<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: axisofarrogance</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/axisofarrogance/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:53:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>It&#x26;#x27;s The Condescension, Stupid.  Why Gore Endorsed Dean.</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037721/posts</link>
<description>I never used to understand why liberals condescended to the rest of us and &#x26;#x27;looked out for the little guy&#x26;#x27; in such an overtly insulting manner. Perhaps I was too busy rummaging my coffee table for heavy, blunt objects to chuck at the pixilated, smirking visage of Bill Clinton. As he denounced everything I believed in as a human being and accused me of being a backward troglodyte. As I watched the highlight film of an over-satisfied and insufferable smug Al Gore endorsing an even more nauseating Howard Brush Dean III, something clicked. I remembered the rich, spoiled brats I...</description>
<author>Vanity</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037721/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gore&#x26;#x27;s endorsement shows changing motives</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037705/posts</link>
<description>When Al Gore endorsed Howard Dean&#x26;#x27;s presidential bid on Tuesday, it was the most excitement Gore has generated since... since... well, the last time - whenever that was. Well, that&#x26;#x27;s a bit unfair. For a sizable group of Democrats, Al Gore gets the blood pumping. For the rest of us, he&#x26;#x27;s the human incarnation of footnotes: dry data compressed into an amazingly dull format. &#x26;#x22;The Simpsons&#x26;#x22; said it best when Bart&#x26;#x27;s friend Martin bought a talking Al Gore doll. When you pull the string on the doll&#x26;#x27;s back it says, &#x26;#x22;You are hearing me talk.&#x26;#x22; No one knows what string...</description>
<author>Townhall.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037705/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:30:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>REPLAY.  Goring Dean</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037032/posts</link>
<description>Add one more name to the list of those who believe that Howard Dean will prove a cataclysmic disaster for the Democratic party: Al Gore. Why else would Gore have endorsed him? Think about it. Does Gore still wish to be president? Pretty clearly, he does: Otherwise he would have found himself a real job and moved to LA, rather than dabbling in business while maintaining a theoretical domicile in Carthage, Tennessee. But how to gain the presidency? Gore was right to decide against running in 2004. The problem for him was not just that incumbents are hard to beat,...</description>
<author>NRO</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1037032/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:44:58 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Dean Machine.  Now it&#x26;#x27;s Gore-powered
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1036966/posts</link>
<description>It&#x26;#x27;s come to this: Howard Dean will be the Democratic nominee for president in 2004. Today, the remaining Democratic candidates will be brainstorming furiously, trying to figure out a way to prevent the inevitable. But the only way is to take off the gloves and start throwing punches at Dean&#x26;#x27;s fast-moving mouth &#x26;#x97; and they&#x26;#x27;ll decide not to do that, in part because Al Gore this morning warned them not to, in part because the candidate who attacked Dean would not only drive up Dean&#x26;#x27;s negatives but also his own. In other words, whoever brought Dean down would benefit not...</description>
<author>NRO</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1036966/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Dec 2003 17:11:51 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>