Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alan Keyes: "Uncle Sam's dangerous drug" (Implies Bush Is Worse Than Hitler!)
WND ^ | Saturday, December 15, 2001 | Dr. Alan Keyes

Posted on 12/15/2001 7:16:32 AM PST by Keyes For President

WorldNetDaily: Uncle Sam's dangerous drug

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25705

Saturday, December 15, 2001


Alan Keyes Alan Keyes
Uncle Sam's dangerous drug


By Alan Keyes


© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com--> © 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

House and Senate negotiators reached agreement this week on education legislation that the president is expected to sign quickly. And the House of Representatives, in an overwhelming vote uniting Democrats and Republicans, passed the bill on Thursday. Representatives Tom DeLay and Peter Hoekstra led a small group of the conservative remnant in opposing the $26.5 billion package, which Bush Republicans are trying hard to portray as a prudent implementation of conservative principle. But it is, in fact, the culminating capitulation of the conservative attempt to reform the federal government's role in education.

What I wrote about the bill in September remains true today: Instead of the promised attempt to rein in government domination of education, we have an education bill that ramps-up federal funding, increases federal control and was cooperatively stripped of all elements of support for genuine school choice and local control.

However distracted conservatives may be by the drama of the war against terror, we should not let this moment pass without noticing the comprehensive defeat that Bush education policy, enshrined in the bill, represents.

Apparently ended is the struggle conservatives have waged for decades to head off the nationalization of K-12 education. Constitutional language, American tradition and fundamental principles of self-government all weigh decidedly against any federal involvement in local education. Since the first election of Ronald Reagan, the Republican Party had stood for a rollback of that involvement, even abolition of the Department of Education. Now, at the federal level, we have abandoned the argument with the public about the costs and dangers of federal involvement in K-12 education. The current bill does not artfully advance an incremental version of the principled position of President Reagan. Indeed, it takes us in precisely the opposite direction.

It also utterly and finally reneges on one of the most important of President Bush's education policy campaign promises. Candidate Bush called for cutting funds to failing schools and returning to the parents that money in a limited voucher scheme. The bill about to pass Congress for President Bush's signature will give failing schools more money! And the voucher proposal was jettisoned shortly after the inauguration.

The increase in federal education funding in this bill is staggering – over 40 percent in one year. This is more than the education budgets of an average-sized state, such as Iowa or Colorado. With the money, President Bush has eagerly taken on himself, on behalf of the national government, responsibility for the educational performance of the nation's children. No rhetoric about flexibility and local independence will prevent the inevitable – ongoing torrents of federal money, bilge about federal resolve to "leave no child behind" and ever increasing levels of federal oversight and control.

And what will happen when an extra $8 billion fails to improve our children's learning? And fail it will, because real improvement in government schools is blocked by administrative inertia, obstructionist unions and statist secularism in the professional educational establishment. Sad history and all the data show that these impediments are increased, not diminished, by federal dollars. But still the cry will go up for more money, and a more aggressive federal commitment. What will President Bush say next year when another $8 billion increase, or $12 billion, is demanded to make real reform happen? After all, the federal government can leave no child behind. What next? Shall we pass the "Lake Woebegone Act" and decree that all the children shall be "above average?"

Most discouraging of all is that the new bipartisan federal education initiative is such a distraction from the deepest source of our educational problems – the demise of the two-parent, marriage-based family. The family is the school of character and must be the primary agent in education. No federal spending can effectively energize the real reform we need – reform in which parents get control of their own lives, reassert effective, wise and moral control over the lives of their children, and extend that control finally to the common life of our public schools.

As with most federal welfare, federal education money is a drug that obscures and intensifies underlying problems. The Republican Party used to preach "Just say 'No!'" Now we are increasing the dose and inviting the country to party on. It's a prescription for GOP and national addiction that immeasurably weakens our children's future. Let us pray it does not ultimately cost us our capacity for responsible self-government.


Be sure to visit Alan Keyes' communications center for founding principles, The Declaration Foundation.


Former Reagan administration official Alan Keyes, was U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Social and Economic Council and 2000 Republican presidential candidate.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 761-775 next last
That does it for me! Implying Bush is worse than Hitler "(Representatives Tom DeLay and Peter Hoekstra led a small group of the conservative remnant in opposing the $26.5 billion package, which Bush Republicans are trying hard to portray as a prudent implementation of conservative principle. But it is, in fact, the culminating capitulation of the conservative attempt to reform the federal government's role in education.)" is bad enough.

But when he goes on to say that Laura Bush is the "Whore of Babylon" spoken of in the Bible "(It also utterly and finally reneges on one of the most important of President Bush's education policy campaign promises. Candidate Bush called for cutting funds to failing schools and returning to the parents that money in a limited voucher scheme. The bill about to pass Congress for President Bush's signature will give failing schools more money! And the voucher proposal was jettisoned shortly after the inauguration.)"---well OK, he didn't actually say it, but we all know that's what he meant---that's just going too far!

I used to admire this man for being staunchly pro-life and a defender of the Constitution. But with this vicious article attacking our most holy president and his perfect family, he has lost me. I'm turning in my Alan Keyes membership card and my official Alan Keyes decoder spy ring! And I'll never buy another bottle of Alan Keyes chocolate breakfast drink as long as I live!!!

1 posted on 12/15/2001 7:16:33 AM PST by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Please refund my $29.95 Alan Keyes fan club membership fee. I'm returning the official Keyester hat and the coffee mug, but I'm keeping the "Alan Keyes Gurgling Cod"!
2 posted on 12/15/2001 7:19:18 AM PST by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gelato; rdf; Eternal Vigilance; Rowdee; seattlesue
Ping!
3 posted on 12/15/2001 7:20:19 AM PST by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Great article IMHO. Keyes hits the nail on the head WRT education here.

What it is going to take is the good people of this country, in larger and larger numbers, taking their kids out of the public education system and letting it fold in on itslef.

I believe more and more are doing just that and pray it will continue so that the beheamouth falls of its own weight.

4 posted on 12/15/2001 7:25:55 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Perhaps you should change your screen name. I agree with Alan. Increase federal funding of schools. Bad form for a "conservative".
5 posted on 12/15/2001 7:26:36 AM PST by Ragin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
What are you talking about? I see no reference to Hitler or Babylon. Somewhat of a stretch don't you think...
6 posted on 12/15/2001 7:33:14 AM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
"But with this vicious article attacking our most holy president and his perfect family [reference to the GWB presidency] ...." -- Keyes For President

I think you have your wires all messed up.

7 posted on 12/15/2001 7:33:40 AM PST by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Keyes is the Mary Francis Berry of the right. Big whining crybaby.
8 posted on 12/15/2001 7:35:16 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Now if we can get you to change your screen name and stop posting these articles we will have achieved a complete deprogramming. :)
9 posted on 12/15/2001 7:36:35 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
No fair! You must have actually read the article!

;-D

10 posted on 12/15/2001 7:37:44 AM PST by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
BUMP!!!
11 posted on 12/15/2001 7:39:29 AM PST by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Ah, the point is proven. When no one shows up to argue with you folks, you feel the need to create controversy.

Have a nice day.

12 posted on 12/15/2001 7:40:10 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Oh, I get it. You think you're funny.
13 posted on 12/15/2001 7:41:32 AM PST by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
For eight years, Loyal Democrats refused to acknowledge clinton's broken promises. How dare any Republican remind us of Bush's broken promises.
14 posted on 12/15/2001 7:41:52 AM PST by IM2Phat4U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Someone has to take Mr. Keyes' crackpipe away and slap a tinfoil helmet on his head. I'm done with Keyes for good now, he can go get bent.
15 posted on 12/15/2001 7:42:53 AM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
You know, what's really funny is that what you may actually accomplish in the long run, is to get people so pissed off at your idiotic comments that they will refuse to even consider Keyes as a choice when it comes down to the wire.

Keep up the good work, Alan Keyes needs more like you around.

16 posted on 12/15/2001 7:44:40 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Keyes For President
also utterly and finally reneges on one of the most important of President Bush's education policy campaign promises. Candidate Bush called for cutting funds to failing schools and returning to the parents that money in a limited voucher scheme. The bill about to pass Congress for President Bush's signature will give failing schools more money! And the voucher proposal was jettisoned shortly after the inauguration.

   Say one thing, then do another? Actively promote policy contrary to the Constitution?

I'm shocked. /sarcasm

   Many here have been saying for months that Dubya is just another in a long line of NWO shills. Maybe, someday, some particularly egregious infringement will result in a watershed event, shaking enough of the populace from its lethargy to actually begin to believe.

Maybe...

...someday...

18 posted on 12/15/2001 7:47:25 AM PST by Le-Roy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
I can only conclude from your editorializing in the title, that you are deliberately trying to start a Keyes flame war here on FR. This is exactly what some of the more vocal Bush supporters here have accused the Keyes contigent of doing. Perhaps you should consider whether doing so is productive in spreading Keyes' message.
19 posted on 12/15/2001 7:48:40 AM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 761-775 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson