Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $11,183
13%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 13%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: bergvobama

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Suit challenges Obama's birth place (Ohio - hearing on Thursday)

    10/26/2008 4:35:19 AM PDT · by Libloather · 144 replies · 4,174+ views
    10/25/08 | Janice Morse
    Link only - Suit challenges Obama's birth place
  • Judge Surrick “Received” the Decision He Issued

    10/25/2008 8:18:39 PM PDT · by RatsDawg · 92 replies · 6,397+ views
    Judge Surrick “Received” the Decision He Issued In the “never-ending” drama that is known as the 2008 Presidential election, there is an appearance that the decision issued yesterday by the Honorable Judge R. Barclay Surrick in the matter of Berg v. Obama might have been SENT to the judge just a short time BEFORE he released the decision. A fax copy of the decision from Judge Surrick was faxed to Mr. Berg from the Judge’s Chambers, pages 1-36, beginning at 18:09 October 24, 2008, and that is clearly notated by the receiving fax, starting at page 01/36. Page 36/36 is...
  • Berg v Obama: Judge Dismisses Case

    10/25/2008 8:12:00 PM PDT · by thekansascitian · 5 replies · 670+ views
    The Kansas Citian ^ | Oct. 25, 2008 | thekansascitian
    Judge R. Barclay Surrick dismissed Berg v Obama on Friday evening on the grounds that Philip J Berg, Philadelphia attorney and former Deputy Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, lacks standing. To have "standing" the plaintiff must show "(1) a particularized injury-in-fact, (2) evidence showing that that the party being sued actually caused the plaintiff’s particularized injury-in-fact, and (3) that adjudication of the matter would actually provide redress." [1] In regards to injury the judge writes, "regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact." Apparently, the judge doesn't...
  • Berg v.Obama Dismissed by Judge Surrick

    10/25/2008 11:45:25 AM PDT · by WmShirerAdmirer · 80 replies · 3,182+ views
    Philip Berg's lawsuit challenging Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as president of the United States had been dismissed by the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick on grounds that the Philadelphia attorney and former Deputy Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania lacked standing. Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court Excerpted from: http://www.americasright.com/ The order and memorandum came down at approximately 6:15 p.m. on Friday. Philip Berg's lawsuit challenging Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as president of the United States had been dismissed by the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick on grounds that the Philadelphia...
  • Judge tosses lawsuit challenging Obama citizenship

    10/25/2008 1:07:59 PM PDT · by pissant · 23 replies · 1,056+ views
    AP ^ | 10/25/08 | staff
    PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's qualifications to be president. U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick on Friday night rejected the suit by attorney Philip J. Berg, who alleged that Obama was not a U.S. citizen and therefore ineligible for the presidency. Berg claimed that Obama is either a citizen of his father's native Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia after he moved there as a boy.
  • Berg will appeal

    10/25/2008 7:31:47 AM PDT · by NoobRep · 125 replies · 2,947+ views
    Americas Right ^ | 10/25/08 | Jeff Schrieber
    So, who does have standing? According to the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, that's completely up to Congress to decide. If, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like Plaintiff. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring in the Amended Complaint.
  • Proof Obamas Certificate Of Live Birth Means Nothing

    10/25/2008 2:33:43 AM PDT · by markedmannerf · 38 replies · 5,894+ views
    Markedmanner ^ | 10/25/08 | Markedmanner
    Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country. This is straight from the Hawaii Department Of Health Website. So in other words the certificate of live birth that is posted on Obamas website, Factcheck.org and KOS do not matter. Simply because someone who was born in a foreign country could obtain one.
  • Judge rejects Montco lawyer's bid to have Obama removed from ballot [Berg's lawsuit]

    10/25/2008 1:48:50 AM PDT · by Dajjal · 334 replies · 11,206+ views
    Philadelphia Daily News ^ | Oct. 25, 2008 | Michael Hinkelman
    A federal judge in Philadelphia last night threw out a complaint by a Montgomery County lawyer who claimed that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was not qualified to be president and that his name should be removed from the Nov. 4 ballot.[snip] In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg's allegations of harm were "too vague and too attenuated" to confer standing on him or any other voters. Surrick ruled that Berg's attempts to use certain laws to gain standing to pursue his claim that Obama was not a natural-born citizen were "frivolous and not worthy of discussion."...
  • Newsmax Covering Birth Certificate Story on Front Page

    10/24/2008 4:31:37 PM PDT · by zaker99 · 86 replies · 4,368+ views
    A Pennsylvania lawsuit alleging that Barack Obama is not a “natural-born citizen” of the United States took an unusual twist this week, after a federally mandated deadline requiring Obama’s lawyers to produce a “vault” copy of his birth certificate expired with no response from Obama or his lawyers. FULL STORY
  • Kenyan Grandmother: “Barack was Born Here” (New Information from Berg)

    10/24/2008 11:04:47 AM PDT · by Free ThinkerNY · 108 replies · 3,838+ views
    texasdarlin.wordpress.com ^ | October 24, 2008 | texasdarlin
    Berg: Grandma Confirms Kenyan Birth Attorney Philip J. Berg announced Thursday that he has an audio recording of Barack Obama’s paternal grandmother confirming that Barack was born in Kenya. Via World Net Daily: Philip J. Berg, a former deputy attorney general for Pennsylvania, told the Michael Savage talk radio program tonight that the document (birth certificate on Obama’s website) is forged and that he has a tape recording he will soon release. “This has been a real sham he’s pulled off for the last 20 months,” Berg told Savage. “I’ll release it [the tape] in a day or two, affidavits...
  • FEC joins call to throw out suit against Obama (Berg's challenge of BHO's citizenship)

    10/23/2008 7:18:55 AM PDT · by Born Conservative · 236 replies · 5,351+ views
    The Morning Call (Allentown, PA) ^ | 10/22/08 | Kevin Amerman
    The Federal Election Commission has joined Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee in asking a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by a Montgomery County attorney seeking Obama's ouster from the November ballot. Philip Berg, who claims the Illinois senator was born in Kenya and can't run for president because he isn't a natural-born U.S. citizen, has no standing to make the claim, according to the FEC. The motion, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia, echoes one filed last month by Obama and the DNC that states Berg hasn't demonstrated how he personally would suffer even...
  • Order on Plaintiff’s Motion Obama Records: OUTRAGEOUS OBAMA OCTOBER SURPRISE!!!

    10/23/2008 1:08:29 PM PDT · by mgist · 83 replies · 5,409+ views
    FrontPage ^ | 1023-2008 | By Nancy Matthis
    Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement in Philly Federal Court By Nancy Matthis  |  Thursday, October 23rd, 2008 at 8:24 am The Berg vs. Obama lawsuit in Philadelphia Federal Court has resulted in an Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement against Obama. ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to F.R.C.P. 56(c) is GRANTED. This Court Declares Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen and is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the...
  • Phil Berg On Michael Savage Tonight

    10/23/2008 2:09:22 PM PDT · by markedmannerf · 31 replies · 2,317+ views
    Michael Savage ^ | 10/23/08 | Michael Savage
    Just saw this on Savages website thought I would alert others. You can read Bergs case at: http://obamacrimes.com/
  • Phil J. Berg files motions to expedite resolution in Berg v. Obama

    10/23/2008 1:43:06 PM PDT · by WmShirerAdmirer · 26 replies · 3,201+ views
    Obama Crimes via Gabrielle Cusumano/Townhall ^ | October 23, 2008 | Administrator Obama Crimes
    PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE This motion argues that the facts have been established Phil J. Berg files motion to expedite resolution in Berg v. Obama Plaintiff Phil J. Berg filed two motions today seeking an expedited resolution in Berg v. Obama. (PDF's of the motions are attached below.) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE This motion argues that the facts have been established that Barack Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be elected or serve as President of the United...
  • Obama's Birth Certificate a "serious embarrassment" Source?

    10/22/2008 2:11:53 PM PDT · by pissant · 229 replies · 9,268+ views
    All the News that Fits ^ | 10/22/08 | Nancy
    Barack Obama claims “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation” in the Berg case and has filed a request for dismissal and a protective order. Berg’s filing asks for copies of his birth certificate, citizenship records, passport and travel records, and other documentation proving citizenship in the U.S. as well as other countries. First, let’s establish that I am no lawyer so don’t depend on my interpretation of the Berg vs. Obama lawsuit as being accurate. I am depending on the interpretations of others who know much more than I, and assuming they have it right....
  • The Justiciability of Eligibility: May Courts Decide Who Can Be President?

    10/22/2008 6:31:55 PM PDT · by Dajjal · 8 replies · 1,207+ views
    The 2008 election cycle has been a busy one for legal disputes over the qualifications of presidential candidates, with federal cases having been filed to challenge both major candidates’ eligibility under the “natural born Citizen” clause. These cases unquestionably present vital questions of constitutional law, touching on matters of self-evident national importance. It is doubtful, however, that they are justiciable in lower federal courts. Standing requirements and the political question doctrine make it unlikely that a federal court will reach the merits in cases of the type filed to date.
  • Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause

    10/22/2008 6:31:48 PM PDT · by Dajjal · 7 replies · 1,133+ views
    First Impressions (companion to Michigan Law Review) ^ | September, 2008 | Lawrence B. Solum
    The enigmatic phrase “natural born citizen” poses a series of problems for contemporary originalism. New Originalists, like Justice Scalia, focus on the original public meaning of the constitutional text. The notion of a “natural born citizen” was likely a term of art derived from the idea of a “natural born subject” in English law—a category that most likely did not extend to persons, like Senator McCain, who were born outside sovereign territory. But the Constitution speaks of “citizens” and not “subjects,” introducing uncertainties and ambiguities that might (or might not) make McCain eligible for the presidency.
  • Philip BERG ( Berg vs Obama )is representing API?? (of the Michelle tapes)

    10/20/2008 7:47:22 AM PDT · by cycle of discernment · 34 replies · 2,732+ views
    US Law firm enters into agreement to represent API in The Michelle Obama tapes to be released soon in the US Posted by africanpress on October 20, 2008 The touchy interview tapes of Michelle Obama, the wife of the US Presidential Candidate Barack Obama is soon ready for release in the US and will be aired unedited. The release has taken long due to the fact that API wanted to clear all legal hurdles and be safe from getting sued by any one. API and a US Law firm - LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP J. BERG has just entered into...
  • Update! API will come with more information on Michelle Obama tapes at 16.00 hours Norwegian time

    10/20/2008 7:29:23 AM PDT · by Danae · 92 replies · 4,112+ views
    UPDATE ZERO HOUR IS 1600 NORWAY TIME API will reach out with important update to the readers at 16.00 hours Norwegian time. Ok FOlks, we have us a Zero hour... Now Cookies for telling me what time that is Pacific! LOL Ok all kidding aside, the cards are being dealt. We have been through a lot of pressure after we published the story. The fact that some people want us to take decisions hurriedly does not help us much. To those who want to listen and take us seriously: The tapes are there and the truth must be told. If...
  • Berg response in oppostion to Obama / DNC protective order

    10/09/2008 8:50:18 PM PDT · by Dajjal · 35 replies · 1,654+ views
    Obama Crimes ^ | Oct. 9, 2008 | Philip Berg
    Attached is Philip J. Berg's Opposition to Defendants, the DNC and Obama's Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery pending Decision on their Motion to Dismiss. If the Protective Order were granted, discovery could not occur until the standing issue has been resolved and only if it is in favor of the plaintiff. Following is an excerpt from the response: PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS BARACK H. OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION ON DISPOSITVE MOTION .... 1. Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss does not entitle them to a Protective Order...