Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US will not help Greek salvage effort, Says Dodecanese demilitarized.
Kathimerini ^ | 12/22/2001 | Zorba

Posted on 12/22/2001 9:13:32 AM PST by a_Turk

The United States has rejected a request by Greece for technical assistance from the US military to raise a German bomber that crashed into the sea off Leros during World War II, with the argument that the Dodecanese island chain in the eastern Aegean should be demilitarized in accordance with the Treaty of Paris of 1947. This is a position with which Greece disagrees and Turkey agrees.

The request was made by the Greek authorities to the US Embassy in May when a specialized US Navy ship was docked in Volos. The salvage operation was scheduled for June but was canceled after the refusal by the United States. The issue emerged yesterday.

A Capt. Paul Lantry of the US Embassy wrote to a Greek brigadier and captain on May 14 and told them that the United States could not help. The Dodecanese were under Italian occupation during World War II, until 1947 when they came under the control of Greece.

"The Department of Defense considers the location, where the salvage operation is to take place, a violation of the Treaty of Paris with regard to the part where it refers to Italy and it considers the islands demilitarized," the letter said. "The Department of Defense does not wish to find itself in violation of this treaty. Consequently, the operation in the region of the island of Leros is not regular and is canceled."

The letter says at the start that the "US Navy cannot take part because serious obstacles cannot be overcome." It refers to "two issues which obstruct the operation." The first is whether Germany has granted its approval for the salvaging of the plane and the second, which Lantry describes as the more difficult for his government, is the demilitarization issue.

Greece argues Turkey is not a party to the Treaty of Paris. It says also that in accordance with the Vienna Convention of 1969, third countries do not have the right to tell parties what their responsibilities are with regard to the treaty. It also says that under international law every country has the right to defend its territory.

The US rejection of Greece's appeal came days after Ankara, on May 7, rejected the flight plan of the Greek chief of the navy who was to attend a NATO ceremony in Turkey because his helicopter was scheduled to refuel on Rhodes, another island Ankara believes should be demilitarized.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/22/2001 9:13:32 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Turkey is not a party to the Treaty of Paris. It says also that in accordance with the Vienna Convention of 1969, third countries do not have the right to tell parties what their responsibilities are with regard to the treaty. It also says that under international law every country has the right to defend its territory.>>>

what, you turks cannot understand plain english!

awww, too bad that your nation acts like a child when it comes to international affairs!

that is why the cyprus dispute cannot get resolved, because turkey is a big baby and does not know what diplomacy is!

2 posted on 12/22/2001 9:27:31 AM PST by oxi-nato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
their is no listed author, SO YOU ARE FABRICATING STORIES AS USUAL!

your credibility sinks like the turkish economy everyday!

3 posted on 12/22/2001 9:34:23 AM PST by oxi-nato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oxi-nato
what, you turks cannot understand plain english!
This article explains, in plain English, the US position, which is that Greece is in violation of the Paris treaty.

The article complains that the US couldn't be fooled into joining Greece in it's violation of the treaty. Bummer huh?

Was the US a signer of the Paris treaty? But of course she was. Too bad for you.
4 posted on 12/22/2001 9:36:26 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oxi-nato
their is no listed author
Complain to the Greek Site Kathimerini, which published the article.



To see the real article, click on the link at the start of the page.
5 posted on 12/22/2001 9:41:18 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
you put zorba as the author, their is no zorba author of this article!

you are guilty of fabrication, your credibility is next to nothing!

6 posted on 12/22/2001 9:46:43 AM PST by oxi-nato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
by the way since when does the u.s. honor its treaty obligations?

the u.s. was in complete control of nato's dirty little kosovo war THAT VIOLATED THE NATO TREATY AND THE UN CHARTER not to mention the declaration of human rights and the geneva convention in some incidents!

you are speaking trash as usual!

7 posted on 12/22/2001 9:48:58 AM PST by oxi-nato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Boys, boys, boys! Don't make me turn this car around!

If you two countries don't stop fighting right now, you are going to be grounded for a week! I've a good mind to give those islands to your sister.

8 posted on 12/22/2001 10:46:10 AM PST by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Jesus H Christ, what is it with the Turks and Greeks? Why can't you stop this petty idiocy?

-ccm

9 posted on 12/22/2001 12:15:54 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay; moyden
All I did was find a Greek article which complained that the US wouldn't join Greece in breaking a treaty. There it is!

I have posted other articles in the past, here are some of them:

A Taliban in Istanbul
Bay of the Ottoman Sultans Recovers
Turks Revere an Ancestor: Ol' St. Nick
Turkish Delight - Why the Middle East needs Ataturks and not Ayatollahs.
10 posted on 12/22/2001 12:29:38 PM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
There is something happening here that might not be obvious at first glance. There are two separate issues at hand that the US Navy is addressing: that of demilitarisation of the Dodecanese, and a peculiar point of law -- specifically admiralty or salvage law.

I am not a lawyer, much less one that practices on the peculiar pitch of admiralty law, but I do know a leetle bit about salvage. Normally property on the bottom of the sea is judged to be abandoned -- it may belong to the land on whose territory it rests, or it may belong to the salvors exclusively, especially if it rests on the sea floor in international waters.

The US Navy has a unique interpretation, that its ships and planes belong in perpetuity to the Navy and cannot be salvaged by anyone, ever. In the past they have seized salvaged aircraft at gunpoint and rammed this bizarre view of salvage law through complaisant American courts, although it has failed everywhere else, including international courts.

The Navy can't even keep half the hangar-deck elevators on the USS John F Kennedy working, but it has hundreds of millions to spend on these court cases... someone in the Navy has been watching way too much "JAG." (For my overseas friends, that is a very bad television show in which the hero is a daring Navy lawyer. Hey, what can we do? Hollywood...).

The Navy is on record that it wants all World War II aircraft under the waters of lakes or seas anywhere to rot, unless it can have them for the Naval Air Museum.

Anyway, that's why the US Navy says the approval of the Germans is required. It is a letter drafted by the lawyers that apparently run the Navy, and stands with this peculiar legal interpretation that is recognised by the Navy and some American courts (but not by Germany, or Greece, or Turkey, or any other civilised nation).

Thanks for the post, Turk. And Oxi -- play nice with your NATO buddy.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

11 posted on 12/22/2001 4:51:49 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk; oxi-nato; moyden; ccmay; Criminal Number 18F
The Dodecanese were under Italian occupation during World War II, until 1947 when they came under the control of Greece.

This week before Christmas marks the anniversary of the zenith of the successful counteroffensive by the out manned and out gunned Greek army against the forces of Fascist Italy. The need for Hitler to save Mussolini from the Greeks diverted Hitler from his timetable for the Russian offensive, thus freezing the Germans just short of Moscow in the following year. Churchill remarked that "Greeks do not fight like heroes; heroes fight like Greeks"

WW2 Anniversary Of the Greatest Extent of the Greek Counter-Offensive Against Italy into Albania

Italian Invasion of Greece

Jealous of Hitler's triumphs over France and Britain and humiliated by his own army's failure to dent the French defense of their common frontier in June 1940, Mussolini decided in August to attack Greece which he regarded as falling within his Mediterranean sphere of interest. He had already occupied Albania in April 1939 and from positions there launched his attack on 28 October without warning Hitler. His local army numbered six divisions against four Greek, and had complete air superiority. The Greeks, however, had 18 mobilizable divisions in all, were hardy and patriotic and were defending familiar home territory - the high harsh mountains of the Epirus.

Despite the engagement of an eventual total of 25 divisions, the Italians were unable to make headway and in November the Greeks, under the command of Metaxas, the country's military dictator, counter-attacked. The Italians were caught in snow in the mountain passes, by-passed and many were forced to surrender. By the end of December the Greeks had occupied a quarter of Albania. On 9 March Mussolini personally supervised the opening of his spring offensive but a week later it had to be abandoned for lack of success. It was this long drawn-out humiliation of his ally which obliged Hitler, whose anger at Mussolini's presumption in declaring war unilaterally had only slowly abated, to undertake his Balkan operation, 'Margarita', in the following April.

12 posted on 12/22/2001 8:34:59 PM PST by Pericles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson