Free Republic 2nd Quarter Fundraising Target: $85,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $23,888
28%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 28% is in!! Thank you all very much!!

Posts by Bigjimslade

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • The Allen West recount continues (an on-the-ground report)

    11/17/2012 12:32:15 PM PST · 3 of 8
    Bigjimslade to Oldpuppymax

    Man, I hope they can find the smoking gun here. Multiply what happened here by every other house district in every other battleground state and you have a Mitt Romney win.

    I have no doubt OH was stolen via the early/absentee vote. If you look at the numbers Mitt showed significant gains in every county that he won and Obama had significant decline in early/absentee in almost every county he won. However the early vote the networks gave showed an 18.5% Obama lead. A large portion of heavily Republican votes was missing. Unfortunately, most counties don’t report a breakdown of how many people actually voted on election day other than one heavily dem one. Therefore, it’s impossible to say if any early votes disappeared from the data but we do know only OH and PA showed Romney losing votes over McCain as compared to surrounding states and other battlegrounds.

  • Anyone else not get Romney gear delivered off his site?

    11/16/2012 3:06:13 PM PST · 9 of 43
    Bigjimslade to GlockThe Vote

    Several items of clothing never showed up but yard sign came very late. I assumed the fine union workers at the post office had something to do with it as I wonder if they had anything to do with my absentee ballots missing as well.

    Has anyone tried to follow up with the Romney store ?

  • Meet the Psychologists Who Convinced You to Vote for Obama

    11/14/2012 9:51:09 AM PST · 12 of 15
    Bigjimslade to rightwingintelligentsia

    This only touches the surface of how they used psychiatry. When you combine the above with their data-mining operations that’s when it gets scary. They have inside tracks to the information from google searches and the information from facebook due to the political leanings of these companies. They know what you’ve searched for, what groups you and your friends belong to, what games you play, what you buy with your credit card. They can then identify those groups of people that aren’t likely to vote but can be convinced to vote through psychology. Once they have a target group they can take it down to almost the individual level and develop a psychological profile and use specific emotional triggers to get that person to vote. I’ve seen it work and it is powerful.

    If you want an example I wrote about it here post 45: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2958583/posts

    This may sound expensive but Obama spent almost 1 Trillion dollars which doesn’t count all the other groups. That is over $7,000 for every person that voted this year, with that kind of money it is only a matter of time before the campaigns realize that they can afford to target individuals and stop spending money on all of the junk mail that no one reads. You can only buy so many ads and they only have so much impact.

    There were help wanted ads for data miners for the Obama campaign posted for years before this election and I believe it will be a bigger and bigger part of how elections are won. You only need to target a few hundred thousand people in the right states to tip a close election. They can afford to spend quite a bit per impressionable voter. We need to catch up on this big time. Younger people in this country have been trained to react to emotional arguments, not logic. Like it or not that’s the only way to win over the majority of them.

  • Can We Replace John Boehner With Paul Ryan?

    11/14/2012 9:22:59 AM PST · 14 of 41
    Bigjimslade to NKP_Vet

    With all the negativity surrounding congress that position will turn him into a lightning rod. As much as we need him there I think it would be a terrible political career decision.

  • The Best or Worst Pollsters in the 2012 Election – How did Nate Silver Do It? (Gallup is Dead Last)

    11/14/2012 9:08:16 AM PST · 10 of 27
    Bigjimslade to SeekAndFind

    There was such a split between two groups of pollsters that I have to think these polls were being used to justify a fraudulent outcome. Those that the administration could manipulate knew the outcome ahead of time.

    During the runup I kept telling my wife that I thought they were using the polls to demoralize people or to justify their inevitable calls of suppression. She just kept saying that the polls were just telling us how much they plan on cheating. Now, I think she was right.

  • After A Bitter Election, Unite A Divided Nation Around Federalism

    11/14/2012 12:45:17 AM PST · 13 of 15
    Bigjimslade to billflax

    This is indeed our best hope, but if this election showed us anything it’s that a huge portion of this country wants the federal govt. to fund and run their lives.

    With changing demographics we will ultimately have to rely on state’s rights to protect us or flee to a country that values freedom, if any exist. We don’t need secession if we hold to the constitution the state rights we need are already there.

    This will unfortunately take state leaders willing to demand our constitutional rights and just as important willing to refuse the federal government’s jurisdiction over any area not enumerated in the constitution.

    Many of our present battleground states still hold Republican majorities in state government. We need leaders that are willing to sour the milk from the government teat. Democrats have been using our tax dollars to attract guaranteed voters to the areas they want for generations. Enact state laws that require work for any kind of government check and watch how fast the demographics change as the welfare recipients flee. When the federal government threatens to withhold their share of the welfare money tell them to shove it. Watch how much faster the demographics change at that point. Get rid of the welfare mooches and it’s no longer a battleground state. This gives an advantage for federal elections at least until the next census but ultimately it helps ensure we hold at least one part of government strong enough to slow down their agenda. Since the Senate is the only body elected that isn’t dependent on population it is possible to hold it against demographic trends.

    Ultimately, this is the moral high ground as well as a good strategy. We shuffle kids through schools giving them one chance to get it right when their home lives often make it impossible. If they fail and drop out they never get another chance, we just doom them to the welfare system and they never learn what work is. Turn their community centers into work centers where they go to learn and work for their checks. Let’s see how many of them really only collect welfare b/c there isn’t any work available and how many just don’t want to work.

  • The Auto Bailout Didn’t Decide Ohio ("historic black turnout " did)

    11/13/2012 11:59:25 PM PST · 14 of 27
    Bigjimslade to DoughtyOne

    IMO, no political party should be able to help anyone vote.

    — I absolutely agree. I also think it should be illegal to keep track of who shows up. If I want to stay home I should have the right to do it without anyone knowing about it.

    If I were a union employee and didn’t show up I could suddenly lose my job. If we take away the party’s ability to keep track of who’s voting we make their job of voter fraud a lot more difficult.

  • The Auto Bailout Didn’t Decide Ohio ("historic black turnout " did)

    11/13/2012 11:51:17 PM PST · 13 of 27
    Bigjimslade to Arthurio

    historic black turnout = massive ballot box stuffing plus massive white voter destruction.

    Since we measure “black voter turnout” as a percentage and not an absolute number, loss of white votes in one of only two states in the region that showed a lower Romney vs McCain total (OH and PA), creates a sense of a higher turnout of all other minorities.

    Someone kept posting the left’s strategy of keeping track of non-voters and “polling” them to see if they plan on voting. If it’s obvious they’re not going to vote you vote for them. Sounded like a lot of work until I noticed that every OH county lets you generate a list of voters and their last voting date on line. You can break it down by precinct, sort it any way you want and generate a PDF, mailing labels, a file meant to be fed right into a database program or even a “walking list” by location. They sure make it easy, takes all of 2 minutes.

  • Was the 2012 Election Stolen?

    11/13/2012 12:08:30 PM PST · 135 of 145
    Bigjimslade to Mountain Mary

    I’m not so sure about that, wolfpat. I’m one of those real conservatives who initially didn’t plan to vote for Mittens..and i caved.

    I know others who did same. Maybe a small percentage stayed home but I think most of us came to realize that a vote for Rom was a vote against Bam and that made it easier.

    -— Exactly, I’ve read hundreds of posts that stated just that. However, only one person has reported they voted for McCain but not Romney. That is what they want us to believe though. There were throngs of people that voted for McCain but thought less of Romney. I believe a lot of people stayed home but I don’t believe enough stayed home that turned out for McCain to lose OH. Especially since only OH and PA showed lower turnout for Romney amongst the comparable states in the area and the other battlegrounds. Something happened to those votes.

  • Was the 2012 Election Stolen?

    11/13/2012 11:59:19 AM PST · 133 of 145
    Bigjimslade to deport

    And the outcome is not at all out of step with recent history

    — Yeah, they pull this stuff every election, doesn’t make it right. Many of these precincts also show 100% turnout, most over 90%. Do you really believe that ? A precinct made up almost entirely of people that have done nothing to help themselves their entire lives other than cashing govt. checks, but they are motivated enough to turnout 100% on the same day ? Impossible.

    I think the Dems have gotten better at targeting areas where we’re not expecting them too. In the recall race it seemed like they swarmed Racine even more than Milwaukee. The biggest turnout in FL was actually in the Tampa/St Pete area where there was likely less scrutiny but still some major inner city areas. There have been reports of Sheboygan, WI being swamped with busloads of voters many voting Obama and the Republican line to bring less scrutiny.

    All of this is expected but it’s the reports of R vote destruction that really seem to have increased this year, not just manufacturing D votes.

    Everyone wants absolute proof, not just statistics and ,but how can we put together the resources to prove any of this unless we pay attention to the indicators 1st ? Proof only comes from investigation but no one wants to investigate unless there’s proof.

  • Hostess to Close Selected Bakeries Due to Nationwide Strike

    11/12/2012 6:24:16 PM PST · 22 of 22
    Bigjimslade to mdittmar

    Beautiful Response. I’m going to have to start buying Hostess products. But it’s not like they need those good paying jobs in Cinncinati, St Louis and Seattle right ?

  • Was David Petraeus Blackmailed By His Own Government?

    11/12/2012 6:13:19 PM PST · 21 of 54
    Bigjimslade to raptor22

    I’ve been saying he was blackmailed since day 1. The best way to deal with it is what he did, go public on your own. If that is what happened there must have been quite a panic when he came out.

  • Twisting the Internal Polling Knife

    11/12/2012 6:02:05 PM PST · 13 of 32
    Bigjimslade to Kaslin

    Of course they had the polls right, they knew exactly where all the fraud was going to take place.

    The one thing that did always bother me through this election season was the comparisons to 2010. Yeah, we did great with the house but in the Statewide Senate races in battleground states we got beat with massive fraud. They proved that even with the biggest wave in Republican support in recent history they had an answer ready. Fraud in the big cities like Denver and L.V. to counter any gains outside of them. This machine was ready to go even then. Add in the fact that this was a presidential election and they would naturally get more of the non-fraud turnout and there really was no good reason to think that we could overcome the fraud.

  • The Myth of the Missing Three Million Republicans

    11/12/2012 5:37:06 PM PST · 45 of 53
    Bigjimslade to OneWingedShark

    They could then be manipulated into supporting whatever argument they wanted by hitting their emotional triggers.
    Hm, do you have some examples?

    —My favorite example was one of my workers. Total misanthrope animal rights person, covered in tats and piercings, never bathed etc etc. and openly hated black people (I had to threaten to fire her for making racist remarks).
    Through data mining they could identify the animal rights groups she belonged to, who her friends were, what ads/sites she clicked etc etc. One of her friends was recruited to constantly work on her to vote for Obama but finally what did it was they bombarded her email with footage of people in Alaska shooting wolves from airplanes and blamed Sarah Palin of course.
    She registered to vote and actually took the day off to drive back to her home state to vote for Obama. All because she felt she was getting back at Sarah Palin. She couldn’t have told you about one issue in the election and whether Obama won or not would change nothing for the wolves in Alaska, but they hit that emotional trigger and it turned literally one of the laziest most unmotivated people I’ve ever met in my life into someone that would have walked through fire to vote against Sarah Palin and threw a party to celebrate it to boot.

    I see this stuff all time from my friends though. I try to make a case about how raising taxes will actually hurt the poor the most and the response is blabber about how I haven’t seen how poor people really are in such and such a neighborhood and I don’t care about the poor. They just skip past the logical argument and go back to emotional ones.

    The other classic example is getting kids on the side of global warming by showing a mother polar bear separated from her cub by the melting ice. Once they see that you can try to explain that even polar bear cubs can swim for miles so this never happens but you will never overcome that initial response.

  • The Myth of the Missing Three Million Republicans

    11/12/2012 2:37:41 PM PST · 39 of 53
    Bigjimslade to ansel12

    Young voters are liberals and they believe what the left has taught them,

    — true, but I think there is more to it than that. The young have been taught to respond to emotional triggers, not logic and the leftists know this and are masters of exploiting it.

    I once heard an ex-KGB agent speak about how 90% of the KGB budget was spent on influencing our schools. He said that they couldn’t just try to make teachers push communism so they focused on teaching children to think with their emotions and reject logic. They could then be manipulated into supporting whatever argument they wanted by hitting their emotional triggers. This strategy was applied to my generation but for some reason I always got defensive when someone tried to trigger my emotions and I was always conscious of it. I’d say 90% of my friends fall for this crap though.

    According to this speaker their research stated that once someone was taught this way it was almost impossible to reverse it, and you could simply never offer enough logic to overcome an emotional argument with them. We need to learn to exploit this strategy when dealing with younger voters instead of fighting it with logic.

    One of the keys to the data-mining operations that the Dems have been using is to assign people into groups that can be easily manipulated into voting using certain emotional triggers. It works and we have nothing that even comes close to counter it with.

  • The Myth of the Missing Three Million Republicans

    11/12/2012 1:48:39 PM PST · 36 of 53
    Bigjimslade to Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

    In the swing states, votes for Romney weren’t ‘missing’. THEY WERE DESTROYED AND/OR SIMPLY NOT COUNTED.

    — Totally agree. Why did Romney’s #’s drop vs McCain’s in OH and PA but Romney did significantly better than McCain in surrounding states and other swing states ? I know our absentee ballots in PA disappeared and others have reported that they were told this was a widespread problem by officials in their district. As far as OH goes the early ballot count was almost 60:40, no way that was accurate unless votes from R districts were missing or counted later.

  • Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

    11/11/2012 8:01:08 PM PST · 77 of 139
    Bigjimslade to SeekAndFind

    We saw thousands of polls this election season. How about someone pays for one more huge poll ?

    Poll OH citizens and ask them 1) did you vote for the Democrat, Republican, Other or no one in this election ?

    2)Did you vote for Dem/REp/Other or no one in the last election ?

    I’d like to see how the results stack up and how many voted for McCain and didn’t vote for Romney. Maybe they can also keep track of those who said no one and check if someone voted in their stead.

    I also wonder if anyone has taken the time to count up the votes in the 90 plus turnout precints in the swing states ? If you adjusted those precincts down to the average state level of turnout how many votes would that take away from Obama ? and would it affect the outcome ? You can’t tell me that people that have never done anything in their lives but wait for a check will turnout for anything at a 100% level and no group of any sort in this country can be convinced to vote 100% in favor of anything, I don’t care if racism is involved or not.

  • Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

    11/11/2012 7:14:36 PM PST · 67 of 139
    Bigjimslade to jivin gene

    “The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800’s.”

    democrats, hell. It was the f-ing “media” whores!!!!!!

    -— what was the one common aspect of every Dem ad I saw in PA ? They called the other guy a “millionaire” usually with ominous music playing. Interesting and ironic that in all cases the dem was a millionaire too.

    If the electorate thinks that being successful at what you do is an automatic disqualifacation for election then we’ve already lost.

  • Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

    11/11/2012 7:14:22 PM PST · 66 of 139
    Bigjimslade to jivin gene

    “The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800’s.”

    democrats, hell. It was the f-ing “media” whores!!!!!!

    -— what was the one common aspect of every Dem ad I saw in PA ? They called the other guy a “millionaire” usually with ominous music playing. Interesting and ironic that in all cases the dem was a millionaire too.

    If the electorate thinks that being successful at what you do is an automatic disqualifacation for election than we’ve already lost.

  • Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

    11/11/2012 6:14:01 PM PST · 40 of 139
    Bigjimslade to muwarriors92

    Don’t we control the Sec of State for Ohio and Florida? Isn’t it up to our side to make sure the rolls are clean?

    — In theory yes. However, in both cases Eric Holder stepped in and took them to court when they tried to do it.

    I’m glad to see a semi-large site at least addressing this issue. I turn on news shows with 8 people supposedly representing all sides sitting around a table discussing elections and no one wants to say anything about the 800lb Gorilla name “Fraud” that is jumping up and down in the middle of the table.

  • The Voters who stayed Home (bitter pill: Republicans re-elected Obama)

    11/11/2012 12:23:18 PM PST · 93 of 262
    Bigjimslade to Tau Food

    OK, I’ve asked this several times and there’s one person that voted for McCain but not Romney.

    Anyone that voted Romney but not McCain ?

  • The Voters who stayed Home (bitter pill: Republicans re-elected Obama)

    11/11/2012 12:23:12 PM PST · 91 of 262
    Bigjimslade to Tau Food

    OK, I’ve asked this several times and there’s one person that voted for McCain but not Romney.

    Anyone that voted Romney but not McCain ?

  • The Voters who stayed Home (bitter pill: Republicans re-elected Obama)

    11/11/2012 12:07:55 PM PST · 57 of 262
    Bigjimslade to pabianice

    First off, some of this decline has to be from the fact that a huge part of the nation was recovering from Sandy but that should have affected Obama more in the total count.

    For those that keep repeating how they stayed home b/c Romney was as bad as Obama, please tell me how many of you voted for McCain and not Romney ? You have every right to stay home, but I know dozens of people that didn’t vote for McCain and turned out for Romney. I’ve yet to meet anyone that did the opposite. If fewer voted for Romney than McCain in OH and PA there surely have to be plenty of you out there. Unless the difference came from voter destruction, that’s my take on it. I guess I’ve yet to see the partisan turnout in OH. If more R’s showed up for him and the I’s didn’t show up that could be the problem too.

  • How I think the election was stolen.

    11/11/2012 10:58:31 AM PST · 69 of 90
    Bigjimslade to ac-rep

    the election might’ve been stolen but the fact is it shouldnt have been that close to be able to steal. we’re talkin about the worst presidential record going into a re election in history.

    — How do you know it has to be close in order to steal it ? If you can get away with fraud you can get away with massive fraud.

  • How I think the election was stolen.

    11/11/2012 10:12:52 AM PST · 58 of 90
    Bigjimslade to TommyC1

    I have one big question:

    Does anyone know anyone that voted for McCain and decided to stay home for Romney ?

    I know dozens that did the opposite but he underperformed in OH and PA ? No freakin way.

    I’m so sick of hearing about the demographics. Destroy enough older white male votes and of course it will appear women and minorities and the young came out in huge numbers, we are just comparing percentages here, not voters.

  • How I think the election was stolen.

    11/11/2012 10:09:22 AM PST · 57 of 90
    Bigjimslade to mvonfr

    Now, here is an important test one should do before jumping to conclusions: we know of strange results from OH, PA, WI, and FL. Any suspicious precincts in NY or CA? (if none can be found, the best explanation is that the Democrats did not bother with the fix in the states they were going to win anyway).

    — One problem, they still needed to build a comfortable margin to lend legitimacy to the election. A few million votes in CA would be child’s play if they can do it in the most watched states in the union.

  • How I think the election was stolen.

    11/11/2012 10:04:15 AM PST · 55 of 90
    Bigjimslade to annelizly

    These were the reports coming in all night, from all R areas. Reports from D areas were the opposite. These came from people that have been willing to write off an election early before, that have said in the past “things don’t look good, don’t get your hopes up”. These same people were very hopeful this time. It just doesn’t pass the “sniff” test.

  • How I think the election was stolen.

    11/11/2012 9:50:48 AM PST · 47 of 90
    Bigjimslade to Terry Mross

    EVERY democrat in the house and senate support all this. They’ve helped install a dictator. They can’t all be that stupid. Are they all evil?

    — They are all vetted before the D party invests a dime in them. They either have to prove they are totally corrupt, have something blackmail worthy, or both. I wonder how long they had info on Petraeus before he decided he’d just tell the world himself.

  • How I think the election was stolen.

    11/11/2012 9:42:39 AM PST · 42 of 90
    Bigjimslade to TommyC1

    We had a professional odds-maker Paddy Power pay out the night before the election ? Wonder how many of the biggest payouts on intrade went to those who helped fix this election ?

    As far as I’m concerned, until I see otherwise, 11% of the OH vote vanished. They started election night with the absentee/early vote and it was only 20% of 2008 numbers and had a 60:40 split Obama. The actual # should have been 31% of 2008 and roughly a 50:39:14 breakdown. Was the other 11% added back in later to one of only two states (PA was the other) in the area that showed less votes for Romney than McCain ? Who knows ? My absentee in PA disappeared and I’ve since heard from others that noted the same thing. I found out b/c I went to the polls, there is no easy way to look it up. One individual said the official she spoke to told her their were massive problems with absentee ballots.

  • Advice to California's GOP: Leave — or better yet, change

    11/11/2012 9:28:11 AM PST · 2 of 46
    Bigjimslade to Oldeconomybuyer

    If you do choose to leave, please go to a true battleground state.

  • Prepare for Demise of California; Liberals Will Get All the Government (and Tax Hikes) They Want

    11/11/2012 9:26:01 AM PST · 43 of 75
    Bigjimslade to Kaslin

    Prepare to keep bailing them out over and over. Do you think Obama is going to let the poster child of Progressivism fail ? We will all fail at once. The demise will be blamed on Capitalism, like it was in 2008. The media will go right along and, well, at least we get to see the looks on the welfare crowd when they realize they’re not going to get as much stuff and they’re going to have to work for it for the good of the collective.

  • The Campaign Made No Difference

    11/11/2012 9:15:38 AM PST · 89 of 111
    Bigjimslade to pepsionice

    the whole Democratic vote was based on splitting people up into classes and going after individual classes with perceived attention. Either you find a guy to unite classes or you have to play the same game in the end.

    -— Yeah, that’s what democrats do, it’s what they are.

    As far as the Dream Act, if we let it happen it is all over. Changing Demographics already are near dooming us and unfortunately, despite their conservative religious views, the vast majority of the hispanic voters believe that the government is the answer to their problems. I think we need to hold our ground on the dream act and in the end Obama will be known as the one that promised them the moon months before an election and then never delivered.

    Ultimately, I refuse to draw conclusions based on this election other than it was stolen from us. My vote was destroyed, I know many others that had the same thing happen, who knows how widespread it was ?

  • The Voters Who Stayed Home (The Key to Understanding the Results of the 2012 Elections)

    11/10/2012 11:52:21 AM PST · 247 of 335
    Bigjimslade to SeekAndFind

    I’m sorry, there is no way in hell anyone can convince me that more Republicans stayed home this time vs. McCain. I believe fewer Republican votes were counted, don’t believe fewer Republicans stayed home though.

    Can we come up with a new term for the “I’ll stay home unless the candidate is perfect” types so that it’s easier to write ?

    We have RINOs on one extreme how about:
    RUINERs — Repulican Unless I’m Exactly Represented.

  • Who Authorized FBI Surveillance of Gen. Petraeus?

    11/10/2012 11:16:19 AM PST · 21 of 107
    Bigjimslade to Perdogg

    I still thinking they were using this as blackmail. Democrats can’t have honest people in power unless they have something to hold against them.

    He probably had enough and said to hell with it, I’ll out myself.

  • BREAKING: Allen West WINNING Fla-18 Recount by 195 Votes!

    11/10/2012 6:26:47 AM PST · 31 of 93
    Bigjimslade to DrDude

    Maybe if the GOP won’t do it one of our tea party groups can organize this. Get volunteers (with security details) to track down every address and then actually knock on the door and say, we are an organization looking to encourage fair elections and make sure all eligible voters are registered, did you vote in this last election ? If they say no, I never vote then we should man those polling locations with undercover police and arrest every one of these a-holes and their “handlers” that bussed them in when they show up to vote. I wonder if in most of these precints they even have to bring in a body to vote, the workers probably just sign the books for them and mark another D ballot down.

    I’d volunteer my time and money for a massive effort like that but it has to start now.

  • POLL: Was the election won lawfully or by way of fraud?

    11/09/2012 7:41:42 PM PST · 114 of 167
    Bigjimslade to pterional

    If the election is going to be close you will never win against unchecked corruption.

    — Why does it have to be close. We let them turnout 100% then 110 then 150%, now our ballots are disappearing. With all these tools they can overcome huge deficits.

  • POLL: Was the election won lawfully or by way of fraud?

    11/09/2012 7:40:47 PM PST · 112 of 167
    Bigjimslade to pterional

    If the election is going to be close you will never win against unchecked corruption.

    — Why does it have to be close. We let them turnout 100% then 110 then 150%, now our ballots are disappearing. With all these tools they can overcome huge deficits.

  • POLL: Was the election won lawfully or by way of fraud?

    11/09/2012 7:33:02 PM PST · 107 of 167
    Bigjimslade to AndyTheBear

    I don’t care where you go in life. You can’t get any group of people to vote 100% for anything. You sure can’t get 100% to show up for anything. Especially when you are dealing with people that have never shown that they can reliably do anything other than pick up their checks.

  • POLL: Was the election won lawfully or by way of fraud?

    11/09/2012 7:28:56 PM PST · 104 of 167
    Bigjimslade to yield 2 the right

    How about we come up with a new name for those that whine and stomp their feet every election and refuse to vote because the candidate isn’t perfect ? The type that say they worship Reagan but wouldn’t vote for him if someone came up with the exact same stances on the issues.

    We already have RINO how about:
    RUINER Republican unless I’m not exactly represented ?
    RIP Republican if perfect or Republican if pro-life ?

    Man, I’m so getting kicked off this site.

  • POLL: Was the election won lawfully or by way of fraud?

    11/09/2012 7:22:58 PM PST · 99 of 167
    Bigjimslade to This Just In

    The president, most senate seats in close states, numerous house seats, all won by fraud. Votes were manufactured and more than ever I believe votes were destroyed. I will go to my grave believing this presidential election was stolen.

  • Regarding the recent Florida election

    11/09/2012 7:03:41 PM PST · 12 of 112
    Bigjimslade to sarasmom

    Whenever I complained about the ridiculous polls to my wife I suggested they were meant to demoralize or justify calls of voter suppression after the election. All she kept saying was that they are just planning on stealing that many votes. I think she was right.

  • Regarding the recent Florida election

    11/09/2012 7:00:46 PM PST · 10 of 112
    Bigjimslade to sarasmom

    So, now we know this happened in Cleveland, Philly, Portsmouth, VA, 110 year olds voting all over the place. This election was outright stolen. They manufactured what they could and destroyed the rest. See my post on having my absentee vote lost:
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2957357/posts

  • CIA Director Petraeus resigns, admits extra-marital affair

    11/09/2012 5:40:03 PM PST · 11 of 30
    Bigjimslade to BCW

    Hmmm... Hopefully he got sick of the blackmail that was going on to keep him shut up. Perhaps coming right out and admitting it was a way to make it stop ? Probably wishful thinking.

  • Yes, Another Vanity Suggesting Fraud ie vote destruction.

    11/09/2012 5:30:59 PM PST · 54 of 54
    Bigjimslade to mo

    I saw that story, disgusting. You gotta wonder how many ballots nationwide this is ? It’s gotta be pretty easy work in the inner cities but in some districts they may even have to have people show up and physically vote under someone else’s name. How old fashioned.

  • Yes, Another Vanity Suggesting Fraud ie vote destruction.

    11/09/2012 1:58:08 PM PST · 52 of 54
    Bigjimslade to JimRed

    Purple ink will not show up well on some darker skin tones. Snookie with a tan, for instance.

    Vaseline on the finger that is dipped will allow it to be wiped clean, too.

    —I think he was just being a jack-ass but you’re right. Also, I think people should have the right to not vote and have no one know about it as well. If you’re a union worker that shows up without a purple finger the next day you might very well be out of work.

  • Yes, Another Vanity Suggesting Fraud ie vote destruction.

    11/09/2012 1:40:49 PM PST · 51 of 54
    Bigjimslade to JimRed

    And Obama’s minions managed to delay military absentee ballots, rendering them invalid.

    — this is the saddest part of the dems fraud and more than anything else should prove that they will sink to any level to win.

  • Yes, Another Vanity Suggesting Fraud ie vote destruction.

    11/09/2012 1:38:38 PM PST · 50 of 54
    Bigjimslade to makersmk2013

    Lets look at Colorado for example.There were 500,000 more voters for the presidential slot than the state amendments,or ANY other issues on the ballot! Why would a voter just vote for the presidential race and nothing else? Not just a few voters but HALF-A MILLION voters did this! They also claim the voter turnout was 66%,but it was actually 91% of active voters.That sounds just a tad bit high to me.

    —You’re right, we didn’t nothing when the started turning out 90% precincts, so they turned out 100% ones, impossible right ? but we did nothing so 110, 120, 150%. How high do you think the turnout will be in Philly precincts this time ? 300% ? would you be shocked? We were supposed to be up in early voting in CO according to everyone, wish I had seen the # for that one at the beginning of the count.

  • Yes, Another Vanity Suggesting Fraud ie vote destruction.

    11/09/2012 1:38:38 PM PST · 49 of 54
    Bigjimslade to makersmk2013

    Lets look at Colorado for example.There were 500,000 more voters for the presidential slot than the state amendments,or ANY other issues on the ballot! Why would a voter just vote for the presidential race and nothing else? Not just a few voters but HALF-A MILLION voters did this! They also claim the voter turnout was 66%,but it was actually 91% of active voters.That sounds just a tad bit high to me.

    —You’re right, we didn’t nothing when the started turning out 90% precincts, so they turned out 100% ones, impossible right ? but we did nothing so 110, 120, 150%. How high do you think the turnout will be in Philly precincts this time ? 300% ? would you be shocked? We were supposed to be up in early voting in CO according to everyone, wish I had seen the # for that one at the beginning of the count.

  • Yes, Another Vanity Suggesting Fraud ie vote destruction.

    11/09/2012 1:34:59 PM PST · 47 of 54
    Bigjimslade to Think free or die

    God, I hate to hear stories from people that had that experience, breaks my heart thinking about what it must feel like to see it all happening again in the one place they thought it never could.

  • Yes, Another Vanity Suggesting Fraud ie vote destruction.

    11/09/2012 1:32:22 PM PST · 46 of 54
    Bigjimslade to danamco

    Used to use those damn machines in VA. Never trusted them a bit.