Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Civil Liberties Meaningless to a Dead Man
www.nonpareilonline.com | Dec. 5, 2001 | Scott L. Moore

Posted on 12/05/2001 1:51:19 PM PST by Mean Daddy

The below letter to the editor was so well written, I thought I'd share it with my fellow freepers. If Mr. Moore isn't a Freeper, he should be.

Your editorial regarding trying terrorist suspects in military tribunals is flawed.

You started by saying, "There is nothing more important ... than ... civil liberties."

Wrong.

Life is more important. Civil liberties are meaningless to a dead man.

The founding fathers knew that placing life ahead of liberty and the pursuit of happiness in the Declaration of Independence. If I'm killed in a terrorist attack, all the editorializing in the world about civil liberties is worthless to me.

Next, you emphasize that 1,100 detainees are "suspected" of being connected to terrorist groups or activities, as though "suspicion" is not sufficient to detain these people for further questioning and investigation.

Under our system of justice, proof of guilt or innocence isn't established until trial. Therefore, anyone held awaiting trial could logically be said to be only under suspicion of committing the crime charged. Would you have our jails emptied of all those awaiting trial simply because, while waiting, they are only "suspected" of a crime?

I thought not.

You then attempt to cast doubt on the military tribunal system, hinting that the panel of officers would vote to convict simply because they "see themselves as "at war" with the accused." This assertion impugns the motives of military officers and implies that they would run roughshod over the accused, regardless of the evidence, in order to obtain a "guilty" verdict.

As a former officer, such an assertion would not have applied to me or the vast majority of my fellow officers while I was on active duty, and I doubt it would apply now. To suggest otherwise, as you did, is wrong.

That terrorists would get any kind of trial at all in the United States is more than they would get in a lot of other countries and probably more than they deserve.

Trial by military tribunal is absolutely appropriate for them, does not jeopardize civil liberties for anyone else and is the best way to send a message to potential terrorists that they will be dealt with appropriately.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
Very well written.
1 posted on 12/05/2001 1:51:19 PM PST by Mean Daddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Good letter, but I have to disagree. The Founders meant that the rights to "life, liberty..." come from God and not from government. That the government should not interfere with, but protect these rights.

While I agree with the premise that Bush is within his rights as CIC and president in demanding military tribunals and detentions of "suspicious" people, many in this great land have died in defense of liberty, civil and otherwise.

2 posted on 12/05/2001 2:01:24 PM PST by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy

"Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" Patrick Henry


3 posted on 12/05/2001 2:06:10 PM PST by NC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
I very much disagree with the premise of this article. To say you value life over liberty is to really miss the point of this entire country's history. America was founded on the principle that it is better to die a free man than live as a slave. Perhaps this author would like to live as the Roman serfs who gave up their freedom for the promise of security.
4 posted on 12/05/2001 2:17:49 PM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Can you name me even one time when dead people raced to the living people in trouble? I don't think there was outside help even during the San Francisco earthquake.

Our neighbours, the living, have faced it alone and I am one dead person who is damned tired of hearing them kicked around. They will come out of this thing with their flag high. And when they do, they are entitled to thumb their nose at the people are gloating over their present troubles.

I hope dead people are not among these. But there are many smug, self-righteous corpses. And finally, the American Red Cross was told at its 48th Annual meeting in New Orleans this morning that it was broke.

This year's disasters .. with the year less than half-over… has taken it all and nobody...but nobody... has helped.

Gordon Sinclair, the famous dead Canadian has been giving this speech for thirty years. He's one corpse who's not afraid to speak up for liberty.

5 posted on 12/05/2001 2:18:24 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NC_Libertarian
Spot on. I was going to go with the "if you have nothing you value more than your own life, you have a valueless life" sort of thing."
6 posted on 12/05/2001 2:19:02 PM PST by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
Forgive me for interrupting your very important thoughts and profound wisdom, but we are in the midst of the most exciting fundraiser ever on FreeRepublic. I would hate for any of you to miss it!

Come visit us at Freepathon Holidays are Here Again: Let's Really Light Our Tree This Year - Thread 6

and be a part of something that is larger than all of us.

Alone, we are a voice crying in the wilderness. Together we are a force for positive action!

Don't be left out!

Be one who can someday say..................... "I was there when..................."

Thank you to everyone who has already come by and become a part!

7 posted on 12/05/2001 2:20:53 PM PST by 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
Ridiculous. The same arguments have been used for years to erode the rights of Americans to own guns, buy SUVs, or smoke cigarettes. It all comes down to people wanting to erode the rights of others but not willing to give up their own rights. It doesn't work that way, and any true Conservative should see the military tribunals for what they are: kangaroo courts. Are they more than someone would get in another country? Yes. Is that a relevant argument? No.

I am shocked by the vast amounts of people so ready to give up their most fundamental rights to the government, the same people that bitch and complain that the government is much too big and much too powerful and corrupt. Wait until you are the one holding the bag because you happen to have the same name as someone "suspected" of being a terrorist, or someone picks you out just because they don't like you. The same thing has been happening in Red China for decades, and that's no system that I want to live under.

Are some things worth more than life? Undoubtably yes. Are someone else's civil liberties worth dying for? Absolutely. It's sad to what lengths people will go so they can protect a pathetic existance. I, on the other hand, would rather be guaranteed liberty and risk death.
8 posted on 12/05/2001 2:21:59 PM PST by misterman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
"The Free Man cannot be long an Ignorant Man." - Pres. McKinley
9 posted on 12/05/2001 2:26:15 PM PST by Refinersfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterman
"I, on the other hand, would rather be guaranteed liberty and risk death.

Here, Here...

10 posted on 12/05/2001 2:28:30 PM PST by Refinersfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Life is more important. Civil liberties are meaningless to a dead man.

Life without civil liberties is slavery...

Slavery makes life meaningless...

The guy who wrote the above doesn't have a clue...

11 posted on 12/05/2001 2:32:47 PM PST by Ferris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterman
After reading all the posts that denounce this
article and the mentality of it's author, I can
only say....

That I have never been as proud to be a
member of FreeRepublic.com, as I am now.

Thanks for supporting Liberty and Freedom.

 

12 posted on 12/05/2001 2:34:34 PM PST by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
"Civil liberties" are not basic human liberties. They are a mutually-agreed-upon luxury, enjoyed at times of peace and security. There is an inalienable right not to be murdered, not to be plundered, etc., but there is not an inalienable right to be read the Miranda warning, or not to be searched at an airport, or to have a civil trial. We have established what we call our "civil liberties" because, in normal times, it is deemed preferable that some criminals go free than that some innocents be convicted. But when the crimes in question are not burglaries or single murders, but acts of war, it is more important that NO guilty parties escape justice than that all citizens enjoy all their normal civil liberties.
13 posted on 12/05/2001 2:38:38 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
Life is more important. Civil liberties are meaningless to a dead man. The founding fathers knew that placing life ahead of liberty and the pursuit of happiness in the Declaration of Independence

Yeah ... tell it to over 40 million dead Americans killed in our own abortuaries.

14 posted on 12/05/2001 2:47:52 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterman
misterman said: "Wait until you are the one holding the bag..."

I like your response very much.

The company I work for recently abandoned drug testing for prospective employees. Now it is no longer possible to destroy someone's life by putting a little coke in their coke. Most of the legal shortcuts applauded by those who don't value their liberties are mechanisms for trampling on good people.

Criminals don't care if their rifle has a plastic pistol grip on it, but I have to store rifles in Nevada to avoid prison.

I have paid hundreds of dollars to prove numerous times to the government that I am not a convicted felon. There is no evidence that any crime has been avoided by this, but I risk my future if I engage in a private transfer of a firearm.

I believe very much in the benefits of the Constitution and it would clearly be better than whatever it is that the government is using now. (paraphasing the bumper sticker)

15 posted on 12/05/2001 2:48:55 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan; misterman
...people, many in this great land have died in defense of liberty, civil and otherwise.

Yes gentlemen, I understand perfectly the difference between liberty as defined in natural law and "civil" liberties. And I would hope I'm at least your equal in rabid defense of our freedoms from government as defined in the Founding documents. But I deplore the despicable blurring of what I view as the intentions expressed in these documents for their own purposes by the ACLU, et. al.

I too am wary of infringements of any rights by the government but I agree with Mr. McGowan that suspension of some civil liberties during wartime is a small sacrifice in defense of the most basic right of all - that to live in freedom.

16 posted on 12/05/2001 3:05:19 PM PST by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan; LisaFab
I agree with you both on the matter of some civil liberties, pertaining to terrorists and foreign nationals, mainly, being abridged or suspended or otherwise altered in times of war. This is a war.

Like most, I don't favor the government getting any more power than it already has but in case no one has noticed, it's the only government we have to work with and our only real defense against terrorism, internal and external. Some of the arguments are based on pure speculation and the mistaken conviction that our military are bloodthirsty dictators who will rubber-stamp any foreigner as 'guilty'. A slur on our nations military men and women that I do not share. I also reject the premise that everyone and anyone will be suddenly arrested, thrown in prison and held forever because some nosy neighbor said 'That guy looks suspicious to me". I don't think the ever-vigilant ACLU and the massive liberal media establishment will waste a noansecond in shouting from the rooftops any misuse of the law.

I'm also mighty weary of being called naive, a statist or a Bush bootlicker simply because I support the President in his attempts to pursue the War on Terrorism. I'm none of the above but that seems to be the kind of nonsense the anti-Bush (excuse me, pro-constitutional - as if no one else can be) people instantly throw up as a rationale when anyone questions the fact that giving terrorists the full gamut of American Civil Liberties may not be in our best interest.

I've come to realize that, on FR at least, this is a truly divisive issue, akin to abortion. Democrats, Libertarians and ultra-rightists all howl loudly about the unfairness of it all and bemoan the 'blindness' of anyone who doesn't see it their way. Everyone stands on 'principle' and no one will give an inch.
Frankly, I'm tired of the argument but wanted to support the good folks who understand the Patriot Act provisions are in our national self-interest and don't want to follow the Democrat/Libertarian line.
Some of us think it's simply a good idea to use the defensive measures now in place through the Patriot Act to find, identify and remove terrorists from our midst whenever possible. Works for me.

17 posted on 12/05/2001 4:30:16 PM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
Wow.

You're willing to give up my civil liberties so you can live in freedom.

That's heavy man....

L

18 posted on 12/05/2001 4:37:40 PM PST by Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott
Frankly, I'm tired of the argument but wanted to support the good folks who understand the Patriot Act provisions are in our national self-interest and don't want to follow the Democrat/Libertarian line.

Extremely well put. I too am sick of defending myself for supporting an administration that I trust and believe in.

And I'm equally sick of being told that I'm naive because I believe in a two-party system that has well served the greatest nation on Earth for over two hundred years.

But I'm especially tired of being accused of not questioning authority because I support this president. If we Bush supporters were the sheeple we're constantly painted as being, we wouldn't be here at FR.

19 posted on 12/05/2001 4:39:13 PM PST by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Hmmmm. See my #19.
20 posted on 12/05/2001 4:41:14 PM PST by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson