My question to those who believe that equal protection be extended to acting on sexual orientation.
What happens when the DSM-VI declares pedophilia and pederastry as mere ‘orientation’ rather than disorder... As early versions of the DSM-V declared?
Could the writers of the 14th Amendment ever have imagined that the constitution would protect the rights of the 80 year old man with the 8 year old bride? Also, would local non discrimination laws force people to participate either the ceremony or the celebration of such a union?
The lawyers on our side of the debate are absolutely failing if they don’t make this argument... Which is get real. What kind of precedents are we setting?