Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leahy, Daschle Anthrax Letters Same (photo)
AP ^ | 12/6/01 | Pete Yost

Posted on 12/07/2001 9:46:24 AM PST by gumbo

Leahy, Daschle Anthrax Letters Same

Updated: Thu, Dec 06 6:35 PM EST

By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - A newly opened letter to Sen. Patrick Leahy contained suspected anthrax and handwriting that appear identical to an earlier letter to Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, the FBI disclosed Thursday.

With the letter and the powder undergoing laboratory analysis, "We hope to learn ... who did this and how they did it," said FBI official Van Harp.

The suspected anthrax in the Leahy letter "appears to be consistent with that found in the letter sent to Senator Daschle," Harp said.

The Leahy and Daschle letters state in part, "09-11-01 You can not stop us. We have this anthrax" and conclude, "Allah is great."

It will take weeks to complete all testing, because "there is a finite amount of material in that letter" to Leahy, necessitating "a very cautious analytical approach," Harp, assistant director in charge of the FBI's Washington field office, said in a statement.

The FBI posted photographs on its Web site that detailed Wednesday's opening of the Leahy letter at the Army's biodefense laboratory in Fort Detrick, Md.

The first step in dealing with the Leahy letter was to cut a small opening in the envelope and use a machine to suck out the suspected anthrax.

The photographs show a technician's gloved hands inside a laboratory device known as a "glove box," as the technician uses a pair of scissors to clip open one end of the Leahy envelope, then pulls out the letter with tweezers.

Harp described the laboratory procedure as taking place in "a controlled, pure, sterile environment in which we controlled motion and air." Glove boxes typically are set up as negative pressure chambers to ensure that in case of an accidental leak, the material would stay inside rather than escape outward.

Investigators now have four letters in the anthrax probe. Letters to NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw and the New York Post also are identical.

The opening of the Leahy letter was delayed almost three weeks as technicians tried to determine the best way to protect evidence retrieved from it.

In October, some of the anthrax from the letter to Daschle "literally jumped off the slide" and was lost to investigators as lab technicians at Fort Detrick tried to examine the deadly powder under a microscope.

The suspected anthrax powder from the Leahy letter will be sent to various labs for analysis.

The letter itself must be decontaminated and irradiated before it can be tested for fingerprints, DNA and fibers.

The Leahy envelope was found by government investigators Nov. 16 among mail quarantined after the Oct. 15 discovery of anthrax in the Daschle letter. All edges of the Leahy envelope was taped, and it was loaded with so much powder - billions of spores - that "you could feel" it when touching the envelope, an FBI microbiologist said in a recent interview.

The Leahy letter was in one of 630 trash bags filled with congressional mail that was set aside after discovery of the Daschle letter. It took investigators a week to find a suitable warehouse to facilitate the search of potentially dangerous material in the unopened mail. Another two weeks were required to build a containment area inside a suburban Washington facility where investigators could test the mail.

And it took almost a full week of testing on the various trash bags to come up with the Leahy letter, the only piece of mail that was loaded inside with suspected anthrax.

Five people have died of anthrax exposure, and 13 others who became ill have recovered.

In another development in the anthrax investigation, the inspector general of the U.S. Postal Service has opened an inquiry into the government's response to the discovery of anthrax spores at a handful of mail facilities.

The four letters - to Leahy, Daschle, Brokaw and the New York Post - were postmarked Trenton, N.J.

---

On the Net: Federal Bureau of Investigation: http://www.fbi.gov


TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anthrax; anthraxscarelist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Couldn't find this posted already. First photo I've seen of text of Leahy letter (not just envelope).
1 posted on 12/07/2001 9:46:24 AM PST by gumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Daschle letter, for comparison:


2 posted on 12/07/2001 9:52:26 AM PST by gumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gumbo
Who is Allan, and why is he great?
3 posted on 12/07/2001 9:58:49 AM PST by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gumbo
It will take weeks to complete all testing, because "there is a finite amount of material in that letter" to Leahy, necessitating "a very cautious analytical approach," Harp, assistant director in charge of the FBI's Washington field office, said in a statement ... The opening of the Leahy letter was delayed almost three weeks as technicians tried to determine the best way to protect evidence retrieved from it ... In October, some of the anthrax from the letter to Daschle "literally jumped off the slide" and was lost to investigators as lab technicians at Fort Detrick tried to examine the deadly powder under a microscope.

And the dog ate my homework. Then again, if there's nothing we can do about it, perhaps we'd rather just not know who has the anthrax.

4 posted on 12/07/2001 9:59:15 AM PST by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Senator Leahy holding images of anthrax letters sent to him and Senator Daschle...


5 posted on 12/07/2001 10:00:29 AM PST by gumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gumbo
What date is the post-mark on the envelopes?
6 posted on 12/07/2001 10:12:04 AM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gumbo
The likeliest story I've seen so far is that this is top-grade, technically sophisticated American anthrax made a few years back in our own biowar program, and that it was sent to these two leaders by a biochemist with access to it as part of a plan to scare the government into signing a nice, profitable contract with his lab. Presumably the sender hopes to sell the government testing equipment, cleansing equipment, air filters, or the like. Of course Daschle and Leahy are the two Senate leaders most likely to influence the decision to pass out such contracts.

Although the FBI has done everything it can to confuse the situation, the most credible reports agree that this is probably the Ames strain and that it is probably beyond the capability of anyone else to make, other than the Russians and the Chinese, to whom clinton may have sold the technology.

7 posted on 12/07/2001 11:03:44 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Am I misreading your post? There seems to be a logical conflict between the two paragraphs. Do you believe that the sender is an American who wishes to gain a huge government contract or that the anthrax came from a Russian or Chinese lab? Can both of these things be true?
8 posted on 12/07/2001 11:12:12 AM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Queen Elizabeth of Iowa
Okay, perhaps your point was that it was the Ames strain possessed by someone in the U.S. AND by the Russians and the Chinese, but that it was someone in the U.S. who is the perpetrator, and the Russians and the Chinese may have it but don't figure in to your scenario.
9 posted on 12/07/2001 11:14:08 AM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gumbo
The letter itself must be decontaminated and irradiated before it can be tested for fingerprints, DNA and fibers.


Wouldn't irradiation make DNA test useless??

10 posted on 12/07/2001 11:23:41 AM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface; aristeides; bvw; Mitchell; Alamo-Girl
What date is the post-mark on the envelopes?

Good question. I don't remember.

aristeides, bvw, Mitchell, Alamo-Girl: anybody got that info at hand?

11 posted on 12/07/2001 11:26:50 AM PST by gumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
Wouldn't irradiation make DNA test useless??

Don't know that either. Hope the gov't does.

12 posted on 12/07/2001 11:27:35 AM PST by gumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I TOTALLY agree with you...I think it's the anthrax vaccine salesman or company president!! FOLLOW THE MONEY!

It IS a foreigner...the "ones" 1's...have a tail and base...no American writes a one like that.

13 posted on 12/07/2001 11:39:06 AM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gumbo; bvw; *Anthrax_Scare_List; Alamo-Girl
I believe both the Daschle and Leahy letters bear Oct. 8 Trenton postmarks.

This letter looks identical enough to the Daschle letter that photocopying must have been at work.

14 posted on 12/07/2001 11:45:01 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gumbo
The phrase "Allah is great" bothers me; I can't help thinking that a muslim would write "God is great" and that the deliberate use of "Allah" is an attempt to mislead.
15 posted on 12/07/2001 12:06:18 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
Wouldn't irradiation make DNA test useless??

The are going to irradiate the *letter*, not the the powder in the envelope.

16 posted on 12/07/2001 12:15:57 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
It IS a foreigner...the "ones" 1's...have a tail and base...no American writes a one like that.

Not true. You can't exclude all americans based on a writing style, and it isn't that unusual.

17 posted on 12/07/2001 12:17:41 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gumbo; aristeides
The Daschle and Leahy letters were postmarked Oct. 9. (The earlier letters to the NY Post and Tom Brokaw were postmarked Sept. 18.)
18 posted on 12/07/2001 12:42:42 PM PST by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Grut
The phrase "Allah is great" bothers me; I can't help thinking that a muslim would write "God is great" and that the deliberate use of "Allah" is an attempt to mislead.

I've heard people say this before. Can you explain why you think a Muslim would not use the term Allah when writing in English?

19 posted on 12/07/2001 12:46:27 PM PST by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mlo
The are going to irradiate the *letter*, not the the powder in the envelope.

Yes, but aren't they going to test the letter (and particularly the envelope) for traces of DNA from the sender ?

It's not just the anthrax's DNA they're interested in.

20 posted on 12/07/2001 1:33:05 PM PST by gumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson