Posts by JohnEBoy

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Letter from Senator Merkely D Oregon

    09/21/2016 1:02:02 PM PDT · 8 of 24
    JohnEBoy to PROCON

    What jumps out at me is ... comparing what is to what will be. So, no matter that Obama promised lower premiums if Ocare was enacted, be “grateful” that Ocare is costing less than our “projections” of future cost.

    What bull-loney! This is the global warming argument. Compare what is happening now to what we are “projecting” to happen in 50 years. You must spend for this because the costs you are incurring are less than we “project” if you don’t pay.

  • Obama: ‘The Time Has Come for Me to Pass the Baton’ to Hillary

    09/14/2016 4:27:36 AM PDT · 21 of 63
    JohnEBoy to ColdOne

    This is just another way of saying “we owe this to her”.

    Her campaign and her speakers do not talk about improving the country, righting wrongs or putting people back to work. No, her hateful campaign is all about, she is inevitable, Trump is horrible, Trump supporters are deplorable, she is healthy as a horse and don’t pay any attention to her e-mail or Clinton Foundation scandals.

    Trump meanwhile, is all about lowering taxes, reducing (eliminating) illegal immigration, helping flood victims, giving Blacks an alternative to the democrat plantation politics, holding upbeat America-affirming rallies, and putting Americans back to work.

    Seems like an easy choice to me.

  • Anxious Dems urge Clinton to open up

    09/09/2016 6:19:58 AM PDT · 45 of 122
    JohnEBoy to ThunderSleeps

    With regard to “improving in certain areas”, even her most lap-doggie sycophants are hard pressed to name her lifetime accomplishments. Vaguely, they say, she has helped children, though there is no evidence. She was fired from the Watergate counsel, for lying, she failed her DC bar exam, HillaryCare was a disaster, she had no significant legislation as senator and as sec of state she left Libya and the rest of the Mid East in political tatters. Her only significant accomplishments involve self-aggradation.

    Others have mentioned the fact that, the more the public sees her, the lower her numbers go. Her handlers know this, that’s why there are no open press conferences and all public appearances are highly scripted with toady pressers in the audience.

  • Hillary Clinton's Illness Revealed

    09/06/2016 4:41:07 AM PDT · 43 of 94
    JohnEBoy to Cowgirl of Justice

    This was the BEST video I have seen about Hillary’s Parkinson disease. This doctor was very careful to explain each step of his analysis based on public evidence. I think even the most partisan Hillary supporter would have to at least consider the possibility if they watched it end to end.

    There is no doubt she should be required to release medical reports going back to 2005 or more. We, the American People, are interviewing her for the job. We have a right to know.

  • Film review: Ben-Hur

    08/20/2016 9:53:53 PM PDT · 73 of 83
    JohnEBoy to Kaslin

    Yes, one big difference was Ben-Hur’s rescue from the shipwreck. In ‘59 he saved the general and prevented him from committing suicide. The general thought they had lost the sea battle, but found out they (the Romans) had won. So he adopted Ben-hur and there was a great deal of development leading to the chariot race.

    In ‘16 version, BH, by himself, washes ashore right where the arabs are training for the races. So the sequence from slave ship rower to chariot racer was greatly reduced.

  • Film review: Ben-Hur

    08/20/2016 3:37:12 PM PDT · 29 of 83
    JohnEBoy to Kaslin

    I have seen both the 1959 and the 2016 version. I agree with the reviewer, about the Massala character in the latest version, very weak. After many years in the Roman army, he returns home as just the same guy who seemed to not have learned anything from traveling throughout the world.

    I think evil characters are stronger in movies where they can articulate their reasons for what they are doing. Massala (1959) was very clear why he did what he did to Ben-Hur. You don’t have to agree with him, but at least you could see his point. And even after losing the race, he stuck it to Ben-Hur one last time, telling him his mother and sister were lepers. There was no reconciliation.

    The ‘59 version won 11 Academy Awards. Hard to top that.

  • Clinton Foundation hired cyber firm after suspected hacking: sources

    08/17/2016 6:19:48 PM PDT · 4 of 10
    JohnEBoy to Hojczyk

    FTA “The attacks have left some Democrats and Clinton campaign officials worried that the hackers might have obtained emails and voice messages that could be used to reinforce Republican charges that donors to the Clinton Foundation were rewarded with access to Clinton and her aides while she was secretary of state, or to her husband, former President Bill Clinton.”

    So why would they be worried that charges that donors were rewarded with access, if there was no pay-to-play going on? It seems they have admitted to the charges by being worried the e-mails will show exactly that.

  • Donna Brazile: "more emails are coming."

    07/26/2016 8:35:58 AM PDT · 57 of 72
    JohnEBoy to gasport

    Good idea. I was wrong about the DNC not replacing her after Friday. If the news is bad enough, she can make a statement about how the campaign has taken a toll on her health and play the victim card ... “I swear I don’t know why everyone is picking on poor little me.” Then the DNC can “reluctantly” replace her with Bernie/Biden/Fauxahautas or whoever.

  • Donna Brazile: "more emails are coming."

    07/26/2016 8:05:59 AM PDT · 51 of 72
    JohnEBoy to bella1

    I see two approaches for email release by WikiLeaks:

    1. Release today or tonight to give everyone a chance to review them and document the juicy ones before the coronation, thus putting the coronation into total chaos and disarray ... or

    2. Release them on Friday, after the coronation. Assuming they are as juicy as we expect, then she will be campaigning under a very dark cloud, all while the DNC can’t replace her.

    I’m good with either approach, but if I had a choice, I would opt for no. 1.

  • State Department Reopening Internal Review of Hillary Clinton Emails

    07/08/2016 3:17:59 PM PDT · 13 of 43
    JohnEBoy to rdl6989

    I thought there was a teensy weensy chance James Comey would recommend to indict. In this case I believe there is less chance that the State Dept. will find anything wrong. It’ll turn out, “everyone does it, anyway”, or she had special permission or “if the FBI has no problem, why should we”, etc.

    This will be a whitewash, because if they were to find she was not following proper protocols, then it’s a black stain on the whole State Department. Just not gonna happen. Also, whatever report is issued, will be long after the election just to make sure it will have no impact.

  • Hillary Clinton's Non-Indictment May Not Help Her

    07/08/2016 5:30:16 AM PDT · 6 of 25
    JohnEBoy to Kaslin

    At this point, Trump’s campaign seems pretty easy to me:

    1. Hammer her on the fact that the FBI has officially called her a serial liar over matters of national security.
    2. Hammer her on the fact that the FBI said she is incompetent when it comes to recognizing classified information.
    3. Hammer her on the fact that the FBI made it clear only Hillary will get this treatment, anyone else will not; i.e., the system is rigged in her favor.
    4. Hammer her on the fact that she is not healthy enough to be president, she has severe coughing spells. (If I were Trump, during a debate, if she coughed, I would make a big deal about getting her a glass of water and some cough syrup and suggest for the sake of her health, she skip the rest of the debate.)

  • FLASH: FBI Director Comey will address reporters at 11AM ET today at FBI HQ DC... Developing..

    07/05/2016 7:11:14 AM PDT · 222 of 667
    JohnEBoy to Genoa

    As much as I believe this evil woman should be indicted on 10 or 20 counts, it is hard to believe that Obama would be making this trip with her today, knowing she will be indicted. I wish it weren’t so but it looks like the “fix is in”.

  • Drudge on Twitter: So far no legit leaks from either side. If Clinton now feels danger, look for Ken

    07/03/2016 6:18:31 PM PDT · 145 of 167
    JohnEBoy to Don Hernando de Las Casas

    My point about using John Roberts as an example. Remember we are talking about Washington DC. In WDC, it seems people go there who are conservative and straight-shooters, and after being tainted by the WDC ilk, they become somebody else. You’re right, there are millions of people in normal walks of life who are forth right and dependable and keep their integrity and their word. It just does not seem to hold true in WDC.

  • Sources: Hillary Clinton Not Expected to Face Charges in Federal Email Probe

    07/03/2016 3:31:23 AM PDT · 195 of 204
    JohnEBoy to napscoordinator

    There is so much contradictory evidence about what is going to happen ... I think no one knows for sure. My estimate of odds is 60% no indictment, 40% some indictment.

    The case for indictment:
    There is so much evidence of felonious activity, it seems to be an open and shut case.
    We are told Comey is a straight shooter (?)
    Her people took the fifth for much of their testimony.
    The Clinton/Lynch meeting looks like desperation by Billy Bob.
    Her meeting with the FBI on Sat. Why have it if everything is innocent?

    The case against indictment:
    Clintons have power and FBI files on all those who matter.
    Obama and Biden are talking about campaigning for her. Why do that if they know she is on the outs. (and they know)
    The talk about Comey reminds me of John Roberts. He’ll do the right thing! Yeah, right.

    Therefore low, but not impossible odds of indictment.

  • Drudge on Twitter: So far no legit leaks from either side. If Clinton now feels danger, look for Ken

    07/03/2016 3:26:20 AM PDT · 13 of 167
    JohnEBoy to gunsequalfreedom

    There is so much contradictory evidence about what is going to happen ... I think no one knows for sure. My estimate of odds is 60% no indictment, 40% some indictment.

    The case for indictment:
    There is so much evidence of felonious activity, it seems to be an open and shut case.
    We are told Comey is a straight shooter (?)
    Her people took the fifth for much of their testimony.
    The Clinton/Lynch meeting looks like desperation by Billy Bob.
    Her meeting with the FBI on Sat. Why have it if everything is innocent?

    The case against indictment:
    Clintons have power and FBI files on all those who matter.
    Obama and Biden are talking about campaigning for her. Why do that if they know she is on the outs. (and they know)
    The talk about Comey reminds me of John Roberts. He’ll do the right thing! Yeah, right.

    Therefore low, but not impossible odds of indictment.

  • Lynch’s plan to “accept the FBI decision” over Clinton’s emails is probably a smokescreen

    07/01/2016 7:14:33 AM PDT · 19 of 60
    JohnEBoy to DugwayDuke

    I agree, if it was “good news”, i.e, Hill is off the hook, why go to all this trouble to meet FTF?

    No, my theory is she met with Bill for good news/bad news. The good news .... she (the DOJ) is going to delay releasing the Clinton Foundation emails (that clearly show influence peddling all over the world) for 2+ years, and thus doing Bill, her mentor, a favor. Badda, badda, bing, happened the next day.

    OTOH, the bad news is .... the case against Hill is so air-tight, so open-and-shut, that there is nothing that can be done to prevent it going forward.

    Just my theory, based on nothing more than what these people have been doing. I’m likely wrong.

  • "Vanity" Loretta Lynch Hangs Hillary Clinton onto POTUS, Obama!!!

    07/01/2016 5:28:34 AM PDT · 37 of 59
    JohnEBoy to JLAGRAYFOX

    This is a very tough call. It is hard to ascribe professional motivation to these people, like Lynch. Being liberals, they believe anything they decide to do is okay, regardless of the rule-of-law, etc. The theory that the meeting was about delaying the CF emails from being released seems to make sense, since the next day they were announced to be tied up for 2+ years.

    OTOH, she may have also told Bill, look, I’m sorry but the case against Hillary is so open-and-shut, that there is nothing I can do to stop it. Comey has the goods and there is no reasonable way to divert what is coming.

    So, in summary, she told him, nothing I can do for your wife, but I can protect you by delaying CF memos.

    Just my theory ... no basis other than watching what these people are doing.

  • Hillary Clinton won't say whether right to bear arms is a constitutional right

    06/06/2016 8:34:30 AM PDT · 25 of 29
    JohnEBoy to GilGil

    Here’s the problem. It doesn’t matter what she says. Suppose she said the second amendment is sacred and should not be touched. Well she said the same thing about marriage a few years ago. Liberal democrat’s words mean nothing. They “evolve” and suddenly they’re on the total opposite side of the fence. For example, prior to running for pres and vice pres, Clinton and Gore were pro-life. But as soon as they were running nationally, suddenly they’re pro-abortion, with no guilt or self doubt.

    So liberal democrat statements and promises carry no weight, whatsoever.

  • Kentucky Man Arrested For Damaging Display of Memorial Day Crosses

    05/30/2016 7:35:49 PM PDT · 7 of 34
    JohnEBoy to MarvinStinson

    But, but ... he said he was not responsible!! (With pieces of crosses stuck in his tires). This is typical liberal behavior.

    “Oh, I’m going to make a statement about the war and so on. Oh, I got caught, oh, well, you know, I didn’t do it.’

    Immoral, irresponsible, juvenile actions that shows that liberal behavior is insane.

  • Significant Premium Hikes Expected Under Obama Health Law

    04/28/2016 11:02:10 AM PDT · 27 of 28
    JohnEBoy to captmar-vell

    I disagree, there was more than a whimper. A LOT of people attended town hall meetings and were very vocal in opposition. But these town halls were a façade, the “fix was in”. And if you don’t believe that last phrase, go back to 2010 or so and see the absolute chicanery used to get this monster passed.

    We have left the period of American history where senators and congressman said they wanted to hear from the people and they would enact legislation based on what the people wanted.

    Now, preposterous, unworkable, 2600 page legislation is passed over the valid objections of hard-working, tax-paying citizens, because it benefits those “who don’t have a voice.” Well, guess what? We’re the ones, now, who don’t have a voice.

  • Hillary Clinton: ‘No Evidence’ to Suggest Raising the Minimum Wage Kills Jobs

    03/22/2016 5:34:09 PM PDT · 12 of 48
    JohnEBoy to Nachum

    I’m not clear on the concept. If she wants $12 per hour compared to Bernie’s $15 per hour, she must think $12 is better. But if she thinks there is no effect from raising the minimum wage, why not go to $15 or $20 or $50 or ....? Liberals never let clear evidence that their ideas are bogus, sway them from what they “feel” is right.

  • Paul Ryan Goes on Offense (After giving Obama all he needs in his last term of office)

    01/23/2016 6:41:21 AM PST · 11 of 28
    JohnEBoy to doldrumsforgop

    If he had put up even a minimal defense against funding Obama’s agenda and Planned Murderhood, I could hope this was true. But he and his buddies did not. I see the agenda, “go on offense, stop the president”, etc. etc., blah, blah, blah, just to get conservative and tea party votes. Then take the easy road and just go along with whatever the DemoRepub establishment agenda is.

  • Canada Set To Unleash Negative Interest Rates As Oil Patch Dies, Depression Deepens

    01/19/2016 5:33:48 PM PST · 9 of 36
    JohnEBoy to SeekAndFind

    I’m old enough to remember long lines at the gas pumps in the 70’s. At that time, we were told oil was a limited commodity and would soon run out. Yet, here we are 45 years later and we have and oil glut. How can this be?!? Is it possible the Malthusian “experts” don’t have a clue? People like Paul Erlich and Al Gore pontificate on how things will be dire in 10 or 20 years, yet when the time goes by, and NONE of their predictions are close to right, media types go back to ask them for more follow-up “expert” advice. I’m an engineer and if I was as totally off-base in my work as they are, I would be drummed out of the profession.

  • Ohio Planned Parenthood Clinics [illegally] Disposed of Fetuses in Landfills, Probe Finds

    12/12/2015 9:38:03 PM PST · 10 of 13
    JohnEBoy to grundle

    When were the videos “debunked”? If there is footage of PP personnel discussing body part disposal or sales, how do you heavily edit to make that happen? Were they discussing where to go to lunch, and the editors changed it to body parts? I don’t get it.

  • ‘Truth’: Movie Reignites Heated Debate Over ‘60 Minutes II’ Scandal

    10/07/2015 10:13:16 PM PDT · 9 of 57
    JohnEBoy to Brad from Tennessee

    This is how backwards this issue was at the time:

    1. We had swift boat guys saying John Kerry was a fraud during the Vietnam War. This was all we knew as voters about John Kerry’s potential ability as a commander in chief. Media ignored or discounted what they said.

    2. Meanwhile CBS pulls out bogus memos about Bush’s time as a NG pilot in 1972. But this was irrelevant information for us as voters. We had already seen Bush operate as commander in chief for the previous 4 years. We could make an informed decision based on the his current capability, we didn’t need 30 year old memos to make a decision.

  • Bill Clinton White House suppressed evidence of Iran’s terrorism

    10/06/2015 4:45:52 AM PDT · 54 of 64
    JohnEBoy to Magic Fingers

    I agree completely. It is very clear the Clinton admin did not want to deal with a terrorist attack on an airliner in the summer of ‘96. His reelection campaign was in full swing and he and his admin had no answer for terrorism, so they blocked it out. “Exploding fuel tank!” Sure.

  • Jeb Bush Is Seriously Tanking Among Primary Voters

    09/15/2015 6:31:25 AM PDT · 9 of 37
    JohnEBoy to jimbo123

    I don’t doubt he, Bush is a fine person. But I see no vision for the future. Nothing about correcting problems generated by the current elites. He’s a member of the elites, so solutions won’t come from him.

    Trump is not my first choice, but I see what he is doing. He’s showing people there are real solutions to real problems. You don’t have to accept the inevitability of illegal immigration, PP, Obamacare, high taxes, etc. People would rather hear about solutions than how we “reached across the aisle”.

  • Mainstream Media Finally Starting to Notice Hillary Clinton In Deep Trouble

    09/14/2015 7:14:45 AM PDT · 12 of 24
    JohnEBoy to JohnEBoy

    By the way, how great is it for the democrats, that their leading alternative candidate for president is NOT EVEN A MEMBER OF THEIR PARTY! HAHA.

  • Mainstream Media Finally Starting to Notice Hillary Clinton In Deep Trouble

    09/14/2015 7:08:19 AM PDT · 7 of 24
    JohnEBoy to E. Pluribus Unum

    A 22 point drop in a few months. This is huge. The MSM would not ignore this for anyone else. People are not turning out for her events. People can’t say what she has accomplished. Finally, after seven years, I can applaud something Obama has done; throwing Hillary under the bus.

    What’s nice about all this is Biden looks like the “default” candidate, the old guy who steps in because it’s his time; i.e., like Dole, McCain, Romney, etc.
    Upcoming debates will be great, between Sanders the extreme socialist and Biden, the moderate socialist.

  • Ted Cruz will take center stage in fight to defund Planned Parenthood

    09/12/2015 3:14:26 PM PDT · 11 of 11
    JohnEBoy to VinL

    Planned Parenthood is amazing. Their only response to 9 videos showing long discussions of buying and selling baby parts and changing abortion procedures to preserve the parts is ... the videos are heavily edited!!?1? Really?
    Well, tell us what the innocent discussion was that got edited into this monstrosity. Were they discussing fishing and what bait to use? How can you edit something else into this? These are liberals, they’re supposed to be so smart. Right?

  • Watch Obama Smirk And Laugh When CBS Major Garret Asks About 4 Americans In Iranian Prison

    07/16/2015 6:06:58 PM PDT · 5 of 19
    JohnEBoy to SkyPilot

    His answer to “why we didn’t tie release of Americans to Iran deal” was nonsense and gobbledygook. He seemed to say that tying it would have caused the deal to take longer. So???? Thank you Major Garrett for asking a real question and not another softball.

  • GOP rife with tensions over Obamacare-SCOTUS response

    06/16/2015 6:43:14 AM PDT · 49 of 57
    JohnEBoy to DoodleDawg

    People are so focused on Obamacare, they forget this case is about a broader issue. That is, can the president or the IRS or any other federal agency ignore plain language in a law and fashion the meaning to their own political ends. At the time Ocare was written, the phrase “exchanges established by the states” was put in the law for a reason, by the democrats. It didn’t work out the way they expected so they want to treat it like the phrase was never enacted. But it was. If a law has faulty provisions, simply go back to congress and ask that the law be changed. But the democrats don’t want to do that, they know the whole law would be up for change. Instead, they and the IRS ignore plain language and subsidize people with no basis in the plain text. So this is a democrat problem/issue.

  • Are Media Just Hillary's Fair-weather Friends?

    06/09/2015 7:16:29 AM PDT · 6 of 12
    JohnEBoy to Kaslin

    Hillary is so difficult to assess. If you analyze her on the basis of accomplishments, likeability, honesty, supporter of women and morality, you would say this person should not even be in the discussion for national office. Yet, because of ‘name-recognition” and “first woman to run”, and so far as I can tell only for those reasons, she is the head and shoulders leader of one major party for president. It defies logic but it is how it is.

  • Scandals force Hillary Clinton to delay 2016 bid announcement

    03/25/2015 11:22:21 PM PDT · 18 of 22
    JohnEBoy to Georgia Girl 2

    I agree. The appearance of cronyism and incompetence seems to be increasing. More people in her circle are going to be included in the scandals. The one service she is providing is, she is keeping the other potential candidates from entering while she frets on the sideline trying to figure out what to do.

  • Wasserman Schultz: Democrats have midterm ‘problem’ but ‘we know we’re right on the issues’

    11/09/2014 6:22:14 AM PST · 5 of 32
    JohnEBoy to Libloather

    “We are right on the issues.” Really? So all those votes defeating your guys and gals were for other reasons than the issues? Like what? How loud can the American people say WE DON’T LIKE OBAMACARE! before they hear it? Apparently there is no volume that will reach them. The only way this will change is when the ethnic groups get wise and start peeling away from them.

  • GRUBER: "Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage." (EXPLOSIVE Video!!!)

    11/08/2014 2:03:02 PM PST · 15 of 45
    JohnEBoy to PJ-Comix

    Let’s say it like it is. “Lack of transparency” is a euphemism for “lying”. So what he said is, “I would rather have this law (Obamacare) by lying to the American people and getting it, then not lying and have them reject it”. We all knew it was true about the democrats that passed this monstrosity including Obama, but it’s amazing to see someone come right out and say it.

  • Obama on the World

    08/09/2014 6:26:12 PM PDT · 6 of 20
    JohnEBoy to Ooh-Ah

    I cannot even get my head around the way he “thinks”. His high poll numbers are preventing him from “doing the right thing”! It’s like everything is upside down and inside out with Obama

    Maybe his (Netanyahu’s) poll numbers are high because his people see him doing the right thing.

    Typical backwards liberal thinking. Like when a state passes a concealed carry law and crime goes down, it confounds liberals ... they can’t explain it!

  • Quiznos Moves Toward Bankruptcy Filing

    02/28/2014 6:49:32 AM PST · 15 of 33
    JohnEBoy to Red in Blue PA

    I went in to one a few years ago and ordered a sandwich. I treated it like Subway, said load it down with tomatoes, lettuce, the works. They gave it to me, I got in my car and took it out to eat it. Nothing but meat and cheese.

    I went back in to complain. The answer ... that’s the way we make it. Well, I said, why didn’t you tell me when I ordered that way? Dead silence.

    Haven’t been back.

  • Blame game as insurers dump doctors

    11/09/2013 9:19:03 PM PST · 21 of 35
    JohnEBoy to Mike Darancette

    News from the DNC and President-for-Life Obama!

    With the great success of the Obamacare program, our Dear Leader has looked out at the fly-over country ... and He sees a right for all Americans that needs to be provided. The inalienable right to transportation!

    That’s right! With the passage of the new law, your right to cheap, dependable transportation can no longer be denied. There are currently 43 million Americans without transportation, but not after the enactment of ..... Obama-CAR!

    Under Obama-CAR, if you like your current car, YOU CAN KEEP IT! ... as long as it gets 40 mpg city, 55 mpg on the highway. Otherwise, the new Obama-CAR! program will trade your old inefficient clunker for a new Obama-CAR. You will be able to choose any car from the vast array of Obama-CAR! choices ... including white, black or yellow GM (Government Motors) Metro!

    Think of it ... a shiny new Metro in your driveway. You will be the envy of your neighbors, at least until they are forced to trade their old inefficient truck or SUV in for their Metro!

    The advantages of the Obama-CAR! program are almost too numerous to mention. For instance:

    No one can be denied cheap trusty transportation after the rollout of Obama-CAR!

    Highways will be more roomy without over-sized trucks and SUV’s crowding everyone out.
    No one will be envious of other drivers more expensive, impractical SUV’s or sports cars ... because there won’t be any!

    Contact your Senator or Representative today! Let him/her know ... you want your Obama-CAR!

    I am President-for -Life Obama and I appoved this message.

  • Obama’s Massive Fraud

    11/09/2013 6:28:56 AM PST · 2 of 50
    JohnEBoy to Hotlanta Mike

    News from the DNC and President-for-Life Obama!

    With the great success of the Obamacare program, our Dear Leader has looked out at the fly-over country ... and He sees a right for all Americans that needs to be provided. The inalienable right to transportation!

    That’s right! With the passage of the new law, your right to cheap, dependable transportation can no longer be denied. There are currently 43 million Americans without transportation, but not after the enactment of ..... Obama-CAR!

    Under Obama-CAR, if you like your current car, YOU CAN KEEP IT! ... as long as it gets 40 mpg city, 55 mpg on the highway. Otherwise, the new Obama-CAR! program will trade your old inefficient clunker for a new Obama-CAR. You will be able to choose any car from the vast array of Obama-CAR! choices ... including white, black or yellow GM (Government Motors) Metro!

    Think of it ... a shiny new Metro in your driveway. You will be the envy of your neighbors, at least until they are forced to trade their old inefficient truck or SUV in for their Metro!

    The advantages of the Obama-CAR! program are almost too numerous to mention. For instance:

    No one can be denied cheap trusty transportation after the rollout of Obama-CAR!

    Highways will be more roomy without over-sized trucks and SUV’s crowding everyone out.

    No one will be envious of other drivers more expensive, impractical SUV’s or sports cars ... because there won’t be any!

    Contact your Senator or Representative today! Let him/her know ... you want your Obama-CAR!

    I am President-for -Life Obama and I appoved this message.

  • The Great Democrat Policy Debate: Are We Wrong or Just Liars?

    11/09/2013 6:22:15 AM PST · 16 of 24
    JohnEBoy to SC_Pete

    News from the DNC and President-for-Life Obama!

    With the great success of the Obamacare program, our Dear Leader has looked out at the fly-over country ... and He sees a right for all Americans that needs to be provided. The inalienable right to transportation!

    That’s right! With the passage of the new law, your right to cheap, dependable transportation can no longer be denied. There are currently 43 million Americans without transportation, but not after the enactment of ..... Obama-CAR!

    Under Obama-CAR, if you like your current car, YOU CAN KEEP IT! ... as long as it gets 40 mpg city, 55 mpg on the highway. Otherwise, the new Obama-CAR! program will trade your old inefficient clunker for a new Obama-CAR. You will be able to choose any car from the vast array of Obama-CAR! choices ... including white, black or yellow GM (Government Motors) Metro!

    Think of it ... a shiny new Metro in your driveway. You will be the envy of your neighbors, at least until they are forced to trade their old inefficient truck or SUV in for their Metro!

    The advantages of the Obama-CAR! program are almost too numerous to mention. For instance:

    No one can be denied cheap trusty transportation after the rollout of Obama-CAR!

    Highways will be more roomy without over-sized trucks and SUV’s crowding everyone out.

    No one will be envious of other drivers more expensive, impractical SUV’s or sports cars ... because there won’t be any!

    Contact your Senator or Representative today! Let him/her know ... you want your Obama-CAR!

    I am President-for -Life Obama and I appoved this message.

  • Obama’s Democrat Party of Pitchmen and Liars

    11/09/2013 6:14:00 AM PST · 10 of 19
    JohnEBoy to Kaslin

    News from the DNC and President-for-Life Obama!

    With the great success of the Obamacare program, our Dear Leader has looked out at the fly-over country ... and He sees a right for all Americans that needs to be provided. The inalienable right to transportation!

    That’s right! With the passage of the new law, your right to cheap, dependable transportation can no longer be denied. There are currently 43 million Americans without transportation, but not after the enactment of ..... Obama-CAR!

    Under Obama-CAR, if you like your current car, YOU CAN KEEP IT! ... as long as it gets 40 mpg city, 55 mpg on the highway. Otherwise, the new Obama-CAR! program will trade your old inefficient clunker for a new Obama-CAR. You will be able to choose any car from the vast array of Obama-CAR! choices ... including white, black or yellow GM (Government Motors) Metro!

    Think of it ... a shiny new Metro in your driveway. You will be the envy of your neighbors, at least until they are forced to trade their old inefficient truck or SUV in for their Metro!

    The advantages of the Obama-CAR! program are almost too numerous to mention. For instance:

    No one can be denied cheap trusty transportation after the rollout of Obama-CAR!

    Highways will be more roomy without over-sized trucks and SUV’s crowding everyone out.

    No one will be envious of other drivers more expensive, impractical SUV’s or sports cars ... because there won’t be any!

    Contact your Senator or Representative today! Let him/her know ... you want your Obama-CAR!

    I am President-for -Life Obama and I appoved this message.

  • (VIDEO) CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: The president now is toxic (Dems held hostage to computer geeks)

    11/08/2013 5:35:59 AM PST · 21 of 46
    JohnEBoy to Gaffer

    Man do I agree. It is amazing that the idea that 634 million and more can be spent over three years ... leading to a non-working “web-site” is unbefrickenlievable. I’m concerned when I go to commercial site to give my credit card no., yet this site wants way more info than that and so far appears to treat that data with no respect at all.

    One of the president’s subtler promises was he would not sign legislation that did not live up to his promises. Yet when the dems pulled the carcass known as obamacare over the finish line with lies, bribes and subterfuge, he did not hesitate to sign it without the slightest idea whether it met any of his (now voided) promises. When not a single pub signed it and millions said this is not gonna work, he never took a second to think, do they possibly have a point? He didn’t even listen to people supporting him who said this will be a “train wreck”. I looked up “totally clueless” in the dictionary, Obama’s picture was there!

  • NYT: Say, Obamacare kind of undermines Obama’s big-government approach, huh?

    10/28/2013 1:27:48 PM PDT · 17 of 41
    JohnEBoy to Paine in the Neck

    Is Obamacare the biggest, costliest, worst man-made disaster in history? (I’m not talking about hurricanes or earthquakes here). What is comparable in dollars and numbers of people affected?

    The Hindenberg?
    The Titanic?
    Chernobyl?

    I don’t know, just asking.

  • 12 Unspoken Rules For Being A Liberal

    08/31/2013 5:04:20 AM PDT · 20 of 42
    JohnEBoy to Kaslin

    No. 10 is key. Questioning the conservative’s motives and not his arguments. This leads to ... Conservative says “I question the validity of Affirmative Action Programs” Liberal says, “You’re a racist!” Conservative says “I question the validity, morality and practicality of Gay Marriage.” Liberal says, “You’re a homophobe!” and so on. The beauty of this for the Liberal is, with the name calling, the Liberal has moved the discussion away from whether the liberal program is good, effective and accomplishing anything. Instead there is a back and forth about whether the Conservative is racist or not and the liberal avoids any discussion of the ineffective liberal program.

  • CNN Analyst: Many Companies Using Obamacare as 'Excuse' to Cut Employee Health Insurance

    08/22/2013 2:29:18 PM PDT · 10 of 18
    JohnEBoy to Sub-Driver

    Let me understand... companies have been providing health care insurance to employees and their families, basically since WWii. Originally as a benefit to attract good candidates to work. So 70 or more years. But now, just by coincidence, Obamacare has provided a convenient excuse to stop providing insurance and these companies have been waiting for this opportunity all this time. Brilliant!

    With these people whatever the issue is, it’s never the issue. So if people say they don’t like Obamacare, that’s not the problem, the problem is they are racist or greedy or prejudiced. Same thing with global warming or Amnesty or affirmative action or any other issue. Anytime a conservative tells what his objection is to the plan, the liberals always read his mind and declare there is a much more sinister motive for his objection.

  • I am looking for a good free photo editor.

    06/07/2013 5:30:48 PM PDT · 25 of 30
    JohnEBoy to freebird5850

    I like Irfanview ... just google the name. It is located everywhere. It will convert your picture from just about any format to any other format. It has been described as the “poor man’s photoshop”.

  • A Double-Trouble Scandal for Obama

    06/01/2013 5:12:58 AM PDT · 7 of 13
    JohnEBoy to MasterGunner01

    The MSM have been too totally invested in Obama to make a switch. Remember, 90% of MSM vote dem, so the peer pressure is enormous ... if you as a lap-dog presser begin to express any doubts about his highness, others will call you down. It’s a self-perpetuating support.

    It leads to preposterous excuses by the press for Obama. Just a few:

    1. He sat in a pew in Rev. Wright’s church for 20 years. Wright was a mentor to him ... but as soon as Wright’s bigotry became news, the press excused Obama because he never really listened to the sermons!
    2. Brochures were distributed for 16 years by the publishing house for Obama’s books. For Obama’s descriptive bio, the brochure said he was born in Kenya. But the press said this was an inadvertent error, and anyone who believes Obama was born in Kenya is a “birther”! So since Obama signed off on the brochure, he must be the original birther.
    3. The head of the IRS, Doug Schulman, has visited the WH 160 or more times. Something like once a week for the entire Obama term. Obama is his boss, but he is supposed to carry out the law with regard to taxes, laws created by Congress. So what is there for them to talk about, so much? Yet we are told they never talked about targeting conservative opponents of Obama’s using the IRS as a weapon. Right! He was there just for the Easter Eggs.

  • [UnSkewed Polls] Final Projection: Romney 275 electoral votes to Obama 263 electoral votes

    11/05/2012 10:48:09 PM PST · 21 of 40
    JohnEBoy to RightWingNilla

    I looked at the data below the map and here’s what I noticed. The numbers for the states that they show going to Romney are pretty solid, mostly 51-48 or more. But on the Obozo side, there are at least 4 states where the margin for O is barely a few thousand votes. Pa, Iowa, Wi, NH are the examples I saw, there might be a few more. So if this data is close to correct, only a few extra Romney voters in those places take it from a 275-263 win to a 300+ Romney landslide.

  • The Stretch Run

    11/02/2012 5:12:47 AM PDT · 8 of 12
    JohnEBoy to Usagi_yo

    I see no one mentioning this. NY is a “lock” for democrats every election. 33 electoral votes locked up. Why? Because the entire state of NY votes across the board for democrat president candidates? No. It’s because NY City votes heavily democrat and carries the rest of the (conservative Catholic) state with it. So what happens when a big storm knocks out power in the NYC area and suppresses voter turnout? What kind of a surprise would it be on election night if 33 “locked” electoral votes went to Romney? That’s a 66 EV swing!

    New Jersey will also be affected, just not sure how that will shake out.