Posts by swpa_mom

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    09/02/2014 7:45:09 PM PDT · 259 of 347
    swpa_mom to Jim Robinson

    Staying classy dear leader, aren’t you? Odd that when you were asked if you were planning to and actually cast your vote for Romney, silence.....

    Why don’t you throw a few more f bombs, using your internet slang?

    It probably excites your fellow Romney hating followers here.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    09/02/2014 6:17:44 PM PDT · 254 of 347
    swpa_mom to Jim Robinson

    You voted for Mitt Romney? Do your followers here know that?

    Why do you claim that I’m pushing Mitt Romney.....who you are calling a conservative hating loser? I have stated that I don’t believe Mitt Romney is running in 2016. Like you, however, I voted for him in the 2012 Presidential election. Unlike you, I have been viciously attacked by your followers for that vote. Perhaps you’ll be attacked as your followers have attacked me; afterall, you, too voted for Mitt Romney.

    The circular firing squad here is totally disgusting. There isn’t even a candidate that most of the most frequent posters here are talking about. Money needs to be raised. THIS is where you could make a difference. You could tell all of your loyal followers here to make sure that “X” or “Y” receives enough donations and volunteer help to propel him or her to the nomination. No matter who’s mentioned, the claws come out among the few frequent posters, claiming that the person in question isn’t really a conservative, it’s better to vote for the democrat! Crazy stuff.

    OR, you could attack the people who will vote for the eventual republican nominee, calling them names and using some kind of internet slang for the F word. Real classy.

    You can decide what kind of leader to be.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    09/02/2014 12:35:52 PM PDT · 252 of 347
    swpa_mom to Jim Robinson

    You show far more outrage toward Mitt Romney and ANYONE
    Who voted for him than you do toward Obama and his voters. Of course some of the Obama voters are also with you when it comes to attacking Mitt Romney and his voters..now isn’t that something.....

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    09/02/2014 5:35:11 AM PDT · 249 of 347
    swpa_mom to JRandomFreeper

    I do not live in North Carolina, not a trucker, nor am I a trainer of any type. I’m also not a male, so therefore, my parents did not name me John.

    What I do is speak truthfully and ask WHY a conservative website wanted (with success) the re-election of Obama. I also ask WHY that same conservative website attacks republicans, claiming it’s better for the democrats to win.

    With the anger shown towards me (and others who dare question same), I really do wonder if some of you are as conservative as you claim.

    I just thought I’d pass that on.

    /not NCTrucker or Trainer John

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    09/02/2014 4:18:17 AM PDT · 248 of 347
    swpa_mom to Jim Robinson

    It’s a shame that you didn’t show enough leadership on your own website to have as much outrage at Barack Obama as you did against Mitt Romney.

    If your loyal followers had seen you express such outrage against Barack Obama, maybe they wouldn’t have thought it was an acceptable idea to vote for him for re-election.

    This is NOT about Mitt Romney. He’s not running in 2016. This is about a conservative website full of people who automatically attack anyone who DARES to claim they would vote for a republican for President. You and your loyal followers can continue to claim that some ‘other’ candidate deserves your vote.....in 2008, 2012 and 2016, the presidential election was and will be decided between a democrat and a republican. Your loyal followers will see post after post after post after post, calling the eventual republican nominee vile names, claiming that they are “REALLY” a liberal...and it’s better for the democrat to win.

    Do what you want with my screen moniker, but frankly sir, after all of the damage done by President Obama during his first term, it was crazy to lobby for his re-election. THAT is what happened here.

    Your followers are loyal. They attack en masse.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    09/01/2014 7:53:00 PM PDT · 242 of 347
    swpa_mom to JRandomFreeper

    Wow. Just wow.

    I am truly and I mean TRULY amazed at the depths to which some of you (and don’t flatter yourselves, there’s only a handful of you) will go to attack anyone who DARES suggest they’ll support a republican candidate.

    During the 2012 Presidential election, the choice was Obama over Romney here by the most vocal.

    During the 2008 Presidential election, the choice was Obama over McCain here by the most vocal.

    One would think that after seeing the damage done by the democrat Obama during the first term, that the same Obama would not have been preferred in 2012.

    That was not the case.

    In 2016, the republican party will have several candidates for President. I REALLY hope that the circular firing squad that’s already forming (see the posts calling Ted Cruz part of the GOP-E) will put down their arms and realize that it’s better to work for the candidate you would like to see with the nomination instead of telling everyone ELSE that his or her candidate isn’t pure enough for you.

    I can dream.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/31/2014 8:13:33 PM PDT · 227 of 347
    swpa_mom to COBOL2Java

    that’s me? swpa_mom? um, yes, it’s me.

    There’s another thread here on the premiere conservative website with posters hoping that Ted Cruz isn’t called part of the “GOP-E” and called “liberal” by the circular firing squad people here.

    Honestly, I had to chuckle. So, it’s not just me who sees it..........

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/31/2014 7:42:20 PM PDT · 221 of 347
    swpa_mom to JRandomFreeper

    Good enough, and very good with the attack comments!
    That should earn you some points with the circular firing squad crew.

    I will anxiously await your posts promoting your candidate and all of his or her conservative qualities, encouraging all of your fellow conservatives to work to elect your candidate.

    Or, I’ll see you as part of the circular firing squad, working really hard to make sure the republican doesn’t get elected.

    I wonder which I’ll see first......

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/31/2014 6:34:43 PM PDT · 219 of 347
    swpa_mom to JRandomFreeper

    You’re just against republicans, then?

    The nomination process will select the candidate. Before every election, I really do believe that most people have a candidate they prefer. One they will work for, make telephone calls, the “shoe leather” work you’ve referred to.

    How about Ted Cruz? Rick Perry? Sarah Palin? Would you be willing to devote shoe leather time to any of them?

    Or, will you just make it easier to not commit and claim to be “against” republicans?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/31/2014 6:17:10 PM PDT · 215 of 347
    swpa_mom to JRandomFreeper

    I really don’t blame you for not naming your candidate for 2016.

    If you DO that, the few others here will jump all over you, claiming that your candidate did or thought something in the past that makes him or her liberal.

    When your candidate doesn’t win the nomination, will you be all over anyone else who’s voting for the eventual republican candidate? Or will you just realize that the primary process has run its course and maybe......realize that the election will be between the nominees of the two primary parties?

    Of course, the circular firing squad will have been in force for some time before that, with the same vocal few attacking all of the candidates for being way too liberal.

    At least it keeps this place interesting, huh? Maybe that’s the real end game for some.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/31/2014 5:55:22 PM PDT · 213 of 347
    swpa_mom to JRandomFreeper

    Ok, if you are happy voting for someone who’s not the perfect conservative, how will you handle the attacks from the few here who *DO* attack any conservative?

    So, who’s your candidate for 2016? What’s your plan of defense when your candidate, who’s not going to be perfect of course, is called liberal by someone else?

    Who’s your candidate for 2016, again?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/31/2014 5:37:27 PM PDT · 211 of 347
    swpa_mom to JRandomFreeper

    And when your perfect conservative doesn’t win the nomination, why, you’re one of the stomp your feet and tell everyone else to NOT vote for that person, right? Of course you are.

    Every single conservative ever talked about here is attacked by a few of the same people. Doesn’t matter who it is.

    Who among the 2012 candidates was conservative perfection? Who? They were all routinely attacked by the same few people, claiming to be not conservative enough.

    And then what happens? While everyone on the right is yelling at each other, telling each other that voting for Romney (HE’S A LIBERAL, WE’RE TOLD) is horrible, Barack Hussein Obama coasts to victory.

    The time to promote your perfect conservative for 2016 is right now. Get out there, post thread after thread about your perfect conservative’s track record, votes, speeches, tweets, facebook posts and everything else. Make SURE that you can defend that candidate’s every word or thoughts against the attacks he or she will receive from others who really want the liberal to win.

    So, who’s your candidate for 2016? Surely you have one.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/31/2014 4:55:28 PM PDT · 209 of 347
    swpa_mom to newnhdad

    Extra butter on the popcorn, please. Otherwise, it’s tasteless.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/31/2014 4:54:43 PM PDT · 208 of 347
    swpa_mom to JRandomFreeper

    Oh, believe me, I know you will NEVER vote for anyone who’s not your ‘perfect’ conservative candidate.

    Keep in mind, that no matter who that is, someone else here will find a reason to tell you that your candidate is a liberal.

    Meanwhile, the REAL liberal cruises to victory, watching the conservative circular firing squad.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/31/2014 4:27:24 PM PDT · 205 of 347
    swpa_mom to JRandomFreeper

    This is where frankly i think some of you are just plain nuts. Barack Hussein Obama has done so much damage to this country, YET a few of you are STILL claiming that you would not vote against him.

    In the 2012 you had two choices. You already knew how bad Obama was at his job of president. But, to keep up the charade you have going as not really voting for Obama, you claim that Romney was just TOO liberal for you. Obama of course wasnt too liberal. You just couldnt vote for that Romney guy even AFTER the damage Obama did in his first term.

    Now, please, dont bother putting out the code red alert to your friends to start attacking me, as is usually the case.

    Frankly, I have figured out this place.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/05/2014 11:24:13 AM PDT · 191 of 347
    swpa_mom to Diogenesis

    Harold Stassen?

    Harold Stassen was one of the signatories to the United Nations charter.

    If that’s the Stassen you mean, didn’t he pass away more than a decade ago?

    Why would you support someone who helped form the United Nations?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/05/2014 5:40:28 AM PDT · 158 of 347
    swpa_mom to Diogenesis

    Its funny how you avoid any talk of who YOUR candidate was or will be.

    Will you get behind Rick Perry or Ted Cruz? Or, will you just continue with name calling and shrill attacks?

    You dont want the democrats to lose, do you?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/05/2014 4:38:54 AM PDT · 156 of 347
    swpa_mom to Diogenesis

    So, according to one of the main characters here on the premiere conservative website, John McCain lost the 2008 Presidential election because of Mitt Romney?

    You need not worry about Mitt Romney for 2016. Hopefully, Rick Perry or Ted Cruz will be the candidate.

    Do you already have bookmarks of attack posts ready for them, too? Or, will you do the right thing and get behind the candidate?

    OR, will you, as I’m beginning to suspect, just keep on your Mitt Romney is responsible for everything tirades?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 8:00:37 PM PDT · 149 of 347
    swpa_mom to Diogenesis

    I’m not attacking anyone.

    The facts are quite simple.

    1. There was a republican primary process in 2008.
    2. There was a republican primary process in 2012.
    3. John McCain was the presidential nominee in 2008
    4. Mitt Romney was the presidential nominee in 2012

    Now, here’s where it gets really sad.

    Many of the main characters here attacked those who *DID* claim support for the republican nominee over Barack Hussein Obama. Did you claim that it would be better if Obama won and was re-elected in 2012? Or, did you just call people names?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 7:56:42 PM PDT · 148 of 347
    swpa_mom to GeronL

    Ok, fair enough. You like Ted Cruz. If he doesn’t win the nomination IF he runs, then what? Will you refuse to vote in the general election? What if Rick Perry (my choice at this point) runs and wins the nomination?

    I’ve been called so many names by people here......all because AFTER the nomination process ended, I stated without doubt that I’m voting for Romney over Obama. Oh, I realize that so many of the main characters here didn’t like Romney and not only didn’t work for THEIR candidate (whoever that was), but viciously attacked anyone who dared to suggest that it was sorta ridiculous to “sit out” the election as some kind of protest. The democrats win EVERY time that happens. Every time.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 7:40:06 PM PDT · 145 of 347
    swpa_mom to GeronL

    So, tell me, who are you going to work for in 2016? Who’s your favorite? How on earth will you convince all of the foul mouthed name callers here to vote for your candidate? Or, don’t you believe in even working for your candidate? It’s easier, isn’t it......to just claim that the nominee wasn’t good enough for you and have a temper tantrum.

    So, who were you working so hard for in 2012? Did you talk about all of the things your candidate stood for and would do? Did you defend your candidate when one of the foul mouthed name calling main characters here claimed he (or God forbid, she) wasn’t conservative enough? How did you handle that? Or, did you just find people who were supporting the republican nominee and start to attack them instead of supporting your own candidate?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 7:27:32 PM PDT · 143 of 347
    swpa_mom to GeronL

    Sane people realize that a presidential election is between the candidates of the two parties, republican and democrat. during the primary process, by ALL means, duke it out, call each other names, threaten each other, do whatever you want to do. But, you need to face facts. SOMEONE’S candidate is going to lose the republican nomination. So, you’ll pout and stomp your feet and say I’M NOT VOTING FOR THAT REPUBLICAN! Now, what does that mean? Sane people realize that the democrat wins that way. You can choose to pout and continue to be the victim......and oh I realize you’ll fit in better with the name calling, foul mouthed main characters here....but is your family better off with Obama as president? Really?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 7:10:07 PM PDT · 141 of 347
    swpa_mom to Diogenesis

    I honestly can’t figure out why any sane person would want Obama in office over the republican.

    You and some of the other main characters here wanted and got just that. Obama in office.

    Why? What did you see in Obama that made you want him to win the election?

    I’ve stated many times (and please, please go back through the posting history)....my candidate during the primaries was Rick Santorum. He’s not conservative, either, right? Santorum has been attacked on this so called premiere conservative website relentlessly. Just the way you and others will attack whoever the republican nominee will be in 2016. You’ll use foul language and name calling, claiming that who ever that republican candidate is, why they’re HORRIBLE and just elect the democrat. It’s better that Obama won, isn’t that your take on things?

    Why ANY sane person wanted Obama to win that election is beyond me.....but then, if the republican won, you and the others here couldn’t be ‘victims’ and go on your foul mouthed, name calling tirades now, could you?

    Don’t worry, foul mouthed name callers travel in packs. Soon, one will come to your defense. Maybe you can paste another tirade about how horrible a republican is. By the way, do you have bookmarked little replies on the damage Obama has done? OR, is that off limits to the foul mouthed name callers?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 6:36:32 PM PDT · 138 of 347
    swpa_mom to Diogenesis

    Wow. It’s a good thing Romney didn’t win! Your head would explode, huh?

    Good thing you successfully worked hard to elect Obama. He’s been so good for America!

    You have such hatred towards Mitt Romney.

    So, who are you going to work for in 2016?

    Do have posts like that bookmarked to tell everyone how horrible Obama has been for America?

    Who are you going to work for in 2016, again?

    Oh, that’s right, anyone but the republican.

    And you worked for....? during the 2012 primary process? You obviously did a lousy job since *GASP* Romney won the nomination, setting you into orbit! Did you then decide to work on the Obama side? Or, were you on that side all along?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 6:14:38 PM PDT · 134 of 347
    swpa_mom to Diogenesis

    ahhh, one of the other main characters here. Do tell, do you also insist on only electing Christian white males?

    Mitt Romney isn’t the issue. The issue *IS* the fact the the main characters here did everything (sadly, successfully) within their power to tell anyone who would dare vote for Romney over Obama that they were wrong.

    Are you gearing up for 2016? Ready to trash and insult everyone and anyone who dares to vote for the republican candidate? whoever that may be....

    By the way, who did you work for during the 2012 primary process? You didn’t do a very good job, apparently.

    I’m not afraid of the name calling, foul mouthed main characters here. I’m voting for the republican in the general election in 2016. You and the other main characters here can continue your foul mouthed, name calling towards anyone who dares to vote for that person.

    By the way, who are YOU going to work to nominate in 2016?

    let me guess, ‘anyone other than the republican’

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 5:22:30 PM PDT · 128 of 347
    swpa_mom to Jim Robinson

    You can do want you wish. I’m never donating to your website because of the criticism *I* received when stating that I’m supporting Romney over Obama.

    It makes me wonder why you wanted Obama?

    Ban me, do want you want. You had a wonderful photo taken with Sarah Palin. She isn’t a white Christian male in case you haven’t noticed. Some of your main characters here, the most foul mouthed, would never vote for her.

    2016 will bring this (perhaps formerly) premiere conservative website into yet another battlefield of the foul mouthed posters who will vote for the liberal before ANY republican (keeping them the victim), and just using vulgarities towards anyone who would dare vote for the republican.

    As far as YOU telling ME to “FU”..........I don’t use that type of language. Being a conservative lady, I really do enjoy being able to speak my mind without crawling into the gutter. You do what you wish with regards to that gutter. But, shame on you for using that type of language. Romney isn’t running in 2016, neither is Santorum, Palin, Cruz or Rubio.

    Rick Perry just MIGHT run which will bring out even more of the filthy language spewing main characters here. It might actually be enjoyable watching the most foul mouthed main characters here trying to impress you and others by attacking Rick Perry, IF he decides to run. He’s a great looking man, that’s for sure.

    Oh, he’ll get my total support if he runs.

    You can continue to “FU” all over the place.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 5:14:53 PM PDT · 127 of 347
    swpa_mom to CatherineofAragon

    Do you really think I’m going to quiver because of someone who demands of only electing “white Christian men” attacks me because I supported Mitt Romney over Barack Hussein Obama?

    Think again.

    This old lady isn’t at ALL impressed by your foul mouthed tirades and never ending angry posts towards anyone with whom you disagree (which seems to be just about everyone)

    During the 2012 election, those of you, especially the main characters here who supported Obama over Romney........do you just want to be the continuous victim? Or, do you have some devious ulterior motive? Perhaps to help Obama in the destruction of America.

    In any event, you’re one of the main characters here. You’re an angry, foul mouthed individual who isn’t going to work to elect ANYONE other than democrats.

    From all of the mail I received today (it was a record setting amount), it seems that a whole bunch of people who read and post here sparingly don’t quite agree with you.

    You and others here worked diligently to elect Barack Hussein Obama not once but twice. Now, why would you want that? He’s not a white Christian male........but it allows you to be the perpetual victim now, doesn’t it? It allows you to continue with your foul mouthed tirade, while claiming that you can ONLY elect white Christian males....

    Mitt Romney isn’t running for President. The problem YOU will face is no matter who the republicans elect during their primary process, you will work tirelessly to criticize and insult ANYONE who dares to support the republican over the democrat.

    Your foul mouthed tirades just make you look a bit unhinged.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/04/2014 11:08:55 AM PDT · 121 of 347
    swpa_mom to CatherineofAragon

    Ladies and gentlemen here you have one of the main characters. Name calling foul mouthed. I have been asked actually demanded to name them. I knew they would show up with their foul mouths and name calling.

    Nice to see you

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 8:49:27 PM PDT · 96 of 347
    swpa_mom to Graewoulf

    So, who is your candidate for 2016? If your candidate fails to win the nomination, will you stay home?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 8:41:35 PM PDT · 93 of 347
    swpa_mom to shibumi

    That creek would have flooded today. Are you now hoping that I drown?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 8:36:43 PM PDT · 91 of 347
    swpa_mom to 2ndDivisionVet

    Huh? I am a capitalist. If you or anyone else wants to start a capitalistic venture, the market will decide its fate.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 8:34:14 PM PDT · 90 of 347
    swpa_mom to shibumi

    A dozen times???? Are you sure it hasnt been more? Are you upset that you are not considered a main character here?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 8:17:30 PM PDT · 80 of 347
    swpa_mom to WatchOutForSnakes

    Why would you be upset with a certain public figure taking “advantage of gullible fans” just to make a buck? Are you against capitalism? What’s wrong with a capitalistic venture? If there’s no market for the capitalistic venture, it would fail.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 8:13:24 PM PDT · 77 of 347
    swpa_mom to ansel12

    um, Romney was the nominee in 2012. it would have been better if I had done like the main characters here did. I should have said that it was better to re-elect Obama than to vote for Romney! right?

    That would make me “good” in your eyes. Are you one of the main characters here who claims it’s better that the republicans McCain/Palin lost to Obama in 2008 because the just were not conservative enough? And then, after four years of a disastrous presidency, are you one of the main characters that claimed it was better that the republicans Romney/Ryan lost in 2012 because they were simply just not conservative enough? Calling me a troll....Name calling is the forte of the main characters here.

    Or, am I simply not drinking the “we need to lose” kool aid being distributed here by the main characters?

    Romney would have been a Fine President. McCain would have been a Fine President as well. Why? They would have surrounded themselves with American loving, GOOD people.

    I’ll add being called a “troll” to the name calling by the main characters here on the premiere conservative website.

    Most of the main characters here will never be happy. It’s better for them if they are always on the losing side.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 7:54:08 PM PDT · 68 of 347
    swpa_mom to 2ndDivisionVet

    To be honest, I’m not going to look for “links” of the main characters here on the premiere conservative website claiming that re-electing Obama would be better than electing Romney.

    It happened. Will it happen again in 2016? Probably.

    Now, you can attack because I’m not going to sift through all of the posts here. The bottom line is, the main characters here would rather lose the presidential election. Does it give them something to talk about for four (or eight) years? Maybe. I really think that some people don’t know how to take charge and feel totally uncomfortable when either they are in charge or responsible for who IS in charge.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 7:50:48 PM PDT · 66 of 347
    swpa_mom to cripplecreek

    Cute, calling me a democrat.

    That’s the same thing as saying “you’re fat”.

    What I said was absolutely true. This premiere conservative website during the 2012 election was a mess. The main characters here working tirelessly telling everyone that it’s MUCH better to re-elect the disaster that is Barack Hussein Obama than to *GASP* vote for Romney.

    We have an unmitigated disaster on our hands with the current White House occupant. Attacking me because I’m not looking forward to the circular firing squad that WILL take place here in 2016 is rather odd. ANY story mentioning Romney, Bush, Cheney, Palin, Cruz, Rubio, Perry, Walker and many others.....just gets the main characters all fired up. The story quoted, and it was, afterall a “story”, from a newspaper that cannot always be believed for accuracy, quoted “sources” that “allegedly” and “reportedly” said this or that.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 7:42:58 PM PDT · 62 of 347
    swpa_mom to 2ndDivisionVet

    Do you want Links to the main characters here bashing Mitt Romney and claiming that re-electing Obama would be better? Really? Do you think that didn’t happen?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 7:41:11 PM PDT · 61 of 347
    swpa_mom to ansel12

    I remember Rick Santorum being called a liberal here by some of the main characters. Rick Perry has been called “not conservative” So has Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal and so many others.

    Who’s your candidate for 2016?

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 7:39:20 PM PDT · 59 of 347
    swpa_mom to cripplecreek

    Who’s your candidate for 2016? Do you have a favorite? How on earth will you convince the main characters here on the premiere conservative website to back your candidate?

    You better hope that your candidate NEVER endorsed someone “they” hate.......OR voted “nay” on a procedural amendment to a piece of legislation....OR had one of the main characters chastise your candidate for simply “not being conservative enough”. Your candidate needs to conform to all of the demands of the main characters here, even though those demands are simply all OVER the place. The main thing your candidate needs to do is agree to lose to the democrat. That’s what makes the main characters here very happy.

    Now THAT sure as heck is odd.

  • Romney Loyalists Hyping Comeback: 'Republicans Are Dying to Be Associated with Him'

    08/03/2014 7:15:04 PM PDT · 45 of 347
    swpa_mom to 2ndDivisionVet

    haha. I haven’t read anything here at FR for awhile and today I look and here we have it!!! The premiere conservative website with all of its main characters going BONKERS over a washpo piece with “reportedly” and “allegedly”........nothing gets the group of main characters here fired up like a ‘story’ about Romney, Bush or really anyone else who isn’t their number “one” choice for President.

    Let’s see, honestly, how long until one of the main characters here on the premiere conservative website claims that they would rather vote for Hillary than elect “X”. The odd thing is, “X” varies from main character to main character......there is zero consensus among the main characters, just absolute and unadulterated HATRED towards anyone who dares suggest that a republican would be a BETTER President than the ultimate liberal who will be on the ballot.

    It sure as heck is odd.

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 9:37:26 AM PDT · 341 of 426
    swpa_mom to sickoflibs

    Good job! You’re staying in the good graces of the Romney/Bush haters.

    Flame on, I’m listening to Rush and spending my day off at the grocery store.

    Remember, Dick Cheney knew......it’s a shame you didn’t.

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 9:35:12 AM PDT · 337 of 426
    swpa_mom to sickoflibs

    You seem very obsessed about loving Mitt Romney.

    My point is very clear, but I’ll repeat it again so you can attack again to stay in the good graces of the Bush/Romney haters.

    I will *NOT* vote for Hillary Clinton under any circumstances, by proxy or otherwise. Now, according to the Romney haters here, DUHHH, you were simply fooled by that man in 2008 and again in 2012. Odd that they didn’t tell you how you were being fooled, isn’t it?

    I really do understand the dynamics of the Romney haters here. You’re all victims. I get it.

    But, why did Dick Cheney know about Obama and you didn’t care?

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 9:29:47 AM PDT · 332 of 426
    swpa_mom to sickoflibs

    I hit enter prematurely, sorry about that....I also wanted to thank you for your claiming that I “love” Bush and Romney. Was that posted so the Bush and Romney haters will make sure you’re not kicked out of their little group?

    I will admit that my major in college was not communication, and everyone who voted for Bush twice and Romney once communicate JUST like me? Really? Cool!

    Just imagine if President George W. Bush had claimed that IRS emails were lost in a “recycling” of a computer.

    Talk about communication! But, at LEAST we don’t have Romney in the White House losing IRS emails. Whew!

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 9:23:03 AM PDT · 329 of 426
    swpa_mom to sickoflibs

    That isn’t the point. You just have to make sure that the other Romney haters KNOW you also hate Romney so you’re not lumped in with a group that wasn’t duped in 2008 by Romney. Right?

    Why didn’t you know you were duped in 2008?

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 9:16:17 AM PDT · 326 of 426
    swpa_mom to CatherineofAragon

    I hope you find the post you’re looking for! Should I say premiere conservative website so “IF” you play a drinking game, you’ll be on the floor?

    There ya go.

    Rush is on. He’s talking about the Obama administration lying about the IRS emails. I’m sure you are as upset at that as you are about Romney.

    Or, maybe not.

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 9:12:32 AM PDT · 324 of 426
    swpa_mom to sickoflibs

    Why do you have to claim you’re not a Romney fan? Is that so you’ll not be kicked out of the “we hate Romney” group here?

    Is Romney running for office????? He is on Dancing with the Stars? American Idol?

    The best picture I have EVER seen when it comes to politics is the one with Vice President Dick Cheney glaring at Barack Obama. HE knew. I wonder why the Romney haters didn’t know?

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 9:01:20 AM PDT · 319 of 426
    swpa_mom to sickoflibs

    Rut roh. It’s Bush’s fault!

    Romney haters, Bush haters....next in line is...?

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 8:58:48 AM PDT · 318 of 426
    swpa_mom to CatherineofAragon

    Thanks for the offer, but honestly, I really don’t spend tons of time here, maybe when I’m retired and traveling the world by yacht I will. I won’t be looking through your posting history, it’s of zero interest to me.

    “there you are”? Drinking games were played during my college days.

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 8:36:59 AM PDT · 312 of 426
    swpa_mom to CatherineofAragon

    Nice of you to study my posting history. I don’t do that, but then, it’s not my style.

    Isn’t FR the premiere conservative website?

  • Poll: Romney the frontrunner in 2016?

    06/20/2014 8:34:55 AM PDT · 310 of 426
    swpa_mom to TerP26

    That’s always been my point. I’m not a fan of the primary schedule, but you have to work with it. What bothers me far more than anything is seeing people claim they would rather have another far leftist like Obama claiming that somehow it would help the GOP. It won’t. The damage being done by the Obama administration may never be fixed.

    In the last two election cycles, this place in particular has been a total circular firing squad. In every thread, any GOP candidate mentioned was attacked (usually by the same small but vocally abusive group) as being “liberal” or not conservative enough. When I see Rick Santorum being called a liberal here, I seriously shake my head. I realize that people are on the net to wreak havoc at times and some of this bluster I see here is just that, but there is a sense in the republican party that nobody can satisfy the more vocal critics.

    I will not vote for Hillary Clinton under any circumstance. Period. I won’t vote for her by proxy either by staying home or writing in a name. Oh, the usual response is “you don’t care about the candidate”. Knock off that crap, the attacks here on those of us who truly understand the primary process by those wreaking havoc is silly. The energy wasted among those who demand the invisible perfect conservative really needs to be put forth to find said candidate.

    This presidential election is going to be ALL on the net. Twitter, facebook, instagram, forums like this. It will probably be the first, but not the last election to be totally dependent upon social media. I hope everyone’s ready for that.