should be indemnified for the harm he suffered by being born because of a medical error.

Damn them for that choice, I says.

Let them argue for their lifes.

15 posted on 12/03/2001 9:48:39 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
This is a joke right?

The French have already surrendered, right?

16 posted on 12/03/2001 9:49:17 AM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Meanwhile in other news from the Bizarro homeworld...
17 posted on 12/03/2001 9:50:14 AM PST by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
#4: Katie Couric's already broken that ground with her Andrea Yates Society.
18 posted on 12/03/2001 9:55:31 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
I really don't understand any of you. The only thing that would top the French aborting all their babies was if they didn't procreate in the first place.
19 posted on 12/03/2001 10:03:09 AM PST by BenF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Ah yes -Frogs!!!

Or, as coined by another FReeper (who??)

"Cheese-eating surrender monkies". One of my all time favs.

prambo

20 posted on 12/03/2001 10:08:24 AM PST by prambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson