Free Republic 3rd Quarter Fundraising Target: $85,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $10,640
12%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 12% is in!! Thank you all very much!!

Posts by john mirse

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • The President’s Amnesty Shell Game

    07/10/2014 5:57:15 AM PDT · 8 of 14
    john mirse to Kaslin
    Some thoughts on illegal immigration mess:

    1. Bottomless pit? Do pro-amnesty supporters and Obama want us---out of the kindness of our hearts---to welcome those children from Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Honduras forever until there are no more children in those countries, because they will all be in the US?

    2. Is this immigration mess turning into a bottomless pit, where wave upon wave of children flood the US, and where there is no solution in sight?

    3. Undocumented: First, they were called "undocumented". A word that I still don't understand.

    4. Refugees: Now the pro-amnesty people are using the term "refugees" to describe this flood of illegals.

    5. If they are refugees, why don't they head south toward Brazil and other countries farther south. But no, they all head north, and even bypass Mexico.

    6. No tattoos: if a person has tattoos covering the visible parts of his body like his face and arms, he must be sent back.

    7. Bottomless pit: Again, is this immigration mess turning into a bottomless pit, where Obama and pro-amnesty people won't be happy until every single child in Central America journeys to America and is allowed to stay? What a mess.

  • How Obama created the border crisis

    07/10/2014 5:54:04 AM PDT · 4 of 8
    john mirse to detective
    Some thoughts on illegal immigration mess:

    1. Bottomless pit? Do pro-amnesty supporters and Obama want us---out of the kindness of our hearts---to welcome those children from Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Honduras forever until there are no more children in those countries, because they will all be in the US?

    2. Is this immigration mess turning into a bottomless pit, where wave upon wave of children flood the US, and where there is no solution in sight?

    3. Undocumented: First, they were called "undocumented". A word that I still don't understand.

    4. Refugees: Now the pro-amnesty people are using the term "refugees" to describe this flood of illegals.

    5. If they are refugees, why don't they head south toward Brazil and other countries farther south. But no, they all head north, and even bypass Mexico.

    6. No tattoos: if a person has tattoos covering the visible parts of his body like his face and arms, he must be sent back.

    7. Bottomless pit: Again, is this immigration mess turning into a bottomless pit, where Obama and pro-amnesty people won't be happy until every single child in Central America journeys to America and is allowed to stay? What a mess.

  • Social Security Numbers And Noncitizens

    07/10/2014 12:16:43 AM PDT · 8 of 17
    john mirse to P-Marlowe
    FELONY: Any new immigration law and a good way to control illegal immigration is to make it a FELONY to take part in identity theft such as stealing someone’s Social Security number.

    And if an immigrant is found guilty of the FELONY, he loses any chance at citizenship, and must be deported.

  • Obama: My Amnesty Programs Not Luring ´Misinformed´ Parents to Send Kids to US

    07/09/2014 10:41:49 PM PDT · 30 of 35
    john mirse to realcleanguy
    But it is luring them up here. Take responsibility for your actions, Barack

    ******

    Obama blames everyone but himself. For instance, Obama admits that he has the power to call out the national guard immediately, but he won't do so. He blames the Republicans for this mess, but he won't admit that his inaction is one main reason why we have this mess.

  • Obama: My Amnesty Programs Not Luring ´Misinformed´ Parents to Send Kids to US

    07/09/2014 10:34:34 PM PDT · 27 of 35
    john mirse to Nachum
    Some thoughts on illegal immigration mess:

    1. Bottomless pit? Do pro-amnesty supporters and Obama want us---out of the kindness of our hearts---to welcome those children from Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Honduras forever until there are no more children in those countries, because they will all be in the US?

    2. Is this immigration mess turning into a bottomless pit, where wave upon wave of children flood the US, and where there is no solution in sight?

    3. Undocumented: First, they were called "undocumented". A word that I still don't understand.

    4. Refugees: Now the pro-amnesty people are using the term "refugees" to describe this flood of illegals.

    5. If they are refugees, why don't they head south toward Brazil and other countries farther south. But no, they all head north, and even bypass Mexico.

    6. No tattoos: if a person has tattoos covering the visible parts of his body like his face and arms, he must be sent back.

    7. Bottomless pit: Again, is this immigration mess turning into a bottomless pit, where Obama and pro-amnesty people won't be happy until every child in Central America journeys to America and is allowed to stay? What a mess.

  • Obama 'Happy to Consider' Deploying National Guard to Border

    07/09/2014 10:31:15 PM PDT · 35 of 60
    john mirse to Nachum
    Some thoughts on illegal immigration mess:

    1. Bottomless pit? Do pro-amnesty supporters and Obama want us---out of the kindness of our hearts---to welcome those children from Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Honduras forever until there are no more children in those countries, because they will all be in the US?

    2. Is this immigration mess turning into a bottomless pit, where wave upon wave of children flood the US, and where there is no solution in sight?

    3. Undocumented: First, they were called "undocumented". A word that I still don't understand.

    4. Refugees: Now the pro-amnesty people are using the term "refugees" to describe this flood of illegals.

    5. If they are refugees, why don't they head south toward Brazil and other countries farther south. But no, they all head north, and even bypass Mexico.

    6. No tattoos: if a person has tattoos covering the visible parts of his body like his face and arms, he must be sent back.

    7. Bottomless pit: Again, is this immigration mess turning into a bottomless pit, where Obama and pro-amnesty people won't be happy until every child in Central America journeys to America and is allowed to stay? What a mess.

  • Someone at a Denver Bar Just Asked Obama If He ‘Wanted a Hit of Pot’...

    07/09/2014 2:18:15 AM PDT · 37 of 43
    john mirse to smokingfrog
    choom!

    ******

    Yes. For an instant, Obama must have had thoughts of his wonderful pot-smoking days with his buddies back in high school in Hawaii.

    And also his undergraduate college days at Occidental in California and Columbia in New York.

  • Housing of Migrant Children "Un-American": California Senator

    07/08/2014 10:19:34 PM PDT · 9 of 20
    john mirse to Tailgunner Joe
    Hawaii and Illinois: I heard that the pro-immigrant demonstrations in Hawaii and Illinois, Obama's "birth" state and adopted state, were even larger than the ones in California.

    Sorry. My mistake. Obama mysteriously has not sent any illegals to either Hawaii or Illinois, as far as I know. I wonder why.

    Hawaii: it would probably only accept illegals from Asia anyway, because most of the people in Hawaii are from Asia or come from an Asian background.

    Illinois: Is it true that parts of Illinois have already rejected the illegals? Thanks.

  • Taxpayers Expected to Pay for Illegal-Immigrant Children’s Education

    07/08/2014 9:58:15 PM PDT · 27 of 33
    john mirse to lilyramone
    The schools have no choice when it comes to providing K-12 education. Supreme Court made that mandatory with Plyler vs Doe in 1982. In Fairfax County, Virginia they pay $104 million a year for ESOL instruction for 31,000 students.

    *******

    That 1982 Supreme Court ruling is the reason we need Constitutional amendments like the following to try to control illegal immigration:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • Are States Constitutionally Required to Educate Illegal Immigrant Children?

    07/08/2014 9:49:05 PM PDT · 19 of 20
    john mirse to dragonblustar
    The schools have no choice when it comes to providing K-12 education. Supreme Court made that mandatory with Plyler vs Doe in 1982. In Fairfax County, Virginia they pay $104 million a year for ESOL instruction for 31,000 students.

    *******

    That 1982 Supreme Court ruling is the reason we need Constitutional amendments like the following to try to control illegal immigration:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • 'So Sue Me': Why President Obama Is Embracing a Fight With Congress

    07/07/2014 2:13:14 AM PDT · 22 of 22
    john mirse to MUDDOG
    "So sue me!"

    Obama is being misquoted.

    What he actually said was this: "So impeach me!"

    Then so be it.

  • Barack Obama’s Foreign Invasion Of U.S. About To Hit Critical Mass In California Community

    07/07/2014 1:42:38 AM PDT · 82 of 96
    john mirse to INVAR
    Obama vs. Congress:

    1. Obama: He says that this immigration mess is the dominant Republicans' Congress' fault, because it won't pass needed legislation.

    2. Congress: On the other hand, Congress says that there are already immigration laws but Obama won't enforce them.

    3. So, who is right? If Obama won't enforce the laws already on the books, could someone please list or explain the immigration laws that Obama ignores? Thanks.

  • Obama’s irresponsible taunt: President increasingly willing to go at it alone: "So Sue Me" He says

    07/06/2014 8:00:59 PM PDT · 15 of 32
    john mirse to SeekAndFind
    Obama vs. Congress:

    1. Obama: He says that this immigration mess is the dominant Republicans' Congress' fault, because it won't pass needed legislation.

    2. Congress: On the other hand, Congress says that there are already immigration laws but Obama won't enforce them.

    3. So, who is right? If Obama won't enforce the laws already on the books, could someone please list or explain the immigration laws that Obama ignores? Thanks.

  • ‘Border is NOT open to illegal migration,’ Obama’s Homeland Security chief says

    07/06/2014 7:26:31 PM PDT · 55 of 71
    john mirse to jimbo123
    Obama vs. Congress:

    1. Obama: He says that this immigration mess is the dominant Republicans' Congress' fault, because it won't pass needed legislation.

    2. Congress: On the other hand, Congress says that there are already immigration laws but Obama won't enforce them.

    3. So, who is right? If Obama won't enforce the laws already on the books, could someone please list or explain the immigration laws that Obama ignores? Thanks.

  • President Obama in Austin this week for two-day fundraising trip

    07/06/2014 5:09:45 PM PDT · 24 of 44
    john mirse to Oldeconomybuyer
    Obama vs. Congress:

    1. Obama: He says that this immigration mess is the dominant Republicans' Congress' fault, because it won't pass needed legislation.

    2. Congress: On the other hand, Congress says that there are already immigration laws but Obama won't enforce them.

    3. So, who is right? If Obama won't enforce the laws already on the books, could someone please list or explain the immigration laws that Obama ignores? Thanks.

  • Sen. Durbin: ‘Fed Up’ with House GOP Criticizing Admin over Immigration (VIDEO)

    07/06/2014 4:57:11 PM PDT · 55 of 56
    john mirse to cripplecreek
    Use Navy Ships: Why can't the federal government use navy ships like carriers to transport the illegals back to El Salvador,Honduras, and Guatemala, and Nicaragua?

    Texas has ports on the Gulf of Mexico that the Navy could use to board and process the illegals.

    Hawaii and Illinois: Does anyone know how many of the illegals are being flown to Hawaii and Illinois, Obama's "birth" state and adopted state and Durbin's home state?

    If Obama is not sending any illegals to those states while he is sending them to other states, he should face a congressional hearing to explain why he is skipping Hawaii and Illinois.

  • City Leaders Shut Out Of Plan To Shelter Immigrant Kids (Dallas)

    07/06/2014 2:38:52 PM PDT · 26 of 39
    john mirse to Tennessee Nana
    Use Navy Ships: Why can't the federal government use navy ships like carriers to transport the illegals back to El Salvador,Honduras, and Guatemala, and Nicaragua?

    Texas has ports that the Navy could use to board and process the illegals.

    Hawaii and Illinois: Does anyone know how many of the illegals are being flown to Hawaii and Illinois, Obama's "birth" state and adopted state?

    If Obama is not sending any illegals to those states while he is sending them to other states, he should face a congressional hearing to explain why he is skipping Hawaii and Illinois.

  • New York Times: Ugly for Americans Against Illegal Immigration to Wave American Flags, Chant 'USA'

    07/06/2014 5:13:11 AM PDT · 53 of 60
    john mirse to 2ndDivisionVet

    New York Times holier than thou attitude: Why not fly 10,000 illegals to New York City and let us see how New York City residents react. I bet there will be protests there just as there are protests in California.

  • New York Times: Ugly for Americans Against Illegal Immigration to Wave American Flags, Chant 'USA'

    07/06/2014 5:04:33 AM PDT · 52 of 60
    john mirse to 2ndDivisionVet
    New laws needed:

    1. New law "Planes cannot be used to transport these illegals to all parts of the country."

    2. New law: " Illegal Immigrants must be completely processed in state of entry. They cannot be released into the general public and be free to travel to other states until after they are processed in the state of entry."

    3. New law: Notify each state: "Each state must be warned 48 hours in advance that busloads and airplane loads of illegal immigrants will be coming to their state."

    4. Indian reservations Why not set up temporary camps in Indian territory? There are large areas of Indian land that is not being used in the southwest. We could pay the Indians for use of their land. I'm sure that the Indians could use the money and will welcome the illegals, mainly children, onto their land with open arms. (Sarcasm)

  • Laredo bus station becomes refuge for undocumented immigrants

    07/05/2014 9:28:39 AM PDT · 16 of 20
    john mirse to red-dawg
    These illegals should not be released into the rest of the country until they are completely processed.

    Unaccompanied children: Pro-Amnesty supporters, in order to appeal to our compassionate side, want us to believe that ALL the children enter the country unaccompanied by an adult, but the article clearly shows us that indeed many children come with an adult, mostly their mothers.

    Again, these illegals should not be released until they are completely processed.

    Phone conversations: I can see it and hear it now, once these illegals gain access to a phone: "We made it! We should be in San Francisco (or Miami or Los Angeles and other cities across America) any day now." What a mess and a bunch of crap.

  • The Movement to Give the Vote to Non-Citizens Begins

    07/05/2014 8:55:39 AM PDT · 28 of 33
    john mirse to SeekAndFind
    Pro-amnesty people make me sick.

    1. First, they argue that we must give AMNESTY to 11-20 million illegals because most of them have been here so long and lived productive lives that it would be inhumane and un-American to send them back to a land that many of them have forgotten.

    2. New pro-amnesty argument concerning the minors pouring across the southern border: Now they want to expand their AMNESTY argument to apply to illegals who crossed the border just a few days ago or just 5 minutes ago, calling them refugees.

    The pro-amnesty people seem to want their cake and eat it too. Nothing seems to please those people. They are so arrogant that they believe they are the only people on the side of justice, while the rest of us are Satan re-born.

    3. Question: How many children are left in El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala if they all seem to be coming here?

    4. If we accept all who cross the border today and say no more, will the flow stop? I don't think so. Sarcasm.

    5.Accompanied minors: not all the children are unaccompanied as the pro-amnesty people want us to believe. Just look at the news footage. You see many small children accompanied by adults, mostly women. i didn't see any young children holding the hands of men. What about the men?

    What kind of fathers would send their children and wives on the long and dangerous trip across Mexico all alone? Those cowards. Or, maybe the fathers are already here, because they sneaked across the border long ago.

    6. We should process those minors accompanied by adults first, and then send the adult and child immediately back to their home country.

    7. So I say this: Let's not let the PRO-AMNESTY supporters BLACKMAIL us and pressure politicians into passing AMNESTY LAWS.

    8. Release of minors: Only release minors to family members who are American citizens. This requirement could help slow down this mess, because many of the family members are here illegally, and they may be too scared to claim their own children for fear that they will be deported along with the children.

  • Gov. Rick Perry Says US Must Send Immigrant Children Back Home to Send a Message

    07/05/2014 8:35:03 AM PDT · 28 of 38
    john mirse to SeekAndFind
    Pro-amnesty people make me sick.

    1. First, they argue that we must give AMNESTY to 11-20 million illegals because most of them have been here so long and lived productive lives that it would be inhumane and un-American to send them back to a land that many of them have forgotten.

    2. New pro-amnesty argument concerning the minors pouring across the southern border: Now they want to expand their AMNESTY argument to apply to illegals who crossed the border just a few days ago or just 5 minutes ago, calling them refugees.

    The pro-amnesty people seem to want their cake and eat it too. Nothing seems to please those people. They are so arrogant that they believe they are the only people on the side of justice, while the rest of us are Satan re-born.

    3. Question: How many children are left in El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala if they all seem to be coming here?

    4. If we accept all who cross the border today and say no more, will the flow stop? I don't think so. Sarcasm.

    5.Accompanied minors: not all the children are unaccompanied as the pro-amnesty people want us to believe. Just look at the news footage. You see many small children accompanied by adults, mostly women. i didn't see any young children holding the hands of men. What about the men?

    What kind of fathers would send their children and wives on the long and dangerous trip across Mexico all alone? Those cowards. Or, maybe the fathers are already here, because they sneaked across the border long ago.

    6. We should process those minors accompanied by adults first, and then send the adult and child immediately back to their home country.

    7. So I say this: Let's not let the PRO-AMNESTY supporters BLACKMAIL us and pressure politicians into passing AMNESTY LAWS.

  • Obama: Don’t Make It ‘Harder for the Best and the Brightest to Come Here’

    07/04/2014 3:04:05 PM PDT · 46 of 125
    john mirse to E. Pluribus Unum
    Those pro-amnesty people are very clever: They mix legal immigration with illegal immigration. They say something like this:

    "We need highly skilled tech workers, landscapers, and restaurant workers like MacDonald workers, so we must legalize all the 11 million illegals already here." What a bunch of crap.

    Let me see if I have this right: Tech companies argue that we need the best and the brightest techs from places like South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India so that we can compete against smart people in South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India?

    Say what? If we get the brightest from those countries, who is left in those countries, the not so best and not so brightest?

    it means that, in a sense, people from those countries are now competing against themselves. So then who is left in those countries to compete against those techs that move to the US? Nobody. How crazy is that thought?

    I can hear the tech teachers in Asia telling their students: "A tech background is the quickest way to get a green card and become an American citizen. Then Later you can bring the rest of your family to the US." What crap.

    And then this happens: Those bright people leave the American companies to start their own tech companies in America, and the vicious cycle of recruiting new foreign Asian tech workers starts all over again.

    NOTES:

    1. European techs: have you noticed that most of the new techs come from Asia, especially India? Why is that? What is wrong with European techs? Aren't they smart enough?

    Let's be honest: If I told you that most of the new techs would come from Latin American countries like Mexico and Brazil instead of from Asia, you would laugh in my face.

    2. Microsoft: We must demand that tech companies like Microsoft set up programs---has Microsoft and other tech companies ever heard of internships---to recruit American tech workers, many of them unemployed but anxious and eager to work and learn.

    3. "immigrants do jobs that Americans won't do": I can't think of many tech jobs, especially entry level tech jobs, Americans won't do.

    4. Statue of Liberty: We should point it towards Asia, and instead of saying "Send us you poor...", we should inscribe something like this:"Send us your smartest and brightest tech people and your richest people who speak English..." Sarcasm.

    5. German techs: I bet that if the US government said that the vast majority of new techs would now come from Germany instead of Asia, the American public would suddenly become very scared, and they would protest that we can't have all these Germans here because they would try to take over the country and start a war.

    Asian countries would also protest that if the US limited the flow of techs from Asia, Asian countries wouldn't have any room for all the techs that their schools are now graduating and thought they were going to the US.

  • Obama under pressure to visit US-Mexico border

    07/04/2014 2:49:54 PM PDT · 15 of 16
    john mirse to Olog-hai
    President Obama is terrible: he visits areas torn by tornadoes, but he doesn't want to visit the explosive invasion of illegal immigrants mostly children along the Mexico-US border, an invasion that will change the United States as we know it today forever.

    How sick is that?

    But maybe he planned to make an unannounced secret, surprise visit to the border all along, like those surprise visits he has made overseas to visit our troops.

    Let's wait and see.

  • INGRAHAM: TIME FOR MASS DEPORTATIONS 'BY THE THOUSANDS,' END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIPS

    07/04/2014 2:43:43 PM PDT · 19 of 20
    john mirse to Hardslab
    The schools have no choice when it comes to providing K-12 education. SCOTUS made that mandatory with Plyler vs Doe in 1982. In Fairfax County, Virginia they pay $104 million a year for ESOL instruction for 31,000 students.

    *******

    That 1982 Supreme Court ruling is the reason we need Constitutional amendments like the following to try to control illegal immigration:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • Obama Plans To IGNORE Illegal Immigrant Children In Detention Facilities On Texas Trip

    07/04/2014 2:15:21 PM PDT · 18 of 20
    john mirse to E. Pluribus Unum
    President Obama is terrible: he visits area torn by tornadoes, but he doesn't want to visit the explosive invasion of illegal immigrant mostly children along the Mexico-US border, an invasion the will change the United States as we know it today forever.

    How sick is that?

    But maybe he planned to make an unannounced secret, surprise visit to the border all along, like those surprise visits he has made overseas to visit our troops.

    Let's wait and see.

  • Senator Jeff Sessions: On Immigration, It’s Time to Defend Americans

    07/04/2014 2:06:43 PM PDT · 27 of 54
    john mirse to lilyramone
    Pro-amnesty people argue that we cannot deport 11+ million illegals. It would be impossible to do so. Maybe, maybe not.

    So why not begin by thinking small and about a program that vigorously goes after illegals one state at a time: Why not begin by deporting illegals from Texas? And then move on to Arizona and California?

    Surely there are not 11 million illegals in Texas. I hope not?

    Once we reduce the illegals in Texas, then we could move on to North Carolina and then to Georgia.

    I'm not joking. Let's take it one state at a time.

    Once the pressure is put on the illegals in Texas, they will probably rush to another state, but at least those illegals thinking of entering the country through Texas and staying there will be discouraged to do so.

    Yes, let's think small by first vigorously going after illegals in Texas and California.

  • ALERT -- Map Of Locations To Which Feds Are Shipping Illegal Alien Minors

    07/04/2014 1:41:01 PM PDT · 46 of 60
    john mirse to blueyon
    New laws need to be passed:

    1. New law: Illegals must stay in state of first entry, not sent all over the country.

    2. If the thousand of illegals are housed in entry points in only Texas, Arizona, and California, then so be it.

    3. Maybe then the governments---federal and state---will be forced to do something.

    4. New law: Illegals cannot be released into the rest of the country until they are completely processed in the state of entry.

    5. Hawaii and Illinois: Send thousands to Hawaii and Illinois, Obama's "birth" state and adopted state. I don't see Hawaii on the list, but the people in Hawaii would probably only welcome the illegals if they came from Asia.

    6. Illinois: They should send the majority to Illinois, Obama's adopted home state, if Obama is so determined in helping the illegals settle here.

  • Rick Perry to Obama: Come to the border

    07/04/2014 10:49:33 AM PDT · 40 of 56
    john mirse to Innovative
    Let's face it: If the thousands of children and adults flooding our Mexico-US border everyday now were Muslim children and adults, the country would be in a greater uproar and angrier than it is already now.

    And if Obama didn't try to do something immediately to stop the invasion, he would be immediately impeached.

  • Rick Perry to Obama: Come to the border

    07/04/2014 10:37:32 AM PDT · 38 of 56
    john mirse to Innovative
    President Obama is terrible: he visits area torn by tornadoes, but he doesn't want to visit the explosive invasion of illegal immigrant mostly children along the Mexico-US order, an invasion the will change the United States as we know it today forever.

    How sick is that?

    But maybe he planned to make an unannounced secret, surprise visit to the border all along, like those surprise visits he has made overseas to visit our troops.

    Let's wait and see.

  • Traitorous President Obama facilitates unconstitutional illegal alien invasion of the states!

    07/03/2014 4:37:52 PM PDT · 83 of 188
    john mirse to Jim Robinson
    The schools have no choice when it comes to providing K-12 education. The Supreme Court made that mandatory with Plyler vs Doe in 1982. In Fairfax County, Virginia they pay $104 million a year for ESOL instruction for 31,000 students.

    *******

    That 1982 Supreme Court ruling is the reason we need Constitutional amendments like the following to try to control illegal immigration:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • INGRAHAM: TIME FOR MASS DEPORTATIONS "BY THE THOUSANDS," END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIPS

    07/03/2014 4:31:35 PM PDT · 26 of 76
    john mirse to Tau Food
    The schools have no choice when it comes to providing K-12 education. The Supreme Court made that mandatory with Plyler vs Doe in 1982. In Fairfax County, Virginia they pay $104 million a year for ESOL instruction for 31,000 students.

    *******

    That 1982 Supreme Court ruling is the reason we need Constitutional amendments like the following to try to control illegal immigration:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • Bill Ayers planned to murder 25 million Americans!

    07/03/2014 8:43:42 AM PDT · 31 of 53
    john mirse to morphing libertarian

    Obama: In a way, Ayers did eventually come to power by helping Obama get elected and by helping Obama write his books.

  • DHS Tells Congress They’ve Sent Open Letter Telling Parents Not to Send Kids Across Border

    07/03/2014 8:21:38 AM PDT · 23 of 40
    john mirse to stars & stripes forever
    The schools have no choice when it comes to providing K-12 education. Supreme Court made that mandatory with Plyler vs Doe in 1982. In Fairfax County, Virginia they pay $104 million a year for ESOL instruction for 31,000 students.

    *******

    That 1982 Supreme Court ruling is the reason we need Constitutional amendments like the following to try to control illegal immigration:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • Poll: Should undocumented and unaccompanied immigrants who are minors be turned away?

    07/02/2014 11:23:28 PM PDT · 46 of 69
    john mirse to South40
    Most of the illegals seem to arrive without an adult.

    1. But many arrive with an adult---it looks like a parent.

    2. Minors with a parent: Process these minors first.

    3. Minors with a parent---most single parents seem to be female---should be sent immediately after processing back to El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala, and other countries.

    4. Mexico: It is also at fault. How could all those minors take the long trip across Mexico without Mexican authorities following them and watching them?

    5. My answer: As long as Mexico is assured that they won't stop in Mexico, Mexico leaves them alone and let's them pass.

  • Flood of illegal immigrants coming to a neighborhood near you

    07/01/2014 10:05:24 PM PDT · 35 of 38
    john mirse to Kenny
    The schools have no choice when it comes to providing K-12 education. The Supreme Court made that mandatory with Plyler vs Doe in 1982. In Fairfax County, Virginia they pay $104 million a year for ESOL instruction for 31,000 students.

    *******

    That 1982 Supreme Court ruling above is the reason we need Constitutional amendments like the following to try to control illegal immigration:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • Luis Gutierrez: Obama can ‘heal’ undocumented

    07/01/2014 9:47:20 PM PDT · 21 of 25
    john mirse to FlingWingFlyer
    The schools have no choice when it comes to providing K-12 education. The Supreme Court made that mandatory with Plyler vs Doe in 1982. In Fairfax County, Virginia they pay $104 million a year for ESOL instruction for 31,000 students.

    *******

    That 1982 Supreme Court ruling above is the reason we need Constitutional amendments like the following to try to control illegal immigration:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • Americans Lose While Immigrants Gain

    07/01/2014 4:47:20 PM PDT · 21 of 33
    john mirse to Kaslin
    Those pro-amnesty people are very clever: They mix legal immigration with illegal immigration. They say something like this:

    "We need highly skilled tech workers, landscapers, and restaurant workers like MacDonald workers, so we must legalize all the 11 million illegals already here." What a bunch of crap.

    Let me see if I have this right: Tech companies argue that we need the brightest techs from places like South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India so that we can compete against smart people in South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India?

    Say what? If we get the brightest from those countries, then it means that people in those countries are competing against themselves. So who is left in those countries to compete against those techs that moved to the US? How crazy is that?

    I can hear the tech teachers in Asia telling their students: "A tech background is the quickest way to get a green card and become an American citizen. Then Later you can bring the rest of your family to the US." What crap.

    And then this happens: Those bright people leave the companies to start their own tech companies, and the vicious cycle of recruiting foreign Asian tech workers start all over again.

    NOTES:

    1. European techs: have you noticed that most of the new techs come from Asia, especially India? Why is that? What is wrong with European techs? Aren't they smart enough?

    Let's be honest: If I told you that most of the new techs would come from Latin American countries like Mexico and Brazil instead of from Asia, you would laugh in my face.

    2. Microsoft: We must demand that tech companies like Microsoft set up programs---has Microsoft and other tech companies ever heard of internships---to recruit American tech workers, many of them unemployed but anxious and eager to work and learn.

    3. "immigrants do jobs that Americans won't do": I can't think of many tech jobs, especially entry level tech jobs, Americans won't do.

    4. Statue of Liberty: We should point it towards Asia, and instead of saying "Send us you poor...", we should inscribe something like this:"Send us your smartest and brightest tech people and your richest people who speak English..." Sarcasm.

    5. German techs: I bet that if the US government said that the vast majority of new techs would now come from Germany instead of Asia, the American public would suddenly become very scared, and they would protest that we can't have all these Germans here because they would try to take over the country and start a war.

    Asian countries would protest that if the US limited the flow of techs from Asia, they wouldn't have any room for all the techs that their schools are now graduating and thought they were going to the US.

  • Obama: Gay College Professor ‘Helped Shape How I Think’

    07/01/2014 10:32:38 AM PDT · 63 of 73
    john mirse to PROCON
    College records: Why won't Obama release his Occidental college records? What is he afraid of? Is he scared that the records will show that he registered as a foreign student and that he was an average student at best? What a liar.
  • Nancy Pelosi: Americans Should Treat Immigration Influx As 'Opportunity' to Help 'God's Children'

    07/01/2014 10:20:09 AM PDT · 28 of 65
    john mirse to SeekAndFind
    The schools have no choice when it comes to providing K-12 education. SCOTUS made that mandatory with Plyler vs Doe in 1982. In Fairfax County, Virginia they pay $104 million a year for ESOL instruction for 31,000 students.

    *******

    That 1982 Supreme Court ruling is the reason we need Constitutional amendments like the following to try to control illegal immigration:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • It's A Disaster At The Border

    07/01/2014 10:11:55 AM PDT · 24 of 27
    john mirse to fivecatsandadog
    “to remedy the situation”. Zero’s “remedy” is pure crap. ENFORCE THE FN LAW!!!! OR ELSE!

    *******

    Iraq: Obama can send 800+ troops to faraway war-torn Iraq, but he can't send troops to our southern border to protect our border from a southern invasion? What crap.

  • It's A Disaster At The Border

    07/01/2014 9:16:22 AM PDT · 20 of 27
    john mirse to Cheerio
    Those pro-amnesty people are very clever: They mix legal immigration with illegal immigration. They say something like this:

    "We need highly skilled tech workers, landscapers, and restaurant workers like MacDonald workers, so we must legalize all the 11 million illegals already here." What a bunch of crap.

    Let me see if I have this right: Tech companies argue that we need the brightest techs from places like South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India so that we can compete against smart people in South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India?

    Say what? If we get the brightest from those countries, then it means that people in those countries are competing against themselves. So who is left in those countries to compete against those techs that moved to the US? How crazy is that?

    I can hear the tech teachers in Asia telling their students: "A tech background is the quickest way to get a green card and become an American citizen. Then Later you can bring the rest of your family to the US." What crap.

    And then this happens: Those bright people leave the companies to start their own tech companies, and the vicious cycle of recruiting foreign Asian tech workers start all over again.

    NOTES:

    1. European techs: have you noticed that most of the new techs come from Asia, especially India? Why is that? What is wrong with European techs? Aren't they smart enough?

    Let's be honest: If I told you that most of the new techs would come from Latin American countries like Mexico and Brazil instead of from Asia, you would laugh in my face.

    2. Microsoft: We must demand that tech companies like Microsoft set up programs---has Microsoft and other tech companies ever heard of internships---to recruit American tech workers, many of them unemployed but anxious and eager to work and learn.

    3. "immigrants do jobs that Americans won't do": I can't think of many tech jobs, especially entry level tech jobs, Americans won't do.

    4. Statue of Liberty: We should point it towards Asia, and instead of saying "Send us you poor...", we should inscribe something like this:"Send us your smartest and brightest tech people and your richest people who speak English..." Sarcasm.

    5. German techs: I bet that if the US government said that the vast majority of new techs would now come from Germany instead of Asia, the American public would suddenly become very scared, and they would protest that we can't have all these Germans here because they would try to take over the country and start a war.

    Asian countries would protest that if the US limited the flow of techs from Asia, they wouldn't have any room for all the techs that their schools are now graduating and thought they were going to the US.

  • DREAM Act Activist: ‘Obviously, the Border Is Secure’(Video)

    07/01/2014 9:11:53 AM PDT · 3 of 11
    john mirse to Cheerio
    To control our southern borders and stop the thousands of children from Latin America from sneaking into the United States, we need at least two new amendments to the Constitution, something like this:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school the next day. That is wrong.

  • Obama vows executive action on immigration

    07/01/2014 3:43:41 AM PDT · 37 of 39
    john mirse to Eleutheria5

    Those pro-amnesty people are very clever: They mix legal immigration with illegal immigration. They say something like this:

    “We need highly skilled tech workers, landscapers, and restaurant workers like MacDonald workers, so we must legalize all the 11 million illegals already here.” What a bunch of crap.

    Let me see if I have this right: Tech companies argue that we need the brightest techs from places like South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India so that we can compete against smart people in South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India?

    Say what? If we get the brightest from those countries, then it means that people in those countries are competing against themselves. So who is left in those countries to compete against those techs that moved to the US? How crazy is that?

    I can hear the tech teachers in Asia telling their students: “A tech background is the quickest way to get a green card and become an American citizen. Then Later you can bring the rest of your family to the US.” What crap.

    And then this happens: Those bright people leave the companies to start their own tech companies, and the vicious cycle of recruiting foreign Asian tech workers start all over again.

    NOTES:

    1. European techs: have you noticed that most of the new techs come from Asia, especially India? Why is that? What is wrong with European techs? Aren’t they smart enough?

    Let’s be honest: If I told you that most of the new techs would come from Latin American countries like Mexico and Brazil instead of from Asia, you would laugh in my face.

    2. Microsoft: We must demand that tech companies like Microsoft set up programs-—has Microsoft and other tech companies ever heard of internships-—to recruit American tech workers, many of them unemployed but anxious and eager to work and learn.

    3. “immigrants do jobs that Americans won’t do”: I can’t think of many tech jobs, especially entry level tech jobs, Americans won’t do.

    4. Statue of Liberty: We should point it towards Asia, and instead of saying “Send us you poor...”, we should inscribe something like this:”Send us your smartest and brightest tech people and your richest people who speak English...” Sarcasm.

    5. German techs: I bet that if the US government said that the vast majority of new techs would now come from Germany instead of Asia, the American public would suddenly become very scared, and they would protest that we can’t have all these Germans here because they would try to take over the country and start a war.

    Asian countries would protest that if the US limited the flow of techs from Asia, they wouldn’t have any room for all the techs that their schools are now graduating and thought they were going to the US.

  • Barack Obama may be Silicon Valley's last hope for immigration reform in 2014

    07/01/2014 2:36:59 AM PDT · 26 of 33
    john mirse to Fledermaus
    That’s a good point. One answer is this; notice how the left mixes legal and illegal “immigration” in terms?

    They want to blur the lines.

    We all know these tech companies truly don’t need that many foreigners to write basic code. They just don’t want to spend their money working to get Americans into the tech market. They know they are lazy and stupid and our education system turns out morons.

    *******

    Those pro-amnesty people are very clever: They mix legal immigration with illegal immigration. They say something like this:

    "We need highly skilled tech workers, landscapers, and restaurant workers like MacDonald workers, so we must legalize all the 11 million illegals already here." What a bunch of crap.

    Let me see if I have this right: Tech companies argue that we need the brightest techs from places like South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India so that we can compete against smart people in South Korea, China, Taiwan, and India?

    Say what? If we get the brightest from those countries, then it means that people in those countries are competing against themselves. So who is left in those countries to compete against those techs that moved to the US? How crazy is that?

    I can hear the tech teachers in Asia telling their students: "A tech background is the quickest way to get a green card and become an American citizen. Then Later you can bring the rest of your family to the US." What crap.

    And then this happens: Those bright people leave the companies to start their own tech companies, and the vicious cycle of recruiting foreign Asian tech workers start all over again.

    NOTES:

    1. European techs: have you noticed that most of the new techs come from Asia, especially India? Why is that? What is wrong with European techs? Aren't they smart enough?

    Let's be honest: If I told you that most of the new techs would come from Latin American countries like Mexico and Brazil instead of from Asia, you would laugh in my face.

    2. Microsoft: We must demand that tech companies like Microsoft set up programs---has Microsoft and other tech companies ever heard of internships---to recruit American tech workers, many of them unemployed but anxious and eager to work and learn.

    3. "immigrants do jobs that Americans won't do": I can't think of many tech jobs, especially entry level tech jobs, Americans won't do.

    4. Statue of Liberty: We should point it towards Asia, and instead of saying "Send us you poor...", we should inscribe something like this:"Send us your smartest and brightest tech people and your richest people who speak English..." Sarcasm.

    5. German techs: I bet that if the US government said that the vast majority of new techs would now come from Germany instead of Asia, the American public would suddenly become very scared, and they would protest that we can't have all these Germans here because they would try to take over the country and start a war.

    Asian countries would protest that if the US limited the flow of techs from Asia, they wouldn't have any room for all the techs that their schools are now graduating and thought they were going to the US.

  • 'Kelly File' Exclusive: William Ayers pressed on controversial past

    06/30/2014 6:02:28 PM PDT · 24 of 43
    john mirse to reasonisfaith
    The Ayers-Obama relationship is clear proof that Obama is one big liar: During Obama's first campaign, Obama said that Ayers was only that guy who lived in the neighborhood. What a liar.

    If Obama lied so much about Ayers, then how can we believe him when he promises with all his heart that he will enforce immigration reform if only the Republican House would pass such reform laws? What a liar.

  • Obama vows executive action on immigration

    06/30/2014 4:40:33 PM PDT · 20 of 39
    john mirse to Eleutheria5

    The term undocumented immigrant: I hope that the flood of illegal immigrants from Central America-—yes, I call them illegal-— finally puts to rest that ridiculous term “undocumented”. People who cross the border illegally are illegal,alien immigrants clear and simple.

  • OBAMA ANNOUNCES HE'S BYPASSING CONGRESS ON IMMIGRATION REFORM

    06/30/2014 4:04:27 PM PDT · 114 of 118
    john mirse to SeekAndFind
    To control our southern borders and stop the thousands of children from Latin America from sneaking into the United States, we need at least two new amendments to the Constitution, something like this:

    1. "School attendance: Only citizens, legal residents, those with special student visas can attend elementary, high school, and colleges in the United States."

    2. "One parent must be a citizen before a newborn child is given automatic citizenship."

    3. Felony: We must finally declare that crossing the border illegally is a felony.

    Illegal parents come to the United States for the wonderful benefits that their children can receive, like a quality education and great health care. Can you blame them for making the dangerous, long trip with their young children, or sending their children by themselves with the hope that the United States will automatically let them stay?

    Freight trains: They must have guards to stop illegal immigrants from using them to get to the Mexico-US border.

    I don't understand how a child can illegally cross the southern border one day and automatically be eligible to enroll in public school anywhere in the country the next day. That is wrong.

  • Iowa rep will file lawsuit over immigration announcement

    06/30/2014 3:53:39 PM PDT · 6 of 7
    john mirse to ObamahatesPACoal
    Major problem with Obama and immigration reform: nobody trusts him to carry out the law as written.

    1. Many of us believe that once Obama gets his immigration reform bill passed, he will change it, or enforce only parts of it that he chooses.

    2. For instance, look at Obamacare.

    3. Obama has made so many changes to the original law through executive action that it is hardly recognizable.

    4. So any lawmaker who is thinking about immigration reform this year must seriously re-think his decision.

  • Sonasoft denies providing IRS with e-mail backup services

    06/30/2014 9:35:56 AM PDT · 18 of 23
    john mirse to chessplayer
    I'm no computer expert, so I would like someone's opinion on the following statement:

    I heard Lerner's lawyer say something like this on a tv talk show yesterday, Sunday: He said that Lerner turned on her computer one day, and the screen was blue. Does this mean anything?

    He said that she called someone to check out her computer (laptop or desktop?), but they couldn't fix the problem.