Posts by Conservative Vermont Vet

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Romney Renews His Support For Gun Control, 23 July: "That's the kind of legislation I like"

    07/27/2012 7:50:07 AM PDT · 56 of 134
    Conservative Vermont Vet to cripplecreek
    Ah Yes, the bigotry card. Are you competing with Jesse Jackson or just aspiring to be like him? Its pathetic.

    Bigot: "One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ."

    Having a devoted love of country and not wanting to see it converted to some 3rd world, Socialist/Communist/Islamic hellholle (and taking to task those who appear willing to let this happen, for whatever reason) can hardly be considered "Bigotry."

    That is something we all expect the Left's use of "Alinsky Tactics" (especially Rule No 5: Using "Ridicule") and not what one expects from a fellow Freeper.

    OK, what else would you refer to "it" (Hatred) for all those who keep pounding Mittens and suggesting he is more eeevil, dangerous and more of a "Threat" than is Dear Leader in spite of not being able to produce a shred of evidence whereby Mitt has ever attacked our Constitution, shown any HATRED (or gone on an "apology tour") toward our Republic; has aligend himself with our sworn enmies, and worked diligently to affect "change" which is code word for harming, if not "DESTROYING" our Republic as we know it?

    Of course if you or any of your fellow Mitt/Mormon haters can produce same, I'll gladly reconsider my intent on voting for the lesser of 2 evils.

  • Women bridge Afghan divide

    07/27/2012 5:06:13 AM PDT · 10 of 10
    Conservative Vermont Vet to robowombat
    Women under Islam:

    Photobucket

    While I admire her effort, all this "Hearts and Minds" crap is a complete exercise in futility. We ain't ever going to influence those poor, illiterate, people who are steeped in that 7th C. cult which dictates their everyday life and as long as they cling to their "Religion of Pieces" they (and almost every other Islamic Republic in the World) will not be forthcoming in joining the civilized, 21st Century, World.

    It's something like this:

    Photobucket
  • Obama to sign Israel security bill on eve of Romney visit

    07/27/2012 4:46:46 AM PDT · 35 of 63
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Free ThinkerNY
    Yeah, but Mittens could best (and reallllly stick it to Dear Leader, Hillary and her Socialist State Dept and the Rat Party in general) and upstage B. Hussein, if only he has the "stones" to do so....

    All he has to do is while in Israel, is to say he recognizes the Capital as being Jerusalem and as President, this would be our (America's) official policy.

    Then it would be fun to see Carney squirm his way (as he tried unsuccessfully to do yesterday) out of that one.

  • Enemies

    07/27/2012 4:28:52 AM PDT · 17 of 43
    Conservative Vermont Vet to kearnyirish2
    In fact they did exactly that, meeting with Stalin and giving him Eastern Europe (including Poland, for which Britain had gone to war originally).

    Yes, true, BUT, Roosevelt at the time was ailing and what was not known was the influence that the commie Alger Hiss had on FDR and how the outcome of the results were skewed in favor of that regime which he secretely worked for, the Evil Empire.

    Much the same can be said today as the Muslim Brotherhood insinuates itself (as it has been doing for some 50 years now) within every aspect of our Government Agencies (as well as our media, education system, courts, etc.) and the influence it has had on our Republic which if we don't wake up soon and face that reality and try to reverse the gains they have made, could easily speel our doom.

  • Enemies

    07/27/2012 4:20:35 AM PDT · 16 of 43
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Leto
    Think of Barack Hussein Obama and his fellow travelers, the Socialists/Demo-Rats/Progressives/Libs/Commies (same o--same o) when reading the following:

    FAIR WARNING: America's Enemies Within

    "A nation can survive its fools, even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.

    An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves against those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

    For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.

    He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear." ...

    Roman statesman and political theorist Marcus Tullius Cicero

  • Soldier battling bombs irked by software switch

    07/27/2012 4:11:41 AM PDT · 12 of 18
    Conservative Vermont Vet to pepsionice
    Every year, a number of companies come out with various gadgets to sell off to the military. Their open tests? Well...sometimes, they are rigged to make a big show and an enthusiastic viewer might come away that some new gadget is a four-star item...when the truth is that it’s marginally better than what they already bought and own.

    This software pitch might be better....or it might involved rigged results. The Army is in this test and evaluate mode. And the thing is....there really isn’t an unlimited budget anymore.

    Be that as it may, can you explain why the report was ordered "destroyed?"

    If what you (and aparently others) suggest is true, then there would have been no need to destroy the evaluation and let the results speak for themselves. That in itself is a a big red flag.

    Don't know if you ever served, but when it comes to the safety and lives of our Warriors, we should NOT be counting pennies or be worried about the "Budget," especially if there are ways to minimize casualties which exist and are not being considered or utilized...usually for political or worse, "monetary" consideration, i.e., that of companies/contractors having influence with the Pentagon or Congress.

  • York: If Obama wins, look for expansion of federal dole

    07/27/2012 3:38:24 AM PDT · 3 of 13
    Conservative Vermont Vet to gusopol3
    Tsk, tsk, tsk!

    So what?

    No big deal right?

    After all, no matter what we have witnessed in the past 3 1/2 years that this FASCIST, Neo-Commie, Hate-America, POS, Scumbag has done and based upon his own words, what he WILL do if reelected, we also know (from the handful of Mitt and Mormon Haters here) that Romney "will" do the same--or be even worse--so we might as well just all stay home or vote 3rd party.

    Yep, let's all have a nice big glass of Hemlock (or Kool Aid) and sign on to their "suicide pact."

    So sorry, no can do!

    While (yes, admittedly) the flip-flopping, RINO, Mittens "MIGHT" embrace and advance some (or even all) of Dear Leader's agenda and programs, we (and that includes those Freeps who keep delusionally comparing Romney with Beelzebub, unless they have a crystal ball) don't know for sure.

    On the other hand, we can say with 100% certainty what we we can expect under the B. Hussein Obama Regime and it ain't purty or healthy for the survival of our Republic or augur well for us Cons.

  • Islamic militants take aim at Myanmar

    07/27/2012 3:25:05 AM PDT · 4 of 8
    Conservative Vermont Vet to tsowellfan
    Meanwhile, there is this from Drudge:

    'Muslim Brothers plotting overthrow of Gulf states'

    "Dubai police chief warns of "international plot" against Gulf states, says Iran, Syria and MB must know Gulf is a red line.

    It appears that those (myself included) who keep warning about the 1,400-year effort of Islamists at Global Hegemony and the dangers this vile, eeeeevil, cult, posing as a "religion" poses (most notably right here in the good ol' U.S. of A.) are ignored by most and dismissed as "fear mongers" or Islamaphobes in spite of the mountain of evidence we are exposed to daily.

    I only hope and pray that enough wake up before its too late.

  • Romney jokes at the expense of Brian Williams

    07/26/2012 5:23:37 PM PDT · 5 of 18
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Nachum
    Tah tah!

    Photobucket

    Ooh, that one's gonna leave a mark.

    And who was it that said that the wuss, white-bread, Mr. No Personality, RINO, had/has no sense of humor?

  • Is Huma Abedin the New Alger Hiss?

    07/25/2012 5:48:09 PM PDT · 11 of 25
    Conservative Vermont Vet to bayouranger
    Photobucket
  • Whistleblower: NSA is watching all of us

    07/25/2012 1:02:51 PM PDT · 53 of 63
    Conservative Vermont Vet to JOAT
    Your FReeping comments, your surfing habits, what you watch and buy and who you associate with are being compiled.

    In my case, I certainly hope so. I'd hate to think all those disparaging remarks about that CLUELESS FAT BITCH, Big Sis and her Fascist, Neo-Commie Boss, Dear Leader are for the entertainment of Freepers only.

    I have no doubt that FR is one of many sites the Fed Jack Booted-Thugs regualarly monitor.

    I also hope they can read sign language cuz this is how much I CAIR:

    Photobucket
  • Judge: Fort Hood Suspect Could Be Forcibly Shaved

    07/25/2012 12:41:08 PM PDT · 5 of 48
    Conservative Vermont Vet to moonshot925
    Photobucket

    "Ooh, ooh, pick me, pick me!

    For those too young to remember, that was Horshak from Welcome Back Kotter and that is the 1st thing that came to my mind.

    I've got a nice old dull hunting knife I'd use and as I'm getting on in years, my hands are not quite as steady as they used to be and I'm apt to slip and oh, well, sorry about that....!

  • Judge: Fort Hood suspect could be forcibly shaved

    07/25/2012 12:32:09 PM PDT · 30 of 37
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Free ThinkerNY
    Photobucket

    "Ooh, ooh, pick me , pick me!"

    For those younguns, that was "Horshak" from Welcome Back Kotter.

  • America, the Law-crazed

    07/25/2012 5:45:27 AM PDT · 13 of 14
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Kaslin
    Many Failed Efforts to Count Nation's Federal Criminal Law

    WASHINGTON—For decades, the task of counting the total number of federal criminal laws has bedeviled lawyers, academics and government officials.

    "You will have died and resurrected three times," and still be trying to figure out the answer, said Ronald Gainer, a retired Justice Department official.

    As Criminal Laws Proliferate, More Americans Are Ensnared

    In 1982, while at the Justice Department, Mr. Gainer oversaw what still stands as the most comprehensive attempt to tote up a number. The effort came as part of a long and ultimately failed campaign to persuade Congress to revise the criminal code, which by the 1980s was scattered among 50 titles and 23,000 pages of federal law.

    Justice Department lawyers undertook "the laborious counting" of the scattered statutes "for the express purpose of exposing the idiocy" of the system, said Mr. Gainer, now 76 years old.

    The project stretched two years. In the end, it produced only an educated estimate: about 3,000 criminal offenses. Since then, no one has tried anything nearly as extensive.

    The Drug Abuse Prevention and Control section of the code—Title 21—provides a window into the difficulties of counting. More than 130 pages in length, it essentially pivots around two basic crimes, trafficking and possession. But it also delves into the specifics of hundreds of drugs and chemicals.

    In 1998, the American Bar Association performed a computer search of the federal codes looking for the words "fine" and "imprison," as well as variations. The ABA study concluded the number of crimes was by then likely much higher than 3,000, but didn't give a specific estimate.

    "We concluded that the hunt to say, 'Here is an exact number of federal crimes,' is likely to prove futile and inaccurate," says James Strazzella, who drafted the ABA report.

    None of these studies broached the separate—and equally complex—question of crimes that stem from federal regulations, such as, for example, the rules written by a federal agency to enforce a given act of Congress.

    These rules can carry the force of federal criminal law. Estimates of the number of regulations range from 10,000 to 300,000. None of the legal groups who have studied the code have a firm number.

    "There is no one in the United States over the age of 18 who cannot be indicted for some federal crime," said John Baker, a retired Louisiana State University law professor who has also tried counting the number of new federal crimes created in recent years.

    "That is not an exaggeration."

    SCARRY!!!

  • Obama says he has "no patience" for "you didn't build that" attacks

    07/25/2012 5:23:03 AM PDT · 26 of 93
    Conservative Vermont Vet to tellw
    “And if you don’t like folks talking about you, you probably shouldn’t run for president.

    Photobucket

    "I don't care who you are that's funny right there!

    Considering the Narcissitic, Fascist, Neo-Commie Dear Leader is the most "thin skinned" President in my (almost 70 years) lifetime.

    His skin is so thin that if were not for the "pigmentation" (is that "racist?" lol) you could see right thru it!

  • Bankrupt cities? Don't blame unions

    07/25/2012 5:09:27 AM PDT · 7 of 38
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Sir Napsalot
    From the L.A. [SL]Imes?

    Nuff said!

  • Mark Levin calls out Boehner: Do you stand with Michele Bachmann or the Muslim Brotherhood?

    07/25/2012 3:45:08 AM PDT · 7 of 16
    Conservative Vermont Vet to tsowellfan
    There are only 2 reasons why any Republi-Tard in Congress would not oppose the Muslim Brotherhood: Ignorance of who they are and their "stated" agenda (to replace our Constitution with Sharia) and their is no excuse for this considering the amount of data available or (2) they have "benefited" from some sort of contribution from sources which are Islamic related.

    I guess as in the case of the "Weeper of the House" one could also add a 3rd: he is a Girly-Guy WUSS who is afraid of his own shadow or what others (most notable the MSM) will say about him; thus his resorting to his default attitude (FOLDING LIKE A CHEAP SUIT) and taking the path of least resistance thus spouting all the Multicultural/PC, BS.

    With regards to "RATS" well their natural inclination is to support anyone who's intentions are the same as theirs ("The enemy of my enemy is my friend") and that is the destruction of Capitalism, if not our Republic itself.

  • Opposites Attract: Republican Rep. Don Young endorses Mazie Hirono in Democratic primary

    07/25/2012 3:25:41 AM PDT · 5 of 14
    Conservative Vermont Vet to tsowellfan
    Ah yes, the old "in the spirit of Bipartisanship," "crossing the aisle," and "can't we jist' all git' along" mantra; actually, Bull-Sheet

    Photobucket

    IF you ever want to shut up a Lib/Dem simply ask the this question:

    While there are MANY "RINO's" (and we can all name several off the top of our heads) and clarify that by qualifying that the definition means "REGULARLY" voting with the "opposite" (meaning the RAT) party to support their legislation or voting against one's party's (Republi-tards) proposals or agenda.....

    WHY are there no (NONE) DINO's and when they start to get defensive and sputter, simply ask them to name one...and no, Lieberman does not count and Zel Miller (the LAST one I can remember) has long ago retired.

  • GM pledges $833M investment in Canada through 2016

    07/24/2012 5:34:36 PM PDT · 9 of 10
    Conservative Vermont Vet to The Good Doctor
    My first car (in 1959 the year I got my license) was a 1953 Chevy.

    Since then, I probably have owned more GM cars (especially my favorite way back when "P's" or Pontiacs) than any other make.

    NO MORE!

    I will NEVER buy another GM product.

  • Gun Background Checks In Colo. Spike After Shooting

    07/24/2012 5:26:47 PM PDT · 5 of 9
    Conservative Vermont Vet to RandallFlagg
    Meanwhile.....

    Bill O'Reilly has gone completely off the rails as he continued tonight to rail against people being able to walk into any gun shop (or gun show) and walk out with a "Fully Automatic" weapon or....wait for it....a "BAZOOKA!"

    He attacked the ability for ANYONE to purchase what he refers to "Heavy Weapons," and he is so uninformed, he keeps saying these people who buy AK's and other weapons and large amounts of ammo (he mistakenly reported that the shooter in Aurora purchased 60,000 rounds as opposed to 6,000) to the FBI, not even knowing that there already is a Fed Agency responsible, the ATF.

    What a Maroooon!

  • Discharged Tea Party Marine says military publication made example of him

    07/24/2012 5:09:17 PM PDT · 8 of 17
    Conservative Vermont Vet to lowbridge
    OK and I ask the all Active Duty/Vets, familty members, relatives and friends to pay attention to what this Fascist Neo-Commie POS has done to our Military and remember that come Nov 6th.

    Do we realllllly want this bottom-feeding, Hate-America/Military SCUMBAG as our "Commander in Chief" for another 4 years?

  • Special Operations Veterans Join Forces to Oppose Obama, Fight Continued Release of Secret Documents

    07/24/2012 5:02:07 PM PDT · 5 of 15
    Conservative Vermont Vet to lward99
    Way to go Larry.

    Back in 04 I communicated often with Larry (as well as John O'Neil "Unfit for Command" and other Swift Boat Vets) as many of us Nam Vets worked diligently to help expose that fraudulent, phony, self-avowed TRAITOR, and bottom-feeding, Rat Bas-turd, POS, John Kerry and his KNOWN lies he and his so called band of "veterans" told before a Senate Committee and how much damage he had done (simply to advance a faltering startup, political career) and I am convinced we helped defenat this scumbag.

    Though never having served in Special Ops, I will be in touch soon with Larry and offer whatever help I can to help defeat an even MORE eeeevil and dangerous (though nowhere near as HATED as was/is Kerry) Demo-Rat nominee, B. Hussein Obama.

    Hope all my Nam Vet bros (and all other Vets) who love their country will join me, Larry, the other Spec Ops personnel and other Patriots in our efforts.

  • Muslim Antichrist? Idea stirs hornet's nest

    07/24/2012 1:10:36 PM PDT · 41 of 51
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Perseverando
    Anyone who has spent any time studying this vile, eeeevil, barbaric, misogynistic, cult, posing as a "religion" or its psychotic, murdering, pederast, thug, "Profit" who divined Islam from whole cloth simply to give himself cover in order to pillage, plunder, rape and otherwise, lead a life of true debauchery, would be hard pressed to disagree or dispute this cartoon:

    Photobucket
  • Obama campaign: Does Romney “even understand how our economy works?”

    07/24/2012 12:58:45 PM PDT · 18 of 19
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Sir Napsalot
    Does he (Romney) even understand how our economy works? We build our businesses through hard work and initiative with public and private sectors working together to create a climate that helps us grow. President Obama knows that.”

    So says Stepahnie Cutter.

    Let us review MS. Cutter's VAST EXPEREINCE working in the "Private Sector" from which to base here statement on:

    Cutter was born in Taunton, Massachusetts in 1968

    She graduated from Smith College and Georgetown Law School 1997

    She worked for Bill Clinton as Deputy Communications Director at the White House during his administration

    and as Associate Administrator for Communications at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    She also served as Communications Director for Senator Edward M. Kennedy

    and in July 2003 was named Communications Director for the Democratic National Committee.

    In November 2003, she was named communications director for the John Kerry campaign.

    In June 2008 she was appointed as chief of staff to Michelle Obama for the 2008 Presidential general election campaign.

    She served as the Chief Spokesperson for the Obama-Biden Transition Project.

    She served as Timothy Geithner's counselor.

    In May 2009, she was appointed to serve as adviser to President Obama in the Supreme Court nominations

    In 2010, Cutter was named Assistant to the President for Special Projects, charged with managing the communications and outreach strategy for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

    In 2011, Cutter was named Deputy Senior Advisor to President Barack Obama.

    In September 2011, the White House announced Cutter would leave her position as Deputy Senior Advisor to serve as deputy campaign manager for Obama for America

    Ah, it appears that Moron Mooncalf Cutter has about as much experience working in the "private sector" (IN OTHER WORDS HAVING HAD A "REAL" JOB) as does her boss, Barack Hussein Obama.

  • Mayor Bloomberg...cops should strike across the country...pressure on Congress...crack down on guns

    07/24/2012 10:36:19 AM PDT · 77 of 82
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Right Wing Assault
    Wow, where did you get those case histories? Looks like a great source.

    Do you have a right to polic protection? http://hematite.com/dragon/policeprot.html

  • Sanitizing Obama's Radical Past (An eyewitness to young Obama's Marxist-Leninist ideology)

    07/24/2012 10:18:29 AM PDT · 12 of 19
    Conservative Vermont Vet to SeekAndFind
    The Communist. Frank Marshall Davis: THE UNTOLD STORY OF BARACK OBAMA’S MENTOR

    Jamie Glazov

    July 18, 2012

    Front Page Magazine

    The Communist. Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.

    Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Paul Kengor, Ph.D., a bestselling author whose works include Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century; and The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism.

    He is the author of the new book, The Communist. Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.

    Ok, so who was Frank Marshall Davis?

    Kengor: Frank Marshall Davis, Communist Party USA (CPUSA) number 47544, was a 20th century American who wrote pro-Soviet propaganda in newspaper columns and was a loyal Soviet patriot.

    FP: What do you mean by “loyal Soviet patriot?”

    Kengor: While it will shock naïve liberals who still don’t grasp the horrors of communism, readers of FrontPage will understand. Leftist Americans who took the extraordinary step of joining CPUSA swore a loyalty oath to the USSR—Stalin’s USSR in the case of Frank Marshall Davis.

    The oath stated: “I pledge myself to rally the masses to defend the Soviet Union, the land of victorious socialism. I pledge myself to remain at all times a vigilant and firm defender of the Leninist line of the Party, the only line that insures the triumph of Soviet Power in the United States.”

    FP: When did Frank Marshall Davis join the Communist Party?

    Kengor: Remarkably, he joined early in World War II, after the Hitler-Stalin Pact—a period when many Party members bolted the Party because they were outraged at Stalin signing that pact with Hitler. That pact, of course, precipitated the invasion of Poland and World War II. Jewish American communists in particular were aghast. The man in Moscow to whom they swore their unwavering allegiance had helped pave the way for the Holocaust.

    I must note that it was also through this group that Davis would work with Robert Taylor, who just happened to be the grandfather of Valerie Jarrett.

    FP: That’s remarkable. Valerie Jarrett today is Obama’s right-hand woman in the White House.

    Kengor: Yes, and it’s even more eerie than that. Frank Marshall Davis, Obama’s mentor, also worked with Vernon Jarrett in these circles.

    Vernon Jarrett was Valerie’s father-in-law. And it’s worse still. Davis, Obama’s mentor, also worked with Harry and David Canter, two other Chicago communists. The Canters mentoblue a young man named David Axelrod in Chicago in the 1970s.

    SO, THE TROIKA THAT’S ARGUABLY RUNNING AMERICA TODAY—OBAMA AND VALERIE JARRETT AND DAVID AXELROD—ALL HAVE COMMON BONDS IN CHICAGO’S COMMUNIST CIRCLES FROM THE 1940S. THEIR MENTORS KNEW EACH OTHER. (Emphasis Added)

    I know this is incblueible, but it’s true. You couldn’t make this up. No one would believe it. WE’RE BEING GOVERNED BY GHOSTS FROM CHICAGO’S COMMUNIST PARTY GLORY YEARS. (Emphasis added)

    FP: Are there other people that Frank Marshall Davis worked with in Chicago who have relevance today?

    Kengor: Oh, yes, I could go on and on. At the Chicago Star, the communist newspaper for which he wrote and was the founding editor-in-chief (1946-48), Davis regularly shablue the op-ed page with Senator Claude “Blue” Pepper, who at that exact time was writing the bill to nationalize healthcare in the United States—which Davis himself advocated in his columns. By the way, Pepper’s chief of staff, who wrote that bill, was Charles Kramer, who we now know was working for the KGB under the codename “mole.”

    Another Davis comrade at the Star was William Patterson, who actually mentoblue Frank Marshall Davis and was probably more important than any other figure in bringing Davis into the Party.

    FP: William Patterson was a hardcore communist.

    Kengor: Yes, and among his legacies is the Kremlin’s “People’s Friendship University,” which he helped plan in the 1960s. People’s Friendship University became better known as the “Patrice Lumumba Friendship University,” a Kremlin grooming school for third-world revolutionaries.

    This university, the third largest in the USSR, schooled some of the world’s leading terrorists. Distinguished alumni include Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas (You know, Obama’s Palestinian Authority’s “PEACE PARTNER?”

    Among this band of rogues, Mohamed Boudia was a top figure in the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), one of the cores branches of the PLO. He was in charge of PFLP terrorist operations in Europe, placed there by the KGB, where he worked with Soviet-backed terror cells in East Berlin.

    There he also worked with the Black September Organization. Among Boudia’s most dastardly acts—WHICH INVOLVED MAHMOUD ABBAS—was the brutal murder of Jewish Olympians in the 1972 Munich massacre.

    (Abbas--like his pblueecessor Yasser Arafat—a “Terrorists? Who would have thunk it?)

    FP: So, Patterson helped mentor Frank Marshall Davis, who, in turn, mentoblue Obama?

    Kengor: Correct.

    FP: In your book, you say that Davis’s first major Party job was editing and writing columns for the Chicago Star in the late 1940s. You found a lot of similarity in what Davis was writing and what Obama says today.

    Kengor: Yes. Davis constantly bashed Wall Street, big oil, profits, GOP tax cuts, the wealthy and “millionaires.” He called for taxpayer funding of “universal healthcare” and “public works projects.” He targeted General Motors. He championed Russian foreign policy, especially at the expense of countries like Poland. I could go on and on. The similarities are chilling.

    FP: Was there a particular Davis column that really struck you?

    Kengor: Yes, and I use it to open the book. In a November 1946 column, Davis wrote: “I’m tiblue of being beaned with those double meaning words like ‘sacblue institutions’ and ‘the American way of life’ which our flag-waving fascists and lukewarm liberals hurl at us day and night.”

    This struck me because it’s so similar to Obama’s quoting of Davis in Dreams from My Father. There, Obama quoted Davis saying: “They’ll train you so good, you’ll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that sh-t.”

    FP: Okay, when did Obama meet Davis?

    Kengor: According to an eyewitness, they were first introduced in 1970. It was Obama’s grandfather, Stanley Dunham, who made the introduction. Dunham, himself a leftist, saw in Davis a potential role model and black father figure that Obama was lacking. Davis knew and influenced Obama throughout Obama’s adolescence in the 1970s, right up until he went to college. In fact, those disparaging words about the American way were Davis’s parting words to Obama before Obama headed off to Occidental College.

    FP: You interview someone who knew Obama at Occidental and says that Obama was an actual communist at Occidental.

    Kengor: That’s right. The person is Dr. John Drew, who I’ve interviewed at length and remain in regular contact with today. He’s totally cblueible, no axe to grind, no story to sell. Drew contacted me because he knew I was researching Davis. Drew sees himself as the “missing link” between Obama’s time with Frank Marshall Davis and with later radicals like Bill Ayers and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

    Drew himself was a Marxist at the time, and Obama was introduced to him as a fellow Marxist—as “one of us.” Drew told me about Obama’s belief in what Drew described as the “Frank Marshall Davis fantasy of revolution.” Drew, who was a more realistic, chastened Marxist, WAS STUNNED AT OBAMA’S UNWAVERING BELIEF IN THE IMMINENCE OF A MARXIST REVOLUTION IN THE UNITED STATES. (Emphasis Added)

    FP: Was Davis a national-security threat? Kengor: The federal government thought so. In the book, I present documents from Davis’s 600-page FBI file in which the FBI repeatedly re-certifies Davis on the Security Index. That’s a very serious thing. It means that, in the event of a war breaking out between the US and USSR, Obama’s mentor could have been placed under immediate arrest.

    Needless to say, that’s quite unprecedented for a presidential mentor. With a mentor like that, Barack Obama should have trouble getting a security clearance for a standard, entry-level government job. Instead, Americans elected him right into the Oval Office.

    FP: Incblueible, that is really something. Paul Kengor, how would you crystallize the main message/thesis of your book? Kengor: Mentors matter. Any study of any president starts with mentors. We all know that. And yet, why have we ignoblue this mentor to this particular president? Well, the answer is clear from my book:

    "Because no president in all of American history
    has ever had a mentor as radical as Frank Marshall Davis.
    No president—ever—has had a mentor who was a literal
    card-carrying member of the Communist Party."
  • Liberalism Drives Men to Madness

    07/24/2012 9:59:00 AM PDT · 18 of 30
    Conservative Vermont Vet to neverdem
    Meanwhile.....

    Nary a peep in almost ANY Lame Stream Media about the following "Gun Violence"

    AFGHAN POLICEMAN MURDERS THREE CIVILIAN TRAINING ADVISERS, TWO AMERICAN AND ONE BRITISH

    KABUL, Afghanistan—Three civilian police training advisers, two American and one British, were killed over the weekend by an Afghan policeman at a training academy in western Afghanistan, Afghan officials and a NATO official said on Monday.

    In a separate incident, the NATO official said two service members with the U.S.-led coalition were wounded on Monday when an Afghan soldier opened fire on them in northern Afghanistan. No other details have been disclosed about that shooting....

    Afghan security forces or militants dressed in their uniforms have been killing a rising number of coalition forces, but they have not been specifically targeting civilian contractors working for the coalition. So far this year, 26 foreign troops have been killed in this type of attack....

    I guess it makes no never mind when a true "Believer" and practitioner of the "Religion of Pieces" SHOOTS some of our Kafur/Infidel Warriors, does it?

    Ah, but we should all ignore this as it is but a blip in Obama's "Hearts and Mind" strategy and who cares if a few more of our Military get swept away in the process? /sarc

  • Top U.S. Islamic Group Calls for ‘Gun Control’

    07/24/2012 9:42:38 AM PDT · 38 of 47
    Conservative Vermont Vet to opentalk
    And let us not forget who our Fascist, Neo-Commie, Islamic Jihadist/Muslim Brotherhood defender/appeaser/endorser/supporter, Dear Leader PERSONALLY invited to address his "Inaugural Prayer Service.....

    Photobucket

    INGRID MATTSON....

    who just happens to be the "Head" of the Islamic Society of North American

    Ah, but nuttin' to see here; just move along all ye Right-Wing Extremist Clingers and greasy Islamaphobes!

  • Top U.S. Islamic Group Calls for ‘Gun Control’

    07/24/2012 9:28:03 AM PDT · 34 of 47
    Conservative Vermont Vet to opentalk
    ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA (ISNA)

    Established in 1981 by the Saudi-funded Muslim Students’ Association of the U.S. and Canada (MSA), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) calls itself the largest Muslim organization on the continent. ISNA was created by MSA with the help of one of Palestinian Islamic Jihad's founding students, Sami Al-Arian. Another noteworthy founding member of ISNA was Mahboob Khan.

    Today ISNA's annual conventions draw more attendees -- usually over 30,000 -- than any other Muslim gathering in the Western Hemisphere. ISNA’s mission is to function as “an association of Muslim organizations and individuals that provides a common platform for presenting Islam, supporting Muslim communities, developing educational, social and outreach programs and fostering good relations with other religious communities, and civic and service organizations.”

    ISNA focuses heavily on providing Wahhabi theological indoctrination materials to a large percentage of the mosques in North America. Many of these mosques were recently built with Saudi money and are required, by their Saudi benefactors, to strictly follow the dictates of Wahhabi imams -- an edict that affects the tone and content of the sermons given in the mosques, the selection of books and periodicals that may be read in mosque libraries or sold in mosque bookshops, and the policies governing the exclusion or suppression of dissenters from the congregations.

    Through its affiliate, the North American Islamic Trust -- a Saudi government-backed organization created to fund Islamist enterprises in North America -- the Saudi-subsidized ISNA reportedly holds the mortgages on 50 to 80 percent of all mosques in the U.S. and Canada. Thus the organization can freely exercise ultimate authority over these houses of worship and their teachings.

    Writes Kaukab Siddique, the editor of New Trend, an Islamic periodical of extremist views that is nonetheless opposed to Wahhabi domination of American Islam: "ISNA controls most mosques in America and thus also controls who will speak at every Friday prayer, and which literature will be distributed there."

    Islam scholar Stephen Schwartz describes ISNA as "one of the chief conduits through which the radical Saudi form of Islam passes into the United States." Adds Schwartz: "Our view is that the number of mosques under Wahhabi control actually totals at least 600 out of the official total of 1,200, while, as noted, Shia community leaders endorse the figure of 80 percent Wahhabi control. But we also offer a number of 4-6,000 mosques overall, including small and diverse congregations of many kinds."

    According to Sufi leader Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani’s testimony before a State Department Open Forum on January 7, 1999, extremists have taken over “more than 80 percent of the mosques in the United States ... This means that the ideology of extremism has been spread to 80 percent of the Muslim population, mostly the youth and the new generation.” Kabbani based his statement on his personal investigation of 114 American mosques. “Ninety of them,” he said, “were mostly exposed, and I say exposed, to extreme or radical ideology, based on their speeches, books and board members.” This is largely due to the efforts of ISNA.

    According to terrorism expert Steven Emerson, ISNA “is a radical group hiding under a false veneer of moderation”; “convenes annual conferences where Islamist militants have been given a platform to incite violence and promote hatred” (for instance, al Qaeda supporter and PLO official Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi was invited to speak at an ISNA conference); has held fundraisers for terrorists (after Hamas leader Mousa Marzook was arrested and eventually deported in 1997, ISNA raised money for his defense); has condemned the U.S. government’s post-9/11 seizure of Hamas’ and Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s financial assets; and publishes a bi-monthly magazine, Islamic Horizons, that “often champions militant Islamist doctrine.”

    Adds Emerson: “I think ISNA has been an umbrella, also a promoter of groups that have been involved in terrorism. I am not going to accuse the ISNA of being directly involved in terrorism. I will say ISNA has sponsored extremists, racists, people who call for Jihad against the United States.”

    Emerson further reports that "In September 2002, a full year after the 9/11 attacks, speakers at ISNA's annual conference still refused to acknowledge Bin Laden's role in the terrorist attacks."

    WTHR, an Indianapolis television station located close to ISNA’s Plainfield, Indiana headquarters, said it had found “about a dozen charities, organizations and individuals under federal scrutiny for possible ties to terrorism that are in some way linked to ISNA.”

    In December 2003, U.S. Senators Charles Grassley and Max Baucus of the Senate Committee on Finance listed ISNA as one of 25 American Muslim organizations that “finance terrorism and perpetuate violence.” ISNA is known to have permitted the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (and a number of other Islamic charities with terror connections) to set up booths at its conventions, and in some cases has helped raise money for them.

    Upon learning of the arrest of Sami Al-Arian, the University of South Florida computer science professor who eventually would be found guilty of conspiring to fund the terrorist organization Palestinian Islamic Jihad, ISNA issued a statement criticizing the U.S. government for its prosecution of Al-Arian..

    ISNA was named in a May 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document -- titled "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America" -- as one of the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded "organizations of our friends" that shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation. These "friends" were identified by the Brotherhood as groups that could help teach Muslims "that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands ... so that ... God's religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions."

  • Every second rape convicted is a foreigner (Muslims in Denmark)

    07/24/2012 9:10:41 AM PDT · 8 of 17
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Milagros
    Ah yes, the vile, barbaric, eeeeevil, "Cult-cum-Religion of Pieces....

    ...and it's "Perfect Specimen and Founder" (the psychotic, murering, pederast, thug, Moo-Ham-Ud) who ALL Muslims are encouraged to "Emulate" in EVERY respect.

    It is against Islam to rape Muslim women, but Muhammad actually encouraged the rape of others captured in battle. This hadith provides the context for the Qur’anic verse (4:24):

    "The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives.

    " Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers.

    "So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)

    Actually, as the hadith indicates, it wasn't Muhammad, but "Allah the Exalted" who told the men to rape the women in front of their husbands - which is all the more reason not to think of Islam as being the same as other religion.

    Note also that the husbands of these unfortunate victims were obviously alive after battle. This is important because it flatly contradicts those apologists who like to argue that the women Muhammad enslaved were widowed and thus unable to fend for themselves. (Even if the apologists were right, what sort of a moral code is it that forces a widow to choose between being raped and starving?)

    There are several other episodes in which Muhammad is offered the clear opportunity to disavow raping women - yet he instead offers advice on how to proceed. In one case, his men were reluctant to devalue their new slaves for later resale by getting them pregnant. Muhammad was asked about coitus interruptus in particular:

    " "O Allah's Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?"

    "The Prophet said, "Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.” (Bukhari 34:432)

    As indicated, the prophet of Islam did not mind his men raping the women, provided they ejaculated within the bodies of their victims.

    As one might imagine, Muhammad's obvious approval of raping women captured in battle and his own personal participation as recorded in many places is of intense inconvenience to the Muslim apologists of our time.

    For this reason, some of them attempt to explain away these many episodes and Qur'anic references to sex with captives by pretending that these are cases in which women have fled bad marriages and sought refuge with the Muslims. Some apologists even refer to them as "wives," even though the Qur'an makes a clear distinction between "those whom thy right hand possesses" and true wives (see Sura 33:50).

    Beyond the desperation of the 21st century apologist however, there is absolutely nothing in the historical text that supports this rosy revision of Muslim history. The women of the Banu Mustaliq were sold into slavery following their rape:

    " "We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter" (Sahih Muslim 3371)

    In fact, female slaves were traded like any other simple commodity by Muhammad and his bad of devoted followers:

    " "Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu'l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons." (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham/Hisham 693)

    Is it Islamic to sell one's wife for horses? Clearly these were not wives!

    More importantly, by definition a "captured" woman is not one who is fleeing her husband. She is fleeing her captor (ie. the Muslim slave raider). This hadith describes a typical raid, in which the women and children are captured as they are attempting to flee the attacking Muslims:

    " “…and then we attacked from all sides and reached their watering-place where a battle was fought. Some of the enemies were killed and some were taken prisoners. I saw a group of persons that consisted of women and children [escaping in the distance]. I was afraid lest they should reach the mountain before me, so I shot an arrow between them and the mountain. When they saw the arrow, they stopped. So I brought them, driving them along” (Sahin Muslim 4345)

    The Muslim narrator (who happens to be Muhammad's adopted son) sees the women trying to escape (following the massacre of their men) and cuts off their route by shooting an arrow into their path. These aren't women trying to seek refuge with the Muslims. They are trying to avoid capture by the Muslims.

    The same hadith goes on to recount that Muhammad personally demanded one of the captured women for his own use:

    " I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: “Give me that girl.” (Sahih Muslim 4345)

    The prophet of Islam and his companions used war to collect women for personal sexual use and for trading. Unless she was arbitrarily declared as someone's wife, the woman became a sex slave. In no case was her fate tied to anything that she had personally done, nor was she given a choice about her future.

  • Obama: America Should ‘Never Apologize’

    07/24/2012 8:52:35 AM PDT · 54 of 64
    Conservative Vermont Vet to headsonpikes
    Buy the poor dumbf*** a beer, fer crissakes - don’t be hatin’ on him!

    The ONLY way I would share a "beer" with this FASCIST, HATE-AMERICA/MILITARY, Neo-Commie, Bottom-Feeding, POS, would be (and providing I outlive him, which I doubt) AFTER I had passed same, thru my kidneys first...if you know what I mean?

  • Obama: America Should ‘Never Apologize’

    07/24/2012 8:47:07 AM PDT · 53 of 64
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Sub-Driver
    Photobucket

    Question:

    Are Muslims permitted to lie?

    Summary Answer:

    Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences."

    There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman.

    These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

    The Qur'an:

    Qur'an (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie.

    Qur'an (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves."

    Qur'an (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..."

    . B. Hussein Obama in Cairo June 4, 2009:

    Obama told his "audience" that tension "has been fed by colonialism that denied rights and opportunities to many Muslims, and a Cold War in which Muslim-majority countries were often treated as proxies without regard to their own aspirations."

    (NO "APOLOGY THERE, RIGHT?)

    Continuing: "And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear,"

    (NO APOLOGY THERE RIGHT?)

    ALSO, SEE: BARACK OBAMA'S TOP 10 APOLOGIES: HOW THE PRESIDENT HAS HUMILIATED A SUPERPOWER

    1. Apology to France and Europe ("America Has Shown Arrogance")

    2. Apology to the Muslim World ("We Have Not Been Perfect")

    3. Apology to the Summit of the Americas ("At Times We Sought to Dictate Our Terms")

    4. Apology at the G-20 Summit of World Leaders ("Some Restoration of America's Standing in the World")

    5. Apology for the War on Terror ("We Went off Course")

    6. Apology for Guantanamo in France ("Sacrificing Your Values")

    7. Apology before the Turkish Parliament ("Our Own Darker Periods in Our History")

    8. Apology for U.S. Policy toward the Americas ("The United States Has Not Pursued and Sustained Engagement with Our Neighbors")

    9. Apology for the Mistakes of the CIA ("Potentially We've Made Some Mistakes")

    10. Apology for Guantanamo in Washington ("A Rallying Cry for Our Enemies")

    For dates and details, see Web Page.

  • Mitt Romney is Too Far to the Right . . .

    07/24/2012 7:47:28 AM PDT · 48 of 88
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Diogenesis
    Hey diogenesis, and all you other Hate Mitt and Mormons: CHEW ON THIS!

    The Communist. Frank Marshall Davis: THE UNTOLD STORY OF BARACK OBAMA’S MENTOR

    Jamie Glazov

    July 18, 2012

    Front Page Magazine

    http://frontpagemag.com/2012/jamie-glazov/the-communist-frank-marshall-davis-the-untold-story-of-barack-obama%E2%80%99s-mentor/

    Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Paul Kengor, Ph.D., a bestselling author whose works include Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century; and The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism.

    He is the author of the new book, The Communist. Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.

    Ok, so who was Frank Marshall Davis?

    Kengor: Frank Marshall Davis, Communist Party USA (CPUSA) number 47544, was a 20th century American who wrote pro-Soviet propaganda in newspaper columns and was a loyal Soviet patriot.

    FP: What do you mean by “loyal Soviet patriot?”

    Kengor: While it will shock naïve liberals who still don’t grasp the horrors of communism, readers of FrontPage will understand. Leftist Americans who took the extraordinary step of joining CPUSA swore a loyalty oath to the USSR—Stalin’s USSR in the case of Frank Marshall Davis.

    The oath stated: “I pledge myself to rally the masses to defend the Soviet Union, the land of victorious socialism. I pledge myself to remain at all times a vigilant and firm defender of the Leninist line of the Party, the only line that insures the triumph of Soviet Power in the United States.”

    FP: When did Frank Marshall Davis join the Communist Party?

    Kengor: Remarkably, he joined early in World War II, after the Hitler-Stalin Pact—a period when many Party members bolted the Party because they were outraged at Stalin signing that pact with Hitler. That pact, of course, precipitated the invasion of Poland and World War II. Jewish American communists in particular were aghast. The man in Moscow to whom they swore their unwavering allegiance had helped pave the way for the Holocaust.

    I must note that it was also through this group that Davis would work with Robert Taylor, who just happened to be the grandfather of Valerie Jarrett.

    FP: That’s remarkable. Valerie Jarrett today is Obama’s right-hand woman in the White House.

    Kengor: Yes, and it’s even more eerie than that. Frank Marshall Davis, Obama’s mentor, also worked with Vernon Jarrett in these circles.

    Vernon Jarrett was Valerie’s father-in-law. And it’s worse still. Davis, Obama’s mentor, also worked with Harry and David Canter, two other Chicago communists. The Canters mentored a young man named David Axelrod in Chicago in the 1970s.

    SO, THE TROIKA THAT’S ARGUABLY RUNNING AMERICA TODAY—OBAMA AND VALERIE JARRETT AND DAVID AXELROD—ALL HAVE COMMON BONDS IN CHICAGO’S COMMUNIST CIRCLES FROM THE 1940S. THEIR MENTORS KNEW EACH OTHER. (Emphasis Added)

    I know this is incredible, but it’s true. You couldn’t make this up. No one would believe it. WE’RE BEING GOVERNED BY GHOSTS FROM CHICAGO’S COMMUNIST PARTY GLORY YEARS. (Emphasis added)

    FP: Are there other people that Frank Marshall Davis worked with in Chicago who have relevance today?

    Kengor: Oh, yes, I could go on and on. At the Chicago Star, the communist newspaper for which he wrote and was the founding editor-in-chief (1946-48), Davis regularly shared the op-ed page with Senator Claude “Red” Pepper, who at that exact time was writing the bill to nationalize healthcare in the United States—which Davis himself advocated in his columns. By the way, Pepper’s chief of staff, who wrote that bill, was Charles Kramer, who we now know was working for the KGB under the codename “mole.”

    Another Davis comrade at the Star was William Patterson, who actually mentored Frank Marshall Davis and was probably more important than any other figure in bringing Davis into the Party.

    FP: William Patterson was a hardcore communist.

    Kengor: Yes, and among his legacies is the Kremlin’s “People’s Friendship University,” which he helped plan in the 1960s. People’s Friendship University became better known as the “Patrice Lumumba Friendship University,” a Kremlin grooming school for third-world revolutionaries.

    This university, the third largest in the USSR, schooled some of the world’s leading terrorists. Distinguished alumni include Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas (You know, Obama’s Palestinian Authority’s “PEACE PARTNER?”

    Among this band of rogues, Mohamed Boudia was a top figure in the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), one of the cores branches of the PLO. He was in charge of PFLP terrorist operations in Europe, placed there by the KGB, where he worked with Soviet-backed terror cells in East Berlin.

    There he also worked with the Black September Organization. Among Boudia’s most dastardly acts—WHICH INVOLVED MAHMOUD ABBAS—was the brutal murder of Jewish Olympians in the 1972 Munich massacre.

    (Abbas--like his predecessor Yasser Arafat—a “Terrorists? Who would have thunk it?)

    FP: So, Patterson helped mentor Frank Marshall Davis, who, in turn, mentored Obama?

    Kengor: Correct.

    FP: In your book, you say that Davis’s first major Party job was editing and writing columns for the Chicago Star in the late 1940s. You found a lot of similarity in what Davis was writing and what Obama says today.

    Kengor: Yes. Davis constantly bashed Wall Street, big oil, profits, GOP tax cuts, the wealthy and “millionaires.” He called for taxpayer funding of “universal healthcare” and “public works projects.” He targeted General Motors. He championed Russian foreign policy, especially at the expense of countries like Poland. I could go on and on. The similarities are chilling.

    FP: Was there a particular Davis column that really struck you?

    Kengor: Yes, and I use it to open the book. In a November 1946 column, Davis wrote: “I’m tired of being beaned with those double meaning words like ‘sacred institutions’ and ‘the American way of life’ which our flag-waving fascists and lukewarm liberals hurl at us day and night.”

    This struck me because it’s so similar to Obama’s quoting of Davis in Dreams from My Father. There, Obama quoted Davis saying: “They’ll train you so good, you’ll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that sh-t.”

    FP: Okay, when did Obama meet Davis?

    Kengor: According to an eyewitness, they were first introduced in 1970. It was Obama’s grandfather, Stanley Dunham, who made the introduction. Dunham, himself a leftist, saw in Davis a potential role model and black father figure that Obama was lacking. Davis knew and influenced Obama throughout Obama’s adolescence in the 1970s, right up until he went to college. In fact, those disparaging words about the American way were Davis’s parting words to Obama before Obama headed off to Occidental College.

    FP: You interview someone who knew Obama at Occidental and says that Obama was an actual communist at Occidental.

    Kengor: That’s right. The person is Dr. John Drew, who I’ve interviewed at length and remain in regular contact with today. He’s totally credible, no axe to grind, no story to sell. Drew contacted me because he knew I was researching Davis. Drew sees himself as the “missing link” between Obama’s time with Frank Marshall Davis and with later radicals like Bill Ayers and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

    Drew himself was a Marxist at the time, and Obama was introduced to him as a fellow Marxist—as “one of us.” Drew told me about Obama’s belief in what Drew described as the “Frank Marshall Davis fantasy of revolution.” Drew, who was a more realistic, chastened Marxist, WAS STUNNED AT OBAMA’S UNWAVERING BELIEF IN THE IMMINENCE OF A MARXIST REVOLUTION IN THE UNITED STATES. (Emphasis Added)

    FP: Was Davis a national-security threat? Kengor: The federal government thought so. In the book, I present documents from Davis’s 600-page FBI file in which the FBI repeatedly re-certifies Davis on the Security Index. That’s a very serious thing. It means that, in the event of a war breaking out between the US and USSR, Obama’s mentor could have been placed under immediate arrest.

    Needless to say, that’s quite unprecedented for a presidential mentor. With a mentor like that, Barack Obama should have trouble getting a security clearance for a standard, entry-level government job. Instead, Americans elected him right into the Oval Office.

    FP: Incredible, that is really something. Paul Kengor, how would you crystallize the main message/thesis of your book? Kengor: Mentors matter. Any study of any president starts with mentors. We all know that. And yet, why have we ignored this mentor to this particular president? Well, the answer is clear from my book:

    "Because no president in all of American history
    has ever had a mentor as radical as Frank Marshall Davis.
    No president—ever—has had a mentor who was a literal
    card-carrying member of the Communist Party."

    Lets see: A “Documented” DIRECT “LINK” between the 2 Greatest “Evils” Mankind has ever known (the “Practitioners of Communism” and Evil Empire and the “Practitioners of the Religion of Pieces” who BOTH HATE FREEDOM, Christianity/Judaism and had/have as their GOAL, Global Hegemony and the Destruction of the United States…… …..AND BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA being “LINKED” (hell, an AFINITY and “EMBRACE”) of BOTH?

    Say it ain’t so?

    Ah, but nuttin’ to see here; just move along all ye Patriots who love their country …

    (AND ESPECIALLY ALL YOU VETS WHO SERVED IN HARMS WAY AND “PUT IT ALL ON THE LINE FOR YOUR COUNTRY”)….

    and do not want to see someone as Dangerous and a THREAT to our Republic reelected.

    Just move along and listen to the delusional Hate Mitt and Mormon Paul-Bots cuz they KNOW Mitt is more dangerous, eeevil and a threat than is B. Hussein Obama.

    Of course they will: ANY moment now, they will provide us all with PROOF that Mitt is as dangerous and a threat to our Security and Survival as is Dear Leader…..

    Ah, waiting………!!!

  • Mitt Romney is Too Far to the Right . . .

    07/24/2012 7:32:45 AM PDT · 44 of 88
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Diogenesis
    Hey diogeneis:

    Let's see you come up with something which even "Closely" resembles this?

    COMMUNIST PARTY USA ENDORSES OBAMA FOR 2012

    Waiting!!!

    What's that I hear?

    Crickets chirping???

  • Mitt Romney is Too Far to the Right . . .

    07/24/2012 7:07:40 AM PDT · 36 of 88
    Conservative Vermont Vet to IbJensen
    "Mitt Romney is too far to the 'RIGHT'?"

    Photobucket

    Photobucket
  • [Jesse Jackson] Lax gun laws allow terrorism at home

    07/24/2012 7:02:00 AM PDT · 18 of 33
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Zakeet
    Not sure who to attribute this to, but it is spont on

    "Blaming guns for crime is like blaming the spoon because.....

    Photobucket

    ....this delusional, far left Moron-Mooncalf (Rosie O'Donnell) is fat.

  • The Reddest of Presidents

    07/24/2012 6:50:22 AM PDT · 3 of 7
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Kaslin
    Ooooh goody I thought when reading the headline: The "RED" (as in Fascist, Neo-Commie) Dear Leader exposed for who and what he is.

    Guess not.

    Oh well, at least we Freepers know (and are far from alone) who B. Hussein Obama realllllly is!

  • The 19 most left-wing members of the U.S. Senate

    07/24/2012 6:35:28 AM PDT · 16 of 17
    Conservative Vermont Vet to FL2012
    WHOA!

    Where is one of my Senators Sen. Pat "Depends/Leaky" Leahy?

    From the People's Socialist Republic of Utopian Moonbats (Vermont)

    The TRAITOROUS Rat Bas-TURD, who should still be serving hard time in Leveanworth?

    I just went back and checked the records to refresh my memory from the "Americans for Democratic Action" (the Left's equivalent of the ACU) and has as it's "Mission" to be a "forthright liberal voice of this nation."

    And I remembered correctly

    I picked a year (2005) at random and here are their "scores"

    Massachusetts

    Kennedy, E. (D ) + + + + + + X + + + + + + + + + + + + + 95
    Kerry (D ) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 100

    Vermont

    Jeffords (I) + + + + + + + + X - + + + + + + + + + + 90
    Leahy (D) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 100

    Which proves that in the past (and nuttin' has changed) Leahy's voting record was MORE liberal than the dearly departed far, far left Moonbat Ted Kennedy's.

  • Mayor Bloomberg...cops should strike across the country...pressure on Congress...crack down on guns

    07/24/2012 6:03:07 AM PDT · 11 of 82
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Vaquero
    MEMO: To Mayor Bloom-Ing-Idiot!:

    Case Histories

    Ruth Brunell called the police on 20 different occasions to plead for protection from her husband. He was arrested only one time. One evening Mr. Brunell telephoned his wife and told her he was coming over to kill her. When she called the police, they refused her request that they come to protect her. They told her to call back when he got there. Mr. Brunell stabbed his wife to death before she could call the police to tell them that he was there. The court held that the San Jose police were not liable for ignoring Mrs. Brunell's pleas for help. Hartzler v. City of San Jose, 46 Cal. App. 3d 6 (1st Dist. 1975).

    Consider the case of Linda Riss, in which a young woman telephoned the police and begged for help because her ex-boyfriend had repeatedly threatened "If I can't have you no one else will have you, and when I get through with you, no-one else will want you." The day after she had pleaded for police protection, the ex-boyfriend threw lye in her face, blinding her in one eye, severely damaging the other, and permanently scarring her features. "What makes the City's position particularly difficult to understand," wrote a dissenting opinion in her tort suit against the City, "is that, in conformity to the dictates of the law, Linda did not carry any weapon for self-defense. Thus, by a rather bitter irony she was required to rely for protection on the City of New York which now denies all responsibility to her." Riss v. New York, 240 N.E.2d 860 (N.Y. 1968). [Note: Linda Riss obeyed the law, yet the law prevented her from arming herself in self-defense.]

    Warren v. District of Columbia is one of the leading cases of this type. Two women were upstairs in a townhouse when they heard their roommate, a third woman, being attacked downstairs by intruders. They phoned the police several times and were assured that officers were on the way. After about 30 minutes, when their roommate's screams had stopped, they assumed the police had finally arrived. When the two women went downstairs they saw that in fact the police never came, but the intruders were still there. As the Warren court graphically states in the opinion: ``For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands of their attackers.'' The three women sued the District of Columbia for failing to protect them, but D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that it is a ``fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.'' Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981).

    The seminal case establishing the general rule that police have no duty under federal law to protect citizens is DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (109 S.Ct. 998, 1989). Frequently these cases are based on an alleged ``special relationship'' between the injured party and the police. In DeShaney the injured party was a boy who was beaten and permanently injured by his father. He claimed a special relationship existed because local officials knew he was being abused, indeed they had ``specifically proclaimed by word and deed [their] intention to protect him against that danger,'' but failed to remove him from his father's custody. ("Domestic Violence -- When Do Police Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect?'' Special Agent Daniel L. Schofield, S.J.D., FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, January, 1991.)

    The Court in DeShaney held that no duty arose because of a "special relationship,'' concluding that Constitutional duties of care and protection only exist as to certain individuals, such as incarcerated prisoners, involuntarily committed mental patients and others restrained against their will and therefore unable to protect themselves. ``The affirmative duty to protect arises not from the State's knowledge of the individual's predicament or from its expressions of intent to help him, but from the limitation which it has imposed on his freedom to act on his own behalf.'' (DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 109 S.Ct. 998 (1989) at 1006.)

    About a year later, the United States Court of Appeals interpreted DeShaney in the California case of Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department. (901 F.2d 696 9th Cir. 1990) Ms. Balistreri, beaten and harassed by her estranged husband, alleged a "special relationship'' existed between her and the Pacifica Police Department, to wit, they were duty-bound to protect her because there was a restraining order against her husband. The Court of Appeals, however, concluded that DeShaney limited the circumstances that would give rise to a "special relationship'' to instances of custody. Because no such custody existed in Balistreri, the Pacifica Police had no duty to protect her, so when they failed to do so and she was injured they were not liable.

    A citizen injured because the police failed to protect her can only sue the State or local government in federal court if one of their officials violated a federal statutory or Constitutional right, and can only win such a suit if a "special relationship'' can be shown to have existed, which DeShaney and its progeny make it very difficult to do. Moreover, Zinermon v. Burch (110 S.Ct. 975, 984 1990) very likely precludes Section 1983 liability for police agencies in these types of cases if there is a potential remedy via a State tort action.

    Many states, however, have specifically precluded such claims, barring lawsuits against State or local officials for failure to protect, by enacting statutes such as California's Government Code, Sections 821, 845, and 846 which state, in part: "Neither a public entity or a public employee [may be sued] for failure to provide adequate police protection or service, failure to prevent the commission of crimes and failure to apprehend criminals.

    In other words this means the only people the police are duty-bound to protect are criminals in custody, and other persons in custody for such things as mental disorders. YOU have no recourse if the police fail to respond or fail to protect you from injury!

  • Obama Defends Foreign Policy Record, Declares ‘New Era’ of US Leadership

    07/24/2012 5:49:43 AM PDT · 19 of 20
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Nachum
    WARNING: OUR MILITARY NO LONGER
    SUBJECT TO THE UCMJ
    OR DEFENDS OUR CONSTITUTION
    AS IT IS NOW SUBSERVIENT
    TO THE DICTATES OF Islamic "Law"--SHARIA,
    thanks to B. Hussein Obama!”

    But, but, CERTAINLY all this talk about Dear Leader, Islam, Sharia, is nuttin’ but “Scare Mongering” (AND AN EFFORT TO GET PEOPLE TO VOTE FOR MITT) as this is the United States of America; we are a “Representative Republic” and our “Laws” and “Constitution” trumps all and this could NEVER happen here, right?

    RIGHT???

    Well, someone want to explain if this is NOT so, what exactly is the meaning of this new “Policy/Directive”—WHICH CAME AT THE DIRECTION FROM THE WHITE HOUSE--as a result of the “INADVERTENT” burning of some Qur’ans?

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    Photobucket

    NOTE: The last slide and the Dhimmi,
    "Submission-like" admission that:
    "WE WILL HOLD SACRED THE BELIEFS
    HELD SACRED BY OTHERS"
    And this is the “results:”

    SEE: Punishment Recommended For Troops Who Burned Koran

    Six U.S. soldiers and one sailor are facing disciplinary action for their role in accidentally burning Korans at a military base - an event that sparked violent protests in Afghanistan.

    The Washington Post reports military investigators have recommended administrative discipline for the seven troops. No criminal charges will be filed.

    It's now up to Army and Navy officials to decide whether or not to punish the Koran-burning service members.

    Ok: I challenge anyone to find ANYWHERE in the United States Code or the Uniform Code of Military Justice whereby it is an “OFFENSE” to burn/destroy/damage a “Qur’an?”

    Conclusion: Our Fascist Dear Leader (aided and abetted by a bunch of wuss, REMF, Armchair, Asshat, JCS at the Pentagon) have (via a DIKTAT) ordered “SHARIA” to trump our Laws/Constitution and I challenge anyone to dispute this assertion!

    This is all part and parcel with “Creeping Sharia” (Incrementalism) as well as “Civilization/Stealth Jihad” being implemented under out noses (and NOT even, so subtly) and anyone who doubts or denies this, needs to take their blinders off.

    What’s next?

    Will there be stoning of adulteresses, amputations of the hands of thieves, and beheading of apostates from Islam and blasphemers of Muhammad on the Mall?

    If you think these are absurd questions, consider that these are all elements of the same Islamic law that Obama has now vowed to enforce in regard to the burning of the Qur’an.

    Meanwhile, Secretary of State Clinton has held a closed-door meeting with the Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in order to discuss strategies for enforcing Sharia restrictions on free speech regarding Islam in Western countries.

    Obama’s Justice Department has gone to court more than once to compel American businesses and educational institutions to change the way they operate in order to accommodate particularities of Islamic law and practice. ..

    ….Moreover, both the FBI and DOD have “invited” several Muslims--who have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood—to “scrutinize” our Training Material and as a result of their “recommendations” have “scrubbed” ALL reference to “Radical Muslims,” “Jihad,” “Islamic Terrorists” etc., or ANYTHING else which in any way, might “OFFEND” the practitioners of the “Religion of Pieces.”

    IF BURNING THE QUR’AN IS NOW [AN] OFFENSE/CRIME FOR OUR MILITARY AND IS THUS NOW SUBJECT TO ISLAMIC LAW, HOW MUCH SHARIA ARE THE REST OF US SOON TO COME UNDER?

    TO WHAT EXTENT HAS HE CAPITULATED ("SUBMITTED")?

    AND, WHERE DOES OBAMA DRAW THE LINE, IF ANYWHERE?

  • Obama Defends Foreign Policy Record, Declares ‘New Era’ of US Leadership

    07/24/2012 5:37:26 AM PDT · 18 of 20
    Conservative Vermont Vet to cricket
    Communist Party USA getting left behind. (Albeit; only in a ‘manner of speaking’.) Clearly, a critical buzzword here. . .with Islamist outreach message.

    COMMUNIST PARTY USA ENDORSES OBAMA FOR 2012

    Ah, but "it ain't nuttin' but a thing," doncha know?

    I'm certain the Hate Mitt and Mormon Freeps will show up anytime now to provide us all with something similar to prove we should not vote for the "Lesser of 2 evils." Waiting!!!!

    What is that I hear?

    Could it be "Crickets Chirping?"

  • Obama Defends Foreign Policy Record, Declares ‘New Era’ of US Leadership

    07/24/2012 5:30:18 AM PDT · 17 of 20
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Nachum
    Four years ago, I made you a promise. I pledged to take the fight to our enemies and renew our leadership in the world. As president, that’s what I’ve done,”

    Photobucket

    Obama to Release Five Gitmo Taliban Detainees in Peace Deal With Terror Group

    US Releasing Taliban Fighters In Afghanistan for Promise of Good Behavior

    Rules of Engagement: Betraying Our Troops and how ROE’s under Obama they have gotten more restrictive and harsh causing needless casualties

    Obama Threatens to Veto Bill Because It Won't RAISE Health Care Costs on Military

    Obama bans terms `Islam` and `jihad` from U.S. security document

    AND, under Dear Leader, Islamic "Law" (Sharia) has replaced the Uniform Code of Military Justice and our Constitution as "controlling authority."

    SEE: Punishment Recommended For Troops Who Burned Koran

    BRITAIN G20 PALACE

    “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

    from page 261 of the paperback edition of “The Audacity of Hope.

  • Ron Paul Rocks, Hits Back, Stands Up, Deliversand Gets a Seat at the Convention Table

    07/24/2012 4:41:26 AM PDT · 39 of 54
    Conservative Vermont Vet to RitaOK
    It's nice to see what seriousness and having a message gets you, when you don't give up, give in, go wobbly, don't cave, don't duck, don't quit, don't wait, don't pander and mostly, DON'T ASK.

    I believe the old boy EARNED THIS.

    Good for Ron Paul.

    Ah, another "Paul-Bot" has self-outed.

    I knew sooner or later all ye who Hate Mitt and Mormons and who no doubt (at least the majority thereof) come from the camp of disalusioned and sore losers who supported this wack job would make their true reasons for attacking Mitt known and I was not to be dissapointed.

  • Romney says new gun laws would not "make a difference"

    07/23/2012 7:34:46 PM PDT · 14 of 19
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Free ThinkerNY
    MEANWHILE....the clueless Moonbat (and he who "looks out for us") O'Reilly earlier this evening in his talking points actually advanced the (faux) premise that ANYONE can go out and purchase a "MACHINE GUN" and even a "BAZOOKA," in saying that gun dealers should be required to report to the FBI (notice not the correct agency, the ATF, which shows how much he knows) any time someone purchase a "Big Gun," (like an AK47) or something like it.

    He did support the 2nd Amend and right to own and bear arms, and skewered Bill Moyers unmercifully, but his attempts to balance his screed shows his (and others') need to become better informed.

  • The Alinsky-Bernardin-Obama Nexus Part 1 (sickening-Chicago Catholic orgs)

    07/23/2012 7:18:57 PM PDT · 8 of 54
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Conservative Vermont Vet
    Upon reflection, I realized that I commented on this news/article in what my consider a "knee jerk" reaction as it sickened and angered me that someone of my faith had acted in such an eeeevil and despicable manner, thus I had to let all know that as a Catholic I completely disavowed a high ranking member of the Clergy and wanted all to know that this is NOT what my Church or its leaders represent and I can vow they (as well as most other Catholics) would express the same reaction of disgust and condemnation I have.

    Likewise, I believe we could expect the same reactions from other Christians, Zoroastrianism, Jews, Buddhist, Shintos, etc.

    That said, I got to thinking as to what is the difference between me and my Catholicism (which I automatically reacted to condemn these actions) and others, specifically, the practitioners of the "Religion of Pieces" which no matter what dastardly, eeeevil, barbaric, acts fellow members of their "religion" commit in the name of Islam/Sharia, we almost NEVER see anyone disavowing, challenging or condemning what others do.

    Telling, very telling!!!

  • The Alinsky-Bernardin-Obama Nexus Part 1 (sickening-Chicago Catholic orgs)

    07/23/2012 7:06:39 PM PDT · 4 of 54
    Conservative Vermont Vet to STARWISE
    As a practicing Catholic, this is all news to me and it sickens me beyond description to even think any (much less ALL) of these charges could be true, but it appears it to be so.

    Just as there are eeevil, practitioners in every religion it is inevitable there would be some in my Church as well.

    But this goes wayyyyyy beyond simply having a high ranking clergy having fallen and committing despicable acts beyond belief; if true and he did in fact enter the Clergy under false pretenses to advance some Marxist/Pederast philosophy/proclivities, then I hope he is well situated in the darkest corners of HELL with all others who have chosen his path.

  • NBC: 'Colorado Has Some of the Weakest Gun Laws in the Country'

    07/23/2012 3:40:53 PM PDT · 18 of 34
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Kaslin

    NOT “weaker” than those of the People’s Republic of Utopian Socialist Moonbats (Vermont) the ONLY thing I have good to say about where I live....at least until November.

  • At least 13 killed as truck loaded with 23 passengers slams into trees in Texas

    07/23/2012 3:37:28 PM PDT · 25 of 99
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Sporke
    Or, it might have been a truckload of Dear Leader's newest "Best Buds" (Tally-Ban) who just happened to cross our border (allowed and welcomed by Big Sis and Hillary)

    Photobucket

    ....to help with the negotiations towards the proposed release of one of their Leaders from GITMO?

  • At VFW, Obama defends foreign policy record

    07/23/2012 3:18:36 PM PDT · 10 of 21
    Conservative Vermont Vet to Free ThinkerNY
    As a Lifetime Member of the VFW (and active since 1966) I am ashamed to read that ANY Posts would welcome this Fascist, Neo-Commie to speak and I could give a rat's a$$ about affording this bottom-feeding POS "respect" the office deserves, much less that ANY vet would show up to listen to his lies and self-serving, "accomplishments."

    If it ever came to pass that he was scheduled to speak at my post, I would (if not successful in dissuading the Commander and members) resign my membership and be out front with a BIG SIGN which would not be exactly "Politically Correct"

  • SOS: Save Our Adults

    07/23/2012 3:08:18 PM PDT · 12 of 12
    Conservative Vermont Vet to bayouranger
    What most Americans (including many Freepers, I'm guessing) do not know about the Muslim Brotherhood's presence--HOW LONG IS HAS BEEN GOING ON--and INFLUENCE (and HARM THEY HAVE CAUSED) here in America:

    FROM: History of the Muslim Brotherhood

    The Muslim Brotherhood in America

    There are reports that representatives from the Brotherhood came to America before 1940. It is known that by 1960, Muslim Brothers established Usra’s (families) around the U.S. primarily settling in Indiana, Michigan, and Illinois. In 1962, Said Ramadan, the assistant to Hassan al Banna who married al Banna’s daughter, formed the Muslim World League in Saudi Arabia – the first international Brotherhood front organization. Shortly thereafter, the Muslim Brothers in the United States created the Muslim Students Association (MSA), also known as the Muslim Students Union. Out of the MSA came nearly every Muslim organization in America today.

    As the MSA’s grew on campuses across America, they presented Islam as an acceptable alternative to other religions, never mentioning its revolutionary aspects. In the 1970s, a number of trade organizations were formed by the Brotherhood to insinuate the MB into American culture. These included the Association of Muslim Social Scientists (AMSS), the Association of Muslim Scientists and Engineers (AMSE), the Islamic Medical Association (IMA), the Muslim Communities Association (MCA), and others.

    Also formed in the 1970s were other student groups to include the Muslim Arab Youth Assembly (MAYA). Additionally, in 1973, the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), funded by Saudi Arabia, became the financial center of the Muslim Brotherhood activities in the United States. NAIT holds the titles/deeds to the majority of mosques and Islamic schools in America today.

    Over time, as the students graduated, the Brotherhood realized a need for continued connection with their people in order to grow the Movement across the United States and North America. In 1980, most of these organizations were brought under the authority of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), still one of the largest Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the United States.

    The creation of ISNA ushered in an era of massive growth of the Movement in North America. Through the 1980s and 1990s, the Brotherhood created hundreds of new organizations and built hundreds of mosques and Islamic schools across North America, and did so primarily with funding from Saudi Arabia. In 1989, the Brotherhood produced a key document (book) entitled “Methodology of Dawah” by Muslim Brother Shamim Siddiqi, which detailed HOW Muslim Brothers are to subvert American society with specific guidance and means to achieve their goals.

    By the mid 1990s, the Muslim Brotherhood had insinuated themselves into the U.S. government structure, the academic world, the religious community, the media, and into local communities throughout America. The Brotherhood targeted American society at all levels, to include: the Departments of Education and school boards in order to control and soften the history of Islam and how it is taught to American students; federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies in order to soften investigative efforts, keep them from being educated on the nature of the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic Law, and to ensure the MB is the only entity from which the U.S. government seeks advice on Islamic matters; churches and synagogues through “interfaith dialogue”; key leaders in communities to encourage them to accept Islam as a part of American culture; the financial community by promoting the implementation of Shari’ah Compliant Finance into the U.S. banking system; and a multitude of others.

    During this time, the Brotherhood was able to get one of its leaders, Abdurahman Alamoudi, into the most senior levels of the U.S. government. Alamoudi, from Eritrea, was naturalized in 1979, became a Good Will Ambassador for the State Department, worked with the U.S. Department of Education, and was frequently welcomed on Capitol Hill and the White House. He personally met with Presidents Clinton and Bush on numerous occasions.

    Alamoudi was the Founder/President of a large number of Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda front groups as noted below. In 2003, Alamoudi was arrested at Heathrow Airport (UK) on his way back from Libya with $340,000 cash given to him by Libyan President Muammar Qaddafi for the jihad, he was involved in a plot to kill Saudi Crown Prince (now King) Abdullah of Saudi Arabia with two UK-based Al Qaeda operatives, and was convicted and sentenced to 23-years in federal prison.

    Abdurahman Alamoudi founded and created the Muslim Chaplain Program for the Department of Defense, the Islamic Institute (with Republican Strategist Grover Norquist), and was the founder of the American Muslim Armed Forces Veteran’s Affair Council (AMAFVAC). After Alamoudi’s demise, several Muslim Brotherhood front organizations gained prominence in the U.S. to include the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR, a Hamas entity), ISNA, the Muslim American Society (MAS), the US-Muslim Engagement Project, the Cordoba Initiative, Muslims for America, the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy (CSID), the American-Muslim Task Force (AMTF), and a host of others.

    During a November 2001 raid in Switzerland at the residence of Youssef Nada, a senior Muslim Brother, a 14-page document was found. Now known as “The Project” the document details how the Muslim Brotherhood will subvert and take over Western nations. In 2004 during a raid in Annandale, VA of the residence of a known Hamas operative and senior Muslim Brother in North America, the archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America were discovered.

    The documents reveal, in great detail, the strategic and operational plans of the Brotherhood in America and how they plan to destroy our civilization from within. In short, the Brotherhood intends on subverting our culture at all levels, creating a situation in which we work against ourselves. Here is an excerpt from the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan for North America, dated May 1991:

    Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America:

    "The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack.

    “By Their Hands.” The MB intends on using our leadership to do their bidding. Once the leadership in key sectors of society is co-opted by the Brothers and their point of view, these leaders will defend the MB’s position against all opposition - even when individuals under the leader’s purview provide information contrary to that position. Over time, the Muslim Brotherhood has been able to subvert the decision-making process of our National Security apparatus in just this way.

    Through this “civilization-jihadist process” the Muslim Brotherhood is undermining our financial system, softening our reaction to violent acts by jihadis, and rendering our security apparatus ineffective. The MB strategic documents also reveals that nearly every major Muslim organization in America today is, as a matter of fact, affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood Movement. Currently, in the U.S. government, there exists no coherent training and education program for our National Security sector which informs them of the existence of the Muslim Brotherhood and the threat they pose. This should not be surprising since the “Muslim advisors” consulting U.S. leadership on how to fight the “Global War on Terror” are all Muslim Brothers