Free Republic 2nd Quarter Fundraising Target: $85,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $20,554
24%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 24% is in!! Thank you all very much!!

Posts by Uncle Sham

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Their Right to Your Money

    03/23/2014 6:47:18 PM PDT · 28 of 28
    Uncle Sham to Pontiac
    "The United States shall GUARANTEE to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government"

    This means that they cannot spend money from anyone not represented. If you are not represented, you are not getting this "guaranteed" Republcan form of government. Those who are not yet born cannot possibly be represented so debt cannot be passed unto them. Spending their money before they can have a voice on representation denies them of this "guarantee".

  • Rome on the Brink as Detroit-Style Bankruptcy Meltdown Looms

    02/27/2014 4:20:14 PM PST · 15 of 17
    Uncle Sham to BRL
    "If only our constitution had stated that the federal government is prohibited from issuing debt."

    Article Four, Section Four "guarantees" that they can't.

  • Face it: Oswald did it

    11/23/2013 5:53:09 AM PST · 175 of 227
    Uncle Sham to doc1019

    I have also read almost everything published about the events in Dallas that day. After doing so, I’m much more disturbed by the events that followed over the following years pointing to a massive coverup by our government. Hundreds of strange and convenient deaths involving all sorts of people who might have had knowledge that had to be silenced. I hold LBJ responsible along with Hoover, the C.I.A. and Nixon for what happened that day. Oswald was set up as a fall guy without his knowledge, then killed to cover it up. Read everything available and this is what you conclude.

  • OBAMACARE AND THE CONSTITUTION . . . Top eleven violations (updated, re-posted)

    10/04/2013 8:02:45 PM PDT · 5 of 15
    Uncle Sham to MrChips
    Article IV, Section 4 - Republican government

    "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

    A "republican" form of government is one in which citizens elect "representatives" to vote on their behalf. That their wishes shall be represented is guaranteed by the Constitution in this passage.

    If my representative cast a vote one way or another without reading the entire bill, there is no way on Earth he/she can guarantee that the bill is either in my best interest or not in my best interest. Thus, this guaranteed republican form of government did not occur for every bill voted on without knowing the effects on those a congressman represents.

    We have statements galore admitting a lack of knowledge about the contents of this legislation, proof of non-representation, proof of disobeying Article IV, Section Four, thus on this basis alone, unconstitutional.

  • CATO Institute: Yes, Ted Cruz Can be President

    09/01/2013 8:50:35 AM PDT · 538 of 1,028
    Uncle Sham to C. Edmund Wright
    "and of course, you have zip zero nada intellectual response to my post. You are out of ammo....."

    Truth and honor are not debatable in my world. I sleep well at night. If you wish to insult that, have at it.

  • CATO Institute: Yes, Ted Cruz Can be President

    09/01/2013 8:17:35 AM PDT · 523 of 1,028
    Uncle Sham to C. Edmund Wright

    I’ll stand my ground, anchored by the truth and the Constitution. If you wish to blow away in the wind, be my guest.

  • CATO Institute: Yes, Ted Cruz Can be President

    08/30/2013 7:35:57 PM PDT · 236 of 1,028
    Uncle Sham to Jim Robinson

    Jim, Compromising the Constitution makes it worthless as well as elevates the current criminal usurper. Please reconsider your view on this. Truth and the law are on our side.

  • Mark Levin Addresses Ted Cruz Eligibility Issue posed by Ridgewood, NJ Man at Book Signing

    08/30/2013 7:10:56 PM PDT · 542 of 586
    Uncle Sham to DiogenesLamp
    Doesn't matter. Jefferson falls under the grandfathered in clause of the eligibility requirements.

    "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

  • Mark Levin Addresses Ted Cruz Eligibility Issue posed by Ridgewood, NJ Man at Book Signing

    08/30/2013 5:23:29 AM PDT · 483 of 586
    Uncle Sham to Jeff Winston

    I like that new signature of yours, self-portrait and all.

  • Mark Levin Addresses Ted Cruz Eligibility Issue posed by Ridgewood, NJ Man at Book Signing

    08/29/2013 4:26:54 PM PDT · 480 of 586
    Uncle Sham to Kenny Bunk
    "In order to decide which of us is correct, The SCOTUS would have to accept an appeal, or let stand the verdict of a lower court. In the specific instance of defining "natural born Citizen" in regard to the candidates now under discussion, they have done neither. "

    Minor versus Happersett is already precedent - Born on soil to Two citizen parents. This either is or is not the condition of the President Elect.

  • Mark Levin Addresses Ted Cruz Eligibility Issue posed by Ridgewood, NJ Man at Book Signing

    08/28/2013 7:47:08 PM PDT · 455 of 586
    Uncle Sham to Kenny Bunk

    Kenny, The Twentieth Amendment, Section Three places this responsibility upon Congress.

  • Mark Levin Addresses Ted Cruz Eligibility Issue posed by Ridgewood, NJ Man at Book Signing

    08/28/2013 7:24:00 PM PDT · 452 of 586
    Uncle Sham to P-Marlowe
    "If they certify the election, then that is the end of the discussion."

    Not quite.

    Congress certifying the election results in the official naming of a President-Elect. Before the certification occurs, we really do not know "who" this will be. Once there is an official "President Elect", Congress is instructed to enforce the provisions of the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three which means that they, Congress must name a replacement if the President Elect dies before taking office OR if the "President Elect" shall have failed to qualify".

    This places the burden of "qualifying" upon the President Elect and upon Congress to know whether or not to name a replacement if this "qualification" did not occur.

    There is only one thing left in the Constitution dealing with "qualifications" as it applies to a President Elect and they happen to be the eligibility requirements in Article Two. If a President Elect is unable to provide proof of eligibility to Congress, he/she has failed to qualify and Congress is charged with naming a replacement.

    We KNOW there was never a qualification because no one in Congress is willing to testify as to what was presented to them as proof. Whether or not there was a failure to qualify due to lack of proof or due to Congress ignoring it's duty to enforce Section Three, the result is the same thing, a failure to qualify.

    Someone who fails to qualify cannot be President according to the eligibility requirements themselves as the first two words of these requirements are "NO PERSON". This does not allow for someone who sneaks in because they forged documents or because Congress didn't do their job. We have a usurper. period.

    Obama's own legal team agrees that the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three gives Congress the duty of enforcing the eligibility requirements and have said so in court.

  • Mark Levin Addresses Ted Cruz Eligibility Issue posed by Ridgewood, NJ Man at Book Signing

    08/28/2013 6:47:48 PM PDT · 448 of 586
    Uncle Sham to Larry - Moe and Curly

    You’re wasting your time trying to debate this issue with those who are determined to cloud it with obfuscation and deceit. The Twentieth Amendment, Section Three solves this problem and tells us exactly what we are dealing with. It proves we have a usurper in the White House and that our entire Congress is complicit with this having taken place. They did not uphold their oaths of office to support the Constitution by ignoring their instructions in Section Three. This is a fact that the “natural born citizen deceivers” are unwilling to debate. It is exactly where this topic should be addressed if we are going to solve this problem.

  • Mark Levin Addresses Ted Cruz Eligibility Issue posed by Ridgewood, NJ Man at Book Signing

    08/27/2013 8:09:25 PM PDT · 318 of 586
    Uncle Sham to SoConPubbie
    " So, please show us from the Constitution, relevant US Law, or Supreme Court ruling where your definition has been proven to be legal and constitutional?"

    Minor versus Happersat for the definition of natural born citizen.

    I also refer you to the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three for determining whether or not a President Elect failed to prove his/her eligibility to Congress. This was ignored by our present and previous congressional representation. There has been a PROVEN "failure to qualify" resulting in a usurpation of the office of President.

  • Mark Levin Addresses Ted Cruz Eligibility Issue posed by Ridgewood, NJ Man at Book Signing

    08/27/2013 7:13:15 PM PDT · 296 of 586
    Uncle Sham to Spaulding
    "Cruz is being used to provide cover for Republicans who agreed not to vet Obama in exchange."

    You are exactly right on this. I've decided that the Constitution comes first and anyone who refuses to obey it will not get my vote. Levin can kiss my behind. He is a coward for ignoring the truth and a traitor for misrepresenting it.

  • Congressman Steve Stockman Questions Obama Birth Certificate; Foreign Student?

    08/22/2013 5:43:42 PM PDT · 56 of 58
    Uncle Sham to Nero Germanicus
    "A reelected incumbent is not a president-elect."

    Untrue.

    Each Presidential election cycle results in a person being named "President Elect". A President Elect is the person who assumes the office of President, if they qualify that is, for the next Presidential term of office. If someone is the current President, they can still be the President Elect as well.

    Meanwhile, most Freepers know that the Constitution is a far better source than Wikipedia.

  • Congressman Steve Stockman Questions Obama Birth Certificate; Foreign Student?

    08/22/2013 5:39:19 AM PDT · 53 of 58
    Uncle Sham to Nero Germanicus
    "A president-elect can “fail to qualify” under the 20th Amendment by not having 270 or more electoral votes certified at the Joint Session of Congress that is held to count and certify the votes of the electors."

    Stop your baloney. We've discussed this several times and you only try to obfuscate the issue. There is no such thing as a "President Elect" until Congress has accepted the results of the Electoral College votes as final and approved. Only after this has been done can anyone know exactly "who" is the President Elect. This means that the qualification required by the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three has NOTHING to do with election results and everything to do with other "qualifications", of which, the only remaining are the eligibility requirements.

    As to the Obama defense position regarding this, you seem to know everything about all of the other trials that point to the innocence of your boss, you damn well know what I'm referring to here.

  • Congressman Steve Stockman Questions Obama Birth Certificate; Foreign Student?

    08/21/2013 7:15:05 PM PDT · 50 of 58
    Uncle Sham to Nero Germanicus
    "The power to check qualifications for office is a state issue not a federal issue."

    You are incorrect. Obama's own defense used the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three as their reason to disallow standing to those who demanded to see proof of eligibility in court. Their argument was that Congress was charged with this responsibility under the Constitution.

  • Congressman Steve Stockman Questions Obama Birth Certificate; Foreign Student?

    08/21/2013 7:10:40 PM PDT · 49 of 58
    Uncle Sham to Kenny Bunk
    "The SCOTUS needs to get 4 justices to agree to take an appeal and tell us what a "natural born Citizen" is."

    This isn't necessary as it's been settled by Minor vs Happersatt. In addition, the "natural born citizen" question is a red herring.

    The President Elect is tasked with "failing or not failing to qualify" under the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three. A failure to qualify forces Congress to act in naming a replacement. In order to act, they must be made aware of whether or not they have to act. If they didn't enforce the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three, this means that there has been a failure to qualify regardless of whether it's because there was no proof of eligibility given or they didn't act upon this non-proof. Both scenarios result in a usurpation of the office of President.

    Even someone who is a natural born citizen will fail to qualify without being able to back it up with evidence to Congress. This is why the "natural born citizen" arguments are a waste of time. What should be discussed, and answered by our congressmen and women is how did they satisfy the demands of the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three. If they are unable to answer, they didn't. So far, I don't think any one of them has.

  • Congressman Steve Stockman Questions Obama Birth Certificate; Foreign Student?

    08/20/2013 4:25:52 PM PDT · 28 of 58
    Uncle Sham to Kenny Bunk
    This isn't a Supreme Court issue.

    It's a "Failure to qualify" issue under the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three. If there is no valid birth certificate upon which to prove eligibility, Congress has allowed a usurpation to occur by FAILING to enforce this amendment. If we are dealing with a usurper, there is no impeachment needed as we do not have a President to impeach. We simply have a usurper to arrest.

    All of this can be acted upon the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three not being obeyed and proving it hasn't been obeyed.

  • What secrets do they hold? researchers demand sealed files about JFK assassination be made public...

    08/18/2013 7:37:36 PM PDT · 64 of 84
    Uncle Sham to generally
    I've done extensive reading on this subject over the last twenty years. The primary crime that has been committed has been the coverup. Many people who might have had knowledge harmful to the official government "Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone" account ended up dead. Study this aspect by itself and it tells you that your government has been lying about this event from the start. I truly believe that Oswald was C.I.A., following orders that were meant to set him up as a patsy, then killed to shut him up and prevent any sort of court proceedings from uncovering evidence. I don't think he fired a shot.

    Everything I've read, which includes almost every theory, points to L.B.J., along with J. Edgar Hoover, the C.I.A., and organized crime as the three primary suspects. They had the ability, the motive, and the power after the fact to cover things up and eliminate "problems". That power structure is still in place after all of these years and has owned every President since the assassination with the exception of Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Remember, they tried getting rid of Reagan one month into his first term so their protection man, George Bush, could be in charge.

    You cannot mess with these people. If they can kill your President in broad daylight in front of hundreds of witnesses, they can kill anyone.

  • Was There A Birth Certificate? - Donald Trump Battles Jon Karl Over Obama's, Ted Cruz's Citizenship

    08/11/2013 5:31:47 PM PDT · 69 of 184
    Uncle Sham to MHGinTN
    "BUT solely from their ruling, not Constitutionally."

    The requirements of the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three occur AFTER Congress has accepted the results of the electoral college. When Congress accepts the results, all they have really done is identify who the "President Elect" happens to be. After this time and before the taking of the oath of office, this person named as the "President Elect" must provide proof of eligibility to Congress in order to legally serve as President. If this is not accomplished, Congress is instructed by the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three to name a replacement.

    Knowing the above, there can never be a condition where there is doubt about the eligibility of a legal President. In this instance, for whatever reason, Congress has twice ignored it's duty under the Constitution in regards to the Twentieth Amendment and there is nothing but doubt. There has been a "failure to qualify" by the President Elect as required by the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three, and thus a usurpation of the office of President.

  • Was There A Birth Certificate? - Donald Trump Battles Jon Karl Over Obama's, Ted Cruz's Citizenship

    08/11/2013 5:10:30 PM PDT · 63 of 184
    Uncle Sham to Jonty30
    "It’s my understanding that when something has been allowed to stand by the courts, it can become the law of the land."

    Name for me, please, the court case that has allowed this issue to be heard on the evidence, or in this case, the lack of evidence that proves eligibility.

    In addition, prove that we even have a legal President. I've provided proof many times that we do not have one.

  • Want Muslims to Leave Your Town? Require Everything to have Pork In or On It

    07/13/2013 2:01:57 PM PDT · 31 of 39
    Uncle Sham to expat2

    How bout getting the EPA to force that all motor oil include a smidgeon of pig fat? Gasoline as well.

  • Want Muslims to Leave Your Town? Require Everything to have Pork In or On It

    07/13/2013 12:17:56 PM PDT · 26 of 39
    Uncle Sham to brent1a

    Force goes both ways. To every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The “actions” of the religion of peace force the consideration of “reactions” that might rid them from the rest of civil society. There are many “reactions” that could be worse. They are the ones forcing the issue, not Porky Pig.

  • Want Muslims to Leave Your Town? Require Everything to have Pork In or On It

    07/13/2013 11:36:05 AM PDT · 12 of 39
    Uncle Sham to Don Corleone
    "Send them a copy of our national budget...its loaded with pork!"

    That's another great idea!

  • Want Muslims to Leave Your Town? Require Everything to have Pork In or On It

    07/13/2013 11:32:20 AM PDT · 10 of 39
    Uncle Sham to mountainlion
    "The full force of the US government would come down on you. You may be audited for just mentioning it. EPA would find some way to close your community down. DOJ would find hundreds of charges for you to answer in court."

    Ok,so perhaps they strike down a few "Pork Has to Be in Everything" laws. How are they going to keep towns from having their own pig "mascot" that everyone's taxes must support the care of?

  • Want Muslims to Leave Your Town? Require Everything to have Pork In or On It

    07/13/2013 11:09:32 AM PDT · 1 of 39
    Uncle Sham
    If I were in charge.
  • Memo to Rush: Coming up on the 15th Anniversary of the March for Justice (with complete video)

    07/03/2013 4:08:49 PM PDT · 27 of 60
    Uncle Sham to Jim Robinson

    Jim, one day,true historians will mark this rally of yours as the beginning of the end to the progressive stronghold on power in this nation. It was an incredible honor for both my wife and me to have participated in person as well as meet one of history’s great men, Jim Robinson. God bless you.

  • The Trayvon Martin Case ... The Narrative Spontaneously Combusts

    06/29/2013 3:17:20 PM PDT · 31 of 110
    Uncle Sham to fso301

    The purpose of this entire case is to INCITE. The prosecution wants an acquittal so all of the blacks can riot. They’ve been agitated by all of the official race-baiting machines for the purpose of creating mayhem.

  • “Immigration” Bill – About Amnesty or ELIGIBILITY??

    06/29/2013 3:08:33 PM PDT · 23 of 24
    Uncle Sham to Smokeyblue
    "Oh this is definitely an attempt to cover for Dear Reader but no CONSTITUTIONAL law can be written that will make the USURPER LEGAL."

    Absolute truth. Great point.

  • “Immigration” Bill – About Amnesty or ELIGIBILITY??

    06/29/2013 3:06:37 PM PDT · 22 of 24
    Uncle Sham to GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
    The republicans should simply add an amendment to this that exempts it from applying SPECIFICALLY to anyone claiming the name of Barrack Hussein Obama and claims to be President of the United States of America as well as anyone else who may have enabled any false representations thereof.

    They've told us he is legal all this time. This exemption should be no problem if he is legal so they have nothing to fear.

  • Mourning: End of the Defense of Marriage in US federal law

    06/27/2013 4:04:10 PM PDT · 7 of 10
    Uncle Sham to Dilbert San Diego
    "if this ruling means that the federal government was accep any definition of marriage from the states, what if a state allows polygamy?"

    In my humble opinion, this "ruling" means that law does not exist, so anything goes.

  • This JUST GOT REAL. After DOMA case, America could be doomed unless O-ZERO is exposed

    06/26/2013 6:19:54 PM PDT · 35 of 59
    Uncle Sham to tractorman
    "I’m with you but how does it get done? "

    It's already been proven by the fact that not one senator or representative in Congress is willing or able to testify to what they were shown to establish his legality. Under the Twentieth Amendment, section three, they are instructed to name a replacement "if the President elect shall have failed to qualify." The burden of proving eligibility is upon the President elect. Congress did not enforce this provision and thus we are stuck with a "failure to qualify", resulting in a usurpation of the Presidency. I think FORCING your representatives and senators in Congress to cite his proof of eligibility is step one.

  • Dumping Union Retiree's Into Obamacare Signals We've Had Our Last Elections

    06/20/2013 5:01:35 AM PDT · 13 of 13
    Uncle Sham to Trailerpark Badass
    "Even the not so good coverage the union commies will get under Obamacare will kick the crap out of the non-existent care the other suckers will get."

    I don't think they'll get anything at all after the rest of the nation pulls the plug on this scam. It is no longer about "health care". It's about the scam. They think they can pull this off without fear from those they are stealing from, both union and public. They had better think again.

  • Dumping Union Retiree's Into Obamacare Signals We've Had Our Last Elections

    06/19/2013 7:07:40 PM PDT · 1 of 13
    Uncle Sham
    This is a Chicago and Detroit problem. Forcing the rest of America to pay this "tax" will not stand.
  • Emanuel to shift retired city workers to Obamacare [Obama lied to his biggest supporters]

    06/17/2013 6:12:21 PM PDT · 14 of 14
    Uncle Sham to grundle

    This should ignite a class action lawsuit against the city of Chicago on behalf of all other tax paying Americans. We are being stuck with the tab for health care that we had no part of negotiating. In addition, we received no benefits from the workers involved. No representation. No benefits. Only the tab. This will not fly. Chicago must face its own problems without expecting the rest of America to pay its bills.

  • America in the Midst of a Coup d'Etat

    06/08/2013 2:23:04 PM PDT · 63 of 80
    Uncle Sham to stockpirate
    "The coup started when others empowered Obama and his band of thugs to pass off the phony BC, and Rush is just as guilty as in any in the media."

    As far as I'm concerned, Rush, Hannity, Levin, and all of the other "conservative" voices have served their purpose being the vaseline that allowed this to happen. I have nothing but contempt for their collective act of silence and no longer waste my time listening to any of them.

  • Shock Video: Senator Marco Rubio Flustered: Show Me Obama Birth Certificate Fraud Evidence

    06/05/2013 8:39:17 PM PDT · 66 of 92
    Uncle Sham to little jeremiah
    "Problem is, there are no known facts about his parentage, date of birth, birth place, birth name, or country of origin."

    It's only a problem for him as it is evidence that he has been unable to prove he is eligible for the office of President. If he had proven that he is eligible, we would all have known about it. The Twentieth Amendment, Section Three is the net in which his deceit is trapped and cannot escape. It requires that he prove his eligibility to Congress or they must name a replacement. The burden of proof is squarely on the one seeking the office.

    This has not occurred, thus he has "failed to qualify" as the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three requires. Whether this failure is a result of his actually being ineligible or Congress failing to do their Constitutional duty to enforce the Amendment doesn't matter. The result is that he has "failed to qualify".

    The eligibility requirements in Article two leave no doubt that anyone who fails to qualify under the Twentieth Amendment, section three can NEVER be a legal President. The requirements first two words "No Person" doesn't leave wiggle room for someone to sneak in because Congress did not do its job.

    Thus it is that the fact we have this "problem" is proof that a qualification was not made and he is nothing but a usurper.

  • Shock Video: Senator Marco Rubio Flustered: Show Me Obama Birth Certificate Fraud Evidence

    06/05/2013 7:46:26 PM PDT · 57 of 92
    Uncle Sham to popdonnelly
    "Anybody got any evidence that he was born anywhere else?"

    We already have all the evidence we need to prove he is a usurper just based upon what we know are the FACTS without even using the birth certificate fraud evidence or the social security number fraud evidence.

  • Sheriff Arpaio's Investigator Mike Zullo Reveals New Devastating Evidence On Obama's Birth Records

    06/05/2013 4:41:42 PM PDT · 248 of 250
    Uncle Sham to Kenny Bunk
    "Are we ready for another Constitutional Convention? Repealing the 17th Amendment might be one good outcome. Placing the states in charge of the taxes generated within their borders might be another"

    Repeal of the seventeenth can be gotten around if the states rearrange their primary laws. For instance, to get on the primary, someone would have to be placed there by the state legislature, then the people of the state can vote for whomever they want from a field of candidates that their state legislature has deemed representative of the legislature's business at the federal level. This would both restore the state's abilities to select their representation in the Senate as well as satisfy the Seventeenth Amendment's requirements as to popular vote elections of Senators.

    We already have a filtering process as it is in regards to who is able to run as Senator so adding the state's ability to choose the entire field of candidates would not impose any new restrictions. The point is that with this approach, the states can deny a candidate his qualifications to run if that candidate has failed to represent the state's interest in the Senate.

    States rights have been backed up against the wall. They are responding and the push back won't end for some time.

  • Sheriff Arpaio's Investigator Mike Zullo Reveals New Devastating Evidence On Obama's Birth Records

    06/05/2013 5:34:51 AM PDT · 240 of 250
    Uncle Sham to Kenny Bunk
    "The choice before us is stark: recapture what we can of the elected government and attempt to redress the situation via the Constitution, or armed revolt."

    A third choice is actually being employed by the states, themselves, nullification. In some ways, this approach will actually one day return the Constitutional balance to our government that the founders intended.

    As the progressive agenda was driven by crisis response, so shall the conservative agenda from now on. Target number one right now should be the IRS and it's monstrous tax codes. This agency has given us a weapon to beat it out of existence, along with the Obamacare it was intended to administer. Using lies and deception gave progressives their power. We can use the truth to take it from them.

  • Sheriff Arpaio's Investigator Mike Zullo Reveals New Devastating Evidence On Obama's Birth Records

    06/04/2013 6:37:00 PM PDT · 237 of 250
    Uncle Sham to Kenny Bunk
    "Obama is not a de jure POTUS, but he sure as hell is the de facto POTUS"

    No such thing as your "de facto" President. You either are a legal President or you are not. If you are not a legal President, you are a U S U R P E R.

    You cannot impeach a non-President, you can only arrest a usurper. We are still frozen at the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three phase as no one has "qualified". Since no one has qualified, an official "legal" term of office has not yet begun. Any member of Congress has the standing to ensure that the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three has been enforced and complied with. It is their duty to do so as their oath from Article Six REQUIRES that it be done. No judge can block them from keeping their oath of office.

    We don't need the proof of forgery at all, we simply need ONE Congressman or Senator to demand that proof be presented. We already have proof that it wasn't presented and thus a "failure to qualify" has occurred.

  • Sheriff Arpaio's Investigator Mike Zullo Reveals New Devastating Evidence On Obama's Birth Records

    06/04/2013 4:53:32 AM PDT · 230 of 250
    Uncle Sham to X-spurt
    "It is obviously an impossible task to get you to see that you can not take a snippet here and a snippet there out of the Constitution and turn those snippets into your own imagined meaning"

    You avoided my question about the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three. Typical Obama troll response. If you can't answer something, deflect. Tell me once again, What does the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three mean?

  • Sheriff Arpaio's Investigator Mike Zullo Reveals New Devastating Evidence On Obama's Birth Records

    06/03/2013 6:32:50 PM PDT · 227 of 250
    Uncle Sham to Spaulding
    "Obama is not a legal president because he is not a natural born citizen. Impeachment does not apply."

    As with all usurpers, a simple arrest will do. Then, the nearest lamp post.

  • Sheriff Arpaio's Investigator Mike Zullo Reveals New Devastating Evidence On Obama's Birth Records

    06/03/2013 3:56:46 PM PDT · 224 of 250
    Uncle Sham to X-spurt
    "12th Amendment, Section 3 addresses the death and replacement of President elect"

    So what.

    The Twentieth Amendment, Section Three addresses the President elect having to prove his/her eligibility to Congress or Congress names a replacement.

    Are you trying to argue that the Twentieth Amendment doesn't exist? If it does exist, tell me what it means, word for word.

  • Sheriff Arpaio's Investigator Mike Zullo Reveals New Devastating Evidence On Obama's Birth Records

    06/02/2013 4:14:05 PM PDT · 198 of 250
    Uncle Sham to X-spurt
    "Obviously you do not understand the Constitution to not grasp that a President is the legal President once given the oath of office, regardless of how he was elected. When a Supreme Court judge swears him in he is the LEGAL PRESIDENT.

    This is totally bull-shit.

    The Twentieth Amendment, Section Three REQUIRES that the "President-elect" provide proof of his/her eligibility to Congress, or Congress is instructed to name a replacement. The eligibility requirements listed in Article Two clearly state that NO PERSON who does not meet the eligibility requirements can be President.

    No Person doesn't allow for someone who "fails to qualify" under the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three, either because he/she wasn't eligible or because Congress didn't do their duty by enforcing it. If he/she is not eligible, he/she can NEVER serve as a legal President no matter how many corrupt judges swear him/her in.

    What you are saying is that if someone gets away with murder, murder becomes legal. What you are refusing to say is that we have a usurpation of the office of President.

  • Unearthed Video: Professor Spiro Admits If Obama Born In Kenya He's Not Eligible

    05/20/2013 8:52:33 PM PDT · 44 of 45
    Uncle Sham to Nero Germanicus
    "The title is used for the apparent winner"

    The Twentieth Amendment, section three applies to the ACTUALwinner.

    The term "President-Elect" in the Twentieth Amendment, section three refers to the ACTUAL winner which is only in existence AFTER the election has been declared final by Congress.

    Words matter. "Apparent" does not equal "Actual".

  • Unearthed Video: Professor Spiro Admits If Obama Born In Kenya He's Not Eligible

    05/20/2013 4:30:51 PM PDT · 40 of 45
    Uncle Sham to Nero Germanicus
    "Readers can choose to believe that every single member of Congress was under some kind of gag order or threat of blackmail from a person who hadn’t even been sworn in yet or they can believe that the 20th Amendment is looking to provide an orderly transition of government under the circumstance where no one receives a majority of the electoral votes."

    They can believe their own eyes in reading the Twentieth Amendment, section three which is actually IN the Constitution, or they can believe Nero Germanicus posting Obama's side of the issue. Credibility is a problem for those who distort, mislead, and lie constantly.

  • Unearthed Video: Professor Spiro Admits If Obama Born In Kenya He's Not Eligible

    05/20/2013 4:21:15 PM PDT · 39 of 45
    Uncle Sham to Nero Germanicus
    ”I come down on the side which says that a president-elect can fail to qualify by winning the popular vote but not getting 270 Electoral votes

    Popular votes mean nothing. If you don’t get enough electoral votes, you are NOT anything, much less a “President-elect”. A “President-elect” doesn’t exist without the election being declared final by Congressional acceptance and ratification of the results of the Electoral College. It is only at this time that we know exactly ”who” has been declared the winner and is thus “President-elect”.

    ”or they can believe that the 20th Amendment is looking to provide an orderly transition of government under the circumstance where no one receives a majority of the electoral votes.”

    This “no one receives a majority of the electoral votes” is covered by the passage from the Twentieth Amendment, section three:

    ”If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term”

    Then, there is still another stipulation which is entirely different because the word “or” is used in between the first condition and the second condition which reads:

    ”, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify"

    Later, in describing who shall be “appointed” as President by Congress, the term and condition “shall have qualified” applies in each circumstance. Anyone “appointed” by Congress could very well be someone who was not running for the office and thus had ZERO Electoral College votes, yet they still have to “qualify”. This is more proof that the term “shall have qualified” has nothing to do with the election results. The only thing left is the "eligibility" requirements from Article Two.

    Try your deception somewhere else.