Posted on 12/09/2001 8:25:58 AM PST by grist for the mill
Albert Einstein is quoted as saying, "A human being is part of the whole, called by us 'Universe', a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty."
Many humans have an attitude that restricts their ability to understand or empathize with non-human animals and other life forms and has some serious consequences for all life on this planet. It is called anthropocentrism, or viewing man as the center or final aim of the universe. I refer to this in my book, Animal Talk, as the "human superiority complex" considering humans as superior to or the pinnacle of all forms of life. From the anthropocentric view, non-human beings that are most like human are usually considered more intelligent, for example, chimpanzees who learn to use sign language or dolphins who signal word or thought comprehension through touching electronic devices in their tanks. Animals or other life forms that don't express themselves in human ways by language or in terms easily comprehensible by common human standards are often considered less developed, inferior, more primitive or mechanistic, and usually of less importance than humans.
This viewpoint has been used to justify using animals as objects for human ends. Since humans are the superior creatures, "dumb, unfeeling" non-humans can be disregarded, mistreated, subjugated, killed or whole species eliminated without much concern for their existence in itself, only their usefulness or lack of it to humankind.
Many humans, as they see other animals are more like them in patterns of behavior and expression of intelligence, begin to respect them more and treat them with more regard for their rights. However, this does not transcend the trap of anthropocentrism. To increase harmony of life on Earth, all beings need to be regarded as worthy of respect, whether seen as different or similar to the human species.
The anthropocentric view toward animals echoes the way in which many humans have discriminated against other humans because they were of different cultures, races, religions, or sexes. Regarding others as less intelligent or substandard has commonly been used to justify domination, cruelty or elimination of them.
Too often people label what they don't understand as inferior, dumb, or to be avoided, without attempting to understand a different way of being. More enlightened humans look upon meeting people, things or animals that are different than themselves as opportunities to expand their understanding, share new realities, and become more whole.
Anthropocentrism does not allow humans to bridge the artificial gap it creates. It leaves humans fragmented or alienated from much of their environment. We see the disastrous consequences of this in human disruption of the earth's ecology, causing the disintegration of health and harmony for all including human life.
Anthropocentrism causes humans to misjudge animal intelligence and awareness. Humans can get too fixed in the view or model that they indeed are the center of and separate from the universe and therefore the most intelligent and aware. They then see or seek only to prove that point.
Anthropocentric humans also tend to judge non-human animals according to human cultural standards, as human groups often do with other human cultures. Instead of viewing and evaluating animals according to the their own cultural experience, heredity, training and environment, they impose human environments, tests, standards and methods and evaluate animals, according to the ability to exhibit human-like behavior.
This is similar to the bias that was found in college preparatory and intelligence tests, which caused anyone unfamiliar with a white middle class upbringing to score lower and therefore to be considered less intelligent. Individuals with different ethnic backgrounds could not comprehend the tests' frames of reference and therefore were not able to express their intelligence through them.
When we respectfully regard animals as intelligent, sensitive fellow beings with whom we walk upon the Earth, our whole perspective of life changes. In cooperation instead of alienation, we can create a new balance and joy in living for all us here. Lets each of us do our part.
As a child, I never understood animal worship that you'd encounter in the study of history (American Indians, Hindus and their sacred cows, etc.) or of the Bible (idols of calves or whatever.)
When I encounter wackos like this, I see now how nature- and animal-worship existed.
These people are pagans suffering from a sort of mental illness. I hope the authorities will keep an eye on them. Their mental illness makes them a threat to normal people. The "logic" of equating animals to human beings is, by any definition, insanity.
Hmmm...maybe I should go ask the cattle for help with this SQL project I'm working on for school. Or maybe the neighbors Sheltie can help me with it.
http://www.tiller.org/science.html
Snip:
"The title "Science and Human Transformation" reveals from the outset Dr. Tiller's broader agenda. He doesn't simply want less than a Science with Heart. He seems to be saying that without incorporating the spiritual dimension into scientific practice, then our models will forever remain sterile and only able to account for the most mundane and materialistic aspects of existence. And then he shows us how to do it. Dr. Tiller builds upon the growing realization in physics that we cannot escape the implications of quantum physics. The old "objectivity" which sought to keep the experimenter and his experiment separate is seen now as a fundamental misunderstanding of how the universe works. But Tiller shows for the first rime how to mathematically incorporate consciousness from the start. This may he the breakthrough which we have all been waiting for."
This viewpoint has been used to justify using animals as objects for human ends. Since humans are the superior creatures, "dumb, unfeeling" non-humans can be disregarded, mistreated, subjugated, killed or whole species eliminated without much concern for their existence in itself, only their usefulness or lack of it to humankind.
Actually I think it's because we got hungry!
Hmmm,steak,chiken,veal,yum,yum.
Who might those be, and how did you reach that interesting conclusion?
Stay Safe !
Ask the cows all you like, but they're more into OOPLs than DB stuff. And I've got dibs on the Sheltie - she's coming over this afternoon to help me optimize this compiler I'm working on.
I wouldn't if I were you. She's sharp on Visual Basic, but other than that, she's just another pretty face. I had to help her with her buried_bone DB last winter. Now, if you want help with a compiler, the guy down the street has a Jack Russell that is an absolute whizz...if you can tolerate the attitude.
As a child, I never understood animal worship that you'd encounter in the study of history (American Indians, Hindus and their sacred cows, etc.) or of the Bible (idols of calves or whatever.)
Nothing in the article indicates animal worship. No need to be frightened thus.
(Hey----you're really Ted Kycinski, right? I didn't think they'd let you have a computer there.)
Man was given dominion over animals. Man is the Son of God, so your scenario is from the SciFi channel.
I would ask these wackos, if nothing separates humans from "animals," then the separation between "animal" and "plant" is equally arbitrary and a construct of eeeveel anthopocentric, mammal-centric (?) humans. Sooo, why is it any more acceptable to experiment on or to eat PLANTS than it is ANIMALS? These are just words and concepts of just another ANIMAL (humans, right.)
In this (your?) scenario, it is wrong to harm ANY LIVING thing. So therefore you should just commit suicide to save the planet from your pollution and consumption.
What about BACTERIA and VIRUS rights? I am deadly serious, as this will come in our lifetime (sooner than later.) Antibiotics are weapons of genocide created by evveeeel anthopocentric humans against the natural, gentle creatures of Mother Nature.
What we are talking about here is nothing more or less than primitive, pagan nature worship and a return to life as, say, the Taliban wish to return to. Or Luddites. It's anti-progress, and most of all it's ANTI-FREEDOM. It seeks to return Western civilization to a dark age that preceeded the enlightenment of the Judeo-Christian.
We believe that man was born with natural rights. Dogs, bacteria and gardenias were NOT born with natural rights. Period, end of discussion.
PS---And what about SPREMICIDE??
pure materialists without compassion, spirituality or any other redeeming featurearound here, and what evidence supports your insulting judgment?
Penelope Smith, meet Cat Mandu.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.