Free Republic 3rd Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $52,914
60%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 60%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Posts by patlin

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/27/2016 8:46:37 PM PDT · 82 of 83
    patlin to mrobisr
    The Bible says that Messiah is coming to rid the world of the religions of men, that includes Judaism. As for me & my house, we simply serve YHWH in spirit & truth, we have no need of worshiping according to the dogmas of men that were nailed to the cross, dogmas which Yeshua made a mockery of.

    And that is where you are deceived, you believe ones needs a religion to worship Elohim, when Abraham our father gave us the example we are to follow, that if His spirit is in us as it was in Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Caleb, Joshua, David, Ruth, etc., etc., then we have no need for men to teach us how to worship as His spirit will guide us and teach us ALL His truth. And THIS is the message that the religions of men deny, including Judaism that rejects Yeshua as their Messiah so to set up another who will come in his own name, they deny the power of His spirit of truth that He gave freely to ALL who had ears to hear & eyes to see & humility in their hearts so to receive His spirit.

    And so it is my prayer daily that those of Judah who are deceived would have their eyes & ears opened to the truth of their Messiah, not the false messiah & the false gospel promoted by mainstream Christianity. Judah is my blood brethren, however, so is ALL of humanity through Adam, and so this brings to light the gravity of “love they neighbor as thyself as well as Yeshua’s message to love our enemies, do good to those who hate us and pray for those who persecute us, because, a man's enemies are those of his own household. (Mt 5:44, 10:36, Micah 7:6 which shines a great light on His message in Zach 14 & Ezekiel 11) Shalom

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/27/2016 6:55:47 PM PDT · 80 of 83
    patlin to mrobisr
    Who said anything about God not loving anyone? Certainly not me. Have you not read in His Word where even Edomites enter the eternal kingdom?

    And as I said, Zach 14 contains several messages for many peoples, which would you prefer I address? Would you like me to begin with the fact that upon Messiah's return, the majority of those who call themselves “Jews” are going to be sent into exile again? Would you like me to expound upon this end times exile that is also written of by Ezekiel so to bring the exiled ones back under the bond of the covenant with Messiah that they broke, and how as it was in the wilderness, so it will be again, many who claim to be Israel will be purged from His midst (rebellion of Korah which is modern Zionism) and NEVER enter His Promised Land?

    And FYI, Hebrew does NOT equate to Judaism in the slightest, Judaism is man made, a Hebrew is one who has turned from the religious doctrines and traditions of men in order to serve God as He desires to be served, in spirit & truth while never looking for an earthly reward, but for the reward of eternal life to come in the city whose make is God.

    Shalom

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/26/2016 6:50:19 PM PDT · 74 of 83
    patlin to amorphous
    You didn't tell me anything that I didn't already know & FYI, obedience is for reward, NOT salvation, salvation comes by His grace alone. Of course, one must understand what it means to confess, to repent & then to walk out ones faith so that it produces the fruit that begets His rewards He has waiting for us. Not all walking in obedience is obedience is His eyes, just as not all who claim to be Israel are actually Israel.

    You shall know them by their fruits, whether they be of Elohim or not.

    Shalom

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/26/2016 10:00:07 AM PDT · 68 of 83
    patlin to mrobisr
    Show me in the OT where YHWH calls His faith that was in Abraham, Judaism? Abraham did not obey men, he did not attend synagogue in order to understand our Creator's instructions (Torah).

    HINT: If it has an “ism” or “ianity” at the end of it, IT IS a man made religion that has taken His pure instructions and added heavy burdens to them which then takes away the freedom of the people to worship Him in Spirit & Truth as it was in the beginning, as it was for our father Abraham!!!

    Judaism: “of Judah” : 2Kg 17:19 Yehudah, also did not guard the commands of YHWH their Elohim, but walked in the statutes (chuqqah:laws, appointments, ordinances, custom, traditions) of Yisrael which they made.

    LONG before Babylon, Judah had already conspired to usurp the authority of YHWH by the "chuqqah" that she had made which today we know as "Judaism"!!!

    Shalom

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/23/2016 6:48:20 AM PDT · 64 of 83
    patlin to Read Write Repeat

    Shabbat Shalom,

    I would welcome some insight as to specifics of what you would like me to read as well as a valid link to it since the link you provided is not a valid web address. There are several sites that display the Aleppo Codex, please be more specific as to which site you are referring to.

    Shalom

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/22/2016 7:50:42 AM PDT · 62 of 83
    patlin to mrobisr

    What specifically do you want interpreted? Zachary 14 is not a one note chapter, it reveals many implications for many different people.

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/22/2016 7:43:09 AM PDT · 61 of 83
    patlin to mrobisr
    Judaism = oral law/traditions that carried severe physical & financial consequences for breaking them. Today this is known as the Talmudism. Jesus definitely rebuked it and He specifically came to free His people from these man made yokes. Shalom
  • Mark Levin is a big dummy?

    07/22/2016 7:39:21 AM PDT · 5 of 85
    patlin to Huck

    Levinis a globalist, always has been

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/21/2016 4:32:30 PM PDT · 56 of 83
    patlin to Read Write Repeat
    Boy, are you in for a shock

    oh, please, do go on with the details of this shock you think I am going to experience & please, use Scripture to back up your position.

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/20/2016 8:25:49 PM PDT · 40 of 83
    patlin to dznutz
  • LIVE THREAD:RNC National Convention Day 3 July 20, 2016 starts @ 7pm ET

    07/20/2016 8:23:10 PM PDT · 3,056 of 3,398
    patlin to mylife
    why do yall hate this man

    Please do not put words in my mouth that I did not say. I hate no man, however, there are plenty of men in whom I have no respect for, number one on the list today, the unrepentant Canadian Cruz Liar.

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/20/2016 8:19:18 PM PDT · 39 of 83
    patlin to amorphous
    Yeshua rebuked those things that the leaders had taken away from the Torah by their adding to the Torah, do not add to and do not take away. Paul (Shaul) reminded us to cling to the simplicity that is Messiah. Well, Messiah is the living Torah, He is the Word of Life spoken of by Moses in Dt 32:46-47. That Word does not detail how we are to wash our hands, how we are to put on and tie our shoes, but most importantly, that Word teaches us that our enemies are those of our own household, and He wasn't speaking of Esau, He was speaking of the brothers who sold Joseph into bondage.

    I see Hebrews as an epistle of encouragement, sent to the assembly in Jerusalem who was soon to see the temple destroyed and so the writer sent a word of encouragement to the remnant in Jerusalem to cling to Messiah who is in them, for the slaughtering of animals was not the sacrifice that Elohim ever wanted,(Ps 40:6-8) He wanted sacrificed (circumcised) hearts (Dt 5:29,30:6). The new covenant was revealed before the children of Israel crossed the Jordan, centuries before Jeremiah prophesied of it and over a millennium before the writer of the epistle to the Hebrews reminded the remnant. We are never to look to the earthly things, we are to set our hearts on the things of His Spirit, His Torah that leads us to the Living Torah, Yeshua the Messiah.

    Rom 7:12 So that the Torah truly is set-apart, and the command set-apart, and righteous, and good. ... 14 For we know that the Torah is Spiritual, ...

  • LIVE THREAD:RNC National Convention Day 3 July 20, 2016 starts @ 7pm ET

    07/20/2016 7:03:31 PM PDT · 2,188 of 3,398
    patlin to mylife
    All the man did was espouse our deepest ideals and tell people not to stay home

    He did not say support Trump, he said vote your conscience, a.k.a. ‘write my name on the ballot’, that is how much of a narcissistic the Canadian Cruz Lair is.

  • Top rabbis: Unmistakable signs of Messiah coming

    07/20/2016 6:27:24 PM PDT · 10 of 83
    patlin to amorphous
    ... as believers in Jesus Christ rediscover the source of their beliefs in both Judaism and the Torah

    Christ rebuked Judaism (Talmud aka oral law/dogma, see Mt 15-16 & Mk 7-8; Col 2:8,14-15,20-23; Eph 2:2,15-16), thus anyone Christian turning to Judaism (salvation through works alone) has utterly succumbed to the great delusion of 2 Thess 2.

  • Iran Tortured This Marine — But the US Government Won't Do Anything About It

    05/16/2016 8:36:29 PM PDT · 17 of 20
    patlin to thoughtomator

    Google: marine Iran prison passport

    It was covered by many conservative media outlets. The guy supposedly has now formally renounced his Iranian citizenship and given up his Iranian passport.

  • Iran Tortured This Marine — But the US Government Won't Do Anything About It

    05/16/2016 7:01:03 PM PDT · 15 of 20
    patlin to Cementjungle

    He entered Iran on his Iranian passport as an Iranian citizen, therefore, by doing so, he abjured his right to US protection abroad. This is why dual citizenship, while it is unlawfully tolerated, the US State Dept. warns those entering the foreign country of their birth on their foreign passports that doing so is not advised because of the legal ramifications. While it may make entry easier, by doing so, they subject themselves to the full law of that foreign country, both civil & political. At that moment of entry into the foreign country on the passport of that foreign country the US no longer has any legal authority to step in on their behalf because in the eyes of the law, they are foreigners to the US govt. and citizens under the country of the passport they used.

    The ignorance of the law, even here on freepers, is astounding, especially in light of this site’s support of our military. And for the life of me, I do not understand the logic of one who swears an oath to the US and to uphold & protect the US Constitution, why that person would even entertain traveling as a foreigner & not as a proud US active duty/veteran of the US military.

  • John McCain Slips in Provision to Draft Women in Defense Bill [With Updates]

    05/13/2016 2:17:34 PM PDT · 74 of 133
    patlin to aynrandfreak

    And that sounds like the response of one who does not understand the religion of the Pharisees whom Jesus & John rebuked, for their religion states, and I quote...

    “A Jew who kills a Christian commits no sin, but offers an acceptable sacrifice to G_d.”

    And for the record, I am a “Jew” by descent, therefore, according to my brethren, I am a self-hater, not an anti-Semite.

    I suggest you go and look up Ben Gurion’s prediction in the special addition of LOOK Magazine, Jan. 16, 1962 “The Next 25 Years”. The entire special addition, with quotes from JFK, MLK, and many many more prominent leaders of that time, many of which have been fulfilled are quite revealing as to the trend of world globalization that we see today. I would also venture to guess that what you call Zionism & what Ben Gurion and those of his ilk call Zionism are two very different things as theirs is rooted in the Talmud & the Zohar, while yours is rooted in a misunderstanding of what it means to ‘pray for the peace of Jerusalem’.

    Shalom & may you have a blessed Shabbat

  • John McCain Slips in Provision to Draft Women in Defense Bill [With Updates]

    05/13/2016 9:34:26 AM PDT · 38 of 133
    patlin to Da Bilge Troll
    Zionist hypocrisy must be defeated, especially those who serve in the military in Zionist Israel, yet they refused to serve the country they claim to be a citizen of ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtDSwyCPEsQ

    This type of one world Zionism is opposed to biblical teaching and therefore, it is opposed to Christ, the Word of God who instructed Moses, gather the men to fight. No where is it written that women should ever be required to sign up for military service. Deuteronomy 24

  • John McCain Slips in Provision to Draft Women in Defense Bill [With Updates]

    05/13/2016 9:22:29 AM PDT · 29 of 133
    patlin to Romulus
    Any country that sends(requires) women to fight for it is no longer worth fighting for

    DITTO That!

  • On “SNL” Dana Carvey’s Church Lady Returns To Interview Trump and Cruz

    05/08/2016 9:49:09 AM PDT · 19 of 22
    patlin to heterosupremacist
    I don't care what you say, that there was funny!

    Oh, I'm sorry, did my comment offend you? @ 5:40 http://youtu.be/00Et3uOmmLQ

  • The May 3 Indiana Live Thread. Polls close at 6 pm Eastern/Central

    05/03/2016 6:20:40 PM PDT · 393 of 397
    patlin to hole_n_one
    Ah, if one listened carefully to Carly's intro... It was obvious that this was going to be a suspension speech, well that and the fact there were teleprompters there.
  • No, Ted Cruz was not ‘John Boehner’s lawyer’

    04/29/2016 11:58:52 AM PDT · 32 of 110
    patlin to OneVike
    So you are telling us that the Seattle Times got it wring in 1998?

    http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19980602&slug=2754000

    Tuesday, June 2, 1998 - Page updated at 12:00 AM

    Campaign Money To Fight Mcdermott

    By James V. Grimaldi

    Seattle Times Washington Bureau

    [excerpt] But Ted Cruz, Boehner’s attorney, said the fund-raising letter demonstrates nothing and highlights the weakness of McDermott’s defense. Boehner alleges that McDermott gave the taped phone call - which Republicans argue did not violate any promise made by Gingrich - to The New York Times, The Atlanta Journal and Roll Call, a semiweekly congressional newspaper.

    “The fund-raising letter is much ado about nothing,” Cruz said. “Congressman McDermott has consistently attempted to delay the litigation and drive up the expense. It is reasonably expected that Congressman Boehner will use the means at his disposal to raise the funds to pursue this lawsuit.”

    You would have us believe that Ted Cruz, who admitted to the Seattle Times that he was indeed the attorney for Boehner, didn't really mean he was the actual attorney, but just a paper pusher?

    Yeah, and I have some ocean front property in South Dakota you might also be interested in.

  • Israeli car engine could halve fuel costs, emissions

    04/29/2016 11:07:55 AM PDT · 19 of 87
    patlin to DJ Taylor

    my guess is this is going to go the same way of the now defunct Israeli electric car company ...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/business/global/israeli-electric-car-company-files-for-liquidation.html

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Better_Place

  • Obama-Netanyahu Rift Impedes U.S. Offer of Record Aid Deal for Israel

    04/29/2016 7:42:36 AM PDT · 3 of 15
    patlin to DoodleDawg
    (JPS) ... Deu 15:4 Howbeit there shall be no needy among you - for the LORD will surely bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it - 5 if only thou diligently hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to observe to do all this commandment which I command thee this day. 6 For the LORD thy God will bless thee, as He promised thee; and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow;

    Deu 28:13 And the LORD will make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath; if thou shalt hearken unto the commandments of the LORD thy God, which I command thee this day, to observe and to do them; 14 and shalt not turn aside from any of the words which I command you this day, to the right hand, or to the left, to go after other gods to serve them. 15 But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to observe to do all His commandments and His statutes which I command thee this day; that all these curses shall come upon thee, and overtake thee. ...

    So if this Zionist state is of God, then how come they borrowing and not lending as God promised? How come they are the biggest welfare receiving nation in the world? And FYI... the ‘voice of the LORD thy God’ is none other than Christ, the Son of God the Father... Acts 7:38-39, Hebrews 3-4, John 1:1-18 (vv 10-13, 18), 3:13. From the beginning, it has always been the Son acting on behalf of the Father, doing what the Father gave Him to do by coming in the Father's Name. And He will continue in this work given to Him until all has been accomplished and the Father then comes to reign over all, including the Son. 1Cor 15:25-28, Rev 21:3

  • ADL Urges Donald Trump to Reconsider "America First" in Foreign Policy Approach

    04/29/2016 7:04:59 AM PDT · 21 of 75
    patlin to VitacoreVision
    The Pharisees are so scared of Trump removing their power over the sheeple, they are still as rabid as they were in the days Christ walked the earth in the flesh. Trump is the only candidate who will put America first rather than the Zionist first doctrines the sheeple have blindly followed. Not all Zionist interests are in the best interest of America
  • Some Common Misperceptions About the Date of Pascha/Easter

    04/26/2016 7:06:22 AM PDT · 2 of 8
    patlin to marshmallow

    Oy-vey

  • The Donald Trump Prophecy - End Time Presidential Election 2016

    04/24/2016 3:00:34 PM PDT · 62 of 71
    patlin to patriot08

    The problem is, government was never meant to be the moral police. And as far as the guy knowing the bible, memorizing Scripture is by no means the measure of ones ability to interpret proprphesy.

    Take Ez 38 which he mentioned, which he says this war must take place before Messiah returns. Ezekiel prophesies about a time when Gog & Magog come up against Israel at a time when Messiah is reigning, when there is total peace in the land, where there is not one wall surrounding any city.

    Now go read Rev 20:7-10 because this is the time that Ezekiel is prophesying about. Sorry, this guy is a Mt 24 false prophet. Shalom

  • The Donald Trump Prophecy - End Time Presidential Election 2016

    04/24/2016 11:02:50 AM PDT · 56 of 71
    patlin to Iscool
    Oh, puh-leeeese! This guy should stick to the problems of his own nation. He invokes the name of Cyrus and eludes that Trump's name is somehow coded in biblical prophesy as if Trump is going to be some kind of savior to Zionist Israel and the world. Then he goes on to lecture Trump as if Trump even has a clue about this false prophet. Yeah, like Trump is going to take advice from a two bit bible huckster.

    An outsider in the bible is one not born of native, I. E. His father is a foreigner, it has nothing to do with political status and to try and elude such a notion is proof of this guy's absolute ignorance of true biblical prophesy.

    There is so much wrong with this message that God Himself is laughing. Psalm 59:8, Prov 1:26

  • The Donald Trump Prophecy - End Time Presidential Election 2016

    04/24/2016 5:34:06 AM PDT · 41 of 71
    patlin to Iscool
    Not only is this just another hit piece, it also speaks to the biblical ignorance of these false prophets and those who follow them.

    The first thing that came to my mind was, Neb & Cyrus were not natural born Israelites, they were natural born foreigners!!! So pardon me if I do not take a word of this very bad intern of end times prophesy seriously, because seriously, it absolutely left me ROFL!!!

  • Trump’s Delegates Are Now Begging for Money Online

    04/21/2016 3:46:32 PM PDT · 71 of 75
    patlin to TexasCajun

    I prefer the delegate rules here in South Dakota where one has to prove up front, that is prove they already have the specified funds needed per SD GOP delegate rules, before they can even be considered as a delegate to the national convention.

  • Cruz: I'm an outsider like Sanders

    04/19/2016 7:53:08 PM PDT · 22 of 66
    patlin to kevcol
    “I want to congratulate him on winning Texas, that was an excellent win,” Trump said of Cruz. “I do congratulate Ted because I know how hard Ted worked on Texas now that’s a big get—now I also did well in Texas, I came in second in the state,” Trump said.

    Via Breitbart, March 2, 2016

    Trump presidential, Ted Cruz not so much!

  • UNESCO changes history, denies existence of Jerusalem Temple

    04/19/2016 7:22:17 PM PDT · 15 of 17
    patlin to Sean_Anthony
    People should really go home and actually read their bibles as what is called the Temple Mount today, this hill is NOT part of the original walled City of David where the original Temple was located. The original Temple was near the Gihon Spring and recent archeology findings have discovered have confirmed what is written in His Word as well as the many Jewish historians such as Josephus.

    What is today called the Temple Mount is the remnants of the old Roman fortress Antonia that housed many pagan temples, so why are the Jews hell bent on building a Temple to YHWH in the ‘high place’ where Solomon built the pagan temples for his wives, where the Romans built their pagan temples to their gods?

    I know why, however, the vast majority, they have chosen the great delusion over His Truth. FYI, for there to be an ‘anti-Christ’ there must first be an anti anti-Christ, you know, the strawman the anti-Christ must destroy for the people to be deceived into following him.

    It's all in the Good Book, ya’ll should spend more time with it rather than gorging on the propaganda of the anti-Christ.

    Shalom

  • Anyone hear Cruz interview on Sean Hannity Radio today?(Vanity)

    04/19/2016 4:46:55 PM PDT · 78 of 108
    patlin to for-q-clinton

    Has nothing to do with being in the 1% generally and everything to do with the type of activity that generates the revenue as to whether you’re in the unprivileged 1% or the taxable privileged 1%. There are many unprivileged 1%’ers.

    We. Paid our fair share for years until we learned the truth of the tax and since then the freeloaders have to look elsewhere for their money because they are not getting ours, And those freeloaders begin with the political cronies elected or otherwise.

  • MORE CRUZ CHEATING IN MISSOURI=> Same MO Couple Won TWO Different Caucuses

    04/19/2016 4:18:47 PM PDT · 52 of 57
    patlin to musicman
  • Anyone hear Cruz interview on Sean Hannity Radio today?(Vanity)

    04/19/2016 3:35:35 PM PDT · 48 of 108
    patlin to for-q-clinton

    if you are not engaged in privileged activity that creates gains or profits, and you paid someone nearly a grand to do your taxes, the problem is not the IRS, the problem is your ignorance of the nature of the 16th Amendment income EXCISE tax that is limited to certain privileged activities.

    As stated by Milton Freidman in 1942, because the government ‘information forms’ will be sent to and filled out by every business, from sally’s alterations to jim’s grocery, ‘income taxes’ will be withheld from a great deal of person’s earnings who do not owe the tax. And to get the erroneously held tax refunded and back in your bank account where is should have been all along, one needs to file the proper forms with the IRS that rebut the erroneous information the ignorant employers put on those govt forms that are meant to be used ONLY for reporting gains/profits from privileged activity.

    We are self employed, thus we do not have anyone filing erroneous information in our name/SS number, therefore we are not required to file any rebuttals. Our granddaughter’s parents filed early this year and have received back 100% of all income & FICA taxes withheld, just as the law states they should.

    So maybe you should become an informed filer rather than letting an agent of the IRS do your taxes, YES.. ALL CPA’s are agents of the IRS due to the nature of the privilege they receive by their working association with the IRS. The ONLY ones in need of a CPA are those engaged in privileged activity. Anyone not engaged in privileged activity need only to take less than 30 min to file out the rebuttal forms, put them in an envelope and mail them to the proper IRS facility that is associated with the state wherein you live.

  • MORE CRUZ CHEATING IN MISSOURI=> Same MO Couple Won TWO Different Caucuses

    04/19/2016 2:28:57 PM PDT · 31 of 57
    patlin to musicman; 2ndDivisionVet; All
    Sweet, thanks for pulling this piece of history from the chief posting constitutional hypocrite for Cruz...

    To: jamese777 who said... "... verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen."

    2DV replies...

    Those are two VERY different things! Dr. Fukino should stick to medicine and not dabble in constitutional law. I don't care if he was born in the Lincoln bedroom! If Barack Hussein Mohammed Obama, Senior (A British subject from Kenya) is Mr. Obama’s father, there is no way he is a natural-born citizen!! Native-born, perhaps, but that's not what the constitution calls for.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2511742/posts?page=20#20

    20 posted on ‎5‎/‎12‎/‎2010‎ ‎3‎:‎03‎:‎41‎ ‎PM by 2ndDivisionVet (Don't care if he was born in a manger on July 4th! A "Natural Born" citizen requires two US parents!)

    So 2DV, how does it fell to be a constitutional hypocrite for Cruz?!

  • 45% of Americans pay no federal income tax

    04/18/2016 7:29:05 PM PDT · 41 of 50
    patlin to george76

    When it comes to all federal taxes...

    Maybe the author of this article should’ve studied the tax laws before writing the article because every tax listed in that paragraph above are all excise taxes. Every single one of them including income and payroll of any kind! Excise taxes are taxes on privileged activity, they have nothing to do with unprivileged private sector earnings.

  • Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    04/18/2016 5:30:38 PM PDT · 18 of 23
    patlin to all the best

    Not only is there a legitimate taxation, there is also a legitimate filing! Daughter and son-in-law filed their taxes with the proper forms regarding the information on the erroneous W-2s and 1099s and without any questions they received back 100% of all income tax withheld along with 100% of all FICA taxes withheld! The problem isn’t the law, The problem is the people’s ignorance of the law!

  • A scriptural defense of the Perpetual virginity of Mary

    04/15/2016 12:09:56 PM PDT · 64 of 398
    patlin to sasportas
    And no, circumcision has nothing to do with salvation, but it does have everything to do with reward...

    Eze 44:9 Thus says YHWH (the Lord): No son of a foreigner, uncircumcised in heart or uncircumcised in flesh, comes into My set-apart place, even any son of a foreigner who is among the children of Israel.

    Circumcision of the heart as well as the flesh... Jer 31, Heb 8, they are the SAME covenant. It is not the terms of the covenant that the belief in Christ changes, it is where the terms of the covenant are written, no longer in stone, but now in the flesh of our hearts as Moses taught it would be...

    Rom 10:5 For Moses writes about the righteousness that is based on the law, that the person who does the commandments shall live by them. 6 But the righteousness based on faith says, “Do not say in your heart, ‘Who will ascend into heaven?’” (that is, to bring Christ down) 7 or “’Who will descend into the abyss?’” (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead). 8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart” (that is, the word of faith that we proclaim);

    PAUL WAS QUOTING FROM MOSES...

    Deu 30:9 YHWH (the LORD) your Elohim (God) will make you abundantly prosperous in all the work of your hand, in the fruit of your womb and in the fruit of your cattle and in the fruit of your ground. For YHWH (the LORD) will again take delight in prospering you, as he took delight in your fathers, 10 when you obey the voice of YHWH (the LORD) your God, to keep his commandments and his statutes that are written in this Book of the Torah (Law), when you turn to YHWH (the LORD) your Elohim (God) with all your heart and with all your soul. 11 For this commandment that I command you today is not too hard for you, neither is it far off. 12 It is not in heaven, that you should say, Who will ascend to heaven for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it? 13 Neither is it beyond the sea, that you should say, Who will go over the sea for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it? 14 But the word is very near you. It is in your mouth and in your heart, so that you can do it.

    Faith isn't just confessing that Jesus is the Christ, it is as Peter instructed us, following the example that Christ left us to follow, who was obedient to the Father unto death and His commandments are not burdensome, however, those of men are and that is why I chose to purge the leaven of men from by walk as Christ instructed us to, so to walk as Christ walked. Not that I am perfect, for He is my perfection when I stumble and without Him, there is no salvation for anyone for ALL mankind has fallen short of the glory of Elohim (God) and in need of a Savior.

    Therefore, we must be careful no to confuse the Torah (Law) of God with the laws of men that corrupt the Torah (Law) of Elohim (God). At least, that is what my Bible teaches from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21.

    And so as I sit and reflect upon the many weekends I sat in Catholic mass with my grandparents of another religion, I never could understand this doctrine that Mary died a virgin when the Bible is clear that she didn't.

    Shalom!

  • A scriptural defense of the Perpetual virginity of Mary

    04/15/2016 10:59:40 AM PDT · 56 of 398
    patlin to sasportas

    Go read the first part of Matthew 16, then read Mark chapter 7 & 8, and then proceed to Luke chapter 12 as Galatians has nothing to do with the doctrines of Christ, but all the man made religious doctrines and traditions that have nothing to do with Moses, or for that matter, Christ, as Christ dictated to Moses ALL of His doctrines He says, “not one jot or tittle shall fall” from that which He gave to Moses for our instruction in the doctrines and teachings of Christ.

  • A scriptural defense of the Perpetual virginity of Mary

    04/15/2016 9:42:40 AM PDT · 38 of 398
    patlin to sasportas
    I am not Hebrew Roots, however, since we do speak English here in America and you used Greek text, then why do you criticize me for using the biblical language of my great grandparents? You assume that which you do not know, therefore, you could have been polite and asked me.

    If Hebrew isn't important, then how come the writers of the New Testament, including the Revelation of Jesus given to John, felt that it was so important so to include it in their writings?

    Act_21:40 And when he had given him permission, Paul, standing on the steps, motioned with his hand to the people. And when there was a great hush, he addressed them in the Hebrew language, saying:
    Act_22:2 And when they heard that he was addressing them in the Hebrew language, they became even more quiet. And he said:
    Act_26:14 And when we had all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice saying to me in the Hebrew language, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’
    Php_3:5 circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee;
    Rev_9:11 They have as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit. His name in Hebrew is Abaddon, and in Greek he is called Apollyon.
    Rev_16:16 And they assembled them at the place that in Hebrew is called Armageddon.

    And as far as the Hebrew no longer being valid, the early church fathers have much to say about the assemblies of Christ that continued in the Hebrew language, even unto the 4th century...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazarene_(sect)

    ...and while I do not agree that the Nazarenes were “Jewish” as ‘Jewish” is defined by the Talmud and not the bible, I have studied and verified the writings in this book, historical writings of the earliest church fathers that clearly reveal that indeed, the Hebrew language was never cast aside for the Greek and why? Because the Greeks were going to the Hebrew speaking synagogues to hear the Gospel of Christ!

    Act 13:42 As they went out, the people begged that these things might be told them the next Sabbath. 43 And after the meeting of the synagogue broke up, many Jews and devout converts to Judaism followed Paul and Barnabas, who, as they spoke with them, urged them to continue in the grace of God. 44 The next Sabbath almost the whole city gathered to hear the word of the Lord. 45 But when the Jews saw the crowds, they were filled with jealousy and began to contradict what was spoken by Paul, reviling him.

    http://www.amazon.com/Nazarene-Jewish-Christianity-Ray-Pritz/dp/9652237981

    So the questions are “Why did the majority of the church fathers divorce themselves from the original sect of the Nazarenes that Paul was accused of being the leader of?” “Why were these Nazarenes hated by both Jew & Greco-Roman religions?”

    Therefore, why nit pick over tongues rather than reply with substance? Ad hominem attacks are used by those who can not support their theological beliefs using His Word alone.

    And yes, the chief cornerstone is Christ and it was the faith of Peter, i.e. the faith of Christ in him that Christ's assembly is built upon.

    Acts 7:38 Christ's assembly was gathered in the wilderness at Mt Sinai...

    1Peter 1-2 Peter instructs us on that assembly in the wilderness and the difference between those who believed and those who did not

    1Cor 10 Paul instructs us that Christ was with the Israelites in the wilderness and that they are examples that we are to learn from (see also Heb 3-4)

    And finally, why where the "KEYS" of binding and unbinding given to ALL the disciples of Christ? Jesus said He gave them to ALL, not just to Peter. Matthew 18:18 Shalom!

  • A scriptural defense of the Perpetual virginity of Mary

    04/15/2016 8:00:02 AM PDT · 10 of 398
    patlin to verga
    How come this teaching does not include these passages?

    Luk 2:22 And when the days of her cleansing according to the Torah of Mosheh were completed, they brought Him to Jerusalem to present Him to YHWH – 23 as it has been written in the Torah of YHWH, “Every male who opens the womb shall be called set-apart to YHWH” –

    When a womb is ‘opened’, virginity no longer exists and hence, the reason for the need for cleansing...

    Lev 12:1 And YHWH spoke to Mosheh, saying, 2 “Speak to the children of Israel, saying, ‘When a woman has conceived, and has given birth to a male child, then she shall be unclean seven days, as in the days of her monthly separation she is unclean. 3 And on the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin is circumcised. 4 And she remains in the blood of her cleansing thirty-three days. She does not touch whatever is set-apart, and she does not come into the set-apart place until the days of her cleansing are completed. 5 But if she gives birth to a female child, then she shall be unclean for two weeks, as in her monthly separation, and she remains in the blood of her cleansing for sixty-six days. 6 And when the days of her cleansing are completed, for a son or for a daughter, she brings to the priest a lamb a year old, as a burnt offering, and a young pigeon or a turtledove as a sin offering, to the door of the Tent of Meeting. 7 And he shall bring it before YHWH, and make atonement for her, and she shall be cleansed from the flow of her blood. This is the Torah for her who has given birth to a male or a female. 8 And if she is not able to bring a lamb, then she shall bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons, one as a burnt offering and the other as a sin offering. And the priest shall make atonement for her, and she shall be clean.”

    The account in the Gospels is very vague and many assume that the day of circumcision & the bringing of the sacrifice for cleansing happened at the same time. They did not. These are two separate events that happened 21 days apart, the 8th day after birth & the 33rd day after birth. But the fact remains, if Mary remained pure as a virgin in that there was no shedding of blood during the birth of Jesus, then how come she brought the required sacrifice that is only required by one who is not longer a virgin?

  • Conservative Wing of California Republicans Endorse Cruz for President

    04/13/2016 7:31:12 PM PDT · 68 of 68
    patlin to CA Conservative

    I realize that you probably just attended a Cruz rally and are all excited at the prospects of a natural born Canadian becoming our next president, however, not all of us are constitutionally illiterate, neither are we deceived by the biased media mafia.

  • Conservative Wing of California Republicans Endorse Cruz for President

    04/13/2016 10:00:59 AM PDT · 66 of 68
    patlin to CA Conservative
    Cruz never asked them to

    you have no proof of this, and yes, I have read the articles and they do elude to someone initiating this conversation on a Senate resolution & that someone would more than likely have been Ted Cruz.

    hint,... the media mafia does not report every detail as they have their own agenda that drives their reporting ... learn to read between the lines!

  • Ted Cruz risks primary disqualification in N.J. resulting from charges of ballot access fraud

    04/12/2016 11:22:02 AM PDT · 709 of 734
    patlin to Moseley
    Cruz relies on the 1790 Act of Congress in regards to his citizenship status. That Naturalization Act of Congress was repealed and replaced with a new one that removed the term “natural born” because Congress was only given authority to make as citizens, those born as aliens, a.k.a. naturalization, hence that Act of Congress was rightly called, the Naturalization Act of 1790. If your citizenship is conferred upon you by an act of Congress, you are a naturalized citizen, whether that act of Congress takes place at birth or at a later date.
  • Ted Cruz risks primary disqualification in N.J. resulting from charges of ballot access fraud

    04/12/2016 8:33:06 AM PDT · 696 of 734
    patlin to Moseley
    Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815 (1971)
    https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/401/815/case.html

    Page 401 U. S. 817

    The plaintiff's father has always been a citizen of Italy, and never has acquired United States citizenship. The plaintiff's mother, however, was born in Philadelphia in 1915

    same scenario as Ted Cruz, foreign father, US citizen mother, born in a foreign country

    Page 401 U. S. 827...

    It is evident that Congress felt itself possessed of the power to grant citizenship to the foreign born, and, at the same time, to impose qualifications and conditions for that citizenship. Of course, Congress obviously felt that way, too, about the two expatriation provisions invalidated by the decisions in Schneider and Afroyim.

    We look again, then, at the Constitution, and further indulge in history's assistance:

    Of initial significance, because of its being the foundation stone of the Court's decisional structure in Afroyim, and, perhaps by a process of after-the-fact osmosis of the earlier Schneider as well, is the Fourteenth Amendment's opening sentence:

    “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

    The central fact in our weighing of the plaintiff's claim to continuing and therefore current United States citizenship is that he was born abroad. He was not born in the United States. He was not naturalized in the United States. And he has not been subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. All this being so, it seems indisputable that the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment has no application to plaintiff Bellei. He simply is not a “Fourteenth Amendment first sentence” citizen. His posture contrasts with that of Mr. Afroyim, who was naturalized in the United States, and with that of Mrs. Schneider, whose citizenship was derivative by her presence here and by her mother's naturalization here.

    Page 401 U. S. 828

    The plaintiff's claim thus must center in the statutory power of Congress and in the appropriate exercise of that power within the restrictions of any pertinent constitutional provisions other than the Fourteenth Amendment's first sentence.

    The reach of congressional power in this area is readily apparent:

    1. Over 70 years ago, the Court, in an opinion by Mr. Justice Gray, reviewed and discussed early English statutes relating to rights of inheritance and of citizenship of persons born abroad of parents who were British subjects. United States v. Won Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 169 U. S. 668-671 (1898). The Court concluded that “naturalization by descent” was not a common law concept, but was dependent, instead, upon statutory enactment. The statutes examined were 25 Edw. 3, Stat. 2 (1350); 29 Car. 2, c. 6 (1677); 7 Anne, c. 5, § 3 (1708); 4 Geo. 2, c. 21 (1731); and 13 Geo. 3, c. 21 (1773). Later, Mr. Chief Justice Taft, speaking for a unanimous Court, referred to this “very learned and useful opinion of Mr. Justice Gray,” and observed

    “that birth within the limits of the jurisdiction of the Crown, and of the United States, as the successor of the Crown, fixed nationality, and that there could be no change in this rule of law except by statute. . . .”

    Now go read the rest of the 1971 SCOTUS ruling that took place 1 year after Cruz was born, however, was a case in which the plaintiff's situation at birth was exactly the same as Ted Cruz. The SCOTUS ruled that Bellei was “naturalized at birth, just as the SCOTUS had determined to be the case over 100 years ago. Rogers v. Bellei has never been overruled, therefore, its decision is still valid and it applies to Ted Cruz who by law is a naturalized US citizen.

  • Ted Cruz risks primary disqualification in N.J. resulting from charges of ballot access fraud

    04/12/2016 7:42:22 AM PDT · 687 of 734
    patlin to Moseley
    Under our Constitution, distinctions between the legal rights of males and females have been erased

    #1... Article II qualifications were defined in 1787, therefore, any change to Article II qualifications must done by Amendment. The 14th Amendment does not do this.

    #2... again, if it takes a “law/statute” to make you a citizen, you are a naturalized citizen. And the governing law at the time Cruz was born defined him as a “nonquota” immigrant.

  • Ted Cruz risks primary disqualification in N.J. resulting from charges of ballot access fraud

    04/12/2016 7:37:07 AM PDT · 686 of 734
    patlin to Moseley
    Article 1 ... list the enumerated powers given to Congress of Congress

    [Constitution for the United States of America][1]

    We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

    Article. I.

    ...

    Section. 8. The Congress shall have Power...

    To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,...

    There is nothing at all in the enumerated powers concerning children born to fathers who are already citizens of the United States, PERIOD! Congress was ONLY given authority over those who were born aliens, a.k.a. citizens of another country, therefore, since Cruz held Canadian citizenship, that he had from birth until May 14, 2014, for purposes of the Constitution, he is a naturalized citizen, PERIOD!

    Ted Cruz is perfectly qualified to hold any office except that of the president & vice president.

    And the 14th Amendment gives no such power to Congress except that of naturalization because the 14th states, all person born "IN" the United States, PERIOD! Ted Cruz was not born "IN" the United States, therefore, the only way for him to be a citizen is under Congress's authority to naturalize him at birth because his mother was a US citizen.

  • Ted Cruz risks primary disqualification in N.J. resulting from charges of ballot access fraud

    04/12/2016 6:28:08 AM PDT · 670 of 734
    patlin to jdirt
    but the keyword, if you remember, was naturalborncitizen

    key word search ‘naturalborncitizen’ works fine for me... http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/naturalborncitizen/index?tab=articles

  • Ted Cruz risks primary disqualification in N.J. resulting from charges of ballot access fraud

    04/12/2016 6:20:15 AM PDT · 669 of 734
    patlin to Moseley
    “Congress ONLY has authority to make citizens through the process of naturalization. “

    Says who?

    It's called the Constitution of the United States. In it you will find no clause giving authority to make as citizens, children of citizen fathers.

    Library of Congress, Immigration & Naturalization(1840-1950)

    “Married women and children under the age of twenty-one derived citizenship from their husband or father respectively. Children of unsuccessful applicants could apply for citizenship in their own right, at the age of twenty-one.”