Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fellowship of the Ring (filmfreak review)
filmfreakcentral.com ^ | 12/6/2001

Posted on 12/06/2001 10:20:46 AM PST by ecurbh

Holm in Fellowship of the RingAt the heart of Peter Jackson's brilliant The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring--the first of three cinematic adaptations of Tolkien's beloved fantasy, shot simultaneously for release in consecutive years--is a favourable melancholy, a despair born of two things: the crucial feeling of desperation that infests a small band of heroes striving against an invincible evil; and the knowledge that this film will soon end, its sequel twelve months away. Jackson has translated nearly every element of Tolkien's universe, from a vast, sprawling history implied in the language and the actions of its multi-specied characters, to a completely immersive fantasy realm with nary a seam to spoil the illusion, to a quest that's worthy of epic attention. He's captured the sadness and moral weight of Tolkien with the kind of deep reality that seems effortless but is born of a meticulous preparation and all-consuming vision. It takes a certain skill to make things look good; it takes genius to keep the pretty pictures from overwhelming the narrative of what is, in this case, a universally familiar story. Ridley Scott never quite got the hang of it.

In many other ways, Jackson's film surpasses Tolkien. Though adept at the creation of a rich history and a multi-layered reality, Tolkien lacked a gift for crafting climactic scenarios and compelling action sequences. You'll find no such problems in The Fellowship of the Ring, particularly when it comes to the fighting: every sword thrust, axe chop, and slung arrow lands with a savage purpose. One forgets that many of the antagonists are computer-generated. Peter Jackson is among the few directors truly capable of integrating CGI and live-action (as evidenced by the underestimated The Frighteners), a knack attributable to his understanding that images should augment a scene and not upstage it. But even better than Jackson's visionary re-imagining of Tolkien's battles is his expulsion of the British theologian's subterranean religiosity and subtext of virulent racism. The Fellowship of the Ring manages to be neither proselytizing nor xenophobic while retaining some political elements that make it surprisingly poignant for a modern audience. It is, in other words, a personal story about hardship that refrains from such easy relationship crutches as schmaltz and, at the other end of the spectrum, a patronizing belligerence.

Frodo Baggins (Elijah Wood) is a hobbit, a creature approximately four feet in height (the actors were digitally, flawlessly shrunk) who lives in the ever-flowering Shire's bucolic Hobbiton. On the occasion of his uncle Bilbo's (Ian Holm) 111th birthday, Frodo is given a mysterious ring as his birthright. The wizard Gandalf the Grey (Ian McKellen) suspects something infernal of the ring when the otherwise honest Bilbo lies to hold onto it. A quick study reveals that it belongs to a dark lord now seeking, through a steady rebuilding of his armies, to regain the ring and with it his corporeal form. The malevolent warlord (named "Sauron") dispatches nine wraiths: hooded avatars riding midnight steeds whose voices sound like screaming children. Frodo is forced to leave his beloved Shire on a journey in which he enlists allies (the titular Fellowship) to destroy the ring in the fires of a volcano at the heart of the enemy's realm.

Tolkien's The Fellowship of the Ring, read variously as a Christian text, a fable of industrialization, and a parable of WWII with its mechanized grand fiend and a confederacy of free peoples allied against him (Tolkien denies the connection to the second World War), functions most effectively--and Jackson understands this--as the most important modern example of the archetypal hero's journey. Frodo is the classic reluctant champion, the son of unlikely parentage called upon to complete an impossible task against forbidding odds. Joining Frodo are Gandalf, his hobbit friends Sam (Sean Astin), Merry (Dominic Monaghan), and Pippin (Billy Boyd), a pair of humans in Boromir (Sean Bean) and the mysterious Strider (a fierce Viggo Mortensen), an Elvish archer, Legolas (Orlando Bloom), and a gruff dwarf named Gimli (an unrecognizable John Rhys-Davies).

Basically a long flight across several realms of Tolkien's Middle Earth, Jackson has crafted distinct looks for each demesne. The black-plumed conflagration of Sauron's infernal homeland Mordor, the soaring spires of the Elf-home Rivendell, the Giger-cum-Robert Mills tower Isengard (stronghold of the treacherous wizard Saruman (Christopher Lee))--all astonish. The highlight of the film is a trip through the dark Mines of Moria. A massive Dwarven city carved through a mountain (it is a four-day walk from one end of it to the other), Moria is the backdrop for three of the film's finest set pieces: a struggle with a terrifying thing in a pond; a battle against a horde of goblins and their pet cave-troll; and a confrontation with a demon of smoke and fire: the winged, whip-wielding Balrog.

At its best, there are moments in The Fellowship of the Ring that I have only seen in my most winsome and wildest fantasies. At its worst--and there are stumbles--the film becomes too enraptured with its own gravity and bogged down as a consequence. If you're a newcomer to the world of Middle Earth, rest assured that the flurry of implied back-stories are faithful to Tolkien's myth-making, the encyclopaedic knowledge of which is not vital to your enjoyment of the film--it's more a matter of knowing that the places and things in this world have names than knowing the names proper. In a slightly misguided effort to present a more unified story, however, Jackson has incorporated a grand skirmish only related in a supplementary work (The Silmarillion), as well as one too many scenes that express the importance of an event in vain. Suffering the most, the incandescent (literally, it so happens in this case) Cate Blanchett has her performance as the Elven queen, Galadriel, almost entirely obscured by sound effects, lighting, and visual pyrotechnics that seem only to underscore a point ('the ring is evil') that has been made a dozen times previous.

Even given its occasional miscue, The Fellowship of the Ring is an unqualified triumph, its status as the best Western fantasy film ever made all but indisputable. (The Japanese have been making fantasies on this level through the anime medium for years.) I have no doubt the series will get better now that the groundwork is laid. The cast carries off the tricky balance between high drama and nuance, the characters are driven by recognizable motivations of greed, love, loyalty, and courage, and Jackson's direction is very plainly above reproach. The breadth of imagination on display here is awe-inspiring, and the reserve with which the fantasy scenario is handled no less so. As an adaptation, it cuts the fat yet preserves the soul of the work, reminding of Kenneth Branagh's mud and glory Henry V in its visceral force and illumination of the source material. (Jackson's film explained things to me from the original text that don't make sense and repairs things that don't work.)

New Line Cinema's unprecedented investment of time and money has been justified, and the film plays too short at a full three hours. The wait already seems interminable for not only the release of the second film (The Two Towers) but also the next showing of this one that I can attend. The uncompromising The Fellowship of the Ring reminds most of us why we go to the movies in the first place: to be frightened, to be excited, to be transported, to be treated with respect. To be enchanted. I can't wait to be reminded again.-Walter Chaw


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
Even given its occasional miscue, The Fellowship of the Ring is an unqualified triumph, its status as the best Western fantasy film ever made all but indisputable.
I'm trying to remain calm, but at the rate these good reviews are coming in, I don't think I can handle it.
1 posted on 12/06/2001 10:20:46 AM PST by ecurbh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
I feel the madness creeping upon me.

MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR! MUST SEE LOTR!

phew.... *hack* ...whoo

2 posted on 12/06/2001 10:25:54 AM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
I am really excited and scared about this.... I read and re-read the books many many times at different points in my life, and I am excited to see it, but a little afraid my own images of these characters and events are too entrenched to be open to another's interpretation.

This review is sure encouraging though!!!

3 posted on 12/06/2001 10:27:13 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
I can't handle the wait. This is the one and only movie that I have ever obsessed about this much. It is the one and only movie (well it will be the first of three) where I have bought tickets in advance to the very first available showing. I figure I can't lose expectations-wise, since all I ask of it is to be better than Bakshi's. If it is as good as the rest of the reviews say, it will be only the third movie that I see twice in the theater and maybe the only move I have seen three times in a theater.

This is as bad as waiting for Christmas as a kid.

4 posted on 12/06/2001 10:27:38 AM PST by valhallasone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Ping!
5 posted on 12/06/2001 10:29:15 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
You know, looking at the pictures I've seen so far, there's one thing that really bugs me. The visuals seem excellent, but what the heck is with the pointy ears on the hobbits? Who came up with that?? Granted, it's a small quibble, but I still think it's stupid.
6 posted on 12/06/2001 10:29:25 AM PST by RosieCotton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
ping
7 posted on 12/06/2001 10:32:52 AM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: valhallasone
This is as bad as waiting for Christmas as a kid.

Oh, no it's much, much worse. Because Christmas comes every year and I've been waiting 24 years for this movie to come out.

8 posted on 12/06/2001 10:33:02 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Frodo Lives!
9 posted on 12/06/2001 10:33:39 AM PST by ObfusGate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RosieCotton
They did have big pointy ears.... check your book... I am trying to find mine now.
10 posted on 12/06/2001 10:34:09 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Dunno about you, but I've been following this movie ever since they first put up a website. (before that, actually...)
11 posted on 12/06/2001 10:34:43 AM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
Happy day! My request for vacation on the release date was granted!

Yours in Truth,

12 posted on 12/06/2001 10:35:17 AM PST by Buggman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
And I thought I was too old to camp overnight for an event....
13 posted on 12/06/2001 10:37:32 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Tolkien doesn't say that they have pointy ears. In fact, his drawings of Bilbo show his ears to be small and kind of round.
14 posted on 12/06/2001 10:45:24 AM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
What the heck, don't remain calm - I haven't! :-) Side note: has anyone noticed the remarkable similarity between this image of Ian Holm playing Bilbo and the real J.R.R. Tolkien? I wonder if that's on purpose....
15 posted on 12/06/2001 10:46:55 AM PST by egarvue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
They did have big pointy ears.... check your book... I am trying to find mine now.

Hmm. Well, if you find anything about that, I stand corrected. But I don't remember anything about that in the books. They're short, have curly hair and hairy feet, but I don't remember anything about big pointy ears.

I guess a lot of us have slightly different pictures in our heads of what a hobbit (and all the other characters) should look like...one of the perils of making a movie about such a well-loved book is that people have been playing their own version of a movie in their heads for so long that no movie is going to get everything right in everyone's opinion.

16 posted on 12/06/2001 10:47:02 AM PST by RosieCotton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
This is the one film I would literally wait hours in line to see... I CAN'T WAIT!!!
17 posted on 12/06/2001 10:52:13 AM PST by austinTparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh
I too am waiting in anticipation, and this incredibly positive review only increases that anticipation, but...........

But even better than Jackson's visionary re-imagining of Tolkien's battles is his expulsion of the British theologian's subterranean religiosity and subtext of virulent racism.

Huh????????????????????????????????????? Why do I immediately have a visceral need to vomit?

18 posted on 12/06/2001 10:53:17 AM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh

The Beauty and the Beast writing team
19 posted on 12/06/2001 10:58:57 AM PST by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
I'm glad someone else caught that! "Virulent racism"????
He must be referring to the Ents.LOL
20 posted on 12/06/2001 11:03:06 AM PST by thurules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson