Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Libertarian Party: Still Going Strong At 30
Toogood Reports ^ | December 11, 2001 | David F. Nolan

Posted on 12/11/2001 3:08:00 PM PST by Starmaker

It seems hard to believe that 30 years have passed since a small group of young idealists, most of us just out of college, met in Colorado Springs to launch the Libertarian Party.

Our inspirations ranged from Thomas Jefferson and John Stuart Mill to Ayn Rand and Robert Heinlein. We were passionate in our belief that no individual should be sacrificed to satisfy some collective "need" or plan; that all people should be free to pursue their own dreams in their own way, so long as they do not use force or fraud to harm others.

The ideal of individual liberty is an age-old dream, but one which has been violated by governments throughout human history, and our hardy group saw that neither of the two major American parties was true to that vision. Republican and Democratic politicians give occasional lip service to individual rights and liberty, but they are only too willing to violate those rights to attain their goal of the moment.

And it is our unswerving devotion to individual liberty, I believe, that has given the Libertarian Party its enduring strength. That strength has enabled it to grow despite the strong institutional bias toward a "two-party system" – not mentioned, by the way, in any of our nation's founding documents.

Currently, there are 240,000 voters registered as Libertarians, and 298 Libertarians hold elective office, more than all other third parties combined.

According to research by Richard Winger, one of the most respected third-party experts in the country, the Libertarian Party is the most successful alternative party of the past half-century. Winger found that Libertarians accounted for the largest number of gubernatorial and Senatorial candidates obtaining the highest percentages in races from 1948 through 2000 – more than the Reform Party, the Greens, or George Wallace's American Independent Party.

Last year, 256 Libertarians ran for the U.S. House – the first time in 80 years that any third party had contested a majority of Congressional seats. And they polled a total of 1.7 million votes, the largest number ever received by any third party slate. In Massachusetts, U.S. Senate candidate Carla Howell received 12 percent of the vote in a three-way race, coming within a point or two of beating the Republican!

The Libertarian Party has helped to fundamentally shift the nature of American political debate – even though it has yet to elect a member of Congress or a president. Libertarian ideas that were considered outlandish 20 years ago – like replacing the bankrupt Social Security system with private retirement accounts, getting rid of the income tax and the IRS, ending the War on Drugs, and so on – are now part of mainstream political debate.

And yet the news media have largely overlooked this evidence that the Libertarian message has a broad and enduring appeal in America. Perhaps it is because our culture is obsessed with celebrities, and the Libertarian Party has never had a "celebrity" candidate for president – a George Wallace, Ross Perot, or Ralph Nader.

But whatever the reason, the Libertarian Party isn't going to go away.

Indeed, as other alternative parties struggle or fade, the Libertarian Party is clearly the only viable national alternative to the Democrats and Republicans.

In 2002, we will once again be fielding candidates in a majority of Congressional districts. In most races, these candidates will be the only choice for voters who are deeply concerned about the ill-conceived and dangerous Security State measures that have been hastily enacted by Congress. We are in a time of tremendous change, and I believe that Americans are soon going to have to choose between a lot more freedom and a lot less freedom.

We are living more and more in a system in which people are no longer innocent until proven guilty. More and more, we are living in a state where it is presumed that the government controls everything, and that Americans have to get the government's permission to do almost anything. Ten years ago, you didn't even need to show identification to get onto an airplane; today you have to show some kind of "government-issued" ID to check into many hotels.

The question is, can we turn that around? I don't know. But I sincerely believe the Libertarian Party is the last, best hope for freedom in America.

Thirty years ago, when the Libertarian Party was founded, we were moved by the idea expressed so well in the Rascals song: "All the world over, so easy to see, people everywhere just want to be free."

They still do.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: libertarians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 541-553 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2001 3:08:00 PM PST by Starmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....
.zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.zzzzzzzzz.zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.zzzzzzzzz.....zzzzzzzzzzzzz.zzzz.......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...............ZZ
2 posted on 12/11/2001 3:13:16 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Going strong? I don't think so.

Maybe when they get Harry Browne to stop making an ass of himself on live TV...

3 posted on 12/11/2001 3:13:39 PM PST by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Where are they going?
4 posted on 12/11/2001 3:15:51 PM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunStar
The Republicans have Trent Lott, the LP has Browne.

Both should be surgically removed.

5 posted on 12/11/2001 3:16:24 PM PST by Doctor Doom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker; *libertarians
I don't know how strong. In 1980 when I voted in my first presidential election for candidate Ed Clarke, he received one million votes. The Party has never matched that level since.
6 posted on 12/11/2001 3:16:40 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
I've always thought of myself as libetarian in philosophy, but never agreed with many of the official planks of the LP. Abolish IRS my plebian central-to-northern european you know what. The city should take care of city streets, cause the people who just live next to streets don't know how.

That seems to be the case with a lot of FReepers, following someone else's party line has little appeal for them that choosem to think for themselfs.

God Bless JimRob, JohnRob, BADJOE, and all the "little people" (giggle) who make this possible. :-) I 'pologize if I have offended anyone. (metagiggle)

7 posted on 12/11/2001 3:27:07 PM PST by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Where are they going?

380,000 votes in 2000 presidentials, 460,000 in 1996,...900,000+ in 1980. I think we see where they're going.

8 posted on 12/11/2001 3:28:52 PM PST by Moosilauke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Moosilauke
Going, going, gone...
9 posted on 12/11/2001 3:30:50 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Doom
>> The Republicans have Trent Lott, the LP has Browne.
Both should be surgically removed.
<<

Apples and Oranges. The GOP never nominated Lott for president ONCE, let alone TWICE.

You might try a comparion by naming Bob Dole, but nobody wanted Dole in 2000-- they knew it was time for a different face after he got his butt kicked. The LP, on the other hand, ignored all the Browne alternatives (Don Gorman, Barry Hess, etc.) and had no quasms about blindly supporting him again. Now they claim he "doesn't represent" the party. Sure didn't seem that way for the last 5 years....

10 posted on 12/11/2001 3:35:48 PM PST by BillyBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Bump. I think YOU said it all.
11 posted on 12/11/2001 3:35:56 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
The one thing I genuinely do appreciate about the Libertarian Party is it's apparent commitment to ending judicial activism, which I consider one of the greatest threats to the rule of the people in this country. I fully expect that a Libertarian president would appoint Supreme Court justices that would finally overrule Roe V. Wade. This is something I sadly cannot expect from the Republican Party.
12 posted on 12/11/2001 3:38:18 PM PST by helmsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Fair points, but choosing a leader who turns out to be a milquetoast, con man or polar opposite of the party's principle is universal to every political party.
13 posted on 12/11/2001 3:39:06 PM PST by Doctor Doom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: helmsman
Why would a Libertarian Supreme Court overturn Roe V Wade when abortion up to birth is in their platform?
14 posted on 12/11/2001 3:41:34 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
That's not the case.

Say what you will of other planks, but the LP rightly recognizes that abortion is not within the purview of the federal government, and would very much seek to overturn Roe v. Wade as unconstitutional.

15 posted on 12/11/2001 3:43:34 PM PST by Doctor Doom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
You might try a comparion by naming Bob Dole, but nobody wanted Dole in 2000 p>
If nobody wanted him, then how the hell did he become the candidate for the GOP?

16 posted on 12/11/2001 3:47:05 PM PST by The Green Goblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: BillyBoy
Lott also didn't come out the very day of the terrorist attacks and assert we had them coming (or any other time, for that matter).
18 posted on 12/11/2001 3:57:07 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Green Goblin
I think you misread...in 2000, not 1996.
19 posted on 12/11/2001 3:58:06 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Green Goblin
Dole got the nomination by default. No other serious candidate wanted to run against Clinton in 96.

It's one thing to throw your hat into the ring like Buchanan did, it's entirely different to mount a real campaign designed to win the White House. That takes real balls, like Bush had when he systematically set out to do it in 1998.

20 posted on 12/11/2001 4:02:06 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 541-553 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson