Free Republic 3rd Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $28,247
32%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 32% is in!! Please keep it coming in, folks. July is almost funded--now we need to cover August and September.

Posts by SvenMagnussen

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • GAME OF THRONES S05E10 DISCUSSION THREAD

    06/14/2015 5:35:02 PM PDT · 11 of 158
    SvenMagnussen to SvenMagnussen

    Jon Snow asks Benjen Stark, “Did my mother abandon me to show me mercy?”

    Benjen Stark responds, “Uhhhh, okay.”

  • GAME OF THRONES S05E10 DISCUSSION THREAD

    06/14/2015 5:29:52 PM PDT · 9 of 158
    SvenMagnussen to SvenMagnussen

    Jon Snow is covered in blood. His eyes roll back into his head and he ...

    is startled when BenJen Stark appears and says, “Your mother’s name is Wylla!”

  • GAME OF THRONES S05E10 DISCUSSION THREAD

    06/14/2015 5:20:16 PM PDT · 7 of 158
    SvenMagnussen to martin_fierro

    Jon Snow is covered in blood. His eyes roll back into his head and he ......?

  • Writing's On The Wall: Texas Pulls $1 Billion In Gold From NY Fed, Makes It "Non-Confiscatable"

    06/13/2015 2:28:51 PM PDT · 13 of 79
    SvenMagnussen to Rockitz

    The People have a right to alter or abolish the US Constitution. See Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton. An ineligible President cannot be removed or prevented from taking office because he is there by the will of the People. An ineligible President voids the US Constitution.

    It is time to start organizing for the development of a national governing document. Email svenmagnussen@conventionforamerica.com to start a ping list.

  • Senator Lee Argues That The Constitution Has Been Willfully Subverted -- He's Right

    06/11/2015 1:43:39 PM PDT · 20 of 25
    SvenMagnussen to All

    The first draft of America’s first written constitution was introduced into the Continental Congress record as, “The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union,” on July 12, 1776.

    Article I. THE Name of this Confederacy shall be “The United States of America.”

    Article II. The said Colonies unite themselves so as never to be Divided by any Act whatever, and hereby severally enter into a firm League of Friendship with each other, for the common Defence, the Security of their Liberties, and their mutual and general Welfare, binding the said Colonies to assist one another against all Force offered ...


    The US Constitution repealed and replaced the Articles of Confederation.

  • Senator Lee Argues That The Constitution Has Been Willfully Subverted -- He's Right

    06/11/2015 11:34:48 AM PDT · 14 of 25
    SvenMagnussen to Lurkinanloomin
    What do we call Post-Constitutional America?

    America survives an ineligible President. The US Constitution and the US federal government are voided by the installation of an ineligible President.

    America is governed by a de facto unitary executive and the Vice President until a national governing document is ratified by the people.

  • Senator Lee Argues That The Constitution Has Been Willfully Subverted -- He's Right

    06/11/2015 11:22:05 AM PDT · 11 of 25
    SvenMagnussen to reaganaut1

    The Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution ratified by the states. The states were sovereign and Congress served as a governing body to resolve disputes between the states, make treaties and alliances, maintain armed forces and coin money. Congress lacked authority to levy taxes and regulate commerce under the Articles of Confederation.

    An amendment to the Articles of Confederation required all states to ratify the amendment. Each state’s contribution to fund the Continental Congress rest on the value of its lands and improvements. The Continental Congress was unicameral and a centralized institution of government. Each state had one vote and delegates were elected by state legislatures.

    The inability of Congress to raise revenue and the improbability of an amendment to the Articles of Confederation led to a Constitutional Convention to repeal and replace the Articles of Confederation. The US Constitution required nine states to ratify it. See Article VII. Two states ratified the U.S. Constitution after President Washington was sworn in.

  • Magna Carta 2.0

    06/10/2015 12:50:45 PM PDT · 7 of 13
    SvenMagnussen to Academiadotorg

    Israel, New Zealand and Britain do not have written constitutions.

    After 800 years, Britain finally asks: Do we need a written constitution?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/after-800-years-britain-finally-asks-do-we-need-a-written-constitution/2015/06/07/6097b50c-e908-11e4-8581-633c536add4b_story.html

  • Britain has no written Constitution. Meet the man who drafted one.

    06/09/2015 8:26:02 AM PDT · 3 of 4
    SvenMagnussen to CondorFlight

    Proposed Consitutional Code begins on Page 32, A New Magna Carta? at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmpolcon/463/463.pdf

  • Britain has no written Constitution. Meet the man who drafted one.

    06/09/2015 8:03:43 AM PDT · 1 of 4
    SvenMagnussen
    Robert Blackburn: "There is growing momentum behind a written constitution coming from different quarters, reflecting the different advantages it has to offer. After several decades of academic debate on the arguments and issues involved at our universities and political societies, it is now a more familiar subject with many accepting it is a less radical and more “do-able” proposition compared to what they originally thought. Certainly the main challenge is achieving cross-party co-operation in a highly adversarial system of politics, but the growing pressures and sense of crisis in our political arrangements may well provide the required motivation to party leaders to think and work positively together towards a change that would greatly enhance our democracy and the stability of the country."
  • SCOTUS Sides With Obama (And Bush) In Fight Over Israeli Passports

    06/09/2015 7:37:36 AM PDT · 53 of 57
    SvenMagnussen to Alberta's Child

    Okay. If you can get Congress to pass a Congressional Act legislating a California born member of La Raza may request Los Angeles, Mexico printed on their US passports and the President signs the Act into law, then I’d support you’re demand to have Los Angeles, Mexico printed on the passport.

    But if the President says, “I signed that Act into law under protest so I refuse to allow the State Department print Los Angeles, Mexico on US passports”, then I don’t want to hear an argument that passports are US foreign policy and the President has exclusive rights to develop and foreign policy.

  • SCOTUS Sides With Obama (And Bush) In Fight Over Israeli Passports

    06/09/2015 7:36:08 AM PDT · 52 of 57
    SvenMagnussen to Alberta's Child

    Okay. If you can get Congress to pass a Congressional Act legislating a California born member of La Raza may request Los Angeles, Mexico printed on their US passports and the President signs the Act into law, then I’d support you’re demand to have Los Angeles, Mexico printed on the passport.

    But if the President says, “I signed that Act into law under protest so I refuse to allow the State Department print Los Angeles, Mexico on US passports”, then I don’t want to hear an argument that passports are US foreign policy and the President has exclusive rights to develop and foreign policy.

  • GAME OF THRONES S05E09 DISCUSSION THREAD

    06/08/2015 5:12:41 PM PDT · 83 of 90
    SvenMagnussen to chris37
    The Sansa rape scene didn’t bother me at all to be honest.

    Me either. Sansa is playing the game of thrones. That became evident in the Vale.

    I have no idea what they are trying to achieve with this Jamie and Bronn to Dorne nonsense.

    The Dornish are the only people to survive the Targarian Dragons. Rhaegar Targaryen and Ella Martell married to keep the peace and not because he loved her. Tryion did the right thing by sending Marcella to the Dornish even though Prince Oberyn knew it was Tywin Lannister who order the murder of Ella Martell. Now, Jamie is ruining it for the Lannisters. Woth the exception of Tyrion, the Lannisters are in freefall with Tywin.

    According to the books, Greyscale is fatal. Princess Shireen was goner and Stannis cut her suffering to a minimum.
  • SCOTUS Sides With Obama (And Bush) In Fight Over Israeli Passports

    06/08/2015 4:40:45 PM PDT · 45 of 57
    SvenMagnussen to Alberta's Child

    Anyone who objected to having Jerusalem, Israel as their place of birth on their US passport was given the choice to have their place of birth printed as Jerusalem on their US passport. Of course, the statist won’t stand for it. Choices lead to personal liberty and the statist would rather sue than allow that. Some US citizens will make their choices to make a public statement with their choice based on their First Amendment right to free speech. The statist will take to the Supreme Court to stop it.

    You’ve been browbeat into submission. Free yourself and demand personal liberty.

  • SCOTUS Sides With Obama (And Bush) In Fight Over Israeli Passports

    06/08/2015 1:41:41 PM PDT · 41 of 57
    SvenMagnussen to Alberta's Child

    Let’s be clear, a Congressional Act was enacted into US law by President Bush. President Bush, could have vetoed it, but chose not too. The law, signed into law by President Bush, gave US citizens a choice to have their place birth printed on their US passport as as Jerusalem, Israel or Jerusalem if they were born at that location.

    Since the law provided a choice to a particular set of US citizens and SCOTUS found that providing a choice to those US citizens is unconstitutional, then its an attack on free speech and individual liberty.

    It’s a step closer toward tyranny. It says Presidents can ignore sections of law they have signed into law if they disagree with the section, but sign it because they agreed with the other sections of the law.

  • SCOTUS Sides With Obama (And Bush) In Fight Over Israeli Passports

    06/08/2015 8:45:50 AM PDT · 21 of 57
    SvenMagnussen to Alberta's Child
    If I was a U.S. citizen born in East Berlin in the 1950s, I wonder how the U.S. State Department would list my place of birth if I went and got a passport for the first time today?

    The section of the law the petitioner and SCOTUS found unconstitutional stated the State Department will print Jerusalem, Israel as the place of birth for a US citizen if the US citizen requested it. Without a request from the US citizen, the State Department printed the place of birth as Jerusalem. It's an attack on an individual's liberty and free speech.

    SEC. 214. UNITED STATES POLICY WITH RESPECT TO JERUSALEM AS THE CAPITAL OF ISRAEL.

    (d) Record of Place of Birth as Israel for Passport Purposes.--For purposes of the registration of birth, certification of nationality, or issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in the city of Jerusalem, the Secretary shall, upon the request of the citizen or the citizen's legal guardian, record the place of birth as Israel.

  • Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded

    06/07/2015 9:40:20 AM PDT · 132 of 153
    SvenMagnussen to azishot

    After I was informed the FBI questioned Obama about naturalizing as a US citizen in 1983 and Obama admitted, I amended a complaint filed in the US District Court to include the FBI and Director James Comey in his personal and professional capacity. Further, I requesting a restraining order on the US government and other defendants with accompanying affidavits alleging threats made to myself and my witnesses.

    I was ignored by the court and then informed by the IRS and others that I have had my personal date compromised and should begin to prepare for the consequences of ID theft.

    My witnesses have withdrawn are afraid for their personal and financial safety. I’m concerned that providing public details about witness statements, dates of notification, details with respect to whistleblowers or anything specific will jeopardize their safety.

    That why I said members of the public should contact Comey directly. Tell Comey what you’ve read, that it concerns you and you would like a competent, independent investigation.

  • Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded

    06/07/2015 9:26:39 AM PDT · 131 of 153
    SvenMagnussen to WildHighlander57

    A complaint was filed in the US District Court alleging Obama was born on Aug 4, 1961 in Hawaii, issued a CLN in 1968 while residing in Indonesia, returned to the US in 1971 to live as a permanent resident alien in the US until 1983 when he naturalized as a US citizen.

    The court considered the allegations in the complaint as true and then dismissed the case as frivilous on a motion by the US government before allowing discovery to begin. An Appointments Clause challenge was raised in a timely manner to challenge the authority of appointees of Obama moving the court to dismiss the case before a challenge to America’s sovereignty could be addressed by the court. A new precedent has been set. Appointments Clause challenges are addressed by the court unless the complainant can prove the President is ineligible.

    And no, I’m not going to give you the case number because I’ve already been the victim of ID theft and I don’t want to compound the problem.

  • “It will take Zealots, not Moderates, to restore our country”

    06/07/2015 9:05:06 AM PDT · 13 of 45
    SvenMagnussen to Oldpuppymax

    America has not failed. The US federal government has failed after a usurper was installed in the Office of the President of the United.

    America delegated limited rights to the US federal government to form a more perfect union. The US Constitution repealed and replaced the Articles of Confederation. Now the US Constituton must be replaced. A new, national governing charter must be established and presented for ratification by the people. The states don’t have the will, so it is up to the people.

  • Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded

    06/07/2015 7:40:25 AM PDT · 125 of 153
    SvenMagnussen to Brown Deer

    Only an Obot and Orly Taitz would dismiss an eyewitness account as a lack of evidence.

  • McConnell backs away from judicial shutdown talk

    06/07/2015 7:26:18 AM PDT · 11 of 16
    SvenMagnussen to KarlInOhio
    Mitch has four gears in reverse and one forward just in case Obama gets behind him.

    Good one!
  • Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded

    06/06/2015 11:43:01 PM PDT · 120 of 153
    SvenMagnussen to Brown Deer

    Obama filed a notice to naturalized in 1981 with the US District Court, Central District of California. It is not uncommon for applicates for naturalization to move after filing a notice. Some applicants choose to notify the USCIS of their change of address, but maintain their application process in the city they orginally filed their application. Some do it for personal reasons; such as, family and friends are located in the city they orginally applied and wish to maintain that location to be with family when their petition for naturalization is granted. Others may be CIA ops stalking a a well known celebrity on behalf of the State Department.

    All I know is that Obama’s petition for naturalization was granted on September 16, 1983.

  • Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded

    06/06/2015 11:27:01 PM PDT · 117 of 153
    SvenMagnussen to WildHighlander57

    Rather than attempting to verify factual statements I swore to be true to the FBI, why don’t swear a statement to the FBI you know to be true and request an investigation. For example, you know you have read numerous statements posted on the internet that Obama naturalized as a US citizen in 1983. As a US citizen, you are very concerned and would like to verify Obama’s current citizenship status with an FBI investigation.

    The FBI investigates criminal activity based on tips provided by individuals. Ask the FBI to investigate and swear out a statement of facts you know to be true.

  • Why do Mitch McConnell and John Boehner act like they have a Denny Hastert problem?

    06/06/2015 9:44:07 PM PDT · 71 of 76
    SvenMagnussen to Myrddin

    Precedent has been set with respect to notification the US federal government has lost the sovereignty delegated to it by the people and the states. A complaint with allegations challenging the US federal government maintenance of its delegated powers is all that is required. A complaint filed in federal court and responded to by the DoJ is all that is necessary to notify the entire US federal government the President is ineligible.


    Article VI:

    All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

    This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

    The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.


    Delegated authority by the people to the US federal government is withdrawn when the people elect an ineligible President. The ineligible President remains in office while the US federal government is removed. The US federal government is a servant of the people. For some oddball reason, many people believe their servants can’t be fired after a vote of the majority.

  • Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded

    06/06/2015 9:27:50 PM PDT · 115 of 153
    SvenMagnussen to shibumi

    The Articles of Confederation required all states to ratify an amendment to the Articles of Confederation. The Founders decided to repeal and replace the Articles of Confederation with the US Constitution. To facilitate repeal and replacement, Article VI stated nine of thirteen states were needed to ratify the US Constitution. Two states ratified the US Constitution after President Washington was sworn in as the first President of the United States.

    Constitutional law requires all law to be authenticated, published and archived as evidence of the existence of law. Without evidence of law maintained by an executive officer in compliance with the law, the law is voided.

    Currently, the people have elected a unitary executive to manage the affairs of the union. As a consequence, the Congress, the Federal courts, and the Executive Branch federal officers acquiesce to maintain continuity of operations until a replacement document is ratified by the majority.

  • Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded

    06/06/2015 3:12:30 PM PDT · 100 of 153
    SvenMagnussen to SatinDoll
    Arpaio has seen the evidence Obama is a naturalized US citizen. http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/just-facts/287g-program-flawed-and-obsolete-method-immigration-enforcement Under Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) may deputize selected state and local law enforcement officers to perform the functions of federal immigration agents. Like employees of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), so-called “287(g) officers” have access to federal immigration databases, may interrogate and arrest noncitizens believed to have violated federal immigration laws, and may lodge “detainers” against alleged noncitizens held in state or local custody. An investigation by the Department of Justice concluded that the Maricopa County (Ariz.) Sheriff’s Office engaged in a pattern and practice of constitutional violations, including racial profiling of Latinos, after entering a 287(g) agreement. The investigation found that deputies of Sheriff Joe Arpaio routinely conducted “sweeps” in Latino neighborhoods, and that Latino drivers in certain parts of Maricopa County were up to nine times more likely to be stopped than non-Latino drivers. The investigation also found that by enforcing federal immigration law, the sheriff’s office “poisoned the relationship between law enforcement and Latinos, hindering general law enforcement efforts within the Latino community.” ---------------------------------------- All US federal officers in the Executive Branch, Judicial Branch and Legislative Branch and state legislative officers must swear an oath to support the US Constitution pursuan to Article VI. They have a vested in making sure Obama's ineligibility is not exposed. Obama can only be removed with impeachment and a trial and conviction in the Senate. If Obama is ordered removed, the Congress, the Courts and all Executive Branch officers are removed from office as Obama is removed. They have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo to maintain their jobs, pensions and reputations.
  • Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded

    06/06/2015 2:24:50 PM PDT · 94 of 153
    SvenMagnussen to shibumi

    A basic tenet of a constitutional republic is that all law is authenicated, published and archived. The federal courts are authorized to accept copies of the originals if a reasonable assurance can be made the originals are archived and maintained by a President and his officers who are not in violation of the US Constitution. Evidence must be preserved and protected by individuals authorized by the Constitution or the evidence is tainted.

    The President is the Chief Executive Officer of the US federal government. An ineligible President voids the Constitution and all US law, rules, regulations, treaties and executive orders because the chain of custody of preserving and protecting the evidence of US law is destroyed.

    There are many reasons the Constitution requires an eligiible President at all times. One of those reasons is to maintain the chain of custody of US law as evidence of law in the archives. Only an eligible President can appoint or delegate authority to the Archivist of the United States.

  • TEXAS REPUBLICAN SENATORS DEFY CONSTITUENTS’ LOUD CRIES FOR ACTION / CONVENTION OF STATES

    06/06/2015 10:36:20 AM PDT · 45 of 50
    SvenMagnussen to WildHighlander57

    The majority has spoken. Regardless of the fact Obama is not an natural born citizen, America has chosen to install an ineligible President into the Office of the President of the United States.

    An ineligible President voids the Constitution. The Congress, the Federal Courts and federal officers of the Executive Branch have lost their authority to serve the union. The U.S. Constitution must be replaced with a national charter just as the Articles of Confederation was replaced by the U.S. Constitution.

    Send an email to svenmagnussen@conventionforamerica.com or respond to this message to get on the ping list to develop a new national governing document. And start writing your proposed national charter. The US Constitution was developed through compromise from competing documents from a variety of interested.

  • Game of Thrones S05E08 discussion thread

    06/05/2015 3:12:19 PM PDT · 98 of 101
    SvenMagnussen to ConjunctionJunction

    Kit Harrington hints he may not be back for Season 6.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/04/jon-snow-fate-game-of-thrones_n_7496458.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592

    “Yep, Harington doesn’t know if he’ll return for Season 6, which can only mean Jon Snow may die at the end of Season 5.”

  • Social Justice vs. Objectivism

    06/05/2015 1:50:08 PM PDT · 33 of 49
    SvenMagnussen to tbw2

    Caesar and the US government created coins and dollars backed by false hope. Caesar and the US government crave false hope and wish to securitize the future of non-believers with it. Give it to them. Love your neighbor as God loves you and you will be richly rewarded in Kingdom of God.

  • Game of Thrones S05E08 discussion thread

    06/05/2015 11:20:55 AM PDT · 95 of 101
    SvenMagnussen to ItsOurTimeNow

    Thanks. I have noscripts loaded on my Firefox browswer and had trouble finding anything to load. I did get the .pdf to load and will take a look at it.

  • Game of Thrones S05E08 discussion thread

    06/05/2015 10:02:50 AM PDT · 92 of 101
    SvenMagnussen to ItsOurTimeNow

    Thanks for the tip. That is the first I’ve heard of that theory. I see on the internet there is something about TellTale video games with reference the theory. Is that where you picked it up?

  • Social Justice vs. Objectivism

    06/05/2015 9:48:19 AM PDT · 4 of 49
    SvenMagnussen to Sgt_Schultze

    Give to Caesar what is Caesars. The Kingdom of God rules all other kingdoms, governments and man.

  • Proof we have a suicide bomber in the White House

    06/04/2015 9:59:49 AM PDT · 37 of 40
    SvenMagnussen to DaveA37

    America must get organized to develop a national charter that will expose corruption and punish those who gratuitously claim Executive privilege, Absolute immunity, Qualified immunity or derivative Qualified immunity to sheild themselves from exposure.

    The Founders replaced the Articles of Confederation with the U.S. Constitution. A new, national governing document must be developed through multiple submissions, negotiations, compromise, and finally, ratification. This is the process used to replace this Articles of Confederation.

  • Proof we have a suicide bomber in the White House

    06/04/2015 5:12:01 AM PDT · 9 of 40
    SvenMagnussen to HomerBohn

    A new charter for America is necessary. Term limits, a Balanced Budget Amendment, and a Flat tax are all within reach.

    A convention for America is necessary.

  • Game of Thrones S05E08 discussion thread

    06/03/2015 8:56:53 PM PDT · 85 of 101
    SvenMagnussen to ConjunctionJunction

    Men of the Nights Watch forfeit titles, nobility and inheritance. They vow to never marry or father children. I don’t think Jon Snow with win the Game of Thrones.

  • Game of Thrones S05E08 discussion thread

    06/01/2015 2:45:41 PM PDT · 65 of 101
    SvenMagnussen to Malsua
    I think Daenerys allies herself with the Dothraki principle that leadership is not inherited, but earned through strength and bravery. Khal Drogo, Daenerys' husband and a Dothraki, died on his way to take the Iron Throne from Robert Baratheon after he sent an assassin for Daenerys. Daenerys used Khal Drogo's funeral pyre to hatch her dragons. The name of this episode was Fire and Blood.

    I believe the book, A Song of Fire and Ice, is a clue about the eventual battle between to Daenerys and her dragons with White Walkers. Even though Jon Snow is at the wall, his dark hair and eyes remind me Robert Baratheon's bastard child. Raeghar was blonde. Lyanna had ginger hair and light skin. I don't see the R + L = J theory working out. Gendry is a Baratheon bastard. I think Jon Snow is a Baratheon bastard.


    Gendry


    Jon Snow

  • Why do Mitch McConnell and John Boehner act like they have a Denny Hastert problem?

    06/01/2015 6:34:27 AM PDT · 65 of 76
    SvenMagnussen to GregNH

    Alright then, dying or falling ill and being unable to perform the duties of the President are examples of the President-elect failing to qualify because he/she is unable to perform the duties of the President. Congress is not constitutionally authorized to enlarge or abridge the rights of any U.S. citizen with respect to citizenship status. See SCHNEIDER v. RUSK, 377 U.S. 163 (1964). (”While the rights of citizenship of the native born derive from [section] 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the rights of the naturalized citizen derive from satisfying, free of fraud, the requirements set by Congress, the latter, apart from the exception noted, “becomes a member of the society, possessing all the rights of a native citizen, and standing, in the view of the constitution, on the footing of a native. The constitution does not authorize Congress to enlarge or abridge those rights. The simple power of the national Legislature, is to prescribe a uniform rule of naturalization, and the exercise of this power exhausts it, so far as respects the individual.” Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 827. And see Luria v. United States, 231 U.S. 9, 22 ; United States v. MacIntosh, 283 U.S. 605, 624 ; Knauer v. United States, 328 U.S. 654, 658.”)

    Interpreting the fact the Congress qualifies a President-elect as determining the President-elect is a natural born citizen is disingenuous in the light of Schneider v. Rusk. Congress does not have the authority to define a natural born citizen and does not have the authority to determine who is a natural born citizen and who is not a natural born citizen. All we know is that a naturalized citizen is not a natural born citizen.

  • Why do Mitch McConnell and John Boehner act like they have a Denny Hastert problem?

    05/31/2015 6:38:38 PM PDT · 63 of 76
    SvenMagnussen to GregNH
    "No person not declared President elect can be ineligible."

    Not true. Numerous people are not eligible to hold the Office of the President of the United States. For example, a naturalized US citizen is not eligible. SCOTUS has opined Congress does not have Constitutional authority to enlarge or abridge the rights of a US Citizen with respect to citizenship status, i.e. Congress does not have authority to declare anyone a natural born citizen nor does Congress have the authority to define a natural born citizen.

    You want to believe qualified and eligible are the same because you nor anyone else has convinced you a President-elect could fail to qualify before being sworn in as President. Here's one example: A President-elect who dies before he is sworn in as President. Let's say Congress had previously certified a candidate who received the majority of Electoral votes and the President-elect dies before being sworn in, then the President-elect is said to have failed to qualify because he cannot perform the duties of the President.

  • Why do Mitch McConnell and John Boehner act like they have a Denny Hastert problem?

    05/31/2015 10:26:38 AM PDT · 61 of 76
    SvenMagnussen to GregNH

    Eligible is not equal to qualified. SCOTUS has opined Congress is not Constitutionally authorized to enlarge or abridge the rights of a U.S. citizen with respect to citizenship status. So, a Congressional vote to affirm a presidential candidate as qualified is not a vote to affirm the eligibility of the candidate.

    The Constitution clearly states a President shall be a natural born citizen. A natural born citizens is a subset to a native born person which is seperate and distinct from a naturalized U.S. citizen. The Electoral College system was installed to prevent the American people and the States from electing an ineligible President. Electors may vote faithlessly, or not, to preserve and protect the Constitutional Republic. In Obama’s case, the Electors chose to elect President Obama while there were numerous individuals publicly complaining he was ineligible.

    The US federal government is a servant of the people and the States. The US federal government is not Constitutionally authorized to prevent the will of the majority of the American people and the States. A naturalized citizen is qualified to be President if he/she receives a majority of the Electoral votes, but that does not equate to eligible.

    The President is the US federal government’s chief executive officer. The President maintains the US Constitution and all other US law, treaties and executive orders in the Archives as evidence of law. An ineligible President breaks the chain of custody of evidence of law to void it. An ineligible President cannot maintain the Constitution while violating the Constitution.

    The Articles of Confederation was repealed and replaced by the US Constitution. The Articles of Confederation required all states to ratify an amendment to the Articles of Confederation. Consequently, Article VII fo the US Constitution only required nine states to ratify the US Constitution and repeal the Articles of Confederation. The people can determine how and why their national government shall operate. Of course, those with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo will strongly resist.

  • Why do Mitch McConnell and John Boehner act like they have a Denny Hastert problem?

    05/30/2015 2:20:52 PM PDT · 56 of 76
    SvenMagnussen to SaveFerris

    The US Constitution and all other US law, rules, regulations, treaties, Presidential proclamations and executive orders are held in trust in the US National Archives as evidence of US law. The President is the nation’s chief executive officer and responsible for maintaining evidence of law. An ineligible President breaks the chain of custody of maintaining the evidence of US law. Consequently, an ineligible President voids the US Constitution and all US law, rules, regulations, Presidential proclamations, treaties and executive orders.

    An ineligible President cannot be prevented from assuming the Office of the President of the United States because the majority of American people have voted to put the ineligible President in the office. The American people voted to void the US Constitution, i.e. fundamentally change America, when they voted to install an ineligible President Obama. Obama is ineligible because he naturalized as a US citizen in 1983. Naturalized citizens are ineligible to assume the Office of the President of the United States. The Congress and the Courts are powerless to prevent Obama from fundamentally changing America. The Congress and the Courts have been fired. A new national governing document must be developed and submitted for ratification by the States. Until then, the Congress and the Courts can only maintain continuity of operations until a new national governing document is ratified.

  • Vanity: Replacing our God-given rights with godless rights

    05/29/2015 12:12:06 PM PDT · 10 of 11
    SvenMagnussen to MeganC

    The Founders thought it unconscionable the state would tax them without representation. King George III proclaimed them to be in rebellion and threatened their lives and their property. The Founders determined they had a God-given right to declare their independence from tyranny.

    It is time for a convention for America to re-establish our God-given rights against tyranny, corruption, and lawlessness.

  • Gtame of Thrones S05E07 Discussion Thread

    05/27/2015 6:01:42 PM PDT · 55 of 57
    SvenMagnussen to ItsOurTimeNow
    "What possible leverage could she hold with having Tyrion?"

    Prince Oberyn, before he was killed by the Mountain, spoke with Tyrion about the House of Dorne being the only House to resist the Tagaryeon Dragons. Tyrion, a student of history and well read, knows the Dornish are a problem for Dany if she decides to take the Iron Throne with her dragons. Tyrion knows Dany needs an alliance with the Dornish. Tyrion tried to establish an alliance with the Dornish for the Lannisters by sending Myrcella there. But Cersei and Jamie are trying to get her back because the Lannister/Dorish alliance was destroyed when the Mountain killed Prince Oberyn.

    Tyrion is fully aware of the massive debt incurred by King's Landing to the Iron Bank. If Tyrion can convince Dany to establish an alliance with the House of Dorne and articulate a plan to pay back the debt to the Iron Bank, then I think Dany will win the Game of Thrones.

  • Liberal Academic Says America’s Founding Document Outmoded

    05/27/2015 5:30:10 PM PDT · 81 of 153
    SvenMagnussen to 2harddrive

    Barack Hussein Obama II naturalized as a US citizen in 1983, Los Angeles, CA. I notified the FBI Director, James Comey, of this fact and complained Obama assumed the Office of the President of the United States in violation of the US Constitution.

    An FBI investigation ensued and President Obama admitted he naturalized as a U.S. Citizen in 1983 to FBI investigators. Contact FBI Director Comey for confirmation.

  • TEXAS REPUBLICAN SENATORS DEFY CONSTITUENTS’ LOUD CRIES FOR ACTION / CONVENTION OF STATES

    05/27/2015 7:21:22 AM PDT · 19 of 50
    SvenMagnussen to servantboy777

    The President, the Courts and the Congress are waiting for the people to establish a national charter for governance after they voided the Constitution by installing an ineligible President as their leader. The “tough love” will continue until the people provide guidance to their servants. The servants aren’t going to write our national charter for governance because we broke it and its up to us to fix it.

  • TEXAS REPUBLICAN SENATORS DEFY CONSTITUENTS’ LOUD CRIES FOR ACTION / CONVENTION OF STATES

    05/27/2015 7:09:29 AM PDT · 18 of 50
    SvenMagnussen to Howie66

    An ineligible President voids the US Constitution. The three branches of the federal government are voided. The people chose an ineligible President as their leader and the Courts and Congress are powerless to thwart the will of the people.

    The next step is for the people to develop a national governing document. The President, the President’s executive level officers, the Courts and the Congress will maintain the status quo for continuity until the people develop a national governing document for the state to vote on for ratification.

  • TEXAS REPUBLICAN SENATORS DEFY CONSTITUENTS’ LOUD CRIES FOR ACTION / CONVENTION OF STATES

    05/27/2015 6:32:36 AM PDT · 10 of 50
    SvenMagnussen to servantboy777

    The US Constitution evolved from competing plans for a national government from various organizations and loose confederations of larges states v. small states. Eventually, compromise resulted in a proposed national charter for governance. The process of state ratification began.

    The Articles of Confederation required all thirteen states to ratify an amendment. Article VII of the proposed US Constitution only required nine states for ratification. Two states ratified the US Constitution after President Washington was sworn in.

    There is nothing to prevent the people from getting the democracy they demand.

  • TEXAS REPUBLICAN SENATORS DEFY CONSTITUENTS’ LOUD CRIES FOR ACTION / CONVENTION OF STATES

    05/27/2015 5:49:05 AM PDT · 3 of 50
    SvenMagnussen to 4Speed

    Stop begging corrupt federal and state legislatures for democracy! An ineligible President voids the US Constitution. A national convention to formulate a new charter for the governing of our country must be held.

    The US Constitution replaced the Article of Confederation. Now, the US Constitution must be replaced.

  • Gtame of Thrones S05E07 Discussion Thread

    05/26/2015 1:59:32 PM PDT · 45 of 57
    SvenMagnussen to ConjunctionJunction

    Okay, I was thinking Stannis went broke when he retreated from the Battle of Blackwater Bay. Apparently, the Iron Bank loaned Stannis money after that to hire the pirate a second time.

  • Gtame of Thrones S05E07 Discussion Thread

    05/26/2015 8:36:53 AM PDT · 43 of 57
    SvenMagnussen to KC_Lion

    “What is Gold and Name to a Religious Fanatic?”

    This question reminded me the Iron Throne is deep in debt to The Iron Bank of Braavos. In the first season, Ned Stark was named Hand of the King and was surprised to find the Iron Throne was deep in debt. Later, when Tyrion became theMaster of Coin, Littlefinger advised Tyrion to remember that it’s only numbers.

    The Iron Bank of Braavos needs a Lannister to control the Iron Throne to get its money bank. Cersei had to be removed because she could care less whether or not The Iron Bank of Braavos gets their money back.

    If Tommen doesn’t work out, the Iron Bank of Braavos will probably install Arya Stark on the Iron Throne to get their money back. If not, Tyrion is aware of the Iron Throne’s debt and may advise Dany to assure the Iron Bank of Braavos she will pay the debt if she takes the Iron Throne.

    Stannis has already ask for a loan from Iron Bank of Braavos and he was rejected. Also, Stannis was unable to articulate a plan to pay of the Iron Throne’s debt if he took the Iron Throne.