Skip to comments.

Posted on 12/17/2001 4:00:42 PM PST by Starmaker

Ethnic profiling is not democratic, nor is it polite. But during wartime, people who have characteristics in common with the enemy are looked upon with suspicion, even malice. Like it or not, the burden of loyalty is upon those who are suspected, not upon those who suspect.

During the Civil War, insinuations of disloyalty were made against American Jews. Like the Muslims of today, they constituted a distinct ethnic group, recently arrived immigrants, with language, customs and religious beliefs different from other Americans. The appointment of Judah P. Benjamin to a prominent position in the Confederate government provided additional motivation to suspect Jewish loyalty, even though Benjamin was an assimilated, intermarried secularist estranged from his own community. Jewish travellers were harrassed by Union patrols at state lines who had been given specific orders to single them out:

I have been very busy in answering the innumerable questions of civilians, and hope they are now about through. I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. This gold has but one use—the purchase of arms and ammunition, which can always be had for gold, at Nassau, New Providence, or Cincinnati; all the guards we may establish cannot stop it. Of course I have respected all permits by yourself or the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews) I have stopped it.
– General William T. Sherman, July 30, 1862.

Refuse all permits to come south of Jackson for the present. The Israelites especially should be kept out.
– General U.S. Grant, November 9, 1862.

Give orders to all the conductors on the road that no Jews are to be permitted to travel on the railroad southward from any point. They may go north and be encouraged in it; but they are such an intolerable nuisance that the department must be purged of them.
–General U.S. Grant, November 10, 1862.

I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the specie regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officer at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department, but they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel everywhere. They will land at any wood-yard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves they will act as agents for some one else, who will be at a military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy up at an agreed rate, paying gold.
– General U.S. Grant, December 17, 1862.

The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the department within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order.

Post commanders will see that all of this class of people be furnished passes and required to leave, and any one returning after such notification will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permit from headquarters.

No passes will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.
– General U.S. Grant, December 17, 1862.

The response of the Jewish community to this uncalled-for profiling, in addition to protesting the injustice, was to underscore their firm loyalty to the Union cause. Cesar F. Kaskell, a Jewish citizen of Paducah, Kentucky, and a Union Army veteran, sent this letter of protest to President Lincoln:

Hon. ABRAHAM LINCOLN,

General Orders, No. 11, issued by General Grant at Oxford, Miss., December the 17th, commands all post commanders to expel all Jews, without distinction, within twenty-four hours, from his entire department. The undersigned, good and loyal citizens of the United States and residents of this town for many years, engaged in legitimate business as merchants, feel greatly insulted and outraged by this inhuman order, the carrying out of which would be the grossest violation of the Constitution and our rights as good citizens under it, and would place us, besides a large number of other Jewish families of this town, as outlaws before the whole world. We respectfully ask your immediate attention to this enormous outrage on all law and humanity, and pray for your effectual and immediate interposition. We would respectfully refer you to the post commander and post adjutant as to our loyalty, and to all respectable citizens of this community as to our standing as citizens and merchants. We respectfully ask for immediate instructions to be sent to the commander of this post.

D. WOLFF & BROS.
C. F. KASKELL.
J. W. KASKELL.

It was not enough for loyal Jews to protest against discrimination and injustice, but they felt compelled to prove their loyalty by more than lip service. They demanded justice, not only because they were entitled to it, but because they felt that they had earned it.

When the war broke out in 1861, Jewish Messenger editor Samuel M. Isaacs called on his readers to Stand By The Flag! and urging American Jews to show their loyalty by “taking up arms in defense of their country, pledging themselves to assist in maintaining inviolate its integrity, and ready to respond, if need be, with their lives, to the call of the constituted authorities, in the cause of law and order.” A Jewish recruit in the Army of the Potomac affirmed, “we are quite satisfied to fight with our Christian comrades for one cause, one country, and THE UNION.”

A century and a half later, we have another distinctive group of newly-arrived immigrants whose loyalty to the United States is called into question. How are Muslims in America responding to the challenge? Are there Muslim newspaper editors urging their readers to Stand By The Flag! even if it means taking up arms against other Muslims, as Samuel M. Isaacs urged American Jews to do? Have Muslim clerics proclaimed an unequivocal fatwah against those who commit murder in the name of Islam? If they are, they haven’t been too successful in conveying assurances of their loyalty to non-Muslim Americans. When confronted, most Islamic leaders in America mumble a feeble deprecation of “all forms of terrorism” before they segue into very loud complaints against other Americans for making them feel “unwelcome.” As though they believe that they should continue to enjoy the hospitality of the United States without showing even the slightest gratitude to America or anger against those who attacked her, even when it comes at the expense of their comfort and convenience.

At one time or another all newcomers have had to pass the test of loyalty—to choose between their adopted country, the United States, and the country that they left behind. The Jews, English, Irish, Germans, Italians, Chinese and Japanese who came to America have chosen the United States. The time has come to stand by the flag without equivocation. Can the Muslims, as a class, accept this challenge?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.