Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(clinton's) NON-WAR ON TERROR
New York Post ^ | 12/26/01 | DICK MORRIS

Posted on 12/26/2001 1:47:12 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:03:01 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

December 26, 2001 -- THE weekly strategy meetings at the White House throughout 1995 and 1996 featured an escalating drumbeat of advice to President Clinton to take decisive steps to crack down on terrorism. The polls gave these ideas a green light. But Clinton hesitated and failed to act, always finding a reason why some other concern was more important.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/26/2001 1:47:12 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Justice feared that it would kindle resentment at the administration from Hispanics and other ethnic groups with large immigrant populations. The INS reported that its backlog of pending deportations had topped 100,000 and warned that it could not handle the additional deportation cases the proposal would generate."

Read: "It would affect his political support and ability to raise funds from those ethnic groups, traditional democratic support groups."

2 posted on 12/26/2001 2:06:12 AM PST by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

If I'm understanding Dickie right, he's referring to departments of the executive branch - those who are supposedly led by and taking their lead from the president, not the other way around.

What a goosenecked whimp.

Well at least this toe-sucker Morris is still good for the anti-spin of the Clinton legacy.

3 posted on 12/26/2001 2:26:12 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More
Somebody please tell me why Clinton and his ineffective administration shouldn't be tried for "acts against the US" - OR treason??? Even tho' I dispise Clinton, I'm trying to see his past actions with a clear mind -- I still can't understand how his neglect doesn't amount to treason???
4 posted on 12/26/2001 2:26:50 AM PST by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
It does. Ex 42 aided and abetted by the media did more to destroy this nation than all the people before him.

Your post and this reply will bring out the clinon worshippers and apologists.

Sport

5 posted on 12/26/2001 2:40:39 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

The proposal called for a federal law which would require that drivers' licenses expire when visas do for foreign citizens and that no permits be issued to illegal aliens. Traffic cops would be able to check to see if those they pulled over on the highway were in the country illegally. If they were, they would be arrested and sent to the INS for deportation.

What?  And lose all those DemocRAT votes?  Besides, Don Tyson might get into a huff over losing his workforce and quit sending money.

America's Fifth Column ... watch PBS documentary JIHAD! In America
Download 8 Mb zip file here (60 minute video)

6 posted on 12/26/2001 2:43:11 AM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
" I still can't understand how his neglect doesn't amount to treason???"

His treason has led to the deaths of many Americans. He and his supporters should be indicted and have a military trial.

7 posted on 12/26/2001 2:43:39 AM PST by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The style of your headline says it all.

(clinton's)

Even the name is becoming a footnote to the history of this great country.

8 posted on 12/26/2001 2:45:36 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Arkancide ? CIA CO & Congressional staffer who investigated Clinton's approval of arms from Iran

AN APPARENTLY SELF-INFLICTED SHOTGUN WOUND
Source: The New York Times
Published: June 5, 2000 Author: Obit.

Before becoming a senior staff aide in Congress, Mr. Millis served as a case officer for the C.I.A. for nearly 13 years. In that period, he lived in Pakistan, working to provide covert aid to Afghan rebels who were fighting the Soviet army.

.

9 posted on 12/26/2001 3:10:14 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
That is the question, now, isn't it!
10 posted on 12/26/2001 4:59:48 AM PST by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
I wonder how much money he got from Tyson's to make sure the laws were not enforced.
12 posted on 12/26/2001 5:37:10 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Waiving of sanctions afforded an excellent means of raising political contributions, presidential "library" contributions, etc. It is comical how the media always wrote up Clinton as a great fund raiser - the fact is that he put the government up for sale in a way that had no precedent. He has now retired with untold millions as a result of his own and his party's corruption. I used to think of democrats as people with some differences in belief about the appropriate functions of government. Now I think of them as fundamentally corrupt and indifferent to wrongdoing.
13 posted on 12/26/2001 6:55:19 AM PST by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elkiejg
Somebody please tell me why Clinton and his ineffective administration shouldn't be tried for "acts against the US" - OR treason??? Even tho' I dispise Clinton, I'm trying to see his past actions with a clear mind -- I still can't understand how his neglect doesn't amount to treason???

It's more than mere neglect -- it's a willful avoidance of dealing with the "hard stuff." You see, a legitimate battle against the terrorists would have not only used up much of his political capital, but would have exposed as a lie the mindless mantra of "8 years of peace and prosperity" that the left-wingnuts have been bleating.

Fighting a real war against terrorism would have blown the sacred surplus, and let's face it, the economy was pretty much the only thing that kept him insulated during impeachment. A weak economy would have made more people willing to toss his blubbery ass out of office.

14 posted on 12/26/2001 10:31:31 AM PST by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
And let's not forget the job Scumbag gave to Algore. Algore pushed through INS a million new potential RAT voters in 1996, many of whom had serious criminal records that were never checked.
15 posted on 12/26/2001 10:49:57 AM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
There is only one solution to illegal immigration.

Implement asset forfeiture laws. It is illegal for them to be here. It is illegal to hire them. It is illegal to transport them. It is illegal to harbor them.

Seize all the assets and property of the illegal aliens, the businesses that hire them, the vehicles that transport them, and the homes of those who harbor them. Sell the property at government auction, split the proceeds among the federal, state, and local government. Then deport the criminal aliens.

If the bureaucrats realize that, they can make MILLIONS/BILLIONS of dollars, by enforcing the laws. Illegal immigration will end. If these “asset forfeiture” laws are good enough for Americans, they are good enough for criminal aliens.

Those delusional few who have stated that “these poor migrants just want to work”, need to go to any welfare office or county hospital for a reality check.

These “migrants”, criminals, are stealing from our children, parents, and from U.S.

16 posted on 12/27/2001 8:22:11 AM PST by Frank Vera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Ethnic politics clearly linked to 9/11. It's the same with 8 USC Section 1357, the 1996 law which empowered police to arrest illegals. Neither the U.S. Justice Dept nor INS established the training program provided for under this law. However, such training is not required if state laws do not prohibit enforcing federal laws including "aliens not lawfully present in the United States."
17 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:43 AM PST by Deportem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson