<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Keyword: birthcertificate</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/birthcertificate/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:27:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Focus Forum</generator>
<ttl>15</ttl>

<item>
<title>Judge Carter, 3 sheets to the wind..</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2418930/posts</link>
<description>Folks, I often wondered what possessed Judge Carter in California to tell the world &#x26;#x93;he wanted to try this case on its merits&#x26;#x94; and then do a sudden 180 by dismissing the case with prejudice? Does the word &#x26;#x93;arrogance&#x26;#x94; come to mind? Did the justice system in California just reach the bottom of the barrel? The performance of Judge Carter was totally disgusting to watch.. Oh, and this whoop-ti-do you heard from folks that Carter would do the right thing because he is an EX-Marine.. what happened? Did honor and his oath get flushed on the way to the bench?...</description>
<author>American Grand Jury</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2418930/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jan 2010 14:27:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why Does Interpol Need Immunity from American Law?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2416746/posts</link>
<description>You just can&#x26;#x27;t make up how brazen this crowd is. One week ago, President Obama quietly signed an executive order that makes an international police force immune from the restraints of American law.</description>
<author>National Review Online</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2416746/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:34:16 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Did Obama Place INTERPOL Above U.S. Law?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2417223/posts</link>
<description>After learning recently that President Barack Obama had, on Dec. 17, quietly amended Executive Order 12425, I decided to find out what impact, if any, it might have on Americans. At first blind to the potential ramifications of the amendment, I was startled at what I found once the pieces of this disturbing political puzzle started falling in place.</description>
<author>Bob McCarty Writes</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2417223/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:34:25 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What is Barack Obama doing? UPDATED: Why Interpol, Mr. President?
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2418500/posts</link>
<description>..There&#x26;#x27;s also this observation by National Review&#x26;#x27;s Andy McCarthy: &#x26;#x22;Being constrained by the Fourth Amendment, Freedom of Information Act, and other limitations of the Constitution and federal law that protect the liberty and privacy of Americans is what prevents law enforcement and its controlling government authority from becoming tyrannical.&#x26;#x22; Executive Order 12425 circumvents all of that. So tell us, Mr. President, why do you think Interpol should operate with no accountability and no transparency in our country? Is this what you had in mind in your 2008 presidential campaign when you said &#x26;#x22;we&#x26;#x27;ve got to have a civilian national security...</description>
<author>examiner</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2418500/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Executive Order Provides Interpol Diplomatic Immunity (Update)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2417546/posts</link>
<description>An update on the article by Jim Vicevich. Multiple RVO readers sent word via e-mail that President Obama had amended Executive Order 12425 on Dec. 16, more or less providing Interpol diplomatic immunity concerning what they can bring into the United States and protecting their archives and records from freedom of information (FOI) requests. Jim already posted on the subject, but I&#x26;#x92;ll add some additional commentary. I&#x26;#x92;m not sure why Obama would do this, but some consider this a big deal since Interpol is the self-described largest police agency in the world, not a government with traveling diplomats and such....</description>
<author>http://www.radioviceonline.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2417546/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Executive Order - Original Classification Authority</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2417224/posts</link>
<description>Note: The following text is a quote: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-original-classification-authority Home &#x26;#x95; Briefing Room &#x26;#x95; Presidential Actions &#x26;#x95; Executive Orders The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release December 29, 2009 Executive Order - Original Classification Authority Pursuant to the provisions of section 1.3 of the Executive Order issued today, entitled &#x26;#x22;Classified National Security Information&#x26;#x22; (Executive Order), I hereby designate the following officials to classify information originally as &#x26;#x22;Top Secret&#x26;#x22; or &#x26;#x22;Secret&#x26;#x22;: TOP SECRET Executive Office of the President: The Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (National Security...</description>
<author>WHITEHOUSE.gov</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2417224/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From Pajamas Media: Obama Surrenders U.S. Sovereignty: His INTERPOL Executive Order</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2417036/posts</link>
<description>Exerpt from Bob Owens December 28,2009 Quietly, Obama just made it much easier for the International Criminal Court to go after American &#x26;#x93;war criminals.&#x26;#x94; At ThreatsWatch.org, Steve Schippert and Clyde Middleton have dug up the bizarre and unsettling issuance of an executive order recently signed by President Barack Obama. Executive Order &#x26;#x97; Amending Executive Order 12425, signed December 16 and released a day later, grants the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) rights on American soil that place it beyond the reach of our own law enforcement agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).</description>
<author>Main Street Radical w/ Pajamas Media</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2417036/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:32:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Surrenders U.S. Sovereignty: His INTERPOL Executive Order</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2416512/posts</link>
<description>At ThreatsWatch.org, Steve Schippert and Clyde Middleton have dug up the bizarre and unsettling issuance of an executive order recently signed by President Barack Obama. Executive Order &#x26;#x97; Amending Executive Order 12425, signed December 16 and released a day later, grants the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) rights on American soil that place it beyond the reach of our own law enforcement agencies, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Schippert and Middleton note that Obama&#x26;#x92;s order removes protections placed upon INTERPOL by President Reagan in 1983. Obama&#x26;#x92;s order gives the group the authority to avoid Freedom of Information...</description>
<author>Pajamas Media</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2416512/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:13:11 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x26;#x92;s INTERPOL Executive Order: immunity for Obama?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414756/posts</link>
<description>It&#x26;#x27;s Chrismas Eve, and instead of sugar plums dancing in my head, I can&#x26;#x27;t get Wordsmith&#x26;#x27;s post about Obama&#x26;#x27;s latest Executive Order out of my mind. It is like a kid getting his first jigzaw puzzle... my mind twists and turns with the repercussions. I&#x26;#x27;ve been pondering the implications... since pondering and speculation is all we can do at the moment. I&#x26;#x27;ve also been searching codification docs, old EOs, wondering if this is business as &#x26;#x22;usual&#x26;#x22; or what. I am also seeing many blogs are misinformed, thinking INTERPOL is a newly added organization to the immunity list of IOIA. Not...</description>
<author>Flopping Aces</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414756/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 00:34:46 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414226/posts</link>
<description>Wither Sovereignty http://threatswatch.org/analysis/2009/12/wither-sovereignty/ Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America - Is The ICC Next? By Steve Schippert, Clyde Middleton | December 23, 2009 Last Thursday, December 17, 2009, The White House released an Executive Order &#x26;#x22;Amending Executive Order 12425.&#x26;#x22; It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other &#x26;#x22;International Organizations&#x26;#x22; as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945.</description>
<author>Threatswatch.org</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414226/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Extends Diplomatic Immunity to Interpol by Executive Order</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2412977/posts</link>
<description>Pres. Obama has issued an amendment to an Executive Order, designating the international law enforcement agency Interpol as a &#x26;#x22;public international organization,&#x26;#x22; extending diplomatic immunity to the group and protecting any files it may have on US political operatives &#x26;#x26; officials. The amendment to the Executive Order -- which does not need to be put to the senatorial test of &#x26;#x22;advise and consent&#x26;#x22; -- reads: &#x26;#x22;By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order...</description>
<author>The New Media Journal</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2412977/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:33:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Executive Order -- Amending Executive Order 12425
</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2412661/posts</link>
<description>By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words &#x26;#x22;except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act&#x26;#x22; and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.</description>
<author>white house</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2412661/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Executive Order 12425</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2412042/posts</link>
<description>EO: AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words &#x26;#x22;except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and...</description>
<author>theobamafile</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2412042/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>EO: AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2411476/posts</link>
<description>Note: The following text is a quote: Home &#x26;#x95; Briefing Room &#x26;#x95; Presidential Actions &#x26;#x95; Executive Orders The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release December 17, 2009 Executive Order -- Amending Executive Order 12425 EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - AMENDING EXECUTIVE ORDER 12425 DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in...</description>
<author>WHITEHOUSE.gov</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2411476/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Obama Admin.Gives INTERPOL More Favorable Immunities Than American Law Enforcement Agencies</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2418201/posts</link>
<description>Okay, okay. I know a lot of you know about this already. For about a week I have been getting emails about Barack Obama surrendering American sovereignty to Interpol, the international criminal police force under the UN&#x26;#x92;s jurisdiction, but I honestly couldn&#x26;#x92;t believe even Obama would do that. The people emailing me were, frankly, mostly of the black helicopter crowd variety so I dismissed it is as overhyped. Then RedState regulars like Kenny Soloman and Veronica Estrada started taking it seriously. I had to pay attention. Finally, I got an email with several links from a friend saying I needed...</description>
<author>Red State</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2418201/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:17:17 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>E.O. Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In U.S. 

</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414012/posts</link>
<description>Wither Sovereignty? Executive Order Amended to Immunize INTERPOL In America-Is The ICC Next? Last Thursday, December 17, 2009, The White House released an Executive Order &#x26;#x22;Amending Executive Order 12425.&#x26;#x22; It grants INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organization) a new level of full diplomatic immunity afforded to foreign embassies and select other &#x26;#x22;International Organizations&#x26;#x22; as set forth in the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945. By removing language from President Reagan&#x26;#x27;s 1983 Executive Order 12425, this international law enforcement body now operates - now operates - on American soil beyond the reach of our own top law enforcement arm, the...</description>
<author>Threat Watch Blog</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414012/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:00:48 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Could Obama Use INTERPOL to Evade Constitutional Law?</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2417841/posts</link>
<description>Much has been written recently since ThreatsWatch first broke the story of President Obama&#x26;#x92;s stealth Executive Order (EO) rendering an international police force immune from the restrictions of the Constitution and American law. Reports are focusing on the ramifications of the EO to U.S. sovereignty and the potential surrender of Americans to war crime tribunals in the International Criminal Court (ICC). But is the President using the 2(c) provision to sidestep Constitutional law and place the U.S. under the jurisdiction of the ICC without ratification of the UN Treaty by 2/3 of the Senate? Or is he granting unrecognized authority...</description>
<author>NewsReal</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2417841/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:51:35 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Remove the usurper, stop the transformation of our Republic</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2418526/posts</link>
<description>OBOGO - Remove the &#x26;#x27;mover&#x26;#x27; rather than fighting his every move!</description>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2418526/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:11:53 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama Gives States a REAL New Year&#x26;#x27;s Gift [National Identity Card]</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2417970/posts</link>
<description>Imagine walking down the street to the corner store for a newspaper and being stopped by policeman. He demands to see an official government-issued photo ID. You don&#x26;#x27;t have it with you. The policeman tells you you&#x26;#x27;re subject to a fine, and takes you into custody until authorities can ascertain your identity. Is this a totalitarian nightmare of East Germany or the Soviet Union? No, this is everyday life in dozens of countries that have issued citizens national ID cards that must be carried at all times. Failing to present the card upon demand is an offense in many of...</description>
<author>Asset Protection</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2417970/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:20:04 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Attorney wants to argue eligibility in Washington (Obama birth-certificate)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2417885/posts</link>
<description>A lawyer who has fought government attorneys in courthouses across the nation over the issue of President Barack Obama&#x26;#x27;s eligibility to occupy the White House now wants the dispute moved to the nation&#x26;#x27;s capital, since that&#x26;#x27;s where government lawyers have said there would be proper jurisdiction. Orly Taitz is asking the California judge who earlier dismissed her clients&#x26;#x27; claims on jurisdictional issues, noting that the proper venue would be Washington, to simply move the case there. &#x26;#x22;During the October 5 motion hearing pursuant to the motion to dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction, the moving parties, the assistant U.S. attorneys...</description>
<author>WND</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2417885/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:55:02 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Chrysler Dealers and attorneys Donofrio and Pidgeon file lawsuit in NYC</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2417248/posts</link>
<description>This column reported December 5, 2009 that Leo Donofrio Esq. and Steve Pidgeon Esq. would be filing two cases against the Obama Administration and Government. The first a Bankruptcy case in the New York District, and the second to be filed in Washington D.C., a Quo Warranto case directly challenging Barack Obama. It can now be reported the Bankruptcy case for the Chrysler Dealers who were stripped of their dealerships by the Obama Administration has indeed been filed. Donofrio and Pidgeon have filed a Rule 60 Motion to reconsider on behalf of 21 rejected Chrysler dealers. As was expected, several...</description>
<author>Examiner.com</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2417248/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:20:28 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Donofrio &#x26;#x26; Pidgeon file Motion for Reconsideration i Chrysler Case</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2416277/posts</link>
<description>Last night Attorney Leo Donofrio filed an Omnibus Motion to Reconsider in the case RE: in Chrysler LLC et al., in the name of Attorney Stephen Pidgeon and himself, and on behalf of more than 20 Chrysler Dealerships, seeking to recover monetary compensation for the loss of their franchises and contractual rights with Chrysler. The case involves the disputed bankruptcy proceedings of Chrysler automotive corporation, known formally as Chrysler LLC. The many cases regarding the dissolution and sale of Chrysler are being heard before the Honorable Robert J. Gonzalez, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Federal Court, Southern District of...</description>
<author>The Post &#x26; Email</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2416277/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:38:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Third-grade photo capture&#x26;#x27;s [sic] Obama&#x26;#x27;s grin (3rd grade in Hawaii?)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2416310/posts</link>
<description>&#x26;#x3C;p&#x26;#x3E;A former Manoa resident sent President Barack Obama an old photo of the two of them taken while they were third-grade classmates at Noelani Elementary School, requesting an autograph more than six months ago. He recently received the autographed picture back, as well as a personally signed thank-you note.&#x26;#x3C;/p&#x26;#x3E;

</description>
<author>Honolulu Star Bulletin</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2416310/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:19:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Atty Philip J. Berg defends Obama birth certificate lawsuits</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2415880/posts</link>
<description>Editor&#x26;#x27;s note: Philip J. Berg, former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania and an activist attorney who brought a lawsuit challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama to become president of the United States, has written the following reply to Jamie Freeze&#x26;#x27;s Dec. 22 RenewAmerica article &#x26;#x22;Facts are stubborn things: Obama is a natural-born citizen.&#x26;#x22; Jamie Freeze, a law student, has called any of us who question Soetoro/Obama&#x26;#x27;s citizenship status and constitutional eligibility to serve as U.S. President &#x26;#x97; a constitutional right of ours, of course &#x26;#x97; incompetent idiots. Ms. Freeze, however, may want to continue her education. Part of being a...</description>
<author>Renew America</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2415880/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:28:12 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>US Military Forces Refusing Orders from Barack Obama and Taking it to Court (Video)</title>
<link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2415595/posts</link>
<description>US Military Forces are refusing to take Orders from Obama unless he can prove he is a US Citizen. They plan Court action as theie Lawyers are taking Briefs as we speak.</description>
<author>2setufree / YouTube</author>
<comments>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2415595/posts#comment</comments>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>