Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oklahoma City Victims Feel Slighted
AP | 12/21/01 | AP

Posted on 12/21/2001 12:01:48 PM PST by anniegetyourgun

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) - Some of those who lost loved ones in the Oklahoma City bombing are feeling slighted by the federal government over its decision to dispense an average of $1.65 million apiece to the families of the Sept. 11 dead.

No such federal fund was ever set up for the Oklahoma City victims.

"I don't want to do a hierarchy on terrorism here, but that's kind of minimizing what happened to the people of Oklahoma City," said Marsha Kight, whose daughter Frankie Merrell was killed in the April 19, 1995, bombing that killed 168 people and wounded more than 500. "The individual loss was just as great for us."

More than 3,000 people were killed in the attacks at the World Trade Center and Pentagon and in the plane crash in Pennsylvania. Generally, survivors will get a minimum of $300,000, with the exact amounts depending on such things as the victim's earning potential and pain and suffering.

The money will be in addition to the hundreds of millions of dollars in charitable donations that are being distributed to those who suffered in the Sept. 11 attacks.

The government fund was set up in September as part of a $15 billion airline bailout package. Those who want to receive money have to agree not to sue the airlines over the terrorist attacks.

Spokesmen for Sens. Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer of New York, who pushed the bill, did not return calls seeking comment on why Oklahoma City victims were not included, as some families say should have been done.

After the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Building, the government paid out death or disability benefits to federal employees or their families. The amounts depended on the employees' insurance coverage.

Dan McKinney, whose wife was a federal employee, estimated spouses received $100,000 on average. "Some people may have gotten rich off of it, but none that I know of," he said.

And cafeteria employees, parents of children killed in the day care center and those who died while visiting the building did not receive federal benefits.

Other federal aid given to the state for the victims totaled only about $75,000, said Suzanne Breedlove, director of victims' services for the district attorney's office.

Oklahoma City collected about $35 million in charitable donations, mostly to the Red Cross, Breedlove said. Victims had to prove loss of income or other reasons for assistance. Much of the money was used for mental health counseling and surgery.

Jannie Coverdale, whose two grandsons were killed in the day care center, said she has always felt the government treated bombing victims unfairly.

"They never offered us anything," she said. "Since we're stuck here in Oklahoma, our state representatives haven't done anything to help us."

Before the attacks, in 2000, Congress passed a law that helps compensate American families who lost loved ones in terrorist attacks in other countries. The law makes it easier for victims to claim damages from the frozen assets of countries suspected of supporting terrorism.

The law retroactively covers the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Africa and the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. The Oklahoma City bombing is not covered because it took place in the United States.

Martin Cash, who lost an eye in the 1995 blast, said the law should not treat one terrorist attack differently from another.

"A lot of us were a little bit miffed that we were excluded because they are making a distinction between homegrown terrorists and foreign terrorists," he said. "There are a lot of people who could use it. It's still mass murder, or attempted murder for those of us who made it through."

On Thursday, Congress did agree to waive some income taxes and provide other tax relief to families of the Sept. 11 victims as well as the Oklahoma City victims.

Kight, who now helps Sept. 11 victims through the National Organization for Victim Assistance in Washington, said she is pleased that they are receiving so much help, but wishes the Oklahoma City families had gotten more attention.

"Our concerns were minimized," she said. "A lot more is being done now because there are more people and many more voices."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
This nation seems to have lost all concept of private charity.
1 posted on 12/21/2001 12:01:48 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I do hope they brought cheeze and crackers to go along with the whine.
2 posted on 12/21/2001 12:03:33 PM PST by camle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I knew this, or something like this, would start.
3 posted on 12/21/2001 12:04:20 PM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
I do hope they brought cheeze and crackers to go along with the whine.

But sadly, they can only afford a domestic whine...

4 posted on 12/21/2001 12:04:52 PM PST by Ward Smythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
Furthermore, what difference does it make whether a murder victim is part of a "mass murder" or in individual murder. Why don't the taxpayers just make millionaires out of all survivors? This whole thing is just nuts.
5 posted on 12/21/2001 12:05:19 PM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lady lawyer
Entirely nuts.
6 posted on 12/21/2001 12:06:33 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Who decided to pay this out from the fed guv anyway?
7 posted on 12/21/2001 12:06:38 PM PST by tgiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ward Smythe
yeah. we could put Regis out of business. Give a whole new meaning to "survivor" millions.
8 posted on 12/21/2001 12:06:39 PM PST by camle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Since everybody's got their tin cup out, maybe the government should buy them all grinders and monkeys.
9 posted on 12/21/2001 12:06:47 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
I like cat food grinders. with rat food, rabbit food

and pickles.:-)

10 posted on 12/21/2001 12:10:53 PM PST by camle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tgiles
The concept, from what I have read, is apparently to avoid lawsuits against airlines, builders of the WTC and the Government to avoid further economic impact. All recipients must sign a form stating that they will not sue anyone in connection with the WTC attack in order to receive the funds.
11 posted on 12/21/2001 12:11:14 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Some of those who lost loved ones in the Oklahoma City bombing are feeling slighted by the federal government over its decision to dispense an average of $1.65 million apiece to the families of the Sept. 11 dead.

Too bad for them that the terrorist bombing in OKC occurred while Bill Clinton was in the White House and not a Republican. If a George W. Bush had been President in 1995 he would have been in OKC handing out million dollar welfare checks to victim’s families. However, at least with Clinton we had a president that was not willing to billions to victims or terrorism.

12 posted on 12/21/2001 12:14:06 PM PST by Austim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: anniegetyourgun
I definitely think that the largesse being heaped on the WTC families is way over the top. Assistance should be enough to ensure medium-term financial peace, but instead is going to change many lives drastically for the better. And that is wrong.

But, the OKC families are no more worthy than any other family that has lost loved ones to crime. They should stifle it.

14 posted on 12/21/2001 12:19:01 PM PST by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Have they noticed we're at war? Those at the WTC, the Pentagon, and Flight 93 were the first victims.
15 posted on 12/21/2001 12:19:22 PM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EricOKC
I agree with your sentiments, and appreciate the sacrifice of OKC folk, but you can't really compare the two incidents. one was a crime by a nut case, the other an act of war by foreign interests devoted to the destruction of our society. thewre's also the matter of degree. 168 people is not 3,000+.

that said, I do feel the empathy for OKC people who have shown the best ot what America is.

16 posted on 12/21/2001 12:19:41 PM PST by camle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tgiles
Lawmakers rushed to wrap up the congressional session by quickly approving remaining spending bills along with a tax-relief bill for victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. This also included payroll and income tax breaks for these victims.

Barring an emergency session, Congress will not return until 1/23/02.

17 posted on 12/21/2001 12:20:00 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
The rationale of 911 funding is simple: an attack on America as such left thousands of dependants without a primary breadwinner. Americans didn't want to let that stand, and we didn't have to--so we didn't. It was our way of rebuffing the terrorists, and sets no precedent for any other case whatsoever.
18 posted on 12/21/2001 12:20:46 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
I see you failed to grasp the larger issue of why are some people more important than others. Given the likelyhood of govt knowledge beforehand of the OKC bombing, it would seem these people have a legitimate grievance. As one freeper said, the victims lost a family member, they didn't win the lottery. So why are they being treated as such? This sets a bad precedent.
19 posted on 12/21/2001 12:22:28 PM PST by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
The government has proven much better at giving out other people's money that doing the only job given to it by the Costitution ... protecting it's citizens from foreign invaders.

So they play to their strength.

20 posted on 12/21/2001 12:24:01 PM PST by tarpon_bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson